Pharmacokinetic Variability of Rufinamide and Stiripentol in Children with Refractory Epilepsy: A Retrospective Study of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring from the National Epilepsy Centers in Denmark and Norway.

BACKGROUND: Rufinamide and stiripentol, orphan drugs used in Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes, respectively, are antiseizure medications (ASMs), often administered to children; however, pharmacokinetic studies are lacking. The authors compared the pharmacokinetic variability of these drugs with respect to the dose, serum concentrations, comedication, age, and duration of treatment. METHODS: Children and adolescents (<18 years) whose serum concentrations were measured were retrospectively identified from the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) databases at 2 national epilepsy centers in Norway and Denmark (2012-2021). RESULTS: Data from 165 patients (56% boys/44% girls) treated with rufinamide and 52 patients (50% boys/50% girls) treated with stiripentol were included. For rufinamide, the median age was 10 (range 2-17) years, dose 23 (3-73) mg/d, and serum concentration 34 (3-227) µmol/L [8.1 mg/L (0.71-54.0 mg/L)]. For stiripentol, the median age was 8.5 (range 1-17) years, dose 37 (18-76) mg/d, and serum concentration 33 (4-113) µmol/L [7.7 mg/L (0.93-26.3 mg/L)]. The concomitant use of 1-9 other ASMs during the data collection was noted. Pharmacokinetic variability, calculated as the concentration/(dose/kg) ratio, ranged from 0.26 to 11.31 (µmol/L)/(mg/kg) for rufinamide and 0.17-1.52 (µmol/L)/(mg/kg) for stiripentol. The intraindividual coefficients of variation ranged widely, from 5% to 110% for rufinamide and 11%-117% for stiripentol. The treatment period was at least 5 years in 50% of patients. No statistically significant effects of age, sex, or ASM comedication were observed, possibly due to the small sample size and heterogeneous groups with variable seizure situations, comorbidities, and changes in comedication and physiology. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates considerable pharmacokinetic variability in and between patients for both drugs and similar use in terms of age, burden of comedication and retention rates. TDM may be useful in the clinical setting to monitor and optimize treatment in this vulnerable patient group.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Sulthiame: The Impact of Age, Drug-Drug Interactions, and Biochemical Markers of Toxicity in Patients with Epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Sulthiame is an antiseizure medication increasingly used for epilepsy. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic variability of sulthiame in children and adults with epilepsy with respect to age, comedication, dose, serum concentration, and biochemical markers of toxicity in a clinical setting. METHOD: Retrospective quantitative data from the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database at the Section for Clinical Pharmacology, the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway (2015-2021), were used. RESULTS: TDM data from 326 patients (127 female/199 male) were included [mean age, 11.4 (range 2-44) years; mean weight, 41 (range 14-109) kg]. Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability in the concentration/(dose/body weight) (C/(D/kg)) ratio was 16-fold; intraindividual variability was up to 8-fold (coefficient of variation = 10%-78%). Young children (younger than 6 years) had a significantly lower C/(D/kg) ratio than older age groups ( P < 0.05). Various comedications did not significantly affect the C/(D/kg) ratio, possibly owing to the small sample size. However, CYP2C19-mediated inhibition by sulthiame was indicated because patients using clobazam and sulthiame (n = 28) had a 3.5-fold higher N-desmethylclobazam C/(D/kg) ratio than those using neutral comedication (n = 45; P < 0.001). Patients with pH values below the adjusted normal range (7.32-7.42; n = 15) had a 33% higher sulthiame concentration than those with normal pH values (n = 22; P < 0.05). Blood gas measurements, especially pH, may serve as markers of toxicity and can be used in combination with clinical data when toxicity is suspected. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the extensive intraindividual and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of sulthiame, with age as a contributing factor. Sulthiame has clinically relevant interactions with clobazam. The use of TDM and pH as a biochemical marker may contribute to individualized and safe sulthiame treatment.

The role of new medical treatments for the management of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: Novel concepts and results.

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are among the most challenging of all epilepsies to manage, given the exceedingly frequent and often severe seizure types, pharmacoresistance to conventional antiseizure medications, and numerous comorbidities. During the past decade, efforts have focused on development of new treatment options for DEEs, with several recently approved in the United States or Europe, including cannabidiol as an orphan drug in Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes and everolimus as a possible antiepileptogenic and precision drug for tuberous sclerosis complex, with its impact on the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Furthermore, fenfluramine, an old drug, was repurposed as a novel therapy in the treatment of Dravet syndrome. The evolution of new insights into pathophysiological processes of various DEEs provides possibilities to investigate novel and repurposed drugs and to place them into the context of their role in future management of these patients. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of these new medical treatment options for the DEEs and to discuss the clinical implications of these results for improved treatment.

Relationship between saliva and plasma rufinamide concentrations in patients with epilepsy.

The assay of saliva samples provides a valuable alternative to the use of blood samples for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), at least for certain categories of patients. To determine the feasibility of using saliva sampling for the TDM of rufinamide, we compared rufinamide concentrations in paired samples of saliva and plasma collected from 26 patients with epilepsy at steady state. Within-patient relationships between plasma rufinamide concentrations and dose, and the influence of comedication were also investigated. Assay results in the two tested fluids showed a good correlation (r2  = .78, P < .0001), but concentrations in saliva were moderately lower than those in plasma (mean saliva to plasma ratio = 0.7 ± 0.2). In eight patients evaluated at three different dose levels, plasma rufinamide concentrations increased linearly with increasing dose. Patients receiving valproic acid comedication had higher dose-normalized plasma rufinamide levels than patients comedicated with drugs devoid of strong enzyme-inducing or enzyme-inhibiting activity. Overall, these findings indicate that use of saliva represents a feasible option for the application of TDM in patients treated with rufinamide. Because rufinamide concentrations are lower in saliva than in plasma, a correction factor is needed if measurements made in saliva are used as a surrogate for plasma concentrations.

Pharmacokinetic Variability During Long-Term Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Valproate, Clobazam, and Levetiracetam in Patients With Dravet Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antiseizure medications (ASMs) may contribute to treatment optimization in individual patients. This study included patients with Dravet syndrome as they often require close monitoring because of polypharmacy with various ASMs. The aim was to use long-term TDM to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of ASMs in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective data from patients with Dravet syndrome were collected from the TDM database at the Section for Clinical Pharmacology, National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2008-2018). Concentration/(dose/kg)ratios (C/D ratios) were calculated for the ASMs and the concentration (C/C ratio) for N-desmethylclobazam. In patients with at least 3 measurements, the CV for C/D ratios for intrapatient and interpatient variability was calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (30 male patients/23 female patients) between 2 and 50 years of age (mean, 16 years) were included. Pharmacokinetic variability of the total number of measurements of valproate (n = 417), clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam (n = 328), and levetiracetam (n = 238) was determined. Interpatient variability was more pronounced than intrapatient variability (coefficient of variations: valproate, 65% vs. 24%; levetiracetam, 71% vs. 27%; and clobazam/N-desmethylclobazam, 47%/77% vs. 35%/55%) (P < 0.01). Comedication with stiripentol (n = 16) increased the C/D ratio of valproate by 63% and of clobazam by 133% and the C/C ratio of N-desmethylclobazam/clobazam by 104% (P < 0.05). Younger age also contributed to pharmacokinetic variability. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term TDM revealed extensive variability in serum concentrations over time; the variability was lowest for levetiracetam, moderate for valproate, and highest for clobazam. Pharmacokinetic variability and interactions can thus be identified and adjusted to facilitate decision making to achieve the optimal treatment outcome.

Clinical experience combined with therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamide.

OBJECTIVE: Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with insufficient clinical experience in patients with intellectual disability (ID). They often have more severe epilepsy with comorbidities. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with refractory epilepsy with and without ID in a real-life setting, taking drug monitoring (TDM) data into account therapeutic. METHODS: Retrospectively, we identified 344 patients using LCM from the TDM service covering the majority of the country, at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2013-2018). Clinical and TDM data were available for 132 patients. RESULTS: Forty-four of the 132 patients (33%) had ID. The retention rate was significantly higher in the ID vs the non-ID group after 1 year (84% vs 68%, P < .05). By combining clinical and TDM data, we demonstrated that 37/38 responding patients had serum concentrations above the lower limit of the reference range (>10 µmol/L), and 16/17 with lower concentrations were non-responders. Mean serum concentration/dose ratios were similar in both groups, 0.06 and 0.07 µmol/L/mg. There were no significant differences regarding efficacy and tolerability. The risk of LCM withdrawal was significantly higher when LCM was added to sodium channel blockers, even if the latter was discontinued. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide was generally well tolerated in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, where one third had ID, and in these patients the retention rate was higher. The combination of clinical and TDM data could possibly facilitate LCM therapy in these vulnerable patients.

Nonadherence to treatment regimens in epilepsy from the patient's perspective and predisposing factors: Differences between intentional and unintentional lack of adherence.

Nonadherence to recommended antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment regimens can result in seizure relapse with increased health risks. Nonadherence can be unintentional (eg, patients forget to take a dose), or intentional, when patients consciously decide not to follow the agreed AED treatment regimen. We aimed to determine the extent to which Norwegian patients with epilepsy (PWEs) report taking their AED differently from prescribed, either intentionally or unintentionally, and to identify risk factors for either form of nonadherence. Of 1182 PWEs who completed an online survey presented on the website of the Norwegian Epilepsy Association, 40% reported that they sometimes or often forget to take their AED as scheduled, and about 30% reported that they consciously chose not to follow the AED treatment plan agreed upon with their physician. Independent variables significantly associated with unintentional nonadherence include the following: feeling depressed, being younger than the mean age, and having memory problems. Independent factors significantly associated with intentional nonadherence include the following: feeling depressed, male gender, and perceptions of stigmatization. To improve the treatment of PWEs, it is important to distinguish between intentional and unintentional nonadherence to AED treatment regimens, as different risk factors and reasons associated with nonadherence to AED treatment regimens might require different interventions.

Sexual function in people with epilepsy: Similarities and differences with the general population.

OBJECTIVE: The potential impact of epilepsy on sexual function is important for patient welfare, but often neglected. This study explored the occurrences of different sexual problems in patients with both well-controlled and mostly refractory epilepsy, and compared these with equivalent information from the general population. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, a total of 221 adult inpatients and outpatients, mostly with intractable epilepsy, at the National Centre for Epilepsy in Norway, and 78 outpatients with well-controlled epilepsy at Lillehammer hospital participated in a questionnaire survey on sexual function. Information on the individual patient's epilepsy was collected. The results were compared with equivalent data on sexual function from 1671 adult Norwegians in the general population. RESULTS: Patients with epilepsy reported a significantly higher frequency of problems with orgasm, dyspareunia, erectile dysfunction, and feelings of sexual deviance. However, reduced sexual desire, premature ejaculation/climax, and vaginal dryness occurred at similar frequencies in the general population. After controlling for gender, we found no significant association between sexual problems and seizure control or use of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs. In both genders, feelings of sexual deviance were associated with lower quality of life. Fewer patients with epilepsy were satisfied with their sex lives. The perception of sex as an important part of daily life was similar among women with epilepsy and women from the general population, whereas significantly fewer men with epilepsy than men in the general population reported that sex was an important part of their daily lives. Women with mostly refractory epilepsy reported asking for help with their sexual problems significantly more often than women in the other groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Some sexual problems occur significantly more often in patients with epilepsy than in the general population and feelings of sexual deviancy occur more frequently. No epilepsy-related factors could be identified as specific predictors.

Pharmacokinetic Variability and Clinical Use of Lacosamide in Children and Adolescents in Denmark and Norway.

