Maternal lipid levels in early pregnancy as a predictor of childhood lipid levels: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Maternal lipid levels in early pregnancy are associated with maternal health and foetal growth. It is however unclear if maternal lipids in early pregnancy can be used to predict childhood lipid levels. The aim of this study is to assess the association between maternal and offspring childhood lipid levels, and to investigate the influence of maternal BMI and diet on these associations. METHODS: This study included 2692 women participating in the Generation R study, an ongoing population-based prospective cohort study from early life onwards. Women with an expected delivery date between 2002 and 2006 living in Rotterdam, the Netherlands were included. Total cholesterol, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) were measured in early pregnancy (median 13.2 weeks [90% range 10.6; 17.1]). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), remnant cholesterol and non-HDL-c were calculated. Corresponding lipid measurements were determined in 2692 children at the age of 6 (median 6.0 years [90% range 5.7; 7.5]) and 1673 children 10 years (median 9.7 years [90% range 9.5; 10.3]). Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to examine the association between maternal lipid levels in early pregnancy and the corresponding childhood lipid measurements at the ages of 6 and 10 years while adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Maternal lipid levels in early pregnancy are positively associated with corresponding childhood lipid levels 6 and 10 years after pregnancy, independent of maternal body mass index and diet. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal lipid levels in early pregnancy may provide an insight to the lipid profile of children years later. Gestational lipid levels may therefore be used as an early predictor of children's long-term health. Monitoring of these gestational lipid levels may give a window-of-opportunity to start early interventions to decrease offspring's lipid levels and possibly diminish their cardiovascular risk later in life. Future studies are warranted to investigate the genetic contribution on maternal lipid levels in pregnancy and lipid levels of their offspring years later.

Lipoprotein(a) in children and adolescents with genetically confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia followed up at a specialized lipid clinic.

Background and aim: Many children with an FH mutation also exhibit elevated lipoprotein(a) levels, which is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Studies have reported higher levels of lipoprotein(a) in adult and middle-aged women than men. There is limited knowledge on the concentration and change of lipoprotein(a) levels in children with genetic FH, and therefore we investigated sex-differences in lipoprotein(a) level and change in lipoprotein(a) in girls and boys with genetically confirmed FH. Methods: Medical records were reviewed retrospectively in 438 subjects with heterozygous FH that started follow-up below the age of 19 years at the Lipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital in Norway, and of these we included 386 subjects with at least one Lp(a) measurement. Results: Mean (SD) age at baseline was 13.8 (7.3) years and the age was similar between sexes. Girls had a higher lipoprotein(a) level than boys at baseline: median (25-75 percentile) 223 (108-487) vs. 154 (78-360) mg/L, respectively (p < 0.01). From baseline to follow-up measurement (mean [SD] 8.9 [6.1] years apart), the mean (95 % CI) absolute and percentage change in Lp(a) level in girls was 151.4 (54.9-247.8) mg/L and 44.8 (16.4-73.1) %, respectively, and in boys it was 66.8 (22.9-110.8) mg/L and 50.5 (8.8-92.3) %, respectively (both p > 0.05). Conclusions: We found an increase in Lp(a) levels in children with genetic FH with age, and higher levels in girls than boys, which could impact risk assessment and future ASCVD. Further research is needed to elucidate whether subjects with FH could benefit from lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapies that are under current investigations.

Young women with familial hypercholesterolemia have higher LDL-cholesterol burden than men: Novel data using repeated measurements during 12-years follow-up.

Background and aims: The concentration and the duration of exposure to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (LDL-C burden) is an important determinant of risk for cardiovascular disease and thresholds has recently been estimated. Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease. The overall aim of the present study was to describe differences in LDL-C level and LDL-C burden in females and males with FH visiting an outpatient lipid clinic from a young age, using multiple LDL-C measurements during a follow-up time of 12 years. First, we aimed to study if the LDL-C concentration and the LDL-C burden is different between females and males at ages 0-10, 10-20, 20-30 and >30 years. Second, we aimed to estimate the subject-specific LDL-C burden at age 19 and 30 years, and the proportion of female and male patients that reach suggested LDL-C thresholds indicating high risk of ASCVD. Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from medical records of 438 subjects (207 girls and 231 boys) with FH, referred to the Lipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital below the age of 19 years. The LDL-C burden was estimated based on repeated LDL-C measurements over time. Results: Subjects were followed over a period of mean 12.0 (SD 7.0) years, with median 10 years (7-17; 25-75 percentiles, minimum 2), with median 6 (4-9; 25-75 percentiles, minimum 2) available LDL-C measurements, starting at mean age 11 (SD 3.9) years. There was a difference in both LDL-C and LDL-C burden between sexes at different ages. On average, males had lower LDL-C over time, although this difference was less pronounced with age and males also had lower estimated LDL-C burden over time, and this difference was further exacerbated with age. Conclusion: Our study shows that young women with FH have a higher LDL-C burden than their male counterparts, potentially explaining the increased excess CVD risk seen among these. It underscores the importance of careful-follow up and early treatment initiation both prior to and after pregnancies in order to limit statin-free periods.

Long term follow-up of children with familial hypercholesterolemia and relatively normal LDL-cholesterol at diagnosis.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder with high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and high risk of cardiovascular disease. The long-term importance of carrying an FH mutation despite having relatively normal LDL-C levels in childhood is not known. We investigated the development of LDL-C levels and need of statin therapy in children with an FH mutation, with pretreatment LDL-C ≤ 4.1 mmol/L (~160 mg/dL), followed-up at lipid clinics in Oslo, Norway and Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Of 742 FH children, 109 (15%) had pretreatment LDL-C ≤ 4.1 mmol/L (~160 mg/dL) [mean (SD) 3.5 (0.5) mmol/L; (~130 (19) mg/dL)] measured at 11.8 (3.9) years of age [mean age (SD)]. After 8.2 (5.2) years [mean (SD)] of follow-up, 71.6% had started statin treatment. Therefore, all children carrying an FH mutation, independent of cholesterol levels, should receive follow-up at specialized lipid clinics for optimal and individualized treatment.

Thirty percent of children and young adults with familial hypercholesterolemia treated with statins have adherence issues.

OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence to lipid lowering therapy (LLT), reasons for poor adherence, and achievement of LDL-C treatment goals in children and young adults with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). METHODS: Retrospective review of the medical records of 438 children that started follow-up at the Lipid Clinic, Oslo University hospital, between 1990 and 2010, and followed-up to the end of July 2019. Based on information on adherence to the LLT at the latest visit, patients were assigned to "good adherence" or "poor adherence" groups. Reasons for poor adherence were categorized as: "lack of motivation", "ran out of drugs", or "side effects". RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-one patients were included. Mean (SD) age and follow-up time at the latest visit was 24.0 (7.1) and 12.9 (6.7) years; 260 patients (70%, 95% CI: 65-74%) had "good adherence" and 111 (30%, 95% CI: 25-35%) had "poor adherence". "Lack of motivation" was the most common reason for poor adherence (n = 85, 23%). In patients with good adherence, compared to patients with poor adherence, age at latest visit (24.6 versus 22.0 years; p = 0.001), years of follow-up (13.5 versus 11.4 years; p = 0.003), and number of visits (8.1 versus 6.5 visits; p<0.001) were significantly higher, whereas LDL-C at the latest visit was lower, (3.1 (0.8) versus 5.3 (1.6) mmol/L; p<0.001) and percentage of patients reaching LDL-C treatment goal was higher, (34.5% versus 2.7%; p<0.001). Gender, BMI, age at first visit and premature cardiovascular disease in first degree relatives were not significantly associated with adherence. CONCLUSION: Thirty percent of young patients with FH had poor adherence to LLT, with lack of motivation as the main reason. Higher age, more visits and more years of follow-up were associated with good adherence.