A DNA variant within the MYO7A promoter regulates YY1 transcription factor binding and gene expression serving as a potential dominant DFNA11 auditory genetic modifier.

Mutations within MYO7A can lead to recessive and dominant forms of inherited hearing loss. We previously identified a large pedigree (referred to as the HL2 family) with hearing loss that first impacts the low and mid frequencies segregating a dominant MYO7A mutation in exon 17 at DNA residue G2164C. The MYO7A(G2164C) mutation predicts a nonconservative glycine-to-arginine (G722R) amino acid substitution at a highly conserved glycine residue. The degree of low and mid frequency hearing loss varies markedly in the family, suggesting the presence of a genetic modifier that either rescues or exacerbates the primary MYO7A(G2164C) mutation. Here we describe a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) T/C at position -4128 in the wild-type MYO7A promoter allele that sorts with the degree of hearing loss severity in the pedigree. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay analysis indicates that the SNP differentially regulates the binding of the YY1 transcription factor with the T(-4128) allele creating an YY1 binding site. Immunocytochemistry demonstrates that Yy1 is expressed in hair cell nuclei within the cochlea. Given that Myo7a is also expressed in cochlear hair cells, Yy1 shows the appropriate localization to regulate Myo7a transcription within the inner ear. YY1 appears to be acting as a transcriptional repressor as the MYO7A promoter allele containing the T(-4128) SNP drives 41 and 46% less reporter gene expression compared with the C(-4128) SNP in the ARPE-19 and HeLa cell lines, respectively. The T(-4128) SNP may be contributing to the severe hearing loss phenotype in the HL2 pedigree by reducing expression of the wild-type MYO7A allele.

A novel WFS1 mutation in a family with dominant low frequency sensorineural hearing loss with normal VEMP and EcochG findings.

BACKGROUND: Low frequency sensorineural hearing loss (LFSNHL) is an uncommon clinical finding. Mutations within three different identified genes (DIAPH1, MYO7A, and WFS1) are known to cause LFSNHL. The majority of hereditary LFSNHL is associated with heterozygous mutations in the WFS1 gene (wolframin protein). The goal of this study was to use genetic analysis to determine if a small American family's hereditary LFSNHL is linked to a mutation in the WFS1 gene and to use VEMP and EcochG testing to further characterize the family's audiovestibular phenotype. METHODS: The clinical phenotype of the American family was characterized by audiologic testing, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP), and electrocochleography (EcochG) evaluation. Genetic characterization was performed by microsatellite analysis and direct sequencing of WFS1 for mutation detection. RESULTS: Sequence analysis of the WFS1 gene revealed a novel heterozygous mutation at c.2054G>C predicting a p.R685P amino acid substitution in wolframin. The c.2054G>C mutation segregates faithfully with hearing loss in the family and is absent in 230 control chromosomes. The p.R685 residue is located within the hydrophilic C-terminus of wolframin and is conserved across species. The VEMP and EcochG findings were normal in individuals segregating the WFS1 c.2054G>C mutation. CONCLUSION: We discovered a novel heterozygous missense mutation in exon 8 of WFS1 predicting a p.R685P amino acid substitution that is likely to underlie the LFSNHL phenotype in the American family. For the first time, we describe VEMP and EcochG findings for individuals segregating a heterozygous WFS1 mutation.

Vestibular function in families with inherited autosomal dominant hearing loss.

The inner ear contains the developmentally related cochlea and peripheral vestibular labyrinth. Given the similar physiology between these two organs, hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction may be expected to occur simultaneously in individuals segregating mutations in inner ear genes. Twenty-two different genes have been discovered that when mutated lead to non-syndromic autosomal dominant hearing loss. A review of the literature indicates that families segregating mutations in 13 of these 22 genes have undergone formal clinical vestibular testing. Formal assessment revealed vestibular dysfunction in families with mutations in ten of these 13 genes. Remarkably, only families with mutations in the COCH and MYO7A genes self-report considerable vestibular challenges. Families segregating mutations in the other eight genes do not self-report significant balance problems and appear to compensate well in everyday life for vestibular deficits discovered during formal clinical vestibular assessment. An example of a family (referred to as the HL1 family) with progressive hearing loss and clinically-detected vestibular hypofunction that does not report vestibular symptoms is described in this review. Notably, one member of the HL1 family with clinically-detected vestibular hypofunction reached the summit of Mount Kilimanjaro.

Resistance to noise-induced hearing loss in 129S6 and MOLF mice: identification of independent, overlapping, and interacting chromosomal regions.

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a prevalent health risk. Inbred mouse strains 129S6/SvEvTac (129S6) and MOLF/EiJ (MOLF) show strong NIHL resistance (NR) relative to CBA/CaJ (CBACa). In this study, we developed quantitative trait locus (QTL) maps for NR. We generated F1 animals by intercrossing (129S6 × CBACa) and (MOLF × CBACa). In each intercross, NR was recessive. N2 animals were produced by backcrossing F1s to their respective parental strain. The 232 N2-129S6 and 225 N2-MOLF progenies were evaluated for NR using auditory brainstem response. In 129S6, five QTL were identified on chromosomes (Chr) 17, 18, 14, 11, and 4, referred to as loci nr1, nr2, nr3, nr4, and nr5, respectively. In MOLF, four QTL were found on Chr 4, 17, 6, and 12, referred to as nr7, nr8, nr9, and nr10, respectively. Given that NR QTL were discovered on Chr 4 and 17 in both the N2-129S6 and N2-MOLF cross, we generated two consomic strains by separately transferring 129S6-derived Chr 4 and 17 into an otherwise CBACa background and a double-consomic strain by crossing the two strains. Phenotypic analysis of the consomic strains indicated that whole 129S6 Chr 4 contributes strongly to mid-frequency NR, while whole 129S6 Chr 17 contributes markedly to high-frequency NR. Therefore, we anticipated that the double-consomic strain containing Chr 4 and 17 would demonstrate NR across the mid- and high-frequency range. However, whole 129S6 Chr 17 masks the expression of mid-frequency NR from whole 129S6 Chr 4. To further dissect NR on 129S6 Chr 4 and 17, CBACa.129S6 congenic strains were generated for each chromosome. Phenotypic analysis of the Chr 17 CBACa.129S6 congenic strains further defined the NR region on proximal Chr 17, uncovered another NR locus (nr6) on distal Chr 17, and revealed an epistatic interaction between proximal and distal 129S6 Chr 17.

In search of the DFNA11 myosin VIIA low- and mid-frequency auditory genetic modifier.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the auditory, vestibular, and retinal characteristics of a large American DFNA11 pedigree with autosomal dominant progressive sensorineural hearing loss that first impacts the low- and mid-frequency auditory range. The pedigree (referred to as the HL2 family) segregates a myosin VIIA (MYO7A) mutation in exon 17 at DNA residue G2164C (MYO7A) that seems to be influenced by a genetic modifier that either rescues or exacerbates the MYO7A alteration. DNA analysis to examine single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 2 candidate modifier genes (ATP2B2 and Wolfram syndrome 1 [WFS1]) is summarized in this report. STUDY DESIGN: Family study. RESULTS: The degree of low- and mid-frequency hearing loss in HL2 family members segregating the MYO7A mutation varies from mild to more severe, with approximately the same number of HL2 family members falling at each end of the severity spectrum. The extent of hearing loss in HL2 individuals can vary between family generations. Differences in the degree of hearing loss in MYO7A HL2 family members may be mirrored by vestibular function in at least 2 of these same individuals. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms examined within ATP2B2 and WFS1 did not segregate with the mild versus more severe auditory phenotype. CONCLUSION: The severity of the auditory and vestibular phenotypes in MYO7A HL2 family members may run in parallel, suggesting a common modifier gene within the inner ear. The putative MYO7A genetic modifier is likely to represent a common polymorphism that is not linked tightly to the MYO7A mutation on the MYO7A allele.

A novel DFNA9 mutation in the vWFA2 domain of COCH alters a conserved cysteine residue and intrachain disulfide bond formation resulting in progressive hearing loss and site-specific vestibular and central oculomotor dysfunction.

Mutations within the COCH gene (encoding the cochlin protein) lead to auditory and vestibular impairment in the DFNA9 disorder. In this study, we describe the genetic mapping of progressive autosomal dominant sensorineural hearing loss first affecting high-frequency auditory thresholds within a human pedigree to the long arm of chromosome 14 in band q12. A maximal pairwise LOD score of 7.08 was obtained with marker D14S1021. We identified a c.1625G > T mutation in exon 12 of COCH that co-segregates with auditory dysfunction in the pedigree. The mutation results in a predicted p.C542F substitution at an evolutionarily conserved cysteine residue in the C-terminus of cochlin. The c.1625G > T transversion in COCH exon 12 represents the first reported mutation outside of the LCCL domain which is encoded by exons 4 and 5. The 542F mutant cochlin is translated and secreted by transfected mammalian cells. Western blot analysis under non-reducing and reducing conditions suggests that the 542F mutation alters intramolecular cochlin disulfide bond formation. In the vestibular system, a progressive horizontal canal hypofunction and a probable saccular otolith challenge were detected in family members with the c.1625G > T COCH alteration. Abnormal central oculomotor test results in family members with the c.1625G > T COCH alteration imply a possible central nervous system change not previously noted in DFNA9 pedigrees harboring mutations within the LCCL domain.