BACKGROUND: The indication for the antiepileptic drug lacosamide (LCM) was recently extended to include children from the age of 4 years. Real-life data on the use and serum concentrations of LCM in children and adolescents are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of LCM in this patient group in relation to age, comedication, dose, serum concentrations and duration of treatment, and to examine pharmacokinetic variability. METHODS: Children and adolescents (<18 years) who had serum concentrations of LCM measured from January 2012 to June 2018 were retrospectively identified from the therapeutic drug monitoring databases at 2 national epilepsy centers in Norway and Denmark. Clinical data were collected from request forms and medical records. RESULTS: Data from 124 patients were included, 61 girls/63 boys. Weight was available for 76 patients. Median age was 15 years (range 2-17 years), dose of LCM 300 mg/d (76-600 mg/d), and serum concentration 18 µmol/L (5-138 µmol/L) [4.5 mg/L (1.3-34.5 mg/L)]. Pharmacokinetic variability was demonstrated as the concentration/(dose/kg) ratio ranged from 1.3 to 9.4 (µmol/L)/(mg/kg) and was affected by age. Polytherapy with 1-3 other antiepileptic drugs was noted in 107 patients (86%). Treatment was continued beyond 1 year in 71% (n = 45) of the 63 patients where such information was available, and all of these 45 patients had serum concentrations within the defined reference range. The 1-year retention rate was higher in patients not concomitantly using other sodium channel-blocking drugs (82% versus 56%). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates pharmacokinetic variability in and between age groups, which indicates usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring. More than two-thirds of patients continued treatment beyond 1 year, suggesting reasonable effectiveness.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of gabapentin in various indications.

OBJECTIVES: Gabapentin has been increasingly used in various indications in recent years. Despite variable pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is scarcely described in other indications than epilepsy. The aim of the study was to investigate the use and pharmacokinetic variability of gabapentin in epilepsy and non-epilepsy indications and to further evaluate the use of TDM in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS). MATERIALS & METHODS: Population-based data from the Norwegian Prescription Database, retrospective TDM data from the section for Clinical Pharmacology, the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway, and prospective observational data on patients with RLS were used. RESULTS: The use of gabapentin increased by 30% from 2014 to 2017 (32 181 to 42 675 users). TDM data from 120 patients showed a 22-fold pharmacokinetic variability in concentration/dose ratios, and this ratio was elevated in elderly patients (≥65 years). The majority of elderly used gabapentin for non-epilepsy indications. In patients with RLS, intake in the evening/night only was common due to nocturnal symptoms, in contrast to regular dosing regimens in epilepsy. Thus, drug fasting concentrations do not reflect concentrations at the time of required therapeutic effect. TDM was still found useful in most patients to support dosage increase or evaluate adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Due to extensive pharmacokinetic variability, TDM can benefit patients using gabapentin. Challenges with applying TDM in new indications such as RLS include different dosage regimens and consequently different interpretation of serum concentrations. Thus, TDM should be requested on clear clinical grounds and the service tailored according to the therapeutic indication.

Treatment and challenges with antiepileptic drugs in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) may have uncontrolled seizures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use and challenges with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the patients' view of these challenges. METHOD: A questionnaire about the use of AEDs, adherence to therapy, and quality of life was given to patients with JME recruited from Drammen Hospital. Data regarding AEDs were confirmed from medical records at Drammen Hospital, Norway (2007-2018). Additional clinical interviews were performed, and a mixed method approach was applied. RESULTS: Ninety patients with defined JME diagnosis, 54/36 women/men aged 14-39 (mean: 25) years, were included. Only 29 (33%) were seizure-free. Within the last year, 21% experienced generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), and 68% had myoclonic jerks. Seventy-six (84%) used AEDs, 78% in monotherapy. A total of 10 AEDs were used;: most commonly valproate (n = 33), lamotrigine (n = 27), and levetiracetam (n = 21). Two-thirds of valproate users were men while all other AEDs were used more in females than in men. Valproate and levetiracetam displayed better efficacy against GTCS than lamotrigine. One-third often/sometimes forgot their medication nonintentionally while 14% had intentional poor adherence. The majority reported good quality of life (76%). No significant correlations between the use of AEDs, use of valproate, poor adherence, quality of life score, and seizure freedom were demonstrated. Half of the patients had serum concentrations measured every year, and two-thirds thought this was important. Qualitative interviews elucidated treatment challenges in JME;, adverse effect burden, adherence, and activities of daily life. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of AEDs in the majority of patients, only one-third were seizure-free. Other challenges included polypharmacy, the use of valproate in women, and variable adherence. This points to a need for closer follow-up in patients with JME.

Pharmacokinetic variability of valproate in women of childbearing age.

The purpose was to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of valproic acid (VPA) in women of childbearing age by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data to elucidate the variable relationship between dose and serum concentrations with the ultimate aim of facilitating safer use of VPA. Anonymized retrospective data from the TDM database (2006-2015) at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway were used. Trough total concentrations of VPA at assumed steady state in women aged 14-46 years were analyzed. Data from 643 nonpregnant women of childbearing age (mean age = 27 years) were included. Mean dose and serum concentration of VPA were 968 (standard deviation [SD] = 453) mg/day and 411 (SD = 138) µmol/L, respectively, and 59% used polytherapy. The pharmacokinetic variability in serum concentration/dose (C/D) ratios between women was extensive. For doses <700 mg/day (n = 202; 32%; 150-625 mg/day), mean serum concentration was 336 µmol/L and variability in C/D ratio was 10-fold. The variability decreased with increasing dose to eightfold (≥700 to <1,500 mg/day, n = 358) and fourfold (≥1,500 mg/day, n = 96). This study demonstrates the extensive pharmacokinetic variability of VPA among women of childbearing age, which is most pronounced at low doses. In future studies, serum concentrations of VPA, rather than dosage, should be used as a guide for exposure of VPA and possible risks of teratogenicity to evaluate safety aspects of VPA in women.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Lacosamide in Norway: Focus on Pharmacokinetic Variability, Efficacy and Tolerability.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED). Experience from therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice is limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic variability of LCM in relation to efficacy and tolerability in patients with refractory epilepsy in a real-life setting. Variables included age, gender, daily doses and serum concentrations of LCM and other AEDs from the TDM-database at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway. Clinical data regarding efficacy and tolerability were collected from medical records. The Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) was used to include population-based numbers of users. TDM-data from 344 patients were included. The median dose, serum concentration, and concentration/dose (C/D)-ratio of LCM was 350 (range 25-700) mg/day, 19.7 (range 8.1-56.2) µmol/L, and 0.06 (0.02-0.82) µmol/L/mg, respectively. Serum concentrations were reduced by 28% by concomitant use of enzyme inducers and increased by 30% in patients aged >65 years. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed in 227 patients: 29% had >50% seizure reduction (eight seizure free), 30% had no effect, and 44% reported adverse effects. In Norway, there were on average 500 patients per year using LCM in this period based on NorPD. The study demonstrated pharmacokinetic variability and use of TDM of LCM in Norway. Data were collected from multiple sources for improved pharmacovigilance. Serum concentrations were influenced by enzyme inducers and ageing, indicating the usefulness of TDM. Effect and tolerability were favorable within a suggested reference range of 10-40 µmol/L given drug-fasting conditions.

The Impact of Pharmacokinetic Interactions With Eslicarbazepine Acetate Versus Oxcarbazepine and Carbamazepine in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new anti-epileptic drug (AED) chemically related to oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) and is increasingly used in clinical practice. The purpose of the study was to investigate 2-way pharmacokinetic interactions between ESL and other AEDs as compared to OXC and CBZ. METHODS: Anonymous data regarding age, gender, use of AEDs, daily doses and serum concentration measurements of ESL, OXC, CBZ and lamotrigine (LTG) and other AEDs were retrieved from 2 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) databases in Norway. Drugs were categorized according to their known potential for interactions. Concentration/dose (C/D) ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Data from 1100 patients were available. The C/D ratios of ESL and OXC were unchanged in combination with enzyme-inducing AEDs or valproate (VPA). The C/D ratio of CBZ decreased by 40% and 22% in combination with other enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA, respectively, pointing to an increased clearance. ESL demonstrated no significant enzyme-inducing effect on LTG metabolism although there was a 20% and 34% decrease in the C/D ratio of LTG in combination with OXC and CBZ, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Possible pharmacokinetic interactions have been studied for ESL as compared to OXC and CBZ. The pharmacokinetics of ESL is not affected by enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA and does not affect the metabolism of LTG in contrast to OXC and CBZ. The study demonstrates the value of using TDM databases to explore the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions of new AEDs.

Proconvulsant effects of antidepressants - What is the current evidence?

Antidepressant drugs may have proconvulsant effects. Psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy is common. Prescribers might be reluctant to initiate treatment with antidepressants in fear of seizure aggravation. The purpose of this review was to focus upon the current evidence for proconvulsant effects of antidepressants and possible clinical implications. Most antidepressants are regarded as safe and may be used in patients with epilepsy, such as the newer serotonin and/or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Four older drugs should, however, be avoided or used with caution; amoxapine, bupropion, clomipramine and maprotiline. Proconvulsant effects are concentration-related. Optimization of drug treatment includes considerations of pharmacokinetic variability to avoid high serum concentrations of the most proconvulsant antidepressants. The risk of seizures is regarded as small and should, therefore, not hamper the pharmacological treatment of depression in people with epilepsy.

Changes in utilisation of antiepileptic drugs in epilepsy and non-epilepsy disorders-a pharmacoepidemiological study and clinical implications.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in utilisation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in epilepsy and non-epilepsy disorders in Norway and furthermore to study the retention rates of the most commonly used AEDs in these indications in long-term use. METHODS: The data consisted of all prescriptions of AEDs from Norwegian pharmacies in the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) (2004-2012). Variables included anonymous data regarding age, gender, diagnosis specific reimbursement codes and utilisation of AEDs. RESULTS: In recent years (2008-2012), the utilisation of AEDs in non-epilepsy disorders accounted for 45-53 % of the total use. In epilepsy, the most commonly used AED was lamotrigine, followed by levetiracetam, carbamazepine and valproate. Lamotrigine was also the predominant AED used in psychiatry, while pregabalin and gabapentin were mostly used in neuropathic pain. In migraine, topiramate predominated but accounted for <1 % of the total utilisation of AEDs. The majority of prescriptions were by general practitioners and only 20 % by specialists. Regardless of indication, newer AEDs had higher retention rates (34-48 %) and were used for a longer period before discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AEDs in non-epilepsy disorders is increasing and accounted for 53 % in 2012. Newer AEDs were predominantly used and demonstrated higher retention rates than older AEDs in all indications. This nationwide study demonstrates an increased exposure to AEDs in new patient groups, and details in prescription patterns and clinical and safety considerations should be closely monitored. This contributes to long-term post-marketing data of AED and accordingly improved pharmacovigilance.

Availability of antiepileptic drugs across Europe.

Europe consists of 53 countries with widely different economic conditions and different political, educational, and health care systems. This study was aimed at determining the availability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) across Europe. An electronic questionnaire was submitted to all 43 European chapters of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). Outcome measures were availability of older, newer, and newest AEDs, generic products, indications, reimbursement rules, and reasons for lack of availability of AEDs. Countries were divided according to economic status as defined by the World Bank. Thirty-four chapters (79%) provided data. There were large differences in AED availability across countries, especially between high-income countries and the other countries. The newest AEDs were not available in any of the 12 non-high-income countries. Availability was higher in countries with public reimbursement systems. Reimbursement policies ranged from full reimbursement for all AEDs to complete lack of reimbursement. Main hurdles for poor access to AEDs included lack of regulatory approval, high prices and reimbursement restrictions. The availability of AEDs differs across European countries, with many hurdles hampering access to epilepsy medicines, particularly to new medications. These findings raise major concerns on the quality of epilepsy care in many countries.

Interactions between antiseizure medications and foods and drinks: A systematic review.

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) constitute the principal of treatment for patients with epilepsy, where long-term treatment is usually necessary. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide practical and useful information regarding various aspects of the interactions between ASMs and foods and drinks. MEDLINE and ScienceDirect, from the inception to July 15, 2023, were searched for related publications. In both electronic databases, the following search strategy was applied, and the following keywords were used (in title/abstract): "food OR drink" AND "antiepileptic OR antiseizure." The primary search yielded 738 studies. After implementing our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we could identify 19 studies on the issue of interest for our endeavor. Four studies were identified in the recheck process and not by the primary search. All studies provided low level of evidence. Interactions between foods and ASMs are a common phenomenon. Many factors may play a role for such an interaction to come to play; these include drug properties, administration route, and administration schedule, among others. Drugs-foods (-drinks) interactions may change the drug exposure or plasma levels of drugs (e.g., grapefruit juice increases carbamazepine concentrations and the bioavailability of cannabidiol is increased 4-5 folds with concomitant intake of fat-rich food); this may require dosage adjustments. Interactions between ASMs and foods and drinks may be important. This should be taken seriously into consideration when consulting patients and their caregivers about ASMs. Future well-designed investigations should explore the specific interactions between foods (and drinks) and ASMs to clarify whether they are clinically important. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Interactions between antiseizure medications and foods and drinks may be important. This should be taken into consideration in patients with epilepsy.

Access to a tailored mobile application enhances medication adherence among young users of antidepressants.

Introduction: Patients' adherence to antidepressants is generally reported to be poor. This study examined whether users of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) enhance medication adherence following access to a mobile application (app) tailored for this patient group. The study addresses the implementation phase of medication adherence. Methods: The study was a single group pre-post intervention design. Data were collected using the validated OsloMet Adherence-to-medication Survey tool (OMAS-37) before and after app access. Pre-app access survey (Survey 1) was conducted via social media and online newspapers, encompassing 445 SSRI/SNRI users aged 18 years and above. Post-app access survey (Survey 2) was sent to 103 SSRI/SNRI users from Survey 1. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test compared pre- and post-intervention adherence measurements. Pearson's chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests compared study population categories. Results: Forty-two SSRI/SNRI users, median age 26 (IQR 17), 93% identifying as female, used the app while using the same antidepressant during the 2-month period between gaining access to the app and Survey 2. There was a statistically significant reduction in non-adherence score post-app access (z = 3.57, n = 42, p < 0.001) with medium effect size (r = 0.39), indicating enhanced adherence. Total non-adherence score decreased by 39% from pre-to post-access, and there was a 12% decrease in users scoring equivalent with poor adherence (score <2) post-access. Twenty-nine of 37 non-adherence causes improved, with three showing statistical significance. Of 42 responders, 50% (n = 21) indicated using the app one to two times, while 50% (n = 21) more than three times. Approximately 69% (n = 28) found it useful, and 43% (n = 18) felt safer in their use of antidepressants after access to the app. No significant preference was observed for the app over alternative sources of information. Discussion: Enhanced medication adherence was observed among antidepressant users following access to the tailored app. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the app applicability to a broader range of antidepressants users or other patient groups, encompassing those in the initiation phase of medication adherence. The app is intended as an easily accessible supplement to the information and advice provided by prescribing physicians and dispensing pharmacists.

Pharmacological treatment of psychiatric comorbidity in patients with refractory epilepsy.

The purpose of the present study was to describe the use of psychopharmacological drugs for the treatment of a stated or presumed psychiatric comorbid condition in patients with refractory epilepsy and discuss the clinical implications of such treatment. The study was a retrospective descriptive study in patients admitted to the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway based on medication described in medical records. The mean age was 40 years (range: 9-90), and the gender ratio was 56/44% female/male. Psychotropic drugs (antidepressants and antipsychotics) were used to a lower extent than in the general population in Norway. Drugs for ADHD were predominantly used in children. The prevalence of patients treated with psychiatric comedication was 13% (143 of 1139 patients). The patients used two to eight concomitant CNS-active drugs, which calls for the close monitoring of potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions and should challenge clinicians to achieve a less complex pharmacotherapy. Psychiatric comorbidity is an important concern in patients with refractory epilepsy and may be undertreated.