Factors affecting hospital readmission and rehospitalization following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE: To identify patient- and procedure-related factors that increase the risk of hospital readmission and emergency room (ER) visits after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with kidney stones treated via PNL in two tertiary referral hospitals between 2008 and 2014. Patient demographics including age, body mass indices, ASA score, stone size, presence of anatomic abnormality and comorbidity, operative and postoperative measures, and ER visit and rehospitalization rates were reviewed. Unplanned readmission to the hospital, including elective, and ER visits due to any reason related to the PNL procedure were primarily examined. The factors affecting ER visit and rehospitalization rate were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1024 patients (mean age 46.57 years) were enrolled into the study. Mean stone size was 28.5 mm. Stone-free status was achieved in 81.7 % of the procedures. Complications occurred at a rate of 6.44 % in the postoperative period. ER visit and rehospitalization rates were 5.76 and 5.27 %, respectively. While stone complexity, anatomic abnormalities, and postoperative course were found to be factors affecting ER visit, postoperative course and hospitalization time were main predictors for rehospitalization rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our outcomes demonstrate that patients, who had an anatomic abnormality and complex kidney stone, were more likely to have an unplanned hospital readmission. Patients with a history of perioperative and/or postoperative complication seem to have a tendency to unplanned readmission and rehospitalization.

Which factors affect the hospital re-admission and re-hospitalization after flexible ureterorenoscopy for kidney stone?

PURPOSE: To investigate patient- and procedure-related factors associated with hospital re-admission (HR) and re-hospitalization following flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of patients who underwent f-URS for renal stones in two reference centers between 2011 and 2015 were examined retrospectively. Patients who were re-admitted to the hospital or re-hospitalized for any reason within 30 days after hospital discharge related to the f-URS procedure were evaluated. The patient- and procedure-related factors affecting the re-admission and re-hospitalization rates were revealed using backward stepwise multiple binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study included 647 patients with a mean age of 46.1 ± 13.7 years. The mean BMI was 27.3 ± 4.6 kg/m(2), and the median ASA score was 1.85. The mean stone diameter was 14.2 ± 5.3 mm. The mean operation and fluoroscopy times were 50.2 ± 16.9 min and 43.1 ± 37.6 s, respectively. The mean hospitalization time was 1.42 ± 0.84 days, and the complication rate was 12.8 % (83/647). Overall, 523 (80.3 %) patients became stone-free, while residual fragments <4 mm were detected in 73 (11.3 %) patients. The procedure failed in 7.9 % of the cases. While 82 (12.7 %) patients were re-admitted, 31 (4.8 %) patients were re-hospitalized for further treatment. Stone-free status was an independent predictor of HR, while the stone-free status, hospitalization time, and postoperative complications all predicted re-hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: We found that inability to achieve stone-free status predicted HR and re-hