Radical Gastrectomy After Chemotherapy May Prolong Survival in Stage IV Gastric Cancer: A Korean Multi-institutional Analysis.

ABASTRACT: BACKGROUND: Despite the development of newer treatments, the prognosis for patients with stage IV gastric cancer remains grave. This study evaluated the efficacy of gastrectomy following response to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 419 patients who were diagnosed with stage IV gastric cancer were identified from the multi-institutional Catholic Gastric Cancer Study Group database. The patients were divided into four groups: 212 were in the chemotherapy only (CTx) group, 124 were in the chemotherapy after palliative gastrectomy (G-CTx) group, 23 were in the radical gastrectomy after chemotherapy (CTx-G) group, and 60 were in the best supportive care group. To compensate for the effects of chemotherapy, cases of chemotherapy responsive were analyzed separately. To identify factors affecting survival rates, cure rates for surgery in the surgery group were analyzed. RESULTS: The 3-year survival rate of the CTx-G group was significantly higher than that of the CTx group (42.8 vs. 12.0%, p = 0.001). Moreover, the CTx-G group's 3-year survival rate was greater than that of the G-CTx group (42.8 vs. 37.1%, p = 0.207). Chemotherapy-responsive patients in the CTx-G group had a better 3-year survival rate than those in the G-CTx group (46.1 vs. 18.4%, respectively, p = 0.011). In the surgery group, R0 resection led to a significantly better 3-year survival rate than palliative gastrectomy (61.1 vs. 16.2%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant surgery might improve the survival rate of patients with stage IV gastric cancer, particularly in R0 resection cases.

Impact of the Cross-Sectional Location of Multidetector Computed Tomography Scans on Prediction of Serosal Exposure in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The extent of serosal exposure varies depending on the cross-section of the stomach that is viewed, affected by the visceral peritoneum of the omentum. Although multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the most useful method to predict serosal exposure, the MDCT criteria for such exposure by cross-sectional location remain to be established. METHODS: The MDCT of gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery, and for whom pathological reports were available, were reviewed by radiologists. The MDCT criteria for invasion depth were divided into five grades: (1) smooth margin; (2) undulating margin; (3) streaky margin within vessels; (4) nodular margin within perigastric vessels; and (5) streaky or nodular margin over the perigastric vessels. The five grades were compared in terms of pathological tumor depth by curvature and wall group. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients of stage ≥ T2 were enrolled. The five MDCT grades correlated with tumor depth (P < 0.001). Exposed serosal lesions of grade 3 (P = 0.031) and 5 (P = 0.030) constituted significantly the largest proportion of wall and curvature cancers, respectively. The accuracy of MDCT in terms of T staging using the five grades was calculated by cross-sectional location. The highest accuracies were associated with curvature- and wall-located tumors (55.1 and 64.3%, respectively) when serosal exposure was graded 5 and 3, respectively. The highest overall accuracy for T staging was 59.2% when the various MDCT criteria were applied by reference to the cross-sectional location. CONCLUSIONS: The MDCT criteria for serosal exposure vary by the cross-sectional location of the gastric cancer.

Usefulness of Two-Dimensional Values Measured Using Preoperative Multidetector Computed Tomography in Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis of Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is essential for the prediction of lymph node (LN) metastasis in gastric cancer. However, the measurement method and size criteria for metastatic LNs using MDCT are unclear. METHODS: MDCTs of gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery and had pathological staging were reviewed by radiologists. The two-dimensional cutoff values for LNs with suspected metastasis were calculated, and clinicopathological data were analyzed using those cutoff values. RESULTS: The total number of enrolled patients was 327. The cutoff values of the maximal area with metastatic LNs were obtained significantly at stations 3, 4, and 6, and those values were 112.09, 33.79, and 85.88 mm(2), respectively. The common cutoff value was 112.09 mm(2), and the area under the curve was 0.617 (P = 0.002). The overall survival rate of the patients with LNs less than 112.09 mm(2) was significantly better than those with LNs greater than 112.09 mm(2) (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the maximal LN area was an independent prognostic factor (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.697 [95% confidence interval 1.116-2.582]). CONCLUSIONS: Using two-dimensional values for LNs measured by MDCT is a practical method of predicting metastatic LNs in gastric cancer. The maximal LN area value would be useful in both the preoperative staging and prognosis prediction of gastric cancer.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula after robot distal gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: To compare the incidences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) between robot-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients with gastric cancer who underwent RADG were compared with 40 initial patients who underwent LADG by a single surgeon. We evaluated and compared the clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical outcomes, and operative complications including POPF in two groups. RESULTS: The POPF was observed more frequently in the LADG group than in the RADG group (22.5% versus 10%, P < 0.001). Although the serum amylase levels in the 20 first-half cases did not statistically differ between LADG and RADG (P = 0.32), those in the 20 latter-half cases were significantly lower in the RADG group (P < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified laparoscopic surgery and visceral fat area as POPF-associated risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: RADG is feasible and safe for distal gastrectomy in terms of POPF.

Optimal prophylactic method of venous thromboembolism for gastrectomy in Korean patients: an interim analysis of prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Whereas routine prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently utilized in the West, Asian physicians employ it much less often, based on its recorded rarity amongst their patients. This study was designed to examine the incidence of VTE and to determine the optimal method of thromboembolic prophylaxis following gastrectomy for cancer. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized trial, patients were assigned to either an intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) only or an IPC plus enoxaparin. The primary end point of this study was to determine the VTE incidence rate within 30 days of surgery. A history with physical examinations for VTE and a serum d-dimer test was scheduled on postoperative days (POD) 0, 1, 4, and 7. Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) was performed as an objective test for deep vein thrombosis at POD 4. An interim analysis was performed to determine if it was ethical to continue the study. This clinical trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01448746). RESULTS: Among the 220 patients, 3 (all from the IPC group) were diagnosed with VTE; these cases were asymptomatic, having been detected only on DUS 4 days after surgery. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 12 cases, among which 11 patients were in the IPC plus enoxaparin group. CONCLUSIONS: This interim analysis showed a higher incidence of VTE in the IPC group but a higher bleeding rate in the IPC plus enoxaparin group. We expect that this study, once completed, will provide information key to the determination of the optimal method for preventing VTE in Korean gastric cancer patients.

Is gastric cancer different in Korea and the United States? Impact of tumor location on prognosis.

PURPOSE: To compare the characteristics and prognoses of gastric cancers by tumor location in Korean and U.S. subjects after curative-intent (R0) resection for gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: Data were collected for all patients who had undergone R0 resection at one U.S. institution (n = 567) and one South Korean institution (n = 1,620). Patients with gastroesophageal junction tumors or neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Patient, surgical, and pathologic variables were compared by tumor location. Factors associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined via multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In the Korean cohort, significantly more upper third GC (UTG) patients had undifferentiated, diffuse type, and advanced stage cancers compared to lower third GC (LTG) and middle third GC (MTG) patients. In the U.S. cohort, however, T stage was relatively evenly distributed among UTG, MTG, and LTG patients. The independent predictors of DSS in the Korean cohort were T stage, tumor size, retrieved and positive lymph node counts, and age, but in the U.S. cohort, the only independent predictors were T stage and positive lymph node count. Tumor size significantly affected DSS of Korean UTG patients but not U.S. UTG patients. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in tumor characteristics by tumor location within and between both national cohorts. On the basis of these findings, further study to investigate the biological difference between the two countries is needed.

A nomogram for predicting individual survival of patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical surgery with extended lymph node dissection.

BACKGROUND: We developed and validated a nomogram for use at a high-volume center where radical surgery with extended lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for gastric cancer. METHODS: Overall, 1,614 patients were randomly divided into the test set (n = 805) and validation set (n = 809). The scoring system was calculated using a Cox proportional hazard regression model with the survival of gastric cancer as the predicted endpoint. The concordance index (c-index) was used as an accuracy measure, with bootstrapping to correct for optimistic bias. Calibration plots were constructed. RESULTS: Based on a Cox model, we developed a nomogram that predicts the probability of 3- and 5-year survival from the time of surgery. The bootstrap-corrected c-indices were 0.87 and 0.84 in the test and validation sets, respectively. Survival was well predicted in both sets. The predictions of our nomogram discriminated better than the AJCC staging system (test set: c-index, 0.87 vs. 0.77; P < 0.0001; validation set: c-index, 0.84 vs. 0.79; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a nomogram that provided a significantly accurate prediction of postoperative survival in Korean patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection.

