Trimodal prehabilitation in oncogynaecology.

Prehabilitation is a set of interventions aimed at increasing the patient's endurance and functional capacity before a planned stressful event (oncogynaecological surgery). Currently, prehabilitation is based on three main modalities which are: physiotherapy, nutritional support and psychological support, with others gradually being added. In studies published to date, a positive effect of combined preoperative intervention on the patient's postoperative recovery reduces the risk of perioperative and postoperative complications, shortening the hospital stay. This directly reduces the costs associated with cancer treatment.

Hand-foot-mouth disease in puerperium.

Our case report describes a case of an otherwise predominantly childhood disease in a young adult woman with a good socioeconomic background who developed pruritic exanthema on the 2nd day after spontaneous delivery. The aim of the paper is to characterize the disease and to describe the possible risks for mother and child according to the available literature, as well as complications not only in puerperium but also during pregnancy.

How can we reduce healthcare costs by using Enhanced Recovery After Surgery more effectively in different groups of gynaecological patients? A single-centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme implementation on treatment costs at a university-type centre, using the DRG scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' data in a group of 604 individuals enroled in the study. We evaluated three groups of patients according to the ERAS clinical protocol (CP): (1) CP oncogynaecology, (2) CP simple hysterectomy, (3) CP laparoscopy. The study aimed to evaluate the impact on the length of stay (LOS), savings in bed-days, and the reduction in direct treatment costs. Three parameters-antibiotic consumption, blood derivative consumption and laboratory test costs-were chosen to compare direct treatment costs. The statistical significance of the difference in the observed parameters was tested by a two-sample unpaired t test with unequal variances at the 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: We analysed data from 604 patients. In all three groups, the length of stay (LOS) was significantly reduced. The most significant reduction was observed in the CP oncogynaecology group, where the LOS was reduced from 11.1 days to 6.8 days (2022) and 7.6 days (2023) compared to 2019 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a notable reduction in inpatient bed-days, which resulted in the capacity being made available to admit additional patients. A statistically significant reduction in direct costs was observed in the group of CP hysterectomy (antibiotic use) and in the CP laparoscopy (laboratory test costs). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the ERAS principles resulted in a number of significant positive economic impacts-reduction in the LOS and a corresponding increase in bed capacity for new patients. Additionally, direct treatment costs, including those related to antibiotic use or laboratory testing were reduced. The Czech Republic's acute healthcare system, like the majority of European healthcare systems, is financed by the DRG system. This flat-rate payment per patient encourages hospital management to seek cost-reduction strategies. The results of our study indicate that fast-track protocols represent a potential viable approach to reducing the cost of treatment while simultaneously meeting the recommendations of evidence-based medicine.

Risk Factors for the Anal and Oral Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infections among Women with Severe Cervical Lesions: A Prospective Case-Control Study.

The carcinogenicity of HPV infection in the anogenital and oropharyngeal regions is broadly accepted. The aim of the study was to define risk factors for anal and oral HPV infections in high-risk patients with biopsy-proven severe cervical lesions (CIN2+). Altogether immunocompetent 473 females with CIN2+ were categorized into the study group and another 245 women into the control group. The strongest risk factor for anal HPV infection was the presence of cervical HPV infection (p < 0.001). Furthermore, ten or more lifetime sexual partners (p = 0.013), a sexual non-coital contact with the anal area (p < 0.001), and actively practicing anal-penetrative intercourse (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with anal HPV. A history of genital warts in the woman (p = 0.010) and the presence of genital warts in the male partner (p = 0.029) were found statistically significant for the risk of oral HPV infection. Our data suggest that the presence of HPV infection, especially high-risk genotypes, in one anatomical site poses the greatest risk for HPV infection in another anatomical site. The cervix is the main reservoir of infection, but the risk factors for anal and oral HPV infections are dissimilar according to different anatomical distances and more complex routes of transmission.