Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Dermatol Online J ; 28(5)2022 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36809139

RESUMO

A 4-year-old boy presented with blistering on his face and distal upper and lower extremities. Subepidermal blisters containing neutrophils and eosinophils visualized on histology supported the diagnosis of linear IgA bullous dermatosis of childhood (LABDC). The dermatosis presents with vesicles and tense blisters in an annular distribution, erythematous papules, and/or excoriated plaques. Histopathology shows subepidermal blisters with a neutrophilic infiltrate in the dermis, mainly concentrated at the tips of dermal papillae in the early stage of the disease, which can be mistaken for the pattern of neutrophilic infiltration as seen in dermatitis herpetiformis. Dapsone is the treatment of choice, which is started at a dosage of 0.5mg/kg/day. Linear IgA bullous dermatosis of childhood is a rare autoimmune disease that can be mistaken for other conditions with similar presentations but should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of children with blistering.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , Dermatose Linear Bolhosa por IgA , Masculino , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Dermatose Linear Bolhosa por IgA/patologia , Vesícula/patologia , Doenças Autoimunes/patologia , Dapsona , Neutrófilos/patologia , Imunoglobulina A
2.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(4): e15599, 2020 04 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32329744

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In recent years, YouTube has become a recognized source of medical information for health care consumers. Although YouTube has advantages in this context, there are potential dangers as videos may contain nonscientific, misleading, or even harmful information. OBJECTIVE: As little is known about YouTube as a source of information on atopic dermatitis (AD), we investigated the content-related quality of AD videos and their perception among YouTube users. METHODS: The quality of the 100 most viewed AD videos was assessed by using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the DISCERN instrument. Videos were classified as "useful," "misleading," and "potentially harmful," and the correlations of viewers' ratings (likes) with the GQS and DISCERN scores were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 100 videos, 68.0% (68/100) and 62.0% (62/100) were of poor and very poor scientific quality, respectively. Additionally, 32.0% (32/100) of the videos were classified as useful, 48.0% (48/100) were classified as misleading, and 34.0% (34/100) were classified as potentially harmful. Viewers' ratings did not correlate with the GQS and DISCERN scores. Overall, 50.0% (50/100) of the videos were posted by private individuals and promoters of complementary/alternative treatments, 42.0% (42/100) by therapeutical advertisers, and only 8.0% (8/100) by nonprofit organizations/universities. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that two-thirds of the videos analyzed were below acceptable medical quality standards and that many videos were disseminating misleading or even dangerous content. Subjective and anecdotal content was overrepresented, and viewers did not appear to be able to distinguish between high- and low-quality videos. Health promotion strategies by professional medical organizations are needed to improve their presence and visibility on YouTube.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Mídias Sociais/normas , Gravação em Vídeo/métodos , Gravação de Videoteipe/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Dermatite Atópica/patologia , Humanos
3.
J Med Internet Res ; 21(1): e11935, 2019 01 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30664460

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Approximately 80% of internet users access health information online and patients with chronic illnesses especially rely on internet-based resources. YouTube ranks second among the most accessed websites worldwide and hosts an increasing number of videos with medical information. However, their quality is sometimes unscientific, misleading, or even harmful. OBJECTIVE: As little is known about YouTube as a source of information on psoriasis, we aimed to investigate the quality of psoriasis-related videos and, if necessary, point out strategies for their improvement. METHODS: The quality of the 100 most viewed psoriasis-related videos was assessed using the DISCERN instrument and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) by categorizing the videos into useful, misleading, and dangerous and by evaluating the reception of the videos by users. RESULTS: Evaluation of the videos exhibited a total of 117,221,391 views and a total duration of 10:28 hour. The majority of clips contained anecdotal personal experiences with complementary and alternative psoriasis treatments, topical treatments, and nutrition and diets being the most frequently addressed topics. While advertisements accounted for 26.0% (26/100) of the videos, evidence-based health information amounted to only 20.0% (20/100); 32.0% (32/100) of the videos were classified as useful, 52.0% (52/100) as misleading, and 11.0% (11/100) as even dangerous. The quality of the videos evaluated by DISCERN and GQS was generally low (1.87 and 1.95, respectively, on a 1 to 5 scale with 5 being the maximum). Moreover, we found that viewers rated poor-quality videos better than higher quality videos. CONCLUSIONS: Our in-depth study demonstrates that nearly two-thirds of the psoriasis-related videos we analyzed disseminate misleading or even dangerous content. Subjective anecdotal and unscientific content is disproportionately overrepresented and poor-quality videos are predominantly rated positively by users, while higher quality video clips receive less positive ratings. Strategies by professional dermatological organizations are urgently needed to improve the quality of information on psoriasis on YouTube and other social media.


Assuntos
Coleta de Dados/métodos , Estilo de Vida Saudável/fisiologia , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Mídias Sociais/normas , Gravação em Vídeo/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Internet
5.
Dermatology ; 232(6): 655-663, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28103601

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials have shown the efficacy of systemic treatments in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Clinical outcomes in psoriasis patients under real-world conditions are less well understood. OBJECTIVE: This study compared Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) improvement in all psoriasis patients registered in the Swiss Dermatology Network for Targeted Therapies. We asked whether outcomes differed between 4 treatment strategies, namely biologic monotherapy versus conventional systemic monotherapy, versus combined biologic and conventional systemic drugs, and versus therapy adaptation (switching from one type to another). METHODS: PASI and DLQI within 1 year after onset of systemic treatment, measured at 3, 6, and 12 months, were compared among the 4 groups using generalized linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Between March 2011 and December 2014, 334 patients were included; 151 received conventional systemic therapeutics, 145 biologics, 13 combined treatment, and 25 had a therapy adaptation. With regard to the absolute PASI, neither the biologic cohort nor the combined treatment cohort significantly differed from the conventional systemic therapeutics cohort. The odds of reaching PASI90 was significantly increased with combined therapy compared to conventional systemic therapeutics (p = 0.043) and decreased with a higher body mass index (p = 0.041). At visits 3 and 4, the PASI was generally lower than at visit 2 (visit 3 vs. visit 2, p = 0.0019; visit 4 vs. visit 2, p < 0.001). After 12 months, patients with biologic treatment had a significantly lower DLQI than those with conventional systemic therapeutics (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that after 1 year of treatment, biologics are superior in improving the subjective disease burden compared to conventional systemic drugs.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Humanos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Suíça
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA