Conventional Versus Traction Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) for colorectal lesions, the traction method (T-ESD) allows the lesion to be stabilized with easier dissection. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting results on the clinical outcomes of T-ESD as compared with C-ESD. We conducted a meta-analysis to compile the data. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for RCTs evaluating C-ESD versus T-ESD for colorectal tumors. The end points of interest were procedure time (min), resection speed (mm²/min), R0 resection, en bloc resection, delayed bleeding, and perforation. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with a total of 566 patients (C-ESD n=284, T-ESD n=282) were included. The mean age was 67±10 y and 60% were men. As compared with the T-ESD technique, the C-ESD group was associated with longer procedure time (SMD 0.91, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.23, P<0.00001) and lesser resection speed (SMD -1.03, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.06, P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the 2 groups with respect to R0 resection rate (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06, P=0.87), en bloc resection (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.01, P=0.35), delayed bleeding (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.59, P=0.55) and perforation (RR 2.16, 95% CI 0.75 to 6.27, P=0.16). DISCUSSION: On meta-analysis, pooled procedure time was significantly faster with T-ESD compared with C-ESD. The clinical outcomes, however, were comparable.

Accuracy and Inter-observer Agreement Among Endoscopists for Visual Identification of Colorectal Polyps Using Endoscopy Images.

BACKGROUND: It is essential to accurately distinguish small benign hyperplastic colon polyps (HP) from sessile serrated lesions (SSL) or adenomatous polyps (TA) based on endoscopic appearances. Our objective was to determine the accuracy and inter-observer agreements for the endoscopic diagnosis of small polyps. METHODS: High-quality endoscopic images of 30 small HPs, SSLs, and TAs were used randomly to create two-timed PowerPoint slide sets-one with and another one without information on polyp size and location. Seven endoscopists viewed the slides on two separate occasions 90 days apart, identified the polyp type, and graded their confidence level. Overall and polyp-specific accuracies were assessed for the group and individual endoscopists. Chi-square tests and Kappa (κ) statistics were used to compare differences as appropriate. RESULTS: When polyp size and location were provided, overall accuracy was 67.1% for TAs, 50.0% for SSLs, and 41.4% for HPs; the corresponding accuracies were 60%, 44.3%, and 34.3% when polyp size and location were withheld (p < .001). Inter-observer agreement was moderate for TAs (κ = 0.50) and fair for SSLs (κ = 0.26) and HPs (κ = 0.29); the corresponding inter-observer agreements were 0.44, 0.31, and 0.17 with polyp size and location withheld. Accuracy was not affected by knowledge of polyp size, location, or confidence level. Endoscopists with ≥ 10 years (vs. < 10 years) of colonoscopy experience had marginally higher (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.05) accuracy for SSL diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to distinguish between small TAs, SSLs, and HPs on their endoscopic appearance is poor regardless of the endoscopists' knowledge of polyp size and location.

Is cryptogenic cirrhosis different from NASH cirrhosis?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We hypothesized that patients currently diagnosed with cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) have truly 'cryptogenic' liver disease, which is unlikely to have evolved from NASH. The aim of this study is to characterize patients with CC, and compare their characteristics to patients with cirrhosis of other etiologies. METHODS: To investigate this, we compared the clinical characteristics of adults with CC (n = 7,999) to those with cirrhosis caused by non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (n = 11,302), alcohol (n = 21,714) and autoimmune hepatitis (n = 3,447), using the UNOS database from 2002-16. We performed an age, gender and year of listing matched comparison of CC and NASH (n = 7,201 in each group), and also stratified patients by the presence of obesity or diabetes mellitus (DM). RESULTS: From 2002 to 2016, patients listed with a diagnosis of NASH increased from about 1% to 16% while CC decreased from 8% to 4%. A logistic regression model using the entire United Network for Organ Sharing data (n = 138,021) suggested that the strongest predictors of NASH were type 2 DM, obesity, age ≥60 years, female gender and white race. Type 2 DM was more common in patients with NASH (53%) than those with CC (29%), alcoholic cirrhosis (16%) and autoimmune hepatitis (16%), and obesity was more common in NASH (65.3%) compared to the other three groups (33-42%). There were more white individuals (82.3%) in the NASH group and a lower prevalence of black, Hispanic and Asian individuals, compared to the other three groups. Hepatocellular carcinoma was more commonly seen in NASH (19% vs. 9-13% in the other groups) and this is not influenced by obesity and type 2 DM. The differences between CC and NASH remained unchanged even when two groups were matched for age, gender and year of listing, or when stratified by the presence or absence of obesity or type 2DM. CONCLUSIONS: Based on risk perspectives, CC should not be equated with the term 'NASH cirrhosis'. LAY SUMMARY: We hypothesized that cryptogenic cirrhosis is a distinct condition from cirrhosis caused by non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). By comparing cryptogenic cirrhosis with cirrhosis of other causes, we found clear clinical differences. Therefore, cryptogenic cirrhosis should not be considered the same as NASH cirrhosis. Further investigations are required to identify unknown causes of cirrhosis.

Endoscopic management of colonic perforations: clips versus suturing closure (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Perforation during colonoscopy remains the most worrisome adverse event and usually requires urgent surgical rescue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic closure of full-thickness colonic perforations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with endoscopically closed colonic perforations over the past 6 years (2009-2014). Colonic perforations were closed by using endoscopic clips or an endoscopic suturing device. Most patients were admitted for treatment with intravenous antibiotics and kept on bowel rest. If their clinical condition deteriorated, urgent surgery was performed. If patients remained stable, oral feeding was resumed, and patients were discharged with subsequent clinical and endoscopic follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients had iatrogenic colonic perforations closed with an endoscopic suturing device or endoscopic clips during the study period. Primary closure of a colonic perforation was performed with endoscopic clips in 5 patients and sutured with an endoscopic suturing device in 16 patients. All 5 patients after clip closure had worsening of abdominal pain and required laparoscopy (4 patients) or rescue colonoscopy with endoscopic suturing closure (1 patient). Two patients had abdominal pain after endoscopic suturing closure, but diagnostic laparoscopy confirmed complete and adequate endoscopic closure of the perforations. The other 15 patients did not require any rescue surgery or laparoscopy after endoscopic suturing. The main limitation of our study is its retrospective, single-center design and relatively small number of patients. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic suturing closure of colonic perforations is technically feasible, eliminates the need for rescue surgery, and appears more effective than closure with hemostatic endoscopic clips.

New endoscopic platform for endoluminal en bloc tissue resection in the gastrointestinal tract (with videos).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal tract lesions is increasingly popular around the world. We evaluated feasibility, safety, effectiveness, and user learning curve of new endoscopic platform for complex intraluminal interventions. METHODS: A novel system, consisting of expandable working chamber with two independent instrument guides (LIG), was inserted into colon. Simulated colonic lesions were removed with endoscopic submucosal (ESD) and submuscular (ESmD) dissection. RESULTS: In all nine in vivo models, an intraluminal chamber and its dynamic tissue retractors (via LIG) provided a stable working space with excellent visualization and adequate access to target tissue. Endoscopic platform facilitated successful completion of 11 en bloc ESDs (mean size 43.0 ± 11.3 mm, mean time 46.3 ± 41.2 min) and eight ESmD (mean size 50.0 ± 14.1 mm, mean time 48.0 ± 21.2 min). The learning curve for ESD using this platform demonstrated three phases: rapid improvement in procedural skills took place during the first three procedures (mean ESD time 98.7 ± 40.0 min). A plateau phase then occurred (procedures 4-7) with mean procedure time 42.0 ± 13.4 min (p = 0.04), followed by another sharp improvement in procedural skills (procedures 8-11) requiring only 16.3 ± 11.4 min (p = 0.03) to complete ESD. Especially dramatic (p = 0.002) was the time difference between the first three procedures (mean time 98.7 ± 40.0 min) and subsequent eight procedures (mean time 29.1 ± 17.9 min). CONCLUSIONS: A newly developed endoscopic platform provides stable intraluminal working space, dynamic tissue retraction, and instrument triangulation, improving visualization and access to the target tissue for safer and more effective en bloc endoscopic submucosal and submuscular dissection. The learning curve for ESD was markedly facilitated by this new endoscopic platform.

Endoscopic suturing closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection is technically feasible, fast, and eliminates the need for hospitalization (with videos).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is less invasive than surgical resection, but the large mucosal defects after ESD may lead to adverse events necessitating hospitalizations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of an endoscopic suturing device for closure of large mucosal defects after ESD. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective, single-center study. PATIENTS: Twelve consecutive patients underwent ESD. INTERVENTIONS: All lesions were removed by using a previously described ESD technique. The large mucosal defects post-ESD were completely closed with the endoscopic suturing device, and all patients were discharged home with subsequent clinical and endoscopic follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Bleeding and perforation rates after ESD with mucosal defect closure. RESULTS: ESD followed by endoscopic suturing of the mucosal defects was performed in 12 patients (mean age, 64.7 ± 11.2 years, 4 lesions in the stomach, 8 lesions in the colon; mean lesion size, 42.5 ± 14.8 mm) over a period of 8 months. All lesions (100%) were removed en bloc. Closure of post-ESD defects with an endoscopic suturing device was technically feasible and fast (mean closure time, 10.0 ± 5.8 minutes per patient). Only 1 stitch (continuous suturing line) was required for complete closure in 8 patients. In the other 4 patients, the mucosal defect was closed with 2 to 4 separate stitches (mean number of sutures per patient, 1.6 ± 1.0). There were no immediate or delayed adverse events in any of the study patients. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Closure of large post-ESD defects with the Overstitch endoscopic suturing device is technically feasible and fast and can significantly decrease treatment cost by eliminating the need for hospitalization.

Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The traditional endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is argon plasma coagulation, but results are not always positive. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a new endoscopic therapy that may be an attractive option for the treatment of GAVE. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of RFA for the treatment of GAVE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, retrospective, case series study. The main outcome measures were number of red blood cell (RBC) packs transfused (transfusion requirement) and hemoglobin concentrations (g/dL) in the 6 months prior to and after RFA. Success was defined as a decrease in transfusion requirement in the 6 months after RFA compared with before treatment. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients underwent a mean of 1.8 ± 0.8 RFA sessions. No complications were reported. One patient was referred for additional argon plasma coagulation during follow-up. The mean number of RBC packs decreased in all 23 transfusion-dependent patients, from a mean of 10.6 ± 12.1 during the 6 months prior to RFA, to a mean of 2.5 ± 5.9 during the 6 months after RFA treatment (P < 0.001), and 15 patients (65.2 %) were weaned off transfusions completely. An increase in the hemoglobin concentration was reported in all patients after RFA (from 6.8 ± 1.4 g/dL to 9.8 ± 1.8 g/dL; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RFA for the treatment of GAVE seems feasible and safe, and significantly reduced the need for RBC transfusion and increased the hemoglobin level in this retrospective case series.

Nonsurgical treatment of actively bleeding internal hemorrhoids with a novel endoscopic device (with video).

BACKGROUND: Internal hemorrhoids often present with bleeding, prolapse, and other symptoms. Currently used nonsurgical treatment modalities have limited effectiveness and usually require several treatment sessions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of a novel endoscopic device for nonsurgical treatment of internal hemorrhoids. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Single center. PATIENTS: This study involved 23 patients with actively bleeding internal hemorrhoids. INTERVENTION: The HET Bipolar System is a modified anoscope, with a treatment window, light source, and tissue temperature monitor. The device is inserted into the rectum under direct observation. The tissue carrying superior hemorrhoidal branches and the apex of the internal hemorrhoid is positioned inside the treatment window, clamped with incorporated tissue forceps, and treated with bipolar energy to ligate hemorrhoidal feeding vessels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rate of hemorrhoidal bleeding after the treatment. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64.3 ± 9.9 years (range 44-79 years). Eleven patients (47.8%) had grade I hemorrhoids and 12 patients (52.2%) had grade II hemorrhoids. In 18 patients (78.3%), treatment with the HET System was performed with the patient under conscious sedation. Five patients (21.7%) were treated without sedation. All patients tolerated treatment without complaints. The average follow-up period was 11.2 ± 4.7 months. No bleeding or prolapse occurred after the procedure in any of the treated patients. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: The newly developed HET System is easy to use, safe, and highly effective in eliminating bleeding in grade I and II internal hemorrhoids and prolapse in grade II internal hemorrhoids.

Variceal ligation in decompensated cirrhosis before esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Video 1This video details our case as well as our method for successfully eradicating varices immediately prior to esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection to minimize risks of variceal hemorrhage.

Purely endoscopic appendectomy.

Video 1Submucosal nodule in the cecum. After submucosal injection, a circumferential incision of the mucosa surrounding the lesion is performed with DualKnife (Olympus America, Center Valley, Pa, USA). The fore-balloon of the double-balloon endoluminal interventional platform (DBEIP) is deployed and the edges of the circumferential incision are attached with 2 endoscopic clips to the long suture-loop mounted on the fore-balloon of the DBEIP. The fore-balloon is retracted in anal direction, pulling the lesion into the cecum. Careful endoscopic submucosal dissection is performed with DualKnife and HookKnife (Olympus America). Dissection is markedly facilitated by traction and continued until the entire appendix is pulled into the cecum. The tip of the appendix is separated from surrounding tissues, resulting in a full-thickness cecal wall defect. The suture-loop holding the resected appendix is cut with LoopCutter (Olympus America). The resected appendix is removed through DBEIP and the Overstitch endoscopic suturing device (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, Tex, USA) is advanced into the cecum. The full-thickness defect in the cecal wall is completely closed with 2 continuous sutures. The final view demonstrates the entire resected appendix.

