RESUMO
Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether point-of-care ultrasound performed during the Pavlik method treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip predicts acetabular morphology at 12 months of age. Methods: We reviewed the medical records, ultrasounds, and radiographs of patients treated successfully with the Pavlik method between 2017 and 2019. We performed sonographic measurements on point-of-care ultrasound at the initial presentation, the Pavlik discontinuation, and an additional sonographic follow-up. We measured the acetabular index on a plain anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis obtained at a minimum of 12 months of age. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze for correlation between sonographic measurements and the acetabular index. Results: A total of 72 patients were included in the final analysis. There were no residual or late dysplasia cases at the last radiographic follow-up (mean age = 14.8 ± 2.7 months). Sonographic parameters at the initial presentation significantly correlated with the acetabular index at the final radiographic follow-up (p < 0.001). Patients with worsening degrees of developmental dysplasia of the hip based on stability on sonographic testing (stable, unstable, or dislocated) had higher acetabular indices at the final radiographic follow-up (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Point-of-care ultrasound at initial presentation and the Pavlik discontinuation significantly correlate with acetabular morphology at 1-1.5 years of age. At initial presentation, hips that were unstable or dislocated on point-of-care ultrasound had significantly greater acetabular indices than stable hips at the final follow-up. Level of evidence: level IV case series.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: No meta-analysis has compared outcomes of operative and nonoperative proximal hamstring avulsion treatment. PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of operative and nonoperative proximal hamstring avulsion treatment, including acute, chronic, partial, and complete repairs. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTdiscus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched up to July 2016. Three authors screened the studies and performed quality assessment using criteria from the Methodologic Index for Nonrandomized Studies. A best evidence synthesis was subsequently used. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies (795 proximal hamstring avulsions) were included. Twenty-two studies included proximal hamstring avulsion repairs; 1 study had proximal hamstring avulsion repairs and a control group of nonoperatively treated proximal hamstring avulsions; and 1 study had solely nonoperatively treated proximal hamstring avulsions. The majority of studies were of low methodological quality. Overall, repairs had significantly higher patient satisfaction (90.81% vs 52.94%), hamstring strength (85.01% vs 63.95%), Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores (72.77 vs 69.53), and single-legged hop test results (119.1 vs 56.62 cm) (all P < .001); complications occurred in 23.17% of cases. Compared with chronic repairs, acute avulsion repairs had greater patient satisfaction (95.48% vs 83.79%), less pain (1.07 vs 3.71), and greater strength (85.2% vs 82.8%), as well as better scores for the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (75.64 vs 71.5), UCLA activity scale (University of California, Los Angeles; 8.57 vs 8.10), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (93.36 vs 86.50) (all P < .001). Compared with partial avulsion repairs, complete avulsion repairs had higher patient satisfaction (89.64% vs 81.35%, P < .001), less pain (1.87 vs 4.60, P < .001), and higher return to sport or preinjury activity level, but this was insignificant (81.43% vs 73.83%, P = .082). Partial avulsion repairs had better hamstring strength (86.04% vs 83.71%, P < .001) and endurance (107.13% vs 100.17%, P < .001). Complete repairs had significantly higher complication rates (29.38% vs 11.27%, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Proximal hamstring avulsion repair resulted in superior outcomes as compared with nonoperative treatment, although the complication rate was 23.17%. The nonoperative group was quite small, making a true comparison difficult. Acute repairs have better outcomes than do chronic repairs. Complete avulsion repairs had higher patient satisfaction, less pain, and a higher complication rate than partial avulsion repairs, although partial avulsion repairs had better hamstring strength and endurance. Studies of high methodological quality are lacking in terms of investigating the outcomes of proximal hamstring avulsion repairs.