Patterns of myocardial injury in recovered troponin-positive COVID-19 patients assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

BACKGROUND: Troponin elevation is common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but underlying aetiologies are ill-defined. We used multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess myocardial injury in recovered COVID-19 patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and forty-eight patients (64 ± 12 years, 70% male) with severe COVID-19 infection [all requiring hospital admission, 48 (32%) requiring ventilatory support] and troponin elevation discharged from six hospitals underwent convalescent CMR (including adenosine stress perfusion if indicated) at median 68 days. Left ventricular (LV) function was normal in 89% (ejection fraction 67% ± 11%). Late gadolinium enhancement and/or ischaemia was found in 54% (80/148). This comprised myocarditis-like scar in 26% (39/148), infarction and/or ischaemia in 22% (32/148) and dual pathology in 6% (9/148). Myocarditis-like injury was limited to three or less myocardial segments in 88% (35/40) of cases with no associated LV dysfunction; of these, 30% had active myocarditis. Myocardial infarction was found in 19% (28/148) and inducible ischaemia in 26% (20/76) of those undergoing stress perfusion (including 7 with both infarction and ischaemia). Of patients with ischaemic injury pattern, 66% (27/41) had no past history of coronary disease. There was no evidence of diffuse fibrosis or oedema in the remote myocardium (T1: COVID-19 patients 1033 ± 41 ms vs. matched controls 1028 ± 35 ms; T2: COVID-19 46 ± 3 ms vs. matched controls 47 ± 3 ms). CONCLUSIONS: During convalescence after severe COVID-19 infection with troponin elevation, myocarditis-like injury can be encountered, with limited extent and minimal functional consequence. In a proportion of patients, there is evidence of possible ongoing localized inflammation. A quarter of patients had ischaemic heart disease, of which two-thirds had no previous history. Whether these observed findings represent pre-existing clinically silent disease or de novo COVID-19-related changes remain undetermined. Diffuse oedema or fibrosis was not detected.

Acute changes in cardiac structural and tissue characterisation parameters following haemodialysis measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), reverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling, including reduction in LV mass, can be observed following long-term haemodialysis (HD) and has been attributed to regression of LV hypertrophy. However, LV mass can vary in response to changes in myocyte volume, edema, or fibrosis. The aims of this study were to investigate the acute changes in structural (myocardial mass and biventricular volumes) and tissue characterization parameters (native T1 and T2) following HD using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Twenty-five stable HD patients underwent non-contrast CMR including volumetric assessment and native T1 and T2 mapping immediately pre- and post-HD. The mean time between the first and second scan was 9.1 ± 1.1 hours and mean time from completion of dialysis to the second scan was 3.5 ± 1.3 hours. Post-HD, there was reduction in LV mass (pre-dialysis 98.9 ± 36.9 g/m2 vs post-dialysis 93.3 ± 35.8 g/m2, p = 0.003), which correlated with change in body weight (r = 0.717, p < 0.001). Both native T1 and T2 reduced significantly following HD (Native T1: pre-dialysis 1085 ± 43 ms, post-dialysis 1072 ± 43 ms; T2: pre-dialysis 53.3 ± 3.0 ms, post-dialysis 51.8 ± 3.1 ms, both p < 0.05). These changes presumably reflect acute reduction in myocardial water content rather than regression of LV hypertrophy. CMR with multiparametric mapping is a promising tool to assess the cardiac changes associated with HD.

Prognostic value of myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients presenting to hospital with acute chest pain and negative troponin.

