Comparison of the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided medial lumbar bundle branch block on pain related to lumbar facet joints: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter randomized interventional prospective study was to compare the ultrasound (US)-guided lumbar medial branch block (LMBB) with the fluoroscopy (FS)-guided LMBB in terms of analgesic efficacy and disability in the setting of the treatment of pain arising from the lumbar facet joints (LFJ). METHODS: Fifty adults with a "LFJ" syndrome were randomized into two groups: in group FS, fluoroscopic-guidance was used to block the medial branch at three lumbar levels (L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1); in group US, same blocks were performed under ultrasound. Needle transverse approach was used with both techniques. Effects of these procedures were assessed with a Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAPS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Duke's Activity Status Index (DASI) scale, before the treatment, 1 week and 1 month after. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score was also collected before the procedure. Analysis of variance, one (for non-inferiority) and two-sided Mann-Whitney tests and Chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: LMBB under US-guidance was not inferior to FS-guidance (P = 0.047) in terms of VAPS, ODI and DASI at 1 week and 1 month. Duration of techniques and HADS were similar between groups (=0.34; p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: The medial lumbar bundle branch block under ultrasound-guidance is not inferior to the fluoroscopy-guidance procedure in effectively alleviating pain arising from the facet joints. Considering that this ultrasound technique has the benefit of an irradiation-free, real-time procedure, it can be considered as an effective alternative to the fluoroscopy-guided technique.

Quantification of systemic o-toluidine after intrathecal administration of hyperbaric prilocaine in humans: a prospective cohort study.

Hyperbaric 2% prilocaine is increasingly used for spinal anesthesia. It is the only local anesthetic metabolized to o-toluidine, a human bladder carcinogen. Increase of o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts, a marker of o-toluidine ability to modify the DNA structure, was described following subcutaneous injection. In this prospective cohort study we aimed to assess and quantify o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts and urinary o-toluidine after a single intrathecal dose of hyperbaric prilocaine.10 patients undergoing surgery received 50 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine intrathecally. Blood and urine samples were collected before injection and up to 24 h later (Hospital Braine l'Alleud-Waterloo, Braine l'Alleud, Belgium). Urinary o-toluidine and o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts were measured by tandem mass-spectrometry after gas-chromatographic separation (Institute of the Ruhr-Universität, Bochum Germany). The trial was registered to ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03642301; 22-08-2018)Intrathecal administration of 50 mg of hyperbaric prilocaine leads to a significant increase of o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts (0.1 ± 0.02-11.9 ± 1.9 ng/g Hb after 24 h, p = 0.001). Peak of urinary o-toluidine was observed after 8 h (0.1 ± 0.1-460.5 ± 352.8 µg/L, p = 0.001) and declined to 98 ± 66.8 µg/L after 24 h (mean ± SD)Single intrathecal administration of hyperbaric prilocaine leads to a systemic burden with o-toluidine and o-toluidine hemoglobin adducts. O-toluidine-induced modifications of DNA should be examined and intrathecal hyperbaric prilocaine should not be proposed to patients chronically exposed to o-toluidine.Clinical trial number and registry URL NCT03642301.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on Nociception Level Index-guided remifentanil antinociception: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of dexmedetomidine on Nociception Level Index-guided (Medasense, Israel) antinociception to reduce intra-operative opioid requirements has not been previously investigated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine if low-dose dexmedetomidine would reduce remifentanil requirements during Nociception Level Index-guided antinociception without increasing complications associated with dexmedetomidine. DESIGN: Double-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two university teaching hospitals in Brussels, Belgium. PATIENTS: American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 and 2 patients (n = 58) undergoing maxillofacial or cervicofacial surgery under propofol--remifentanil target-controlled infusion anaesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: A 30 min infusion of dexmedetomidine, or equal volume of 0.9% NaCl, was infused at 1.2 µg kg-1 h-1 immediately preceding induction and then decreased to 0.6 µg kg-1 h-1 until 30 min before ending surgery. Nociception Level Index and frontal electroencephalogram guided the remifentanil and propofol infusions, respectively. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the remifentanil requirement. Other outcomes included the propofol requirement, cardiovascular status and postoperative outcome. RESULTS: Mean ±â€ŠSD remifentanil (3.96 ±â€Š1.95 vs. 4.42 ±â€Š2.04 ng ml-1; P = 0.0024) and propofol (2.78 ±â€Š1.36 vs. 3.06 ±â€Š1.29 µg ml-1; P = 0.0046) TCI effect site concentrations were lower in the dexmedetomidine group at 30 min postincision and remained lower throughout surgery. When remifentanil (0.133 ±â€Š0.085 vs. 0.198 ±â€Š0.086 µg kg-1 min-1; P = 0.0074) and propofol (5.7 ±â€Š2.72 vs. 7.4 ±â€Š2.80 mg kg-1 h-1; P = 0.0228) requirements are represented as infusion rates, this effect became statistically significant at 2 h postincision. CONCLUSION: In ASA 1 and 2 patients receiving Nociception Level Index-guided antinociception, dexmedetomidine decreases intra-operative remifentanil requirements. Combined frontal electroencephalogram and Nociception Level Index monitoring can measure dexmedetomidine's hypnotic and opioid-sparing effects during remifentanil-propofol target-controlled infusion anaesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03912740, EudraCT: 2018-004512-22.

A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing the up and down, biased-coin up and down and continual reassessment methods used to estimate an effective dose (ED95 or ED90) in anaesthesiology research.

Background: Dose-finding studies in anaesthesiology aim to target the effective dose (ED) of an anaesthetic agent in a specific population. The common dose-finding designs used are the up and down method (UDM), the biased-coin up and down (BCD), and the continual reassessment method (CRM). Although the advantages of CRM over the UDM and BCD methods have been described in the statistical literature in terms of precision and direct estimation of ED, CRM may also offer attractive properties from an ethical point of view. Methods: Based on Monte Carlo simulations, this article aims to compare the three methods with regard to 1) their ability to find as close an estimate as possible for the ED95 or ED90 and 2) the total number of patients needed to treat and the number of failures. Results: In contrast to BCD and UDM, CRM does find an estimate for ED95 and ED90. UDM underestimates both ED95 and ED90. BCD is close to the targeted EDs when the starting dose does not exceed the ED of interest, otherwise it overestimates it. CRM with cohorts of two patients is closest to the ED of interest independently of the starting doses. CRM requires between 20 and 50 observations, UDM should include 90 patients, and BCD 100 or 60 observations. Lastly, CRM is associated with fewer failures, compared with BCD and UDM. Conclusions: Based on Monte Carlo simulations, our work suggests that the UDM is not an adequate dose-finding method because it underestimates the ED of interest. Compared with BCD, CRM offers the advantages of being more efficient, requires fewer patients to be included, and is associated with fewer failures.

Pharmacodynamics of rocuronium in sickle cell patients.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease is the most widespread genetic disease in the world. The chronic organ damage due to this disease could lead to variability of responses to the anaesthetic drugs. We analysed the pharmacodynamics response of rocuronium to sickle cell patients. METHODS: We observed and compared the onset time and clinical duration (time to recovery first twitch) of 0.6 mg kg-1 of rocuronium using a TOFscan® monitor, as well as the time before the first incremental dose (time to recovery second twitch), in a group of 22 homozygous sickle cell patients and a group of 23 controls, all programmed for laparoscopic surgical procedures. RESULTS: The onset time of rocuronium was longer in sickle cell patients [mean ± SD (extremes)], [6.3 ± 2.1 (1.8-10) min] than in the control group [2.5 ± 0.6 (1.4-3.5) min] (P < 0.01). The clinical duration was shorter in sickle cell patients [19.2 ± 7.1 (13-41) min] when compared to the control group [28.9 ± 6.9 (21-48) min] (P < 0.01). The time before the first incremental dose was shorter in the sickle cell patients group [27.7 ± 7.9 (19-49) min] compared to the control group [39.9 ± 8.7 (30-56) min] (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The onset time of rocuronium was significantly longer with a shorter duration of action in patients with sickle cell disease versus the general population.