Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 28(1): E23-E32, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32520772

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Maryland historically had a high cancer burden, which prompted the implementation of aggressive cancer control strategies. We examined the status of cancer in Maryland and work under the current and previous editions of the MD Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan. METHODS: We examined the prevalence of cancer mortality, cancer incidence, and cancer-related behaviors in Maryland and the United States from 1985 to 2015 using publicly available data in the US Cancer Control PLANET, CDC WONDER, and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System portals. We estimated the average annual cancer deaths avoided by triangulation. RESULTS: In 1983-1987, Maryland had the highest age-adjusted cancer mortality rate of all 50 states, second only to Washington, District of Columbia. Today (2011-2015), Maryland's age-adjusted cancer mortality rate ranks 31st. Overall cancer mortality rates have declined 1.9% annually from 1990 to 2015, avoiding nearly 60 000 deaths over 3 decades. While the prevalence of healthy cancer-related behaviors in Maryland was qualitatively similar or higher than that of the United States in 2015, Maryland's 5-year (2011-2015) cancer incidence rate was significantly greater than that of the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Maryland's 30-year cancer mortality declines have outpaced other states. However, a reduction in mortality while incidence rates remain high indicates a need for enhanced focus on primary prevention.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Sistema de Vigilância de Fator de Risco Comportamental , District of Columbia , Humanos , Incidência , Maryland/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
2.
Am J Public Health ; 111(10): 1865-1873, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34623882

RESUMO

For nearly 2 decades, the Community Health Status Indicators tool reliably supplied communities with standardized, local health data and the capacity for peer-community comparisons. At the same time, it created a large community of users who shared learning in addressing local health needs. The tool survived a transition from the Health Resources and Services Administration to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before being shuttered in 2017. While new community data tools have come online, nothing has replaced Community Health Status Indicators, and many stakeholders continue to clamor for something new that will enable local health needs assessments, peer comparisons, and creation of a community of solutions. The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics heard from many stakeholders that they still need a replacement data source. (Am J Public Health. 2021;111(10):1865-1873. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306437).


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/normas , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Administração em Saúde Pública/normas , Planejamento em Saúde/organização & administração , Apoio ao Planejamento em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Estados Unidos
3.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol ; 18(8): 468-476, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32903246

RESUMO

Health professionals agree that increasing diversity in clinical trial participants is an important way to improve cancer care and address disparities in outcomes. However, trial participation among minority populations has been low historically and continues to be low. Underrepresentation has resulted in majority groups reaping greater benefit from research findings, thus widening cancer health disparities. Addressing these disparities effectively has proven to be challenging. To maximize diversity among participants, it is necessary to understand the steps patients take to enroll in trials; the barriers patients face at each step; and the needs and preferences of the patient population overall and subgroups specified by age, race, ethnicity, or sex, in order to develop interventions to address barriers to participation. To improve clinical trial participation, and most importantly to eliminate disparities, cancer centers should examine reasons patients fail to enroll in trials and develop interventions designed to meet their patients' needs and preferences.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Seleção de Pacientes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
4.
Prostate ; 78(11): 801-811, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29682763

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although studies have observed several markers correlate with progression of prostate cancer (PCa), no specific markers have been identified that accurately predict the progression of this disease, even in African American (AA) men who are generally at higher risk than other ethnic groups. The primary goal of this study was to explore whether three markers could predict the progression of PCa. METHOD: We investigated protein expression of Annexin 2 (ANX2), serine peptidase inhibitor, kazal type 1(SPINK1)/tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI), and heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60) in 79 archival human prostate trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy tissues according to a modified World Health Organization (WHO) classification: normal (WHO1a), Gleason Score (GS6 (WHO1b), GS7 subgroups (WHO2 = 3 + 4, WHO3 = 4 + 3), GS8 (WHO4), and GS9-10 (WHO5). AA men aged 41-90 diagnosed from 1990 to 2013 at Howard University were included. Automated staining assessed expression of each biomarker. Spearman correlation assessed the direction and relationship between biomarkers, WHO and modified WHO GS, age, and 5-year survival. A two-tailed t-test and ANOVA evaluated biomarkers expression in relationship to WHO normal and other GS levels, and between WHO GS levels. A logistic and linear regression analysis examined the relationship between biomarker score and WHO GS categories. Kaplan-Meier curves graphed survival. RESULTS: ANX2 expression decreased monotonically with the progression of PCa while expression of SPINK1/TATI and Hsp60 increased but had a more WHO GS-specific effect; SPINK1/TATI differed between normal and GS 2-6 and HSP60 differed between GS 7 and GS 2-6. WHO GS was found to be significantly and negatively associated with ANX2, and positively with SPINK1/TATI and Hsp60 expression. High SPINK1/TATI expression together with the low ANX2 expression at higher GS exhibited a bi-directional relationship that is associated with PCa progression and survival. CONCLUSION: Importantly, the data reveal that ANX2, and SPINK1/TAT1 highly associate with WHO GS and with the transition from one stage of PrCa to the next in AA men. Future research is needed in biracial and larger population studies to confirm this dynamic relationship between ANX2 and SPINK1 as independent predictors of PCa progression in all men.


Assuntos
Anexina A2/biossíntese , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Chaperonina 60/biossíntese , Proteínas Mitocondriais/biossíntese , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Inibidor da Tripsina Pancreática de Kazal/biossíntese , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia
5.
Prostate ; 77(13): 1366-1372, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28786124

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Root cause analysis is a technique used to assess systems factors related to "sentinel events"-serious adverse events within healthcare systems. This technique is commonly used to identify factors, which allowed these adverse events to occur, to target areas for improvement and to improve health care delivery systems. We sought to apply this technique to men presenting with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: We performed an in-depth case series analysis of 15 patients, who presented with metastatic disease at Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center using root cause analysis to refine a list of health system factors that lead to late stage presentation in the current era. RESULTS: Key factors in late diagnosis of PCa included lack of insurance, lack of routine PSA testing, comorbidities, reticence of patients to follow up actionable PSA, and aggressive disease. Three patients had aggressive disease that would not have been discovered at an early stage in the disease process, despite routine screening. However, analysis of the remaining 12 patients illuminated health system factors led to missing important diagnostic information, which might have led to diagnosis of PCa at a curable stage. CONCLUSIONS: The cases help highlight the need for systems based approaches to early diagnosis of PCa. A heterogeneous group of barriers to early diagnosis were identified in our series of patients including economic, health systems, and cultural factors. These findings underscore the need for individualized approaches to preventing delayed diagnosis of PCa. While limited by our single-institution scope, this approach provides a model for research and quality improvement initiatives to identify modifiable systems factors impeding appropriate diagnoses of PCa.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Metástase Neoplásica , Neoplasias da Próstata , Comorbidade , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Organizacionais , Metástase Neoplásica/diagnóstico , Metástase Neoplásica/prevenção & controle , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análise , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Am J Public Health ; 105(11): 2202-9, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26378853

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We assessed news media framing of New York City's proposed regulation to prohibit the sale of sugar-sweetened beverages greater than 16 ounces. METHODS: We conducted a quantitative content analysis of print and television news from within and outside New York City media markets. We examined support for and opposition to the portion-size cap in the news coverage from its May 31, 2012, proposal through the appellate court ruling on July 31, 2013. RESULTS: News coverage corresponded to key events in the policy's evolution. Although most stories mentioned obesity as a problem, a larger proportion used opposing frames (84%) than pro-policy frames (36%). Mention of pro-policy frames shifted toward the policy's effect on special populations. The debate's most prominent frame was the opposing frame that the policy was beyond the government's role (69%). CONCLUSIONS: News coverage within and outside the New York City media market was more likely to mention arguments in opposition to than in support of the portion-size cap. Understanding how the news media framed this issue provides important insights for advocates interested in advancing similar measures in other jurisdictions.


Assuntos
Bebidas , Jornais como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Tamanho da Porção , Televisão/estatística & dados numéricos , Sacarose Alimentar , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Obesidade/prevenção & controle
7.
Prev Med ; 74: 117-22, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25735604

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examined bill- and state-level factors associated with enactment of adult obesity prevention legislation in US states. METHODS: A review of bills in the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity's legislative database identified 487 adult obesity prevention bills, or proposed legislation, introduced between 2010 and 2013. Multilevel models were constructed to examine bill- and state-level characteristics associated with enactment. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2013, 81 (17%) of obesity prevention bills introduced were enacted across 35 states and the District of Columbia. Bills introduced in 2010 were more likely to be enacted than in 2013 (OR=9.49; 95% CI: 2.61-34.5). Bills focused on access to healthy food, physical activity, general and educational programs, as well as modifying rules and procedures (e.g., preemption) had greater odds of enactment relative to food and beverage taxes (OR=8.18; 95% CI: 2.85-23.4 healthy food; OR=17.3; 95% CI: 4.55-65.7 physical activity; OR=15.2; 95% CI: 4.80-47.9 general; OR=13.7; 95% CI: 3.07-61.5 rules). CONCLUSION: The year of bill introduction and overall bill enactment rate were related to adult obesity prevention legislation enactment in states. This study highlights the importance of a bill's topic area for enactment and provides insights for advocates and policymakers trying to address enactment barriers.