We hypothesized that myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) could be used to stratify risk in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram and negative troponin. Pretest Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) scores were determined. Exercise electrocardiographic data in those patients undergoing treadmill stress echocardiography as part of risk evaluation were analyzed independently of echocardiographic data. On a separate day, low-power MCE at rest and during vasodilator stress was performed. All patients were followed for cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization). Of 148 patients, 27 demonstrated abnormal myocardial contrast echocardiographic results and had higher cardiac event rates compared with those with normal myocardial contrast echocardiographic findings (59% vs 7%, p <0.0001) at follow-up (8 +/- 5 months). Hard cardiac event rates (death and nonfatal myocardial infarction) were low (3%) in patients with normal myocardial contrast echocardiographic findings. Cardiac events in patients with abnormal myocardial contrast echocardiographic findings (59%) were significantly higher than those predicted by a high-risk TIMI score (33%, p = 0.0023) and compared with those predicted by high-risk exercise electrocardiography (80% vs 57%, p = 0.0003). In conclusion, stress MCE was superior to TIMI risk score and exercise electrocardiography in the assessment of risk in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram, and negative troponin.

Myocardial contrast echocardiography for distinguishing ischemic from nonischemic first-onset acute heart failure: insights into the mechanism of acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing ischemic from nonischemic origin in patients presenting with acute heart failure (AHF) not resulting from acute myocardial infarction has both therapeutic and prognostic implications. The aim of the study was to assess whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can identify underlying coronary artery disease (CAD) as the cause of AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with AHF with no prior clinical history of CAD and no clinical evidence of acute myocardial infarction underwent resting echocardiography and MCE both at rest and after dipyridamole stress at a mean of 9+/-2 days after admission. All patients underwent coronary arteriography before discharge. Of the 52 patients, 22 demonstrated flow-limiting CAD (>50% luminal diameter narrowing). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MCE for the detection of CAD were 82%, 97%, 95%, and 88%, respectively. Among clinical, ECG, biochemical, resting echocardiographic, and MCE markers of CAD, MCE was the only independent predictor of CAD (P<0.0001). Quantitative MCE demonstrated significantly (P<0.0001) lower myocardial blood flow velocity reserve in vascular territories subtended by >50% CAD (0.59+/-0.46) compared with patients with normal coronary arteries (1.99+/-1.00). However, myocardial blood flow velocity reserve in patients with no significant CAD was significantly (P=0.03) lower compared with control (2.91+/-0.41). Myocardial blood flow velocity reserve correlated significantly (P<0.0001) with increasing severity of CAD. CONCLUSIONS: MCE, which is a bedside technique, may be used to detect CAD in patients presenting with AHF without a prior history of CAD or evidence of acute myocardial infarction. Quantitative MCE may further risk-stratify patients with AHF but no CAD.

Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiography derived coronary flow reserve to accurately determine severity of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.

Thirty-five patients underwent quantitative low-power myocardial contrast echocardiography to evaluate the severity of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Coronary flow reserve and myocardial blood flow were able to accurately differentiate among angiographically derived grades of coronary stenosis.

Community screening for left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension using hand-held echocardiography.

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) confers increased cardiovascular risk on patients with hypertension. Echocardiography using new hand-held devices might allow community-based cost-effective screening for LVH in a targeted hypertensive population. Thus, the aim of this study was to test the validity of hand-held ultrasound devices to screen for LVH in the community. Accordingly, 189 patients with hypertension attending a community-based heart failure screening program underwent echocardiography by both hand-held and standard devices by an experienced echocardiographer. LVH was defined as LV mass index >/=134 g.m(-2) for men and >/=110 g.m(-2) for women using the Devereux-modified American Society of Echocardiography cube equation. No significant differences were noted between the 2 devices in the measurement of LV wall thickness or LV mass index. Agreement for estimation of LVH between the 2 devices was 86% (kappa = 0.63). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the hand-held device for predicting LVH were 72%, 91%, 73%, and 90%, respectively. Thus, hand-held echocardiography devices accurately assessed LVH and may be used for community-based screening for LVH in targeted patients with hypertension.

Myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether the extent of residual myocardial viability demonstrated by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) predicts the degree of left ventricular (LV) remodelling after acute myocardial infarction as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. METHODS: Accordingly, 25 patients underwent MCE 5 to 7 days after acute myocardial infarction followed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, and LV ejection fraction. A contrast perfusion index was calculated within the infarct-related territory. RESULTS: LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were significantly smaller (138 +/- 38 vs 188 +/- 43 mL, P =.008, and 86 +/- 35 vs 119 +/- 49 mL, P =.01, respectively) and LV ejection fraction was significantly higher (52 +/- 5.4 vs 31.5 +/- 3.2%, P> =.02) in patients showing good myocardial viability (contrast perfusion index

Clinical and economic impact of stress echocardiography compared with exercise electrocardiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but negative troponin: a prospective randomized controlled study.

AIMS: Patients attending hospital with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), non-diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG), and negative troponin present a diagnostic dilemma for admitting physicians. We sought to determine the clinical and economic impact of stress echocardiography (SEcho) when compared with exercise ECG (ExECG) in the assessment of these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Following pre-test assessment by (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) TIMI score, patients were randomized to ExECG (n=218) or SEcho (n=215). Subsequently, low-risk patients were discharged; those considered high risk were referred for coronary angiography. Patients were followed-up for cardiac events and a cost-analysis performed. SEcho was superior to ExECG in stratifying patients as low risk (77 vs. 33%, respectively, P<0.0001) with no difference in cardiac event rate (5 vs. 3%, respectively). SEcho classified fewer patients as intermediate risk (3 vs. 39%, respectively, P<0.0001) and fewer patients required further tests when compared with ExECG (3 vs. 47%, respectively, P<0.0001). Costs for detection of coronary artery disease were significantly less in patients undergoing SEcho (pound366.63 vs. pound515.48, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: SEcho is superior to ExECG in the risk stratification of patients with suspected ACS but negative troponin. SEcho resulted in less diagnostic uncertainty, fewer referrals for further investigation, and hence, a significant cost benefit over ExECG.

Stress echocardiography is superior to exercise ECG in the risk stratification of patients presenting with acute chest pain with negative Troponin.

OBJECTIVE: To compare exercise electrocardiography (ExECG) and stress echocardiography (SE) in the risk stratification of patients presenting to hospital with cardiac-sounding chest pain, non-diagnostic ECGs and negative cardiac Troponin. METHODS: Patients presenting with acute chest pain were prospectively randomised to early ExECG or SE. A post-test likelihood of CAD was determined by the pre-test likelihood and the result of the stress test. Patients with a low post-test likelihood of CAD were discharged; those with a high post-test probability were considered for coronary angiography. All others were managed according to standard hospital protocols. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients underwent either ExECG or SE. SE identified significantly more patients with a low post-test probability of CAD (80% vs 31%, p<0.0001) and significantly fewer patients with an intermediate post-test likelihood of CAD compared to ExECG (3% vs 47%; p<0.0001). Significantly fewer patients undergoing SE were referred for further tests to exclude or refute the diagnosis of CAD (16% vs 52%; p<0.0001). In total, 36 (12%) had flow limiting CAD demonstrated by coronary angiography. Significant CAD was seen in fewer patients with a positive ExECG than with a positive SE (56% vs 84% (p=0.12)). Event rates were low for both modalities in patients with low post-test probability (3.5% for SE vs 5.1% for ExECG; p=ns) though the number of patients identified as low risk was higher if SE was performed. CONCLUSION: Despite negative cardiac Troponin, 12% of patients with acute chest pain had significant CAD. SE is superior to ExECG in discriminating between those patients with a low and intermediate risk of CAD and correctly identified patients with significant CAD, as well as conferring an excellent prognosis in those considered low risk. SE significantly reduces the requirement for further tests to diagnose CAD compared to ExECG.

Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: a prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with symptoms suggestive of CAD. BACKGROUND: Single-photon emission computed tomography is a well-established method of assessing patients with CAD. Myocardial contrast echocardiography is a new technique allowing bedside assessment of myocardial perfusion. We hypothesized that MCE was comparable to SPECT in the assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD. METHODS: A total of 123 patients scheduled for coronary angiography underwent intermediate (mechanical index 0.5) triggered replenishment MCE and SPECT imaging at rest and after vasodilator stress. Coronary angiography was performed within four weeks of stress imaging. RESULTS: In total, 96 of 123 (78%) patients demonstrated CAD (stenosis >/=50%). There was no difference in the sensitivity of MCE compared with SPECT in the detection of CAD (84% vs. 82%; p = NS), and both demonstrated similar specificity (56% vs. 52%, respectively). In patients with multivessel disease, MCE and SPECT also demonstrated similar sensitivity (91% and 88%, respectively) for the detection of CAD. Agreement between MCE and SPECT for the presence or absence of CAD was 73%. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial contrast echocardiography is comparable to SPECT in the detection of CAD not only on a patient basis but also in the localization of disease by vascular territory in a relatively high-risk population.

The use of hand-carried ultrasound in the hospital setting--a cost-effective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the accuracy of hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) in the prediction of a normal study, and its cost-effectiveness in reducing the number of standard departmental echocardiograms (SDE) performed on hospital inpatients. METHODS: The setting was a district general hospital. Participants were 157 consecutive inpatients, mean age 68 (range: 18-97) years, 95 men (61%), referred for SDE. HCU was performed at the bedside as part of the clinical assessment. SDE was performed routinely. Main outcome measures were: (1) assessment of the accuracy of HCU in detection of a normal or abnormal study as determined by SDE; and (2) a cost-effectiveness analysis. RESULTS: Indications for echocardiography were: left ventricular (LV) function assessment, n = 101 (64.3%); valvular abnormalities, n = 11 (7%); arrhythmia, n = 4 (2.6%); miscellaneous, n = 10 (6.4%); and no reason stated, 31 (19.7%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of HCU predicting a completely normal scan were 74%, 96%, 94%, and 81%, respectively, and of predicting normal LV function in requests specific for LV function assessment were 81%, 100%, 100%, and 77%, respectively. If either all inpatients or those with requests for LV function assessment underwent HCU initially, and only those with abnormal scans underwent further SDE, there would be a 29% and 22% reduction in departmental workload and a cost saving of pound sterling 23,000 and pound sterling 30,000, respectively. CONCLUSION: HCU is an accurate method of identifying patients with normal hearts as determined by SDE. Its routine use is cost-effective and can significantly reduce the number of SDE that need be performed.

Comparison between Tc-99m N-NOET and Tl-201 in the assessment of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Technetium 99m N-ethoxy-N-ethyl dithiocarbamate (N-NOET) is a new radionuclide tracer for cardiac single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. It combines the advantageous properties of a Tc-99m agent with the redistribution characteristics of thallium 201. We directly compared the two agents in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent treadmill exercise Tc-99m N-NOET and Tl-201 SPECT studies. Images were acquired at stress, redistribution, and reinjection. Segmental analysis was carried out, and direct comparisons were made with corresponding segments. A stress score index was calculated and compared with the degree of lung uptake for each patient. From the 50 patients, 2657 of 2664 exercise, redistribution, and reinjection segments (99%) were interpreted. There was excellent agreement between the two modalities (weighted kappa = 0.83). Of the patients, 24 demonstrated reversible ischemia by Tl-201 SPECT reinjection imaging, of which Tc-99m N-NOET stress-redistribution imaging correctly identified 14 (58%); this improved significantly to 20 patients (83%) ( P = .03) when a reinjection protocol was used. A higher stress score index was seen in those patients with significant lung uptake (lung-heart ratio > or =0.6) after Tc-99m N-NOET stress imaging (1.6 vs 1.3, P = .03). CONCLUSION: SPECT imaging with Tc-99m N-NOET is comparable to Tl-201 for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Significant lung uptake with stress Tc-99m N-NOET may also indicate the severity of disease.