Risk of limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically early gastric cancer: indications of extended lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy is usually indicated in T1 N0-1 early gastric cancer (EGC). Limited lymph node dissection, such as D1+, is applied in these cases. However, preoperative staging is not always correct, and the risk of undertreatment thus exists. METHODS: Patients with clinically early gastric cancer (cEGC) who underwent gastrectomy with lymph node dissection of D2 and over were selected from 4,021 patients with gastric cancer. The station numbers of all metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) were identified, and MLNs were classified into groups 1 and 2 (including lymph nodes of second tier and over) on the basis of the system of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, irrespective of the number of MLNs. Clinicopathological data were compared according to the existence of lymph node metastasis and the classification of MLNs. RESULTS: Of 1,308 patients with cEGC who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 1,184 (90.5 %) were diagnosed pathologically with EGC. Among 126 patients with cEGC who were diagnosed with lymph node metastasis, 93 patients had only group 1 MLNs and 33 patients had group 2 MLNs. Tumor location in the proximal third of the stomach (odds ratio 5.450) and ulceration (odds ratio 11.928) were significant factors for group 2 metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Extended lymph node dissection is recommended in cEGC with ulceration or disease located in the proximal third of the stomach.

Treatment outcomes of systemic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from gastric cancer with no measurable disease: retrospective analysis from a single center.

BACKGROUND: Few studies of systemic chemotherapy have focused on gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) without measurable lesions. In the present study, we characterized the outcomes of systemic chemotherapy and prognostic factors for gastric cancer with PC, particularly in patients without measurable disease. METHODS: Clinical data from 211 gastric cancer patients with PC (137 without and 74 with measurable disease) who had received systemic chemotherapy between January 2003 and December 2010 at a single center were reviewed. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) rate of gastric cancer patients with PC with no measurable disease was significantly longer than that of patients with measurable disease (18.0 vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.010). On multivariate analysis, poor performance status [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.15, p < 0.001], the presence of metastatic lymphadenopathy (HR = 2.17, p < 0.001), and high-grade PC (HR = 1.83, p = 0.001) were associated with significantly decreased OS. When patients with low-grade PC were stratified by clinical PC grade, the median OS of those without measurable disease was 19.6 months. The median OS of patients with low-grade PC with no measurable disease was longer than those of patients with high-grade PC without measurable disease, patients with low-grade PC with measurable disease, and patients with high-grade PC with measurable disease (p = 0.001, p = 0.029, and p < 0.001, respectively). Among the patients with low-grade PC, patients who received a gastrectomy had longer survival than patients who did not receive a gastrectomy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, clinically low-grade PC without measurable disease was associated with better outcomes of systemic chemotherapy than the outcomes in the other groups examined. Clinical trials in patients with gastric cancer with PC should be stratified according to PC grade.

Various types of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Even for expert surgeons, esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is not always easy to perform. Herein, we compare various types of esophagojejunostomy in terms of the technical aspects and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A total of 48 patients underwent LTG for gastric cancer by the same surgeon. Four types of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomies have been applied after LTG: type A, a conventional anvil head method; type B, an OrVil™ system method; type C, a hemi-double stapling technique with anvil head; and type D, side-to-side esophagojejunostomy with linear stapler. We describe and review these types of esophagojejunostomy using a step-by-step approach. RESULTS: The mean reconstruction times were longer for types A and B than for types C and D (p < 0.05). In terms of complications, there were five cases (10.4%) of anastomosis leakage, which was more common in types A and B: two cases in each of type A and B and one case in type C. Moreover, anastomosis stricture requiring intervention was more common in types A and B (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: To date, there are no reliable reconstruction methods after LTG. Therefore, special care is needed to prevent postoperative complication regardless of methods; also, technical innovations to support development of the safest methods of esophagojejunostomy are warranted.

CD133 expression is correlated with chemoresistance and early recurrence of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: CD133 has been suggested to be a cancer stem cell (CSC) marker in various types of cancers. The present study assessed the relationship between CD133 expression and clinicopathological features of gastric cancer. In addition, the prognostic value of CD133 for gastric cancer was evaluated. METHODS: In total, 100 advanced gastric cancer patients who received curative gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy were included. CD133 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry and clinicopathological results, including survival, were analyzed. RESULTS: CD133 was expressed in 23% of advanced gastric cancer patients (23/100). CD133 expression was significantly associated with serosal exposure (P = 0.036), venous invasion (P = 0.047), well and moderate differentiation (P = 0.002), and intestinal-type Lauren classification (P = 0.001). CD133-positive patients had a significantly worse 5-year disease-free (28.1% vs. 65.8%, P = 0.002) and overall (47.5% vs. 74.0%, P = 0.037) survival rate than those who were CD133-negative. A multivariate analysis suggested that CD133 expression significantly affected the 5-year disease-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: CD133 may play an important role in chemoresistance and recurrence, thus representing a promising predictive marker for the prognosis of gastric cancer.

Morbidity and mortality after non-curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined the surgical outcome of non-curative resection in elderly patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: The study reviewed 278 patients who underwent non-curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. The clinicopathological features of elderly patients (≥ 75 years, n = 257) and younger patients (<75 years, n = 21) were compared. RESULTS: Although no difference was observed in terms of preoperative performance, there were distinct differences in terms of albumin level, presence of symptoms, and the rate of comorbidities between the two groups. The postoperative morbidity and mortality rate did not differ between the two groups. Age, preoperative performance status, preoperative transfusion, and presence of comorbidity were not independent predictors of postoperative complications. However, the extent of gastric resection and combined resection were closely related to postoperative complications in patients with non-curative gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In a setting of non-curative resection for gastric cancer, age was not a limiting factor. Rather, the risk of postoperative morbidity should be considered carefully in total gastrectomy and combined resection.

The clinical value of non-curative resection followed by chemotherapy for incurable gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The clinical value of a non-curative resection for gastric cancer is still controversial. We analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent non-curative gastric resection. METHODS: Data from a total of 178 patients who underwent non-curative resection for advanced gastric cancer at Seoul St. Mary's hospital were reviewed. Factors related to the incurability were classified as peritoneal metastasis (P), liver metastasis (H), extra-abdominal metastasis (X), direct adjacent organ invasion that was unresectable (T). The clinicopathologic data, survival, and quality of life of patients were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall median survival time was 12.1 months, and that for the patients with gastrectomy with chemotherapy was 14.3 months. Operation-related complications occurred in 20 patients (11.2 %). Five patients (2.8 %) died of postoperative complications within 30 days, and 43 patients (24.2 %) had symptoms and signs of gastric outlet obstruction or uncontrolled bleeding. The mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was 15.9 days for those symptomatic patients, and the symptom-relieved period was 8.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: There might be a role for non-curative resection followed by chemotherapy for incurable gastric cancer, in terms of survival, and this treatment approach should be carefully considered because of the high mortality rate associated with the disease. A large, randomized, prospective study is warranted to prove the benefit of non-curative resection in patients with incurable gastric cancer.

Undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact of three histological types.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the three constituents of undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma remains unclear. The present study assessed the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of undifferentiated-type mucinous adenocarcinoma (uMAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) compared with those of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: In total, 1,376 patients with undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma were included, consisting of 1,002 patients diagnosed with PDAC, 54 with uMAC and 320 with SRC. Clinicopathological factors and survival rates were compared among the three histological types. RESULTS: Significant differences in the distribution of pathological stages were observed among the groups. Patients with SRC had a significantly better survival rate than those with PDAC or uMAC, in both the all patients including non-curative resected patients and curative-resected groups. In addition, there was significant difference in survival between the PDAC and uMAC groups. Multivariate analysis suggested that age, gender, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis and curability significantly affected survival. Histological type was not an independent prognostic factor. There was no significant difference in the pattern of recurrence among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The uMAC and SRC had worse and favorable prognosis compared with PDCA, respectively. However, there were no differences in survival by pathological stage, thus histological type was not an independent predictor of prognosis.

Low accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography for detailed T staging in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for preoperative staging of gastric cancer varies. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of EUS tumor (T) and node (N) staging, and to identify the histopathological factors influencing accuracy based on the detailed tumor depth of gastric cancer. METHODS: In total, 309 patients with gastric cancer with confirmed pathological staging underwent EUS examination for preoperative staging at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Korea, between January and December 2009. The T and N staging of EUS and the pathologic report were compared. RESULTS: The overall accuracies of EUS for T stage and the detailed T stages were 70.2% and 43.0%, respectively. In detailed stage, tumors greater than 50 mm in diameter were significantly associated with T overstaging (odds ratio (OR) = 2.094). The overall accuracy of EUS for N staging was 71.2%. Tumor size (20 mm ≤ size < 50 mm, OR = 4.389; and 50 mm ≤ size, OR = 8.170), cross-sectional tumor location (circumferential, OR = 4.381) and tumor depth (submucosa, OR = 3.324; muscular propria, OR = 6.923; sub-serosa, OR = 4.517; and serosa-exposed, OR = 6.495) were significant factors affecting incorrect nodal detection. CONCLUSIONS: Careful attention is required during EUS examination of large-sized gastric cancers to increase accuracy, especially for T staging.

Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification for gastric cancer was published in 2010 and included major revisions. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the validity of the seventh edition TNM classification for gastric cancer based on an Asian population. METHODS: A total of 2916 gastric cancer patients who underwent R0 surgical resection from 1989 through 2008 in a single institute were included, and were analyzed according to the seventh edition of the TNM classification for validation. RESULTS: When adjusted using the seventh edition of the TNM classification, upstaging was observed in 771 patients (26.4%) and downstaging was observed in 178 patients (6.1%) compared with the sixth edition of the TNM classification. The relative risk (RR) of seventh edition pT classification was found to be increased with regular intensity compared with the sixth edition pT classification. The RR of seventh edition pN classification was found to be increased with irregular intensity compared with the sixth edition pN classification. In survival analysis, there were significant differences noted for each stage of disease, but only a marginal difference was demonstrated between stage IA and stage IB (P = .049). In the hybrid TNM classification, which combines the seventh edition pT classification and the sixth edition pN classification, both pT and pN classifications demonstrated a more ideal distribution of the RR, and 5-year survival rates also showed a significant difference for each stage (P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: The seventh edition of the TNM classification was considered valid based on the results of the current study. However, the hybrid TNM classification, comprised of a combination of the seventh edition pT classification and sixth edition pN classification, should be considered for the next edition.

Intragastric approach for submucosal tumors located near the Z-line: a hybrid laparoscopic and endoscopic technique.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and impact of the "intragastric" approach to laparoscopic wedge resection as a surgical option for the treatment of suspected small sized gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) located at the level of Z-line. METHODS: We reviewed six patients who underwent laparoscopic intragastric resection of a suspected gastric SMT. In all cases, tumor mass was located just below the Z-line. The patients' clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes were prospectively recorded and reviewed. RESULTS: All six patients were underwent successfully laparoscopic wedge resection by the intragastric approach using a balloon-type trocar. No case was required open conversion. The mean operation time was 128 min, and the mean hospital stay was 4 days. Five cases were proven to have leiomyoma, and one case was found to have gastrointestinal stromal tumor with low risk. The mean tumor size was 2.7 cm. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection through the "intragastric" approach is a safe and feasible option for gastric SMTs located at the level of Z-line.

Analysis of 151 consecutive gastric submucosal tumors according to tumor location.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the histopathological characteristics of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) according to their location. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 151 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for gastric SMTs between 2001 and 2009 was performed. RESULTS: Of 151 gastric SMTs, 100 (66.2%) were gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 21 (13.9%) were leiomyomas, and 30 (19.9%) were other benign tumors. Leiomyoma was the most common neoplasm at the cardia (55.2%; P < 0.05), and the incidence of endophytic cardia tumors was higher compared with other locations (65.5%; P < 0.05). SMTs located at the cardia were significantly smaller than those found in the upper third (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 4.1 ± 3.0; P < 0.05) and middle third (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.9 ± 3.3; P < 0.05) of the stomach. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of gastric SMTs located at the cardia differ significantly from those of gastric SMTs located in other regions of the stomach. These findings suggest that treatment strategy should be tailored by the location of tumors.

Long-term outcomes and survival after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: three-year survival analysis of a single-center experience in Korea.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has been established as an alternative treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) because of excellent short-term results. However, only a few reports have considered the long-term outcomes of LADG. In this study, we investigated the 3-year outcome and survival of patients who underwent LADG. METHODS: We assessed 182 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent LADG. The indication for LADG was confined to EGCs (T1N0 or T1N1 cases). The clinicopathological characteristics and long-term survival data of all patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall morbidity and mortality rates of the patients were 11% and 0%, respectively. An analysis of the final pathological stages of the patients revealed that 160 had stage Ia, 20 had stage Ib, and only 2 had stage II. The median follow-up period was 44 months (range, 2-73 months), and there were two recurrences. Five patients died of other causes, but no patients died of a gastric cancer recurrence. The 3-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 97.3% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LADG for EGC is acceptable in terms of both short- and long-term outcomes. Thus, LADG can be considered a primary treatment for EGC.

Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Leakage has been shown to adversely affect survival in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies. However, the effect of leakage following radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer remains unclear. METHODS: In total, 478 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgery with curative intent were reviewed. Anastomosis or duodenal stump leakage was diagnosed clinically or radiologically. Risk factors for leakage were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. The impact of leakage on patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Leakage was diagnosed in 32 of 478 patients (6.7%); 14 patients (2.9%) exhibited esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage, 14 (2.9%) showed duodenal stump leakage, and four (0.8%) showed gastroduodenal anastomotic leakage. Poor performance status [odds ratio (OR): 4.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.80-8.93] and tumor location (OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 1.56-8.89) were risk factors for postoperative leakage. Overall mean survival of patients with leakage was significantly lower than that of patients without leakage (30.5 vs. 96.2 months; P < 0.001). Leakage was one of the independent predictive factor for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR): 3.58, 95% CI: 2.29-5.59]. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative inflammation due to leakage is a negative prognostic factor for patients with advanced gastric cancer.