Assuntos
Legislação sobre Alimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Nutricional/legislação & jurisprudência , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Educação Física e Treinamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Adulto , Humanos , Legislação sobre Alimentos/tendências , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Governo Estadual , Impostos/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Public Health Nutr ; 18(12): 2263-73, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25430945

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of supporters and opponents of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax and to identify pro-tax messages that resonate with the public. DESIGN: A survey was administered by telephone in February 2013 to assess public opinion about a penny-per-ounce tax on SSB. Support was also examined for SSB consumption reduction and pro-tax messages. Individual characteristics including sociodemographics, political affiliation, SSB consumption behaviours and beliefs were explored as predictors of support using logistic regression. SETTING: A representative sample of voters was recruited from a Mid-Atlantic US state. SUBJECTS: The sample included 1000 registered voters. RESULTS: Findings indicate considerable support (50 %) for an SSB tax. Support was stronger among Democrats, those who believe SSB are a major cause of childhood obesity and those who believe childhood obesity warrants a societal intervention. Belief that a tax would be effective in lowering obesity rates was associated with support for the tax and pro-tax messages. Respondents reporting that a health-care provider had recommended they lose weight were less convinced by pro-tax messages. Women, Independents and those concerned about childhood obesity were more convinced by the SSB reduction messages. Overall, the most popular messages focused on the importance of reducing consumption among children without mentioning the tax. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding who supports and opposes SSB tax measures can assist advocates in developing strategies to maximize support for this type of intervention. Messages that focus on the effect of consumption on children may be useful in framing the discussion around SSB tax proposals.


Assuntos
Bebidas/economia , Opinião Pública , Impostos/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Bebidas/análise , Peso Corporal , Carboidratos/administração & dosagem , Carboidratos/análise , Carboidratos/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Mid-Atlantic Region , Análise Multivariada , Obesidade Infantil/economia , Obesidade Infantil/prevenção & controle , Projetos Piloto , Política , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
9.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 12: E163, 2015 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26425867

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Since the introduction of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2012, 11 million more Americans now have access to preventive services via health care coverage. Several prevention-related recommendations issued by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) are covered under the ACA. State cancer plans often provide prevention strategies, but whether these strategies correspond to federal evidence-based recommendations is unclear. The objective of this article is to assess whether federal evidence-based recommendations, including those covered under the ACA, are included in the Maryland Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan (MCCCP). METHODS: A total of 19 federal recommendations pertaining to cancer prevention and control were identified. Inclusion of federal cancer-related recommendations by USPSTF, CDC, and ACIP in the MCCCP's goals, objectives, and strategies was examined. RESULTS: Nine of the federal recommendations were issued after the MCCCP's publication. MCCCP recommendations corresponded completely with 4 federal recommendations and corresponded only partially with 3. Reasons for partial correspondence included specification of less restrictive at-risk populations or different intervention implementers. Three federal recommendations were not mentioned in the MCCCP's goals, objectives, and strategies. CONCLUSION: Many cancer-related federal recommendations were released after the MCCCP's publication and therefore do not appear in the most current version. We recommend that the results of this analysis be considered in the update of the MCCCP. Our findings underscore the need for a periodic scan for changes to federal recommendations and for adjusting state policies and programs to correspond with federal recommendations, as appropriate for Marylanders.


Assuntos
Assistência Integral à Saúde/métodos , Órgãos Governamentais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/normas , Comitês Consultivos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/normas , Maryland , Objetivos Organizacionais , Prevenção Secundária/normas , Estados Unidos
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e249474, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696166

RESUMO

Importance: The National Cancer Institute comprehensive cancer centers (CCCs) lack spatial and temporal evaluation of their self-designated catchment areas. Objective: To identify disparities in cancer stage at diagnosis within and outside a CCC's catchment area across a 10-year period using spatial and statistical analyses. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional, population-based study conducted between 2010 and 2019 utilized cancer registry data for the Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel CCC (SKCCC). Eligible participants included patients with cancer in the contiguous US who received treatment for cancer, a diagnosis of cancer, or both at SKCCC. Patients were geocoded to zip code tabulation areas (ZCTAs). Individual-level variables included sociodemographic characteristics, smoking and alcohol use, treatment type, cancer site, and insurance type. Data analysis was performed between March and July 2023. Exposures: Distance between SKCCC and ZCTAs were computed to generate a catchment area of the closest 75% of patients and outer zones in 5% increments for comparison. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was cancer stage at diagnosis, defined as early-stage, late-stage, or unknown stage. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine associations of catchment area with stage at diagnosis. Results: This study had a total of 94 007 participants (46 009 male [48.94%] and 47 998 female [51.06%]; 30 195 aged 22-45 years [32.12%]; 4209 Asian [4.48%]; 2408 Hispanic [2.56%]; 16 004 non-Hispanic Black [17.02%]; 69 052 non-Hispanic White [73.45%]; and 2334 with other or unknown race or ethnicity [2.48%]), including 47 245 patients (50.26%) who received a diagnosis of early-stage cancer, 19 491 (20.73%) who received a diagnosis of late-stage cancer , and 27 271 (29.01%) with unknown stage. Living outside the main catchment area was associated with higher odds of late-stage cancers for those who received only a diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.10-2.05) or only treatment (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.28-1.61) at SKCCC. Non-Hispanic Black patients (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.23) and those with Medicaid (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.46-1.86) and no insurance at time of treatment (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.79-2.51) also had higher odds of receiving a late-stage cancer diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of CCC data from 2010 to 2019, patients residing outside the main catchment area, non-Hispanic Black patients, and patients with Medicaid or no insurance had higher odds of late-stage diagnoses. These findings suggest that disadvantaged populations and those living outside of the main catchment area of a CCC may face barriers to screening and treatment. Care-sharing agreements among CCCs could address these issues.


Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer , Área Programática de Saúde , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Área Programática de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Sistema de Registros
11.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 13: e54126, 2024 Jun 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials examining lifestyle interventions for weight loss in cancer survivors have been demonstrated to be safe, feasible, and effective. However, scalable weight loss programs are needed to support their widespread implementation. The ASPIRE trial was designed to evaluate real-world, lifestyle-based, weight loss programs for cancer survivors throughout Maryland. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this protocol paper are to describe the design of a nonrandomized pragmatic trial, study recruitment, and baseline characteristics of participants. METHODS: Participants were aged ≥18 years, residing in Maryland, with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2, who reported a diagnosis of a malignant solid tumor, completed curative treatment, and had no ongoing or planned cancer treatment. Enrollment criteria were minimized to increase generalizability. The primary recruitment source was the Johns Hopkins Health System electronic health records (EHRs). Participants selected 1 of 3 remotely delivered weight loss programs: self-directed, app-supported, or coach-supported program. RESULTS: Participants were recruited across all 5 geographic regions of Maryland. Targeted invitations using EHRs accounted for 287 (84.4%) of the 340 participants enrolled. Of the 5644 patients invited through EHR, 5.1% (287/5644) enrolled. Participants had a mean age of 60.7 (SD 10.8) years, 74.7% (254/340) were female, 55.9% (190/340) identified as non-Hispanic Black, 58.5% (199/340) had a bachelor's degree, and the average BMI was 34.1 kg/m2 (SD 5.9 kg/m2). The most common types of cancers were breast (168/340, 49.4%), prostate (72/340, 21.2%), and thyroid (39/340, 8.5%). The self-directed weight loss program (n=91) included 25 participants who agreed to provide weights through a study scale; the app-supported program (n=142) included 108 individuals who agreed to provide their weight measurements; and the coach-supported weight loss program included 107 participants. We anticipate final analysis will take place in the fall of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Using EHR-based recruitment efforts, this study took a pragmatic approach to reach and enroll cancer survivors into remotely delivered weight loss programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04534309; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04534309. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54126.


Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Programas de Redução de Peso , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Maryland/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Redução de Peso , Programas de Redução de Peso/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Pragmáticos como Assunto
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(5): e229706, 2022 05 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35499828

RESUMO

Importance: The recommendations for the age and frequency that women at average risk for breast cancer should undergo breast cancer mammography screening have been a matter of emotional, political, and scientific debate over the past decades. Multiple national organizations provide recommendations for breast cancer screening age and frequency. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding for state comprehensive cancer control (CCC) planning requires compliance with stated objectives for attaining goals. US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations on cancer prevention and control are currently used to require coverage of prevention services. Objectives: To evaluate the consistency of state CCC plan objectives compared with the most current (2016) USPSTF recommendations for the age and frequency that individuals should undergo mammography screening and to make recommendations for improvement of state CCC plans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a descriptive, point-in-time evaluation and was conducted from November 1, 2019, to June 30, 2021. In November 2019, the most recent CCC plans from 50 US states and the District of Columbia were downloaded from the CDC website. The recommended ages at which to begin and end mammography examinations and the frequency of mammography examinations were extracted from plan objectives. Main Outcomes and Measures: The recommendations found in CCC plan objectives regarding the ages at which to begin and end mammography examinations and the frequency of mammography examinations for women with average risk for breast cancer were compared with USPSTF recommendations. Results: Of the 51 CCC plans, 16 (31%) were consistent with all USPSTF recommendations for age and frequency that women at average risk should undergo mammography. Twenty-six plans (51%) were partially consistent with recommendations, and 9 plans (18%) were not consistent with any of the 3 guideline components. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with the USPSTF recommendation, state CCC plans are not homogenous regarding the age and frequency that women at average risk for breast cancer should undergo mammography. This variation is partially due to differences in state-specific planning considerations and discretion, variations in recommendations among national organizations, and publication of plans prior to the most current USPSTF recommendation (2016). Specifying the concept that high-risk populations need different age and frequency of screening recommendations than the general population may reduce heterogeneity among plans.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamografia , Fatores Etários , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Estudos Transversais , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36142029

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: with regards to tobacco dependence management, there are certain barriers to successful smoking cessation for patients, such as untreated anxiety and depression. Complicating the impact of mental health morbidities on tobacco dependence may be the significant portion of patients whose mental health issues and limited social connections are undiagnosed and unaddressed. We hypothesize that patients with no prior mental health diagnoses who are treated for tobacco dependence have high rates of undiagnosed mental health morbidities. METHODS: patients were recruited from a tobacco treatment clinic in 2021. Every patient who came for an inaugural visit without a prior diagnosis of mental health disease was screened for depression, anxiety, social isolation and loneliness. Sociodemographic variables were collected. RESULTS: over a 12-month period, 114 patients were seen at the tobacco treatment clinic. Of these 114 patients, 77 (67.5%) did not have a prior diagnosis of a mental health disease. The mean age was 54.3 ± 11.2 years, 52 (67.5%) were females, and 64 (83.1%) were Black/African American. The mean age of starting smoking was 19.3 ± 5.2 years, and 43 (55.8%) had never attempted to quit smoking in the past. With regards to mental health screening, 32 (41.6%) patients had a score of 9 or greater on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9, 59 (76.6%) had a score of 7 or greater on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) 7, 67 (87.0%) were identified with social isolation and 70 (90.1%) for loneliness on screening. CONCLUSION: there was a high prevalence of undiagnosed mental health morbidities and social disconnection in patients who were actively smoking and were struggling to achieve smoking cessation. While a larger scale study is necessary to reaffirm these results, screening for mental health morbidities and social disconnection may be warranted in order to provide effective tobacco dependence management.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Tabagismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Prevalência , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabagismo/epidemiologia , Tabagismo/psicologia , Tabagismo/terapia , Adulto Jovem
14.
Gynecol Oncol ; 122(2): 324-7, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21620446

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to determine the impact of payer status on the likelihood of receiving definitive treatment for invasive cervical cancer at a tertiary medical center. METHODS: All consecutive patients presenting to Johns Hopkins Hospital with a diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer between 1/1/95-12/31/08 were retrospectively identified from the tumor registry. Demographic and clinical information were abstracted from the medical record. Payer status was categorized as private, public, no insurance, or unknown. Treatment was defined as surgery, chemo-radiation, chemotherapy, radiation, or no definitive therapy. The likelihood of receiving no definitive therapy was analyzed using Pearson chi-square analysis, univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients were identified. Median age was 47 and 60% of patients had early stage disease at diagnosis (stages IA-IIA). Fifty-six percent of the cohort had private insurance, 34% had public insurance, and 6% had no insurance. Having no insurance was the single most significant risk factor associated with receiving no standard therapy. While 7% of privately insured and 4% of publicly insured patients did not receive definitive therapy, 16% of uninsured patients did not receive definitive treatment. In multivariate analysis controlling for age, race, stage, histology, and comorbidities, uninsured payer status was a significant and independent predictor of receiving no definitive treatment (OR 8.01, CI 1.265-50.694, p=0.027) than patients with public insurance. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, uninsured payer status was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of not receiving standard therapy for cervical cancer. Additional studies are warranted to characterize specific barriers to care for this at-risk population.


