Taxonomic inventory and distributions of Chenopodiaceae (Amaranthaceae s.l.) in Orenburg Region, Russia.

Background: Orenburg Region is located in the South Urals, mostly in the steppe zone and is characterised by various landscapes suitable for many Chenopodiaceae. The species of Chenopodiaceae are present in all major plant communities (saline vegetation, steppes, on limestone, chalk and sand, and as degraded or ruderal communities). In the steppe zone, many native subshrubby species (Atriplexcana, Caroxylonlaricinum, Suaedaphysophora) playing a crucial role in semi-deserts (known as southern steppes in the recent Russian literature) located southwards of Orenburg Region are locally found, and several annuals (Salicorniaperennans, Suaeda spp.) are most common dominants in plant communities. Some typical semi-desert species (Kalidiumfoliatum, Bassiahyssopifolia, Sodafoliosa, Spirobassiahirsuta) are found in the easternmost part of the region. New information: We compiled a checklist of Chenopodiaceae in Orenburg Region, with two new records (Chenopodiumvirgatum, Corispermumlaxiflorum), based on our critical revision, comprehensive inventory of herbarium specimens and documented observations and field research. In total, we report 76 species in the Region, which is the third-highest number of the Chenopodiaceae species compared with other administrative territories of European Russia, North Caucasus and West Siberia. Alien and native taxa are distinguished. Zonal patterns of species distributions are confirmed. A preliminary conservation status is proposed for each native species. Three species are recommended for exclusion from the Red Data Book of Orenburg Region: Petrosimoniatriandra (because of its extensive distribution), Kalidiumfoliatum and Anabasissalsa (because of the lack of actual threat to their populations). Arthrophytumlehmannianum and Salsolarosacea are considered threatened (Vulnerable) because of their restricted occurrence and population size and because their localities are under anthropogenic pressure. Atriplexhortensis, Atriplexrosea, Chenopodiumacuminatum, C.karoi, C.praetericola, C.vulvaria, Climacopteraaffinis, C.crassa, Halimocnemiskarelinii, Salsolapaulsenii and Xylosalsolaarbuscula are excluded from the checklist, based on various reasons as discussed in the paper. Point distribution maps are provided for each species. Agriophyllumpungens (Vahl) Link is accepted as the correct authorship instead of "M.Bieb. ex C.A.Mey."

Long-term efficacy of lipoprotein apheresis and lomitapide in the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH): a cross-national retrospective survey.

BACKGROUND: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare life-threatening condition that represents a therapeutic challenge. The vast majority of HoFH patients fail to achieve LDL-C targets when treated with the standard protocol, which associates maximally tolerated dose of lipid-lowering medications with lipoprotein apheresis (LA). Lomitapide is an emerging therapy in HoFH, but its place in the treatment algorithm is disputed because a comparison of its long-term efficacy versus LA in reducing LDL-C burden is not available. We assessed changes in long-term LDL-C burden and goals achievement in two independent HoFH patients' cohorts, one treated with lomitapide in Italy (n = 30) and the other with LA in France (n = 29). RESULTS: The two cohorts differed significantly for genotype (p = 0.004), baseline lipid profile (p < 0.001), age of treatment initiation (p < 0.001), occurrence of cardiovascular disease (p = 0.003) as well as follow-up duration (p < 0.001). The adjunct of lomitapide to conventional lipid-lowering therapies determined an additional 58.0% reduction of last visit LDL-C levels, compared to 37.1% when LA was added (padj = 0.004). Yearly on-treatment LDL-C < 70 mg/dl and < 55 mg/dl goals were only achieved in 45.5% and 13.5% of HoFH patients treated with lomitapide. The long-term exposure to LDL-C burden was found to be higher in LA than in Lomitapide cohort (13,236.1 ± 5492.1 vs. 11,656.6 ± 4730.9 mg/dL-year respectively, padj = 0.002). A trend towards fewer total cardiovascular events was observed in the Lomitapide than in the LA cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with LA, lomitapide appears to provide a better control of LDL-C in HoFH. Further studies are needed to confirm this data and establish whether this translates into a reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Long-term outcome in 53 patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia in a single centre in France.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare inherited condition characterized by elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, severe, accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary heart disease. We evaluated cardiovascular complications in HoFH patients over extended follow-up and investigated their association with changes in cholesterol over time, as well as total cholesterol burden. METHODS: In this retrospective single-centre study, 53 patients (baseline mean ± standard deviation [SD], total cholesterol 15.5 ± 3.7 mmol/L and LDL-C 13.2 ± 2.6 mmol/L) were followed for up to 38 years (21.2 ± 10 years). The primary outcome was an adverse clinical event, defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or angina. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients experienced an event, of whom 8 died due to complications of major surgery (4), myocardial infarction (3) or stroke (1). While total cholesterol levels were comparable in patients with and without an event at baseline (20 mmol/L), those who subsequently experienced an event showed a slower decline in total cholesterol. Cumulative total cholesterol (i.e. total-cholesterol year score) was highly associated with the incidence of an adverse clinical event in a linear dose-response relation. A 100 mmol/L increase in cumulative total cholesterol (i.e. an average exposure of 10 mmol/L per 10 years or 20 mmol/L per 5 years) was associated with a doubling of the risk of a cardiovascular event (age-adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.99, 95% CI, 1.16-3.41). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reinforce the importance of early diagnosis and initiation of maximal treatment, including lipoprotein apheresis, to ensure long-term reduction in the cholesterol burden, expressed as the total-cholesterol year score, and risk of cardiovascular complications in HoFH.

Lack of effects of statins on high-density lipoprotein subfractions in HIV-1-infected patients receiving protease inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of 45 days of rosuvastatin or pravastatin treatment on the distribution of HDL subfractions in HIV-1-infected individuals receiving boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) with cardiovascular risk. METHODS: The distribution of HDL subclasses by gradient gel electrophoresis was blindly assessed in 74 HIV-1-infected individuals receiving boosted PIs at baseline and at day 45 of statin treatment, and compared with the distribution obtained in 63 healthy normolipidemic individuals taken as controls. RESULTS: No significant modification appeared in HDL distribution between the two arms of statins for the HIV-1-infected individuals. Nevertheless, when compared to controls, HDL subfractions showed a significantly lower HDL2b proportion and significantly higher proportions of HDL2a and HDL3b (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: No difference was observed in HDL distribution between pravastatin and rosuvastatin after 45 days treatment, in HIV-1-infected individuals under PIs. Nevertheless, when compared to healthy normolipidemic subjects, HDL distribution is clearly different, with a distribution in HIV-infected individuals under PIs associated with an increased cardiovascular risk.

Determinants of low-density lipoprotein particle diameter during antiretroviral therapy including protease inhibitors in HIV-1-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Lipid disorders are frequent in HIV-1-infected patients taking combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) that includes protease inhibitors (PIs). The presence of small dense low-density lipoprotein particles might be an important predictive marker of cardiovascular disease in this setting. This cross-sectional substudy of the ANRS 126 trial was designed to identify variables influencing LDL diameter. METHODS: We studied 81 stable HIV-1-infected patients with dyslipidaemia (LDL-cholesterol >4.1 mmol/l, triglycerides <8.8 mmol/l) receiving PI-including cART regimens and no lipid-lowering drugs. LDL diameter was assessed by gradient gel electrophoresis. Relationships between LDL diameter and demographic, metabolic and HIV-related variables were identified by using non-parametric univariate tests and multiple linear regression models. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, LDL diameter was related to demographic variables, triglyceride (TG) levels, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) levels, and the numbers and duration of exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and PIs. In multivariable linear regression analysis, LDL diameter was negatively associated with the TG level (P<0.0001) and positively associated with the HDL-c level (P<0.0001). For each 1-mmol/l increase in TG, LDL diameter fell by 0.281 nm. Conversely, for each 1-mmol/l increase in HDL-c, LDL diameter rose by 1.175 nm. CONCLUSIONS: Higher TG and lower HDL-c levels are associated with smaller LDL particle diameter. Small-diameter LDL particles could contribute to early atherogenic processes in HIV-1-infected patients on cART.

Effects of rosuvastatin versus pravastatin on low-density lipoprotein diameter in HIV-1-infected patients receiving ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: HIV infection is associated with an atherogenic lipoprotein profile, and ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors exacerbate this phenotype. We evaluated the effect of 45 days of rosuvastatin versus pravastatin on the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) size and the distribution of LDL subfractions in HIV-1 patients receiving boosted protease inhibitors with elevated LDL levels. DESIGN: Substudy of the randomized double-blind multicentre ANRS 126 VIHstatine trial. SETTING: Twenty clinical centres in France. PATIENTS: HIV-infected patients receiving boosted protease inhibitors with dyslipidaemia (LDL cholesterol > 4.1 mmol/l and triglycerides < 8.8 mmol/l). INTERVENTION: Rosuvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 39) or pravastatin 40 mg/day (n = 37) for 45 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): LDL size and distribution of LDL subfractions blindly assessed by gradient gel electrophoresis at baseline and at day 45. RESULTS: Rosuvastatin was more effective than pravastatin in increasing the diameter of the LDL peak. The LDL diameter change was 0.33 ± 0.59 nm in the rosuvastatin group versus -0.01 ± 0.52 nm in the pravastatin group (P = 0.021). Rosuvastatin was also more effective in increasing significantly the percentage of large LDL (LDL1, P = 0.038; LDL2, P = 0.031) and in decreasing the percentage of small LDL (LDL3, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin was more effective than pravastatin in normalizing LDL size and LDL subfraction distributions, leading to a less atherogenic phenotype.

Rosuvastatin versus pravastatin in dyslipidemic HIV-1-infected patients receiving protease inhibitors: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: HIV infection and its treatment with protease inhibitors, especially when boosted with ritonavir, can cause lipid disorders. Statins, with the exception of fluvastatin, pravastatin and rosuvastatin, interact with protease inhibitor metabolism via CYP450. Pravastatin is recommended for patients with protease inhibitor-associated dyslipidemia. Rosuvastatin is the statin most effective on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) in non-HIV patients. METHODS: HIV-1-infected patients treated with boosted protease inhibitor were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg/day or pravastatin 40 mg/day for dyslipidemia (LDL-c >4.1 mmol/l and triglycerides <8.8 mmol/l). The percentage change in LDL-c, triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels, measured in a central laboratory, was determined after 45 days of statin treatment. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were randomized and 83 took the study drugs, 41 rosuvastatin and 42 pravastatin. The median duration of prior antiretroviral treatment was 9 years. At baseline, the median LDL-c level was 4.93 mmol/l, the triglyceride level 2.29 mmol/l, and the high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level 1.27 mmol/l. The median percentage changes in the rosuvastatin and pravastatin arms were -37 and -19% for LDL-c (P < 0.001), respectively, and -19 and -7% for triglycerides (P = 0.035), respectively. The change in the high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level was not significantly different between the two arms. None of the four severe adverse events was attributed to the statins; in particular, there were no renal, hepatic or muscular events. CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin 10 mg/day was more effective than pravastatin 40 mg/day on LDL-c and triglyceride levels in HIV-1-infected patients receiving a boosted protease inhibitor.