An analysis of Medtronic MiniMed 670G insulin pump use in clinical practice and the impact on glycemic control, quality of life, and compliance.

AIMS: This study evaluated the use of the Medtronic MiniMed 670G system in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus from a large endocrinology practice and its impact on glycemic control, quality of life (QoL), compliance and safety. METHODS: 84 participants completed one site visit for data collection. Percentage of time in range (TIR: 70-180 mg/dL), hyperglycemia or time above range (TAB) (>180 mg/dL), hypoglycemia or time below range (TBR) (<70 mg/dL), HbA1c, average blood glucose (ABG), and other metrics were evaluated at the last visit using the system (LVMM) and compared between the last visit on previous insulin therapy (LVPT). RESULTS: The mean percentage of TIR at the LVMM was 74.0 ± 12.1%, with an increase of 27.1% (p < 0.001) in TIR from the LVPT. The mean percentage of TAR was 22.9 ± 11.8% and the mean percentage of TBR was 3.2 ± 5.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Medtronic MiniMed 670G system in our practice resulted in a TIR above the recommended target with a high degree of treatment satisfaction and compliance in adults with type 1 diabetes. Furthermore, the system may be a reasonable choice for patients struggling with significant amounts of hypoglycemia.

Giant myelolipomas and inadvertent bilateral adrenalectomy in classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

UNLABELLED: Myelolipomas have been reported in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). ACTH excess, as seen with non-adherence to glucocorticoid therapy, may be responsible for tumor development. We report a case of a 51-year-old man with classic salt-wasting CAH managed on prednisone 7.5 mg daily and fludrocortisone who presented with chronic back pain and was found to have giant bilateral retroperitoneal masses. On computed tomography (CT) imaging, the masses were heterogeneous, but contained predominantly low-density fat attenuation. The tumors were resected due to concern for malignancy and mass symptoms. Pathologic examination identified both retroperitoneal masses as myelolipomas. The left tumor was 34×20×13 cm and weighed 4.7 kg and the right tumor was 20 cm in the largest dimension. Adrenal tissue was present in the specimen. The patient reported long-term compliance with glucocorticoid treatment. However, no biochemical monitoring of ACTH levels had occurred. Therefore, it is unclear if ACTH excess contributed to the development of these large tumors in this patient. It was presumed that both adrenal glands were inadvertently removed during surgery and the patient was treated with physiologic replacement doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone postoperatively. In this case, the bilateral adrenalectomy was inadvertent. However, adrenalectomy can be considered as a treatment option in patients with classical CAH under certain circumstances to avoid complications of glucocorticoid excess. LEARNING POINTS: Myelolipomas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adrenal or retroperitoneal masses in patients with CAH.On CT imaging, myelolipomas are seen as heterogeneous masses with low-density mature fat interspersed with more dense myeloid tissue.Myelolipomas are usually unilateral and measure <4 cm; however, very large and bilateral tumors have been reported.Treatment of CAH typically involves using supraphysiologic doses of glucocorticoid to suppress adrenal hyperandrogenism. Bilateral adrenalectomy is an alternative treatment option in patients with CAH.There is an association between ACTH excess and increased incidence of adrenal myelolipoma but the direct causal link remains to be established.