Can invasive diagnostic methods be reduced by magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of diaphragmatic injuries in left thoracoabdominal penetrating injuries?

Aim: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting diaphragmatic injury by comparing preoperative computed tomography (CT) and MRI imaging results with diagnostic laparoscopy/thoracoscopy results in patients with left thoracoabdominal penetrating injury. We investigated whether MRI reduces the rate of unnecessary surgery by examining its sensitivity and specificity. Materials and Methods: Patients with left thoracoabdominal penetrating injuries who applied to the Emergency Surgery Unit of Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine between November 2017 and December 2020 were evaluated. Patients who underwent emergency surgery, who could not undergo MRI or CT for any reason or who could not be operated on were excluded from the study. Preoperative MRI and CT images of patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy/thoracoscopy due to left thoracoabdominal injury in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively by a radiologist who did not know the surgical results. MRI results of the cases were compared with surgical findings and CT images. Results: A total of 43 (41 males, mean age: 31, range: 15-57) patients were included in the study. The most common physical examination finding was lateral injury. The diaphragmatic injury was detected in 13 (30%) cases during surgical interventions. Laparoscopic repair was performed in 11 (84%) cases and thoracoscopic repair was performed in 2 (15%) cases with diaphragmatic injuries. MRI images of 14 (32%) cases were found to be compatible with diaphragmatic injury, in 1 of them no injury was observed during surgical intervention. According to these data, the sensitivity of MRI was calculated as 100%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value 86%, and negative predictive value 100%. The mean hospital stay was 6 days (1-30) in all cases. Conclusion: In our study, MRI was found to have high specificity and sensitivity in detecting diaphragmatic injuries. The number of negative laparoscopy/thoracoscopy can be reduced by performing surgical intervention only in cases with positive or suspected diaphragmatic injury on MRI. Results should be supported by conducting new studies with larger case series with normal MRI findings and long follow-ups.

Can Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Change the Immunologic Risk Profile in Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus Who Are on the Cadaveric Waiting List?

BACKGROUND: In patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, the activation of the immune system by the virus or viral proteins leads to the production of numerous autoantibodies and clinical manifestations. The objectives of this study were to investigate the relationship between HCV and anti-HLA antibodies, as well as the effect of viremia on the antibody response and of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on anti-HLA antibody persistence in patients on the waiting list for a cadaveric kidney transplant. METHODS: A total of 395 patients from the cadaveric renal transplant waiting list were included in the study. The patients were grouped according to the presence of HCV infection, and patients with HCV positivity were further divided into a spontaneous clearance group and a persistent group. Anti-HLA antibodies were examined before and after treatment of the patients in the persistent group. The One Lambda Luminex method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) was used to assess both HLA class I and II alleles and the anti-HLA antibody profile. RESULTS: Anti-HLA class I and II antibodies were detected in 48.2% and 55.1%, respectively, of the patients infected with HCV and in 21.8% and 20.4%, respectively, of the patients who were not infected. The level of anti-HLA A3, A11, B72, B52, Cw6, Cw16, DR3, and DQ4 antibodies was significantly higher in the patients infected with HCV. There was no statistically significant difference in class I and II antibody titration between the HCV-infected spontaneous clearance group and the persistent group (class I mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] ± SD: 13,583 ± 6224, 13,450 ± 9540, P = .808; Class II MFI ± SD: 13,000 ± 8673, 8440 ± 8302, P = .317, respectively). There was no significant difference in the class I and class II anti-HLA antibody profile and titration in the persistent group after treatment with DAAs (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that hepatitis C DAA treatment did not change the anti-HLA antibody profile and titration.

What is the clinical yield of capsule endoscopy in the management of obscure bleeding in emergency service?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of capsule endoscopy (CE) performed on patients who presented to emergency room with clinically evident gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding from unknown source and were hospitalized for follow-up. METHODS: Total of 38 patients who underwent CE and were followed-up for evaluation of clinically perceptible GI bleeding with no obvious etiology in Istanbul Medical Faculty emergency surgery department were included in the study. Patient data, which were collected between January 1, 2007 and June 1, 2015, were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients included in this study, 12 (32%) patients were women and 26 (68%) were men. Average age was 55.57 years (range: 20-88 years). Nine patients were using anticoagulants. Ten patients were followed-up in intensive care, and 7 patients underwent angiography. Angioembolization was performed for 1 patient who was diagnosed as having active bleed with CE. Average erythrocyte suspension replacement was 20.7 units. Total of 13 patients underwent surgery for bleeding found with CE. Eleven (34%) patients underwent double-balloon endoscopy, during which 5 patients were treated with cauterization and sclerotherapy was performed on 2. Four (18%) patients died during the study period: 2 died as result of bleeding from unknown source, 1 died of cholangiocarcinoma recurrence, and 1 died of anastomotic leakage. One patient was readmitted to hospital due to recurrence of bleeding. Nineteen (50%) patients were treated successfully based on CE findings. Diagnostic yield of CE was determined to be 78.9%. Average length of hospital stay was 32.68 days (range: 3-153 days). CONCLUSION: CE is an effective tool to detect source of GI bleeding. CE should be first choice of evaluation method for patients admitted to emergency room with obscure overt GI bleeding once radiological imaging determines absence of obstruction.