[Combination of irinotecan and Mitomycin C as second-line chemotherapy for patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer in clinical practice].

BACKGROUND: Recently, combination S-1 and CDDP chemotherapy is considered as a standard regimen for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer. Second-line chemotherapy is reportedly important to improve survival, and combination of Irinotecan and Mitomycin C as second-line chemotherapy has proven effective in phase II study of JCOG 0109-DI. PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy of combination of Irinotecan and Mitomycin C as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 12 patients receiving combination of Irinotecan and Mitomycin C as second-line chemotherapy between Nov. 2002 and Apr. 2006. RESULTS: The response rate was 42% including 2 complete response. Progression-free survival was 6.1 months, and time to progression was 5.4 months. Median survival time after the start of second-line chemotherapy was 11.2 months, and after first-line treatment 20.5 months. One-year survival rate was 50%, and 2-year survival rate was 33%. CONCLUSION: In our hospital, combination of Irinotecan and Mitomycin C as second-line chemotherapy prolonged median survival time, and seemed to be an effective regimen.

[Episcleritis and erythema nodosum in a patient with ulcerative colitis].

A 62-year-old Japanese woman with ulcerative colitis (UC) had episcleritis and erythema nodosum. Oral administration of corticosteroid with granulocytapheresis improved all these diseases. Extraintestinal manifestations such as ocular and skin complications are infrequent, especially in Japan, in patients with UC. Although concurrent onset of episcleritis and erythema nodosum associated with UC is also extremely rare, clinical course in this case suggests a possible association among ulcerative colitis, episcleritis and erythema nodosum.

[Congenital absence of the portal vein in an adult woman with liver tumor].

A 30-years-old Japanese woman with a liver tumor was found to have congenital absence of the portal vein (CAPV). Both three-dimensional CT and angiography revealed that the superior mesenteric vein and splenic vein flowed into inferior vena cava and there was us portal vein, CAPV is an extremely rare congenital anomaly and liver tumor. Most cases on diagnosed in childhood, although this case was found in on adult. We reviewed the literature on reported CAPV cases.

Endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Since endoscopic en bloc resection of large and sessile tumors is technically difficult, endoscopic en bloc piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) is usually chosen for resection of such tumors. Tumors resected by EPMR are, however, difficult to evaluate histologically. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EPMR. METHODOLOGY: We removed 30 large colorectal tumors in 30 patients by EPMR between 1992-2000. Endoscopic examination was repeated at 3, 6 and 12 months and later on after initial endoscopic resection. Patients in whom no residual tumor was found by both endoscopic and histologic examination were considered to be "cured". RESULTS: Histological examination of the resected tumor tissues revealed malignancy in 43.3% (13/30). Three patients had invasive malignant tumors and underwent surgery. Following complete endoscopic resection, recurrences were observed in 2 patients with benign tumors, which were resected by additional endoscopic resection. All patients including the two with non-invasive malignant tumors remain free from recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 45.2 months (range, 3-104 months). Bleeding was the only complication and was seen in one patient (3.3%; 1/30), which was treated by endoscopic clipping. CONCLUSIONS: EPMR of benign or non-invasive large malignant tumors is a safe and effective procedure. Complete excision of large, sessile and non-invasive tumors is possible, although complete removal by EPMR cannot be verified histologically.

Self-limited colitis during the course of rubella and cytomegalovirus infection in an immunocompetent adult.

We report a case of self-limited colitis in cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in an immunocompetent adult. A 22-year-old man developed a high fever and diarrhea. Laboratory data revealed an increased number of lymphocytes and liver damage. Enzyme immunoassays for anti-virus antibodies revealed that the patient was recently infected with CMV and rubella. Colonoscopy revealed severe erosive and edematous mucosa that resembled ulcerative colitis (UC). The symptoms, laboratory data and colonoscopic findings improved without any medical treatment. This case indicates that UC-like self-limited colitis can occur in an immunocompetent individual during the course of CMV infection.

Primary mesenteric liposarcoma successfully diagnosed by preoperative imaging studies.

Liposarcoma is one of the most common primary neoplasms in the retroperitoneum, whereas primary mesenteric liposarcomas are rare. We encountered a case of liposarcoma which arose from the mesentery of the jejunum that was diagnosed by imaging studies before surgical operation.

Comparison of glucagon and scopolamine butylbromide as premedication for colonoscopy in unsedated patients.

PURPOSE: Premedication with glucagon or hyoscyamine is reported to be effective in reducing colonic spasm. However, these drugs can be associated with unfavorable events. This prospective study was designed to compare the effects of premedication with glucagon with those of scopolamine butylbromide on cardiopulmonary parameters, intubation time, and patient discomfort in unsedated patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. METHODS: One hundred consecutive adult patients (65 males) undergoing colonoscopy without sedation were randomized to receive 1 mg of glucagon (n = 50) or 20 mg of scopolamine butylbromide (n = 50), intramuscularly. Physiologic changes, including systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation, were monitored before colonoscope insertion and at three-minute intervals during colonoscopy. The percentages of completed procedure and time to cecal intubation were recorded. Patients were asked to rate pain by using a five-point pain score (0 = no pain; 4 = severe pain). RESULTS: The percentages of completed procedure (96 vs. 98 percent), time to cecal intubation (16.3 vs. 14.5 minutes), and pain score (1.7 vs. 1.5) did not differ significantly between two groups. An increase in heart rate of more than ten beats per minute from baseline during colonoscopy occurred significantly more often in scopolamine group (44 percent of 50 patients) than in the glucagon group (12 percent of 50 patients; P = 0.0004). There were no significant differences between the two study groups with regard to changes in systolic blood pressure and decrease in oxygen saturation during colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with 1 mg of glucagon facilitates favorable examination with respect to physiologic changes compared with 20 mg of scopolamine. These features favor glucagon as the preferred premedication for patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer with a novel 2-channel prelooped hood.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope (EMRC) such as a soft prelooped hood is a useful, effective, and safe technique. One problem with this method is that the lesion cannot always be maintained in the center of the cap because the procedure is performed blindly after aspiration. OBJECTIVE: We developed a 2-channel prelooped hood that facilitates EMRC while simultaneously allowing both grip of the center in the lesion and irrigation of the aspiration site and evaluated the usefulness of this end hood for early gastric cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Between August 2003 and October 2004, patients underwent our novel EMR. PATIENTS: Twelve cases of early gastric cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Two side holes were fabricated by drilling in the cap portion of a conventional soft prelooped hood, and then the irrigation tube and the accessory channel tube were glued to the exterior surface of the holes. We placed the fabricated transparent hood at the tip of the endoscope and performed grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Accurate aspiration and the rate of en bloc resection. RESULTS: We obtained a satisfactory field of view and accurate aspiration in the center of the tumor in all lesions. The rate of en bloc resection was 91.7% (11/12). LIMITATIONS: Gastric intramucosal cancer. CONCLUSION: Grasping forceps-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection with a novel 2-channel prelooped hood is safe and useful for mucosal resection of intramucosal cancers less than 20 mm and may help center the lesion in the cap before resection.

Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients.

OBJECTIVES: Application of a new variable stiffness colonoscope (VSC) is expected to control loop formation and to lessen patient discomfort. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy of VSC with a conventional colonoscope (CC) in unsedated colonoscopy, based on the experience of examiners. METHODS: Four-hundred sixty-seven patients were randomly assigned to undergo colonoscopy with either VSC or CC by an endoscopist, including experienced and less-experienced examiners. The percentages of completed procedure and time to cecal intubation were recorded. Patients were asked to rate pain on a 5-point pain score. RESULTS: The percentages of completed procedure with VSC and CC were 98% and 95%, respectively, by less-experienced hands, and 99% and 98%, respectively, by experienced hands. Time for cecal intubation with VSC and CC was 15.7 and 18.5 min, respectively, by less-experienced hands, and 9.8 and 10.6 min, respectively, by experienced hands. A significantly lower mean pain score was noted in VSC patients compared with CC patients, irrespective of experience of the examiner. The percent of patients rating the procedure as moderately or severely painful was significantly lower with VSC than with CC, both in less-experienced (19% vs 40%; p < 0.01) and experienced hands (15% vs 26%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that VSC allows favorable examination compared with CC regarding completeness, time to cecal intubation, and comfort of patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy, irrespective of the examiner's experience. These features suggest VSC as the preferred colonoscope for patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy.