Occurrence of Second Oral Potentially Malignant Disorder following Excision of Primary Lesion: A Prospective Study of Cases from a Tertiary Care Centre.

Background: Early diagnosis and timely management of potentially malignant oral disorders may prevent malignant transformation and prompt diagnosis of frank malignancies favours better prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of surgical management of oral potentially malignant disorders of the oral cavity and observe the prevalence of recurrence at the primary site and occurrence of another potentially malignant lesion in these patients. Methods: The study participants included patients who had undergone clinical oral examination, surgical excision of biopsy-proven cases of dysplastic oral potentially malignant disorders (leukoplakia, erythroplakia, non-healing ulcerative and erosive areas, etc.) who were on routine follow-up as per the standard guidelines. These patients were followed up closely during each monthly follow-up visit for the first year. The patients were then prospectively analysed for any recurrence of lesion. On follow-up visits, detailed clinical oral examination was done to note the prevalence of a new lesion in any oral cavity sub site other than the previous site. If a new lesion was detected, then biopsy followed by surgical excision was followed as per standard guidelines. The follow-up period after the second surgical intervention was 12 months. Results: Fifty patients with potentially malignant oral disorders underwent surgical excision. The majority of the study subjects were males (39/50) and 41 of them were below 65 years of age. Of 50 patients, 13 (26%) had second oral potentially malignant lesion other than the primary site. The rate of recurrence of the lesions at the primary site was 4% (2/50). Of these patients with recurrence, all had malignant transformation (2/2). Also, patients who were initially diagnosed with moderate dysplasia had a higher chance of recurrence. A second lesion at a site different from the primary lesion was seen in 26% of the cases. Conclusion: Surgical management of such lesions with one-centimetre oncological margins in all dimensions contrary to the routine five millimetre surgical margins reduces the chance of recurrence.

Kratom use categories and their associations with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorder symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Kratom, a psychoactive substance, use is an evolving research area that needs more studies to augment the limited literature. Our study examines the association between kratom use categories and mental health and substance use disorders in the U.S. METHODS: We used the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data (N = 32,893), a cross-sectional survey data, on the U.S. population aged 12 years or older. We used STATA/SE version 16 to perform a multinomial logistic regression analysis to assess our study aims. RESULTS: Bisexuals, compared to heterosexuals, had higher risks of kratom use within the past 30 days (relative risk ratio [RRR]= 2.47, 95% CI= 1.07, 5.71). Major depressive episode was positively associated with kratom use more than 30 days ago (RRR= 2.04, 95% CI= 1.24, 3.34). This association was also observed for mild (RRR= 2.04, 95% CI= 1.38, 3.02), moderate (RRR= 2.25, 95% CI= 1.13, 4.51), or severe alcohol use disorder (RRR= 1.88, 95% CI= 1.05, 3.36); and mild (RRR= 1.98, 95% CI= 1.27, 3.11), moderate (RRR= 2.38, 95% CI= 1.27, 4.45), or severe marijuana use disorder (RRR= 2.13, 95% CI= 1.02, 4.47). Illicit drug other than marijuana use disorder was associated positively with kratom use more than 30 days ago (RRR= 2.81, 95% CI= 1.85, 4.26) and kratom use within the past 30 days (RRR= 5.48, 95% CI= 1.50, 20.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that identifying as bisexual, experiencing depression, alcohol use disorder, or illicit drug use disorder increased the risks of kratom use. There is a need to consider mental health and substance use disorders and sexual identity in kratom use interventions and policies geared toward reducing or preventing kratom use.

Evaluation of quality of life in patients surgically treated for potentially malignant oral lesions.

BACKGROUND: The oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) can impair the quality of life (QOL) of an individual. The evaluation of various aspects of life getting affected will help the health service providers to better comprehend the problems faced by the patients. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative QOL of surgically treated patients for OPMDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study done on 45 follow-up patients, aged 24-80 years, who were surgically treated for OPMDs. A performa with questions regarding sociodemographics, personal, and abusive habits and a questionnaire on QOL was used. Oral examination was done to analyze the oral mucosa for recurrence. Data were analyzed using frequency analysis and unpaired student's t-test to compare the mean scores. RESULTS: Several patients reported to have experienced a lot of pain (15, 33%), burning sensation on having spicy food (36, 80%), great difficulty in opening mouth (15, 33%), alteration in taste sensation (36, 80%), limiting of eating desired food (24, 53%), and dryness of mouth (7, 16%). Many patients felt very frustrated, depressed (9, 20%), and reported their condition to have affected their satisfaction with life (19, 42%). However, neither did social relationship with family and friends got affected by this nor did it add discomfort to them at parties, social functions, or get together. Their main concern was the likelihood of their oral condition progressing into cancer. There was a statistically significant difference in the QOL scores for habit of areca nut chewing (P = 0.05), erythroplakia lesions (P = 0.05), and recurrence of lesion (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: OPMDs affected the physical, functional, and psychological well-being of study patients, caused discomfort, and affected their daily activities. However, the social well-being of patients was unaltered and a large number of patients were reportedly satisfied with their treatments. The timely diagnosis and management can improve the quality of life and prevent its progression to malignancy.

Intra-Lesional Medicaments for the Management of Intra-Osseous Lesions of Maxilla and Mandible - Systematic Review.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review the success or remission of intralesional medicaments in the management of intraosseous lesions in the oral cavity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in two databases (PubMed and Scopus). Research articles, case reports, case series, and clinical trials were included. Review articles, lesions not involving the bone, incomplete reporting, any other treatment other than intralesional medicaments to treat intraosseous bone lesions, publications without any treatment, and letter to editor were excluded. Data on remission (complete, partial, or no remission), details and regimen of the intervention, number of participants, and follow-up in months were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 653 publications were available for title and abstract screening after the removal of duplicates. Seven articles were excluded, which were not in English. After title and abstract screening, a total of 88 publications were available for full-text screening. Fifty-five articles were included in qualitative synthesis. A total of 168 patients from 55 publications were evaluated. Minimum follow-up was 1 month and maximum was 264 months. More than two-third (n = 38) of the publications were case reports on single patient. More than two-third (n = 38) of the publications had complete remission. CONCLUSION: Intralesional medications have shown variable success rates. Extensive lesions may undergo intralesional medications followed by surgical management.

Prophylactic extraction of non-impacted third molars: is it necessary?

BACKGROUND: The decision of removing a non-impacted 3rd molar, unlike extraction of an impacted 3rd molar, is challenging for dentists as well as patients. This study investigates the pathologies affecting second molars situated adjacent to asymptomatic non-impacted 3rd molars. METHODS: This retrospective study included digital radiographs of 749 patients taken between April to October 2015. Panoramic radiographs were evaluated for the presence of erupted asymptomatic non-impacted 3rd molars and pathologies on adjacent second molars. The patients were reviewed according to age and gender. RESULTS: A total of 2342 asymptomatic 3rd molars were assessed in the study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 2112 of them were found to be non-impacted. The second molars adjacent to non-impacted 3rd molars were shown to be significantly associated with distal caries (25.2%), mesial bone loss (10.5%) and total bone loss (37.2%), i.e., mesial as well as distal bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologies of the 3rd molars and teeth adjacent to 3rd molars can occur as a result of multiple factors. Caries and periodontal disease may also occur due to the inaccessibility to maintain oral hygiene. With a regular follow-up schedule, reinforced by the dentist and good oral hygiene, several pathologies that are significantly associated with non-impacted 3rd molars can be prevented and may not require prophylactic extraction.