Assuntos
Seguro Saúde , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER
15.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 106(10): e4179-e4191, 2021 09 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33884414

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Higher levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) are associated with increased risk of cancers and higher mortality. Therapies that reduce IGF-1 have considerable appeal as means to prevent recurrence. DESIGN: Randomized, 3-parallel-arm controlled clinical trial. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: Cancer survivors with overweight or obesity were randomized to (1) self-directed weight loss (comparison), (2) coach-directed weight loss, or (3) metformin treatment. Main outcomes were changes in IGF-1 and IGF-1:IGFBP3 molar ratio at 6 months. The trial duration was 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 121 randomized participants, 79% were women, 46% were African Americans, and the mean age was 60 years. At baseline, the average body mass index was 35 kg/m2; mean IGF-1 was 72.9 (SD, 21.7) ng/mL; and mean IGF1:IGFBP3 molar ratio was 0.17 (SD, 0.05). At 6 months, weight changes were -1.0% (P = 0.07), -4.2% (P < 0.0001), and -2.8% (P < 0.0001) in self-directed, coach-directed, and metformin groups, respectively. Compared with the self-directed group, participants in metformin had significant decreases on IGF-1 (mean difference in change: -5.50 ng/mL, P = 0.02) and IGF1:IGFBP3 molar ratio (mean difference in change: -0.0119, P = 0.011) at 3 months. The significant decrease of IGF-1 remained in participants with obesity at 6 months (mean difference in change: -7.2 ng/mL; 95% CI: -13.3 to -1.1), but not in participants with overweight (P for interaction = 0.045). There were no significant differences in changes between the coach-directed and self-directed groups. There were no differences in outcomes at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In cancer survivors with obesity, metformin may have a short-term effect on IGF-1 reduction that wanes over time.


Assuntos
Proteína 3 de Ligação a Fator de Crescimento Semelhante à Insulina/sangue , Fator de Crescimento Insulin-Like I/metabolismo , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Manejo da Obesidade/métodos , Obesidade/terapia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Tutoria , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/fisiopatologia , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso/fisiologia
16.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 8(12): 1343-51, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21147901

RESUMO

This study assessed the effects of race and place of residence on clinical trial participation by patients seen at a designated NCI comprehensive cancer center. Clinical trial accrual to cancer case ratios were evaluated using a database of residents at the continental United States seen at The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins from 2005 to 2007. Place of residence was categorized into 3 nonoverlapping geographic areas: Baltimore City, non-Baltimore City catchment area, and non-catchment area. Controlling for age, sex, county poverty level, and cancer site, significant race and place of residence differences were seen in therapeutic or nontherapeutic clinical trials participation. White non-Baltimore City catchment area residents, the designated reference group, achieved the highest participation rate. Although the test of interaction (control group compared with all others) was not significant, some race-geographic area group differences were detected. In therapeutic trials, most race-place of residence group levels were statistically lower and different from reference; in nontherapeutic trials, race-specific Baltimore City groups participated at levels similar to reference. Baltimore City residents had lower participation rates only in therapeutic trials, irrespective of race. County poverty level was not significant but was retained as a confounder. Place of residence and race were found to be significant predictors of participation in therapeutic and nontherapeutic clinical trials, although patterns differed somewhat between therapeutic and nontherapeutic trials. Clinical trial accruals are not uniform across age, sex, race, place of residence, cancer site, or trial type, underscoring that cancer centers must better understand their source patients to enhance clinical trial participation.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Grupos Raciais , Características de Residência , Adulto , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Participação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
17.
Heliyon ; 6(2): e03241, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32072035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A review of literature on the expression of Annexin 2 in cancer has shown that there is very limited research work on the association of this protein with breast cancer aggressiveness in African Americans. In the present study, TMA breast tissues from African American women were stained with Annexin 2 antibody to determine the association between the molecular subtypes and Annexin 2 protein expression. METHOD: An annotated case series of 135 breast cancer tissues archived from 2000 to 2010 was acquired from the Howard University Tumor Registry. The association between ANX2 expression and survival by molecular subtypes Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2, and Triple Negative (TN) was assessed using Multinomial regression, chi-square analysis, and Kaplan-Meir graphs (Stata 11). RESULTS: Our findings show a marked association between ANX2 protein expression in Luminal B and HER2 subtypes unadjusted and when adjusted for age. Borderline differences in tumor grade were found in TN only.Univariately, age (<50, 50 + years) and metastases were highly significant for overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival. Stage, tumor size, and nodal involvement were of borderline or greater significance for overall and disease-free survival. ANX2 expression was not significant. Kaplan Meier tests of ANX2 showed significant separation of overall survival by ANX2 protein expression in all breast tumor subtypes. In multivariate analyses comparing TN to Luminal A, ANX2 was not important while controlling for age and grade. CONCLUSION: ANX2 might be a biomarker of aggressiveness and a relevant candidate biomarker in high risk African American women with Luminal B and HER2 breast cancer.

19.
Public Health Rep ; 135(5): 565-570, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32735159

RESUMO

Community resilience is a community's ability to maintain functioning (ie, delivery of services) during and after a disaster event. The Composite of Post-Event Well-Being (COPEWELL) is a system dynamics model of community resilience that predicts a community's disaster-specific functioning over time. We explored COPEWELL's usefulness as a practice-based tool for understanding community resilience and to engage partners in identifying resilience-strengthening strategies. In 2014, along with academic partners, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene organized an interdisciplinary work group that used COPEWELL to advance cross-sector engagement, design approaches to understand and strengthen community resilience, and identify local data to explore COPEWELL implementation at neighborhood levels. The authors conducted participant interviews and collected shared experiences to capture information on lessons learned. The COPEWELL model led to an improved understanding of community resilience among agency members and community partners. Integration and enhanced alignment of efforts among preparedness, disaster resilience, and community development emerged. The work group identified strategies to strengthen resilience. Searches of neighborhood-level data sets and mapping helped prioritize communities that are vulnerable to disasters (eg, medically vulnerable, socially isolated, low income). These actions increased understanding of available data, identified data gaps, and generated ideas for future data collection. The COPEWELL model can be used to drive an understanding of resilience, identify key geographic areas at risk during and after a disaster, spur efforts to build on local metrics, and result in innovative interventions that integrate and align efforts among emergency preparedness, community development, and broader public health initiatives.


Assuntos
Desastres/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Teóricos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Resiliência Psicológica , Capital Social , Estresse Psicológico , Humanos , Cidade de Nova Iorque
20.
J Endocr Soc ; 3(10): 1825-1836, 2019 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31555753

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report age-specific serum estradiol concentration in nonsmoking, lean US men without comorbidities. We provide concentrations from 30 and 15 to 20 years ago given previously described declines in serum estradiol in US men over time. METHODS: We used data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III; 1988 to 1991) and continuous NHANES (1999 to 2004). Serum estradiol and SHBG were previously measured by competitive electrochemiluminescence immunoassays. Free estradiol was estimated from estradiol, SHBG, and albumin. By age, we calculated median concentrations overall and for nonsmoking, lean (body mass index <25 kg/m2 and waist <102 cm) men without diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or cancer. RESULTS: Overall, respective total estradiol medians for men ages 20 to 39, 40 to 59, and ≥60 years old were 37.0, 33.9, and 33.5 pg/mL in NHANES III and 31.3, 30.5, and 27.0 pg/mL in continuous NHANES. In nonsmoking, lean men without comorbidities, respective total estradiol medians were 32.0, 32.1, and 32.0 pg/mL in NHANES III and 29.1, 22.7, and 26.1 pg/mL in continuous NHANES. Overall, respective free estradiol medians were 0.82, 0.72, and 0.64 pg/mL in NHANES III and 0.67, 0.61, and 0.47 pg/mL in continuous NHANES. In nonsmoking, lean men without comorbidities, respective free estradiol medians were 0.64, 0.67, and 0.62 pg/mL in NHANES III and 0.58, 0.42, and 0.40 pg/mL continuous NHANES. CONCLUSION: We report US nationally representative serum estradiol concentrations in healthy men, which could be used for targeting estradiol during testosterone supplementation and for general good health.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA