RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although several studies report that the robotic approach is more costly than laparoscopy, the cost-effectiveness of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is still an issue. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the RDP and LDP approaches across several Spanish centres. METHODS: This study is an observational, multicenter, national prospective study (ROBOCOSTES). For one year from 2022, all consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy were included, and clinical, QALY, and cost data were prospectively collected. The primary aim was to analyze the cost-effectiveness between RDP and LDP. RESULTS: During the study period, 80 procedures from 14 Spanish centres were analyzed. LDP had a shorter operative time than the RDP approach (192.2 min vs 241.3 min, p = 0.004). RDP showed a lower conversion rate (19.5% vs 2.5%, p = 0.006) and a lower splenectomy rate (60% vs 26.5%, p = 0.004). A statistically significant difference was reported for the Comprehensive Complication Index between the two study groups, favouring the robotic approach (12.7 vs 6.1, p = 0.022). RDP was associated with increased operative costs of 1600 euros (p < 0.031), while overall cost expenses resulted in being 1070.92 Euros higher than the LDP but without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.064). The mean QALYs at 90 days after surgery for RDP (0.9534) were higher than those of LDP (0.8882) (p = 0.030). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20,000 and 30,000 euros, there was a 62.64% and 71.30% probability that RDP was more cost-effective than LDP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The RDP procedure in the Spanish healthcare system appears more cost-effective than the LDP.
RESUMO
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma contributes significantly to global cancer-related deaths, featuring only a 10% survival rate over five years. The quest for novel tumor markers is critical to facilitate early diagnosis and tailor treatment strategies for this disease, which is key to improving patient outcomes. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, these markers have been demonstrated to play a crucial role in early identification, continuous monitoring, and prediction of its prognosis and have led to better patient outcomes. Nowadays, biopsy specimens serve to ascertain diagnosis and determine tumor type. However, liquid biopsies present distinct advantages over conventional biopsy techniques. They offer a noninvasive, easily administered procedure, delivering insights into the tumor's status and facilitating real-time monitoring. Liquid biopsies encompass a variety of elements, such as circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, extracellular vesicles, microRNAs, circulating RNA, tumor platelets, and tumor endothelial cells. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical applications of liquid biopsy as a technique in the management of pancreatic cancer.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Células Endoteliais/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Biópsia Líquida/métodos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , DNA de Neoplasias/genética , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genéticaRESUMO
Background: Equatorial Guinea (EG) is located on the African west coast, with only 0.4 trained physicians per 1,000 resident population. The country has one medical school and there is no specialist training program. From 2000 to 2022, 524 doctors have received their medical degree. However, the number of national surgical specialists in the entire country is currently 42. Objective: Formación Especializada Sanitaria en Guinea Ecuatorial (FES Guinea) is a program specifically aimed at designing and implementing a long-term national surgical specialist training program. Methods: Más Que Salud (+QS), which means "More than Health" in Spanish, is a nonprofit organization leading the FES Guinea program. We used the theory of change (ToC) framework to evaluate the work accomplished and implement subsequent phases. The initial phase (A) included a needs assessment and mapping of available resources. An intermediate phase (B) started with a memorandum of understanding to implement a Train the Trainer program. The consolidation phase (C) consists of educational interventions and future advanced training projects. Findings: The ToC model allowed us an analyses of initial and intermediate phases. The needs assessments and resources mapping were executed while several scientific meetings and workshops were given. Scholarships to support specialist training abroad benefited six physicians in a diverse set of surgical disciplines. A regulatory commission to implement the FES Guinea program and the National Medical Council of EG were created. Working directly with the EG Ministry of Health, +QS codesigned a National Health Development Plan that began implementation in 2021 to continue until 2025. Conclusions: The ToC model allowed us to predict the current and future potential effects of FES Guinea on surgical workforce development in EG. This is a unique surgical training program, which combined effective initiatives spearheaded initially by an NGO that successfully incorporated both local health and academic authorities, ensuring sustainability.
Assuntos
Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Guiné Equatorial , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Avaliação das NecessidadesRESUMO
Purpose: The simultaneous repair of incisional hernias (IH) and the reconstruction of the intestinal transit may pose a challenge for many surgeons. Collaboration between units specialized in abdominal wall and colorectal surgery can favor simultaneous treatment. Methods: Descriptive study of patients undergoing simultaneous surgery of complex IH repair and intestinal transit reconstruction from the start of treatment in a joint team. All interventions were performed electively and with the collaboration of surgeons experts in abdominal wall and colorectal surgery. Results: 23 patients are included. 11 end colostomies, 1 loop colostomy, 6 end ileostomies and 5 loop ileostomies. Seven (30%) patients presented with a medial laparotomy incisional hernia, 3 (13%) with a parastomal incisional hernia, and 13 (56%) with a medial and parastomal incisional hernia. Closure of the hernial defect was achieved in 100% of cases, and reconstruction of the intestinal tract was achieved in 22 (95%). Component separation was required in 17 patients (74%), which were 11 (48%) posterior and 6 (26%) anterior. In-hospital morbidity was 9%, and only two patients presented Clavien-Dindo morbidity > III when requiring reoperation, one due to hemorrhage of the surgical bed and another due to dehiscence of the coloproctostomy. The mean follow-up was 11 months, with 20 (87%) patients having no complications. Mesh had to be removed in one patient with anastomotic dehiscence, no mesh had to be removed due to surgical site infection.