Endoscopy-Induced Pancreatic Pseudocyst Rupture: A Case of Secondary Peritonitis After Upper Endoscopy.

Pancreatic pseudocysts are often drained endoscopically after 4-6 weeks of maturation. Allowing for developed encapsulation ensures that the cyst walls are strong enough to sustain drainage. However, in 3%-5% of these cases, pseudocysts will rupture spontaneously and put patients at risk of peritonitis. We present the first documented case of pancreatic pseudocyst rupture after upper endoscopy. Exploratory laparotomy confirmed the absence of viscus perforation and highlighted the danger of any procedure that increases intra-abdominal pressure in a patient with a pancreatic pseudocyst. Awareness of this complication should impact our decision when considering endoscopy in patients with pancreatic pseudocysts.

Interventional EUS.

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of new or emerging endoscopic technologies that have the potential to have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used by performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent preclinical and clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but, in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through August 2009 by using the keywords "interventional endoscopic ultrasound," "EUS," and "interventional endoscopy." Reports on Emerging Technologies are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the Governing Board of the ASGE. These reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Reports on Emerging Technologies are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

Infection during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a randomized, controlled study in a live porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Currently reported natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures in animals have been done in heterogeneous milieus ranging from nonsterile to sterile procedures, with mixed results, including no infection in those performed in nonsterile settings. OBJECTIVE: To establish the potential frequency of infection during NOTES, comparing sterile to nonsterile approaches. SETTING: Survival experiments on sixteen 50-kg pigs. DESIGN AND INTERVENTIONS: From pilot data (100% infection frequency after nonsterile procedures), sample size (8 animals in each group) was calculated by using a power of 95% and an alpha risk of 0.05. The animals were randomly assigned to two groups: In the transgastric peritoneoscopy study group, liver and ovarian biopsies were performed with sterile overtubes, endoscopes, and accessories and the use of preoperative intravenous antibiotics and antiseptic gastric lavage. In the nonsterile (control) group, the same procedures were performed with nonsterile endoscopes and accessories without the use of gastric lavage and preoperative antibiotics. Complete transmural closure of the transgastric access site was made in all animals. After a 1-week survival time, all animals were killed for necropsy, which included Gram staining and peritoneal cultures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Intraperitoneal infection on necropsy. RESULTS: All necropsies revealed intraperitoneal infection (abscesses, fibrinopurulent exudates, and adhesions) in the control group (frequency of infection 100%). Peritoneal bacterial culture grew various aerobic and anaerobic organisms. No gross or bacteriological evidence of infection was seen in the sterile group (frequency of infection 0%, P value = <.0002). LIMITATIONS: Animal experiments. CONCLUSION: Nonsterile conditions invariably lead to intraperitoneal infection. Aseptic techniques during NOTES can prevent intra-abdominal infection. Future studies will determine which infection prevention steps are mandatory and which can be omitted during NOTES procedures.

Gastric wall healing after NOTES procedures: closure with endoscopic clips provides superior histological outcome compared with threaded tags closure.

BACKGROUND: Closure of the transgastric access to the peritoneal cavity is a critical step in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). OBJECTIVE: To perform a direct comparison of the histological healing post clips and threaded tags (T-tags) closure after transgastric NOTES procedures. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Twelve survival porcine experiments. After standardized endoscopic gastric wall puncture, balloon-dilation, and transgastric peritoneoscopy, closure of the gastric wall was performed with either clips or T-tags. Necropsy at 14 days was performed for histological evaluation of 2-mm interval transversal cross sections of the gastrotomy site. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Histological healing of the gastric wall opening. RESULTS: Endoscopic closure of the gastrotomy was successfully achieved in all 12 animals, followed by an uneventful 2-week clinical follow-up. Transmural healing was seen in 3 (75%) animals after clip closure compared with only 1 (12.5%) in the group with T-tag closure (P = .06). Gastric wall muscular bridging was observed in 4 (100%) animals with clip closure compared with only 1 (12.5%) in the group with T-tag closure (P = .01). LIMITATIONS: Animal model with short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic clip closure results in a layer-to-layer transmural healing of the gastric wall. In contrast, T-tag gastric wall plication impairs gastric layer bridging. These findings might guide the future design of new endoscopic devices and techniques for gastrotomy closure after NOTES procedures.