Does the index in Morse taper connection affect the abutment stability? An in vitro experimental study.

The present study compared three different implant and abutment sets of type Morse taper (MT) connection, with- and without-index, were analyzed regarding their mechanical behavior without and with cyclic load application simulating the masticatory function. Ninety implant and abutment (IA) sets were used in the present study, divided into three groups (n = 30 samples per group): Group A, Ideale solid straight abutment (one piece) without index; Group B, Ideale abutment with an angle of 30-degree (two pieces) without index; Group C, Ideale abutment with an angle of 30-degree (two pieces) with index. The abutment stability quotient (ASQ) values, detorque value and rotation angle were measured before and after the cycling load. Twenty IA sets of each group were submitted to mechanical load at 360,000 cycles. The ASQ without load were 64.7 ± 2.49 for the group A, 60.2 ± 2.64 for the group B, 54.4 ± 3.27 for the group C; With load were 66.1 ± 5.20 for the group A, 58.5 ± 6.14 for the group B, 58.9 ± 2.99 for the group C. Detorque values were lower in groups B and C compared to group A (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the presence of the index did not influence the stability values. However, solid straight abutments (group A) showed higher values of stability compared to groups of angled abutments (groups B and C).

Implant Stability and Histomorphometric Analysis Comparing Two Different Implant Macrogeometries Placed in Fresh Sockets: An Experimental Study in Sheep.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present animal study was to examine the impact of two implant designs that promote different insertion torque values on implant stability and evaluate, histomorphometrically, the bone healing for immediate implant placement in fresh sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve female sheep (35.0±5.0kg) and 48 conical Morse-taper dental implants divided into two groups (n = 24 per group): G1 group, where the implants present a design that can provide high insertion torque values; and G2 group, where the implants present a design that can provide low insertion torque values. Both had the same surface treatment, and dimensions (4.0 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length). The first two posterior teeth (both sides) were extracted carefully. Sequentially, there were osteotomies in the mesial socket of each molar tooth. The final implant position was 2 mm below the buccal bone crest level. On the right side, implants of the G1 were placed anteriorly, followed by implants of the G2; and, on the left side, it was the reverse. A digital torquemeter was used to measure the maximum final insertion torque value (f-IT). The initial implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured immediately after the implant insertion (T0) and immediately after the euthanasia and removing the mandibles with the implants. The animals were euthanized (n=6 animals/ time) at 21 days (T1) and 35 days (T2). The t-test was used to compare statistical differences for each intragroup parameter analyzed. Pearson's correlation was used to analyze possible correlations: f-IT and BIC%, f-IT and ISQ, and ISQ and %BIC. RESULTS: Regarding the insertion torque, the G1 presented higher values than the G2, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.0001). The ISQ mean values were higher in the B-L direction than those obtained for M-D for both groups. %BIC measurements showed higher values in samples from G2 than G1 at both times and in both directions. New bone, medullary spaces, and collagen matrix had statistical differences between the groups at each evaluation time. CONCLUSION: Using implants with a modified macrogeometry plays a significant role in implant stability and the healing process of bone tissue around the implant. It is important for clinicians to carefully consider implant macrogeometry when planning dental implant surgery to achieve optimal implant stability and successful osseointegration, mainly in cases of immediate implant placement.

Comparative analysis of the mechanical limits of resistance in implant/abutment set of a new implant design: An in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the resistance on quasi-static forces and in the fatigue mechanical cycling of a new implant design compared to two other conventional implant designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight implants with their respective abutments were tested and distributed into four groups (n = 22 per group): Morse taper connection implant (MT group), conventional external hexagon implant (EH con group), new Collo implant of external hexagon with the smooth portion out of the bone insertion (EH out group), and new Collo implant of external hexagon with the implant platform inserted to the bone level (EH bl group). All the sets were subjected to quasi-static loading in a universal testing machine, and we measured the maximum resistance force supported by each sample. Another 12 samples from each group were submitted to the cyclic fatigue test at 4 intensities of forces (n = 3 per force): 80%, 60%, 40%, and 20%. The number of cycles supported by each sample at each force intensity was evaluated. RESULTS: The three groups of implants with external hexagon connection had similar maximum strength values of the sets (p > 0.05). Meanwhile, samples from the MT group showed the highest resistance values in comparison to the other three groups (p < 0.05). In the fatigue test, the Collo out group supported a smaller number of cycles that led to the fracture than the other 3 groups proposed at loads of 80%, 60%, and 40%, and only at the load value of 20% all groups had the same performance. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present in vitro study, the results showed that the new Collo implant performs better when installed at bone level.

Effects of insertion torque on the structure of dental implants with different connections: Experimental pilot study in vitro.

OBJECTIVE: During the insertion of dental implants in the bone tissue, different torque values can be applied. However, the high applied torque can cause damage to the implant connection. Our study sought to evaluate, by measuring the angle of rotation of the insertion drive and, later microscopic observation, possible changes in the structure of implants of different diameters with 3 different types of connections after the application of 4 different torque intensities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred tapered dental implants and three hundred insertion drivers were used in the present study. Implants of 3.5 and 4 mm in diameter with 3 connection models were tested: external hexagon (EH), internal hexagon (IH) and Morse taper (MT). Then, sis groups were performed: EH3 group, EH4 group, IH3 group, IH4 group, MT3 group and MT4 group. The samples were submitted to the torque/torsion force at 4 intensities (n = 10 samples per group and intensity): 60, 80, 100 and 120 Ncm. The turning angle of the insertion driver was measured in each test. In addition, in 10 samples from each group, the maximum torque value supported by each implant model was measured. After the tests, all samples were inspected microscopically to describe the observed changes. RESULTS: The maximum torque supported by the different implant models showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). The values of the measured angles showed statistically significant differences between the torque values applied within each group (p < 0.001) and between groups with the same torque value (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study in vitro, the results showed that high torque values cause mechanical damage to the implants.