Evidence Threshold for a Precision Medicine Test that Predicts Optimal Response to a Biologic Agent in Patients With Psoriasis: A Consensus Panel.

Precision medicine approaches are receiving increased attention in dermatology, including inflammatory skin diseases. In psoriasis, a precision medicine treatment paradigm could temper the rapid increase in pharmacy costs that have resulted from a tremendous expansion in the number of available biologic drug options. However, without a clear and agreed upon proof of clinical utility in a real-world setting, costly new pharmacotherapies are often burdened with barriers to coverage by payers and ultimately, routine patient care. This panel was assembled to discuss the evidence threshold required to demonstrate the clinical utility of a precision medicine diagnostic that predicts the biologic therapeutic class for treating psoriasis patients. The panel reviewed clinical utility study designs and economic impact study designs aimed at delineating net savings and waste reduction. A psoriasis biologic precision medicine test could optimize pharmacotherapy management of psoriasis patients. The consensus opinion of this panel was that positive results from the study described here would prove the clinical utility of this precision medicine test. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(6):630-636. doi:10.36849/JDD.6864.

Bending the cost curve: a unique collaboration between radiation oncologists and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts to optimize the use of advanced technology.

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) limits the dose of radiation to critical normal tissue structures and can be applied to the management of most cancers treated with radiation therapy. Because of increased treatment planning time and quality assurance, IMRT is costly. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) and the Massachusetts Radiation Oncology Physicians Advisory Council (PAC) developed a strategy to develop standards for the appropriate use of IMRT. METHODS: Normal tissue volume guidelines were established in multiple oncology disease areas and body site regions. Guidelines were activated in September 2011, and the use of IMRT per case was tracked quarterly by BCBSMA staff. RESULTS: During the first year of activation of the volume-based guidelines, use of IMRT decreased by 17% in Massachusetts, in contrast to a 20% increase during the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: The normal tissue-based guidelines have decreased the use of IMRT in Massachusetts; increased the use of 3D treatment; continued communication between treating radiation oncologists and an insurance organization responsible for cost and quality in medicine; increased cost savings; enabled an efficient appeal process; and provided optimal, cost-effective patient care. This may prove to be an effective model for other disciplines and other developing and maturing radiation technologies.