Multimodal management of surgery- and radiation-refractory meningiomas: an analysis of the French national tumor board meeting on meningiomas cohort.

PURPOSE: Meningiomas represent the most frequent tumor of the central nervous system in adults. While most meningiomas are efficiently treated by surgery and radiotherapy/radiosurgery, there is a small portion of radiation- and surgery-refractory tumors for which there is no clear recommendation for optimal management. The French National Tumor Board Meeting on Meningiomas (NTBM) offers a glimpse on the current management of such patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients presented to the multidisciplinary Meeting between 2016 and 2019. We selected patients with a progressive disease after at least two treatments, including surgery and radiotherapy. RESULTS: In this multicentric cohort of 86 cases, patients harbored 17 (19.8%) WHO Grade I, 48 (55.8%) WHO Grade II and 21 (24.4%) WHO Grade III tumors. The median number of treatments received before inclusion was 3 (range: 2 - 11). Following the Board Meeting, 32 patients (37.2%) received chemotherapy, 11 (12.8%) surgery, 17 (19.8%) radiotherapy, 14 (16.3%) watchful observation and 12 (13.9%) palliative care. After a mean follow-up of 13 months post-inclusion, 32 patients (37.2%) had died from their disease. The mean progression free survival was 27 months after radiotherapy, 10 months after surgery, 8.5 months after chemotherapy (Bevacizumab: 9 months - Octreotide/Everolimus: 8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery- and radiation-refractory meningiomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors with a majority of WHO Grade II cases. If re-irradiation and redo-surgery are not possible, bevacizumab and octreotide-everolimus appear as a valuable option in heavily pre-treated patients considering the current EANO guidelines.

BRAF and MEK inhibitor targeted therapy in papillary craniopharyngiomas: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Targeted therapy (TT) with BRAF/MEK inhibitors has emerged as a potential treatment in papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCPs). However, standardized data on large cohorts are lacking. Our study aimed to assess real-life efficacy and safety of BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with PCPs. DESIGN: Retrospective French multicenter study involving BRAF V600E-mutated PCP patients, treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination dabrafenib and trametinib, from April 2019 to July 2023. METHODS: Objective response and clinical and safety outcomes were assessed after 3 months and at the last available follow-up during TT. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (8 females, mean age 50.5 ± 15.75 years), receiving either neoadjuvant therapy (NEO) for non-resectable tumors (n = 6), post-surgical adjuvant therapy (ADJ; n = 8), or palliative therapy (PAL) following failure of multimodal treatment (n = 2), were included.At the last follow-up (mean 7.6 ± 5.3 months), 12 patients showed subtotal response, 3 exhibited partial response, and 1 maintained stable disease. Mean volume reduction was 88.9 ± 4.4%, 73.3 ± 23.4%, and 91.8 ± 4.3% in the NEO, ADJ, and PAL groups, respectively.Targeted therapy resolved headaches in 5/5 patients and visual impairment in 6/9; 2/3 patients had improved neurological symptoms, 1/4 presented weight loss, and 2/14 recovered endocrine function.Targeted therapy was well-tolerated in 62.5% of cases; adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 5 patients and definitive discontinuation in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 94% of patients showed partial response or better to TT. Adverse events were acceptable. Further research is needed to establish standardized protocols; however, these results advocate for a NEO approach in invasive PCPs.

Metronomic Cyclophosphamide With Cisplatin and Bevacizumab for Refractory Anaplastic Ependymoma: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Anaplastic ependymoma is a rare cancer of the central nervous system. The treatment includes optimal resection with focal radiotherapy. Some case reports or retrospective studies have suggested efficacy of regimens containing platinum or bevacizumab. We describe the feasibility and clinical benefit of the cisplatin-bevacizumab-cyclophosphamide treatment of anaplastic ependymoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were identified through the Adolescent and Young Adults (AYAS) brain tumor national Web conference. We estimated the median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: There were eight patients with anaplastic ependymoma, with a median age of 36 years. The median OS was 19.9 months and median PFS was 12.3 months. Three patients obtained partial response, four stable disease, and one patient had disease progression during induction. Six patients received maintenance with a median duration of 224 days. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the tolerance of bevacizumab-cyclophosphamide-cisplatin treatment of anaplastic ependymoma. The clinical benefit seems even superior to that described in the literature.

Real-life efficacy and predictors of response to immunotherapy in pituitary tumors: a cohort study.

Objective: After temozolomide failure, no evidence-based treatment is available for pituitary carcinomas (PCs) and aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs). To date, only 12 cases treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been published, showing encouraging efficacy. Predictive factors of response are lacking. Here, we aimed to assess the real-life efficacy and predictors of response to ICIs in PCs and APTs. Design and methods: This study is a multicentric, retrospective, observational cohort study, including all PCs and APTs treated with ICIs in France up to March 2022. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and CD8+ T cell infiltration were evaluated centrally. Results: Six PCs (four corticotroph and two lactotroph) and nine APTs (five corticotroph and four lactotroph) were included. The real-life efficacy of ICIs was lower than previously published data. Three corticotroph tumors (33.3%) showed partial response, one (11.1%) stable disease, while five (55.6%) progressed. One lactotroph tumor (16.7%) showed partial response, one (16.7%) stable disease, while four (66.7%) progressed. PCs responded far better than APTs, with 4/6 PCs showing partial response compared to 0/9 APTs. Corticotroph tumors responded slightly better than lactotroph tumors. In the four responsive corticotroph tumors, PD-L1 staining was negative and CD8+ T cell infiltration attained a maximum of 1% in the tumor center. Conclusions: Confirmation of the presence or absence of metastases is necessary before starting ICIs. After temozolomide failure, ICIs appear as a good therapeutic option for PCs, especially for corticotroph carcinomas. Negative PD-L1 staining and very low CD8+ T cell infiltration in the tumor center should not preclude ICI administration in corticotroph carcinomas. Significance statement: This is the first study to assess the real-life efficacy of ICIs in pituitary carcinomas (PCs) and aggressive pituitary tumors. We also assessed potential predictors of response and are the first to assess the predictive value of CD8+ cell infiltration. We identified the tumor type as a major predictor, ICIs proving far more effective in treating PCs. Our study provides evidence that ICIs are a good option after temozolomide failure for PCs (four of six responded), especially for corticotroph carcinomas (three of four responded). We also provide evidence that negative PD-L1 staining and very low CD8+ cell infiltration in the tumor center should not preclude ICI administration in corticotroph carcinomas. Moreover, our findings point toward the need to systematically perform extension workup before starting ICIs.