Safety, Tolerability, and Effects of a Single Subcutaneous Administration of SP16 - a SERPIN-like, Small Peptide Agonist of the Low-Density Lipoprotein-like Receptor 1- on the Acute Inflammatory Response in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Modulation of the inflammatory response is a promising therapeutic strategy in acute myocardial infarction. The novel approach is based on the anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective properties mediated by the engagement of the low-density lipoprotein‒related protein 1 (LRP1) receptor. SERPIN peptide 16 (SP16) is a synthetic, selective LRP1 agonist. We herein present the results of a study with a single subcutaneous administration of SP16 in 10 patients with STEMI, to appraise its safety and tolerability and explore the effects on the acute inflammatory response, infarct size, and cardiac function. METHODS: Ten patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were enrolled within 12 hours of symptoms onset and 6 hours of percutaneous coronary intervention in a single-center, single-arm, open-label study of a single subcutaneous administration of SP16 (0.2 mg/kg). Serial clinical biomarkers and echocardiography data were collected up to 12 months. The data are presented separately for the treatment group and compared with historical controls from a placebo-treated arm in a recently completed clinical trial (N = 28) with similar enrollment criteria. RESULTS: All ten patients with STEMI received subcutaneous administration of SP16, 381 [272-478] minutes after percutaneous coronary intervention, without any treatment-related adverse events. The area under the curve for C-reactive protein was 133 [46-528] mg·d/L in the SP16-treated group versus 286 [141-581] mg·d/L in the historical placebo-treated group ( P = 0.161). The area under the curve for creatine kinase-myocardial band was 1432 [675-3089] ng·d/mL in the SP16-treated group versus 2367 [830-4750] ng·d/mL in the historical placebo-treated patients ( P = 0.428). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 46% [39-54] at baseline and 51% [46-58] at 1 year follow-up in SP16-treated patients (interval change 5% [-0.3% to +9%] P = 0.05) and 44% [38%-56%] at baseline and 53% [43%-59%] at 1 year follow-up in historical placebo-treated patients (interval change 3% [-5% to 10%], P = 0.305). CONCLUSION: A single subcutaneous administration of SP16, a synthetic targeted LRP1 agonist, was safe and well-tolerated in patients with STEMI. A trend toward reduction in the inflammatory response and infarct size with SP16 was noted; however, the sample size for this study was not based on formal statistical criteria. More extensive studies are planned to determine the clinical efficacy of SP16 in STEMI.NCT: NCT04225533.

Effect of Canagliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin on Serum Lipids in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the CANA-HF Study.

ABSTRACT: The sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors have demonstrated favorable effects on cardiovascular and renal disease; however, they may also increase low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). There are limited data directly comparing the effects of sodium glucose co-transporter 2inhibitors on serum lipids to other antihyperglycemic therapies. In this post-hoc analysis of the CANA-HF trial, we sought to compare the effects of canagliflozin to sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The CANA-HF trial was a prospective, randomized controlled study that compared the effects of canagliflozin 100 mg daily to sitagliptin 100 mg daily on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with HFrEF and T2DM. Of the 36 patients enrolled in CANA-HF, 35 patients had both baseline and 12-weeks serum lipids obtained via venipuncture. The change in LDL-C from baseline to 12 weeks was 5 (-12.5 to 19.5) mg/dL versus -8 (-19 to -1) mg/dL (P = 0.82) and triglyceride levels was -4 (-26 to 9) mg/dL and -10.5 (-50 to 29.3) mg/dL (P = 0.52) for canagliflozin and sitagliptin, respectively. No significant differences were found between canagliflozin and sitagliptin for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or non-HDL-C (P > 0.5 for all). These data suggest that compared with sitagliptin, canagliflozin may not increase LDL-C in patients with T2DM and HFrEF.

Time of eating and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Our objective was to examine the impact of caloric intake before or after the mean time of evening meal on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and obesity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve patients with HFpEF and obesity completed a cardiorespiratory exercise test to measure CRF, defined as peak oxygen consumption (VO2). Three five-pass 24-h dietary recalls were performed for each participant and mean evening meal time was determined for each participant individually as well as the group. Participants were divided into those who ate before (Group I) and after (Group II) the mean time of evening meal, 7:25 PM. Peak VO2 and exercise time were significantly greater in Group II compared to Group I, moreover, delaying time of evening meal was associated with greater peak VO2. CONCLUSION: Caloric intake after the mean time of evening meal was associated with better CRF in patients with HFpEF and concomitant obesity. Later nutrient intake may help prevent fasting related stress associated with cardiac metabolic disturbances present in HFpEF. Based on these findings, prospective trials aimed at examining the effects of later evening meal times in patients with HFpEF and obesity are warranted.

The effects of canagliflozin compared to sitagliptin on cardiorespiratory fitness in type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The CANA-HF study.

BACKGROUND: Canagliflozin reduces hospitalizations for heart failure (HF) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Its effect on cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiac function in patients with established HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial of canagliflozin 100 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg daily for 12 weeks in 88 patients, and measured peak oxygen consumption (VO2 ) and minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2 ) slope (co-primary endpoints for repeated measure ANOVA time_x_group interaction), lean peak VO2 , ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), cardiac function and quality of life (ie, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire [MLHFQ]), at baseline and 12-week follow-up. RESULTS: The study was terminated early due to the new guidelines recommending canagliflozin over sitagliptin in HF: 17 patients were assigned to canagliflozin and 19 to sitagliptin, total of 36 patients. There were no significant changes in peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope between the two groups (P = .083 and P = .98, respectively). Canagliflozin improved lean peak VO2 (+2.4 mL kgLM-1 min-1 , P = .036), VAT (+1.5 mL kg-1 min-1 , P = .012) and VO2 matched for respiratory exchange ratio (+2.4 mL Kg-1 min-1 , P = .002) compared to sitagliptin. Canagliflozin also reduced MLHFQ score (-12.1, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: In this small and short-term study of patients with T2DM and HFrEF, interrupted early after only 36 patients, canagliflozin did not improve the primary endpoints of peak VO2 or VE/VCO2 slope compared to sitagliptin, while showing favourable trends observed on several additional surrogate endpoints such as lean peak VO2 , VAT and quality of life.

Acute Effects of Interleukin-1 Blockade Using Anakinra in Patients With Acute Pericarditis.

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist (anakinra) has been shown to be effective in steroid-dependent recurrent pericarditis resistant to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine. We sought to evaluate the acute efficacy of anakinra given early in patients with acute pericarditis. We enrolled patients within 24 hours of presentation of a first or recurrent episode of acute pericarditis who were experiencing severe pain (≥6 in 11-point Likert scale), despite treatment with at least one dose of NSAIDs and of colchicine. The primary outcome was pain relief at 24 hours. Subcutaneous anakinra 100 mg was administered in all patients, whereas NSAIDs and colchicine were suspended for 24 hours. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured at baseline and 24 hours. Data are reported as median (interquartile range). We treated 5 patients (4 male and 1 female; 38 [31-54] years old). Anakinra significantly reduced pain from 6.0 (6.0-7.5) to 4.0 (2.5-4.0) at 6 hours (P = 0.012 vs. baseline) and to 2.0 (1.5-2.5) at 24 hours (P = 0.0025 vs. baseline). No patients required rescue pain medication. IL-6 levels were also significantly reduced from 95.3 (24.2-155.1) to 23.9 (4.5-71.9) pg/mL at 24 hours (P = 0.037). The reduction in pain intensity paralleled the reduction in IL-6 serum levels (R = +0.966, P = 0.007). No adverse events related to treatment occurred. The administration of anakinra given early in acute pericarditis treatment course rapidly and significantly improved chest pain from acute pericarditis. The improvement is correlated with a reduction in IL-6 levels.

Phase 1B, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Dose Escalation, Single-Center, Repeat Dose Safety and Pharmacodynamics Study of the Oral NLRP3 Inhibitor Dapansutrile in Subjects With NYHA II-III Systolic Heart Failure.

ABSTRACT: The NLRP3 inflammasome has been implicated in the development and progression of heart failure. The aim of this study was to determine the safety of an oral inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome, dapansutrile (OLT1177), in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This was a phase 1B, randomized, double-blind, dose escalation, single-center, repeat dose safety and pharmacodynamics study of dapansutrile in stable patients with HFrEF (New York Heart Association Class II-III). Subjects were randomized to treatment with dapansutrile for up to 14 days at a ratio of 4:1 into 1 of 3 sequential ascending dose cohorts (500, 1000, or 2000 mg) each including 10 patients. Subjects underwent clinical assessment, biomarker determination, transthoracic echocardiogram, and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline, day 14, and day 28 to ascertain changes in clinical status. Placebo cases (N = 2 per cohort) were used as a decoy to reduce bias and not for statistical comparisons. Thirty participants (20 men) were treated for 13 (12-14) days. No serious adverse events during the study were recorded. All clinical or laboratory parameters at day 14 compared with baseline suggested clinical stability without significant within-group differences in the dapansutrile-pooled group or the 3 dapansutrile cohorts. Improvements in left ventricular EF [from 31.5% (27.5-39) to 36.5% (27.5-45), P = 0.039] and in exercise time [from 570 (399.5-627) to 616 (446.5-688) seconds, P = 0.039] were seen in the dapansutrile 2000 mg cohort. Treatment with dapansutrile for 14 days was safe and well tolerated in patients with stable HFrEF.

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Cocaine-Induced Changes in Cardiac Output and Systemic Vascular Resistance in Subjects With Chronic Cocaine Use Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a common problem in the United States and worldwide. The mechanisms by which cocaine induces acute cardiovascular toxicity are various. When systemically absorbed through inhaled or intravenous routes, cocaine induces an acute rise in the heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) leading to a significant increase in the cardiac output (CO) and myocardial oxygen demand. Subjects with chronic CUD represent a special population that has experienced long-term cocaine exposure, often without showing signs of cardiovascular disease. We herein present prospectively collected data on the acute hemodynamic effects of intravenous cocaine in a cohort of nontreatment-seeking individuals with CUD without cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline physiologic data were collected while participants underwent infusion of escalating doses of cocaine (10, 20, and 40 mg administered over 2 minutes) at baseline and after receiving single-blind placebo treatment. Continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring was performed throughout the infusion sessions using the ccNexfin finger cuffs (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, CA). The recorded arterial BP tracings allowed for the measurement of beat-to-beat changes in HR, BP, stroke volume, CO, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). None of the subjects experienced a treatment-related serious adverse event. Cocaine produced significant dose-dependent increases in median HR, BP, CO, and +dP/dt (a measure of cardiac contractility) and a significant dose-dependent reduction in median SVR. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous cocaine in a cohort of otherwise healthy subjects with CUD produced dose-dependent increases in CO, largely explained by an increase in HR, accompanied by a dose-dependent decrease in SVR.

Alirocumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Virginia Commonwealth University Alirocumab Response Trial (VCU-AlirocRT).

Alirocumab improves outcomes in patients with a history of recent acute coronary syndrome, but treatment acutely at the time of myocardial infarction is untested. We present the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded pilot study of alirocumab treatment at the time of non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI). Twenty patients with type 1 NSTEMI and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >70 mg/dL despite high intensity statin therapy were randomized 1:1 to one dose of alirocumab 150 mg subcutaneously or placebo within 24 hours of presentation. LDL-C and inflammatory biomarkers-including C-reactive protein-were obtained at baseline, 72 hours, and 14 days. Median (interquartile range) and number (%) were: age 59 (49, 65) years, 7 (35%) men, 16 (80%) black; baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C from baseline to 14 days by 64 mg/dL (-96, -47) compared with placebo [+1 mg/dL (-25, +16)] (primary endpoint). There were no significant between-group differences in C-reactive protein changes at any time point (all P > 0.2) or serious adverse events attributable to the study treatment. In conclusion, alirocumab administration at the time of NSTEMI significantly reduced LDL-C levels at 14 days, was safe, and had neutral effects on inflammatory biomarkers. Further studies are warranted to explore the effects on clinical outcomes.

Effects of empagliflozin on cardiorespiratory fitness and significant interaction of loop diuretics.

The effects of empagliflozin on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are unknown. In this pilot study we determined the effects of empagliflozin 10 mg/d for 4 weeks on peak oxygen consumption (VO2 ) in 15 patients with T2DM and HFrEF. As an exploratory analysis, we assessed whether there was an interaction of the effects of empagliflozin on peak VO2 of loop diuretics. Empagliflozin reduced body weight (-1.7 kg; P = .031), but did not change peak VO2 (from 14.5 mL kg-1 min-1 [12.6-17.8] to 15.8 [12.5-17.4] mL kg-1 min-1 ; P = .95). However, patients using loop diuretics (N = 9) demonstrated an improvement, whereas those without loop diuretics (N = 6) experienced a decrease in peak VO2 (+0.9 [0.1-1.4] vs -0.9 [-2.1 to -0.3] mL kg-1 min-1 ; P = .001), and peak VO2 changes correlated with the baseline daily dose of diuretics (R = +0.83; P < .001). Empagliflozin did not improve peak VO2 in patients with T2DM and HFrEF. However, as a result of exploratory analysis, patients concomitantly treated with loop diuretics experienced a significant improvement in peak VO2 .

Effect of Interleukin-1 Blockade on Left Ventricular Systolic Performance and Work: A Post Hoc Pooled Analysis of 2 Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockade seems to improve anaerobic exercise in patients with systolic heart failure through improved left ventricular (LV) systolic performance. However, it is unclear whether IL-1 blockade affects LV systolic performance. METHODS: We pooled data from 2 clinical trials of patients with systolic heart failure who were randomized to IL-1 blockade or placebo. We estimated changes in LV systolic performance (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] and end-systolic elastance [LVEes]) and pressure-volume area (PVA), a surrogate of oxygen consumption, after 14 days of treatment. RESULTS: LVEF increased from 30% (24%-38%) to 36% (29%-43%) between baseline and day 14 only in anakinra-treated patients (P = 0.03 for within-group change and P = 0.02 for between-group change compared with placebo). LVEes increased from 1.0 mm Hg/mL (0.7-1.5) to 1.3 mm Hg/mL (0.8-1.6) in anakinra-treated patients between baseline and day 14 but not in placebo-treated patients (P = 0.03 for within-group change and P = 0.08 for between-group change). A change in PVA between baseline and 14 days was not detected in either anakinra or placebo patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, LVEes and LVEF increased significantly in patients treated with an IL-1 blocker but not in placebo-treated patients. An effect of IL-1 blockade on calculated PVA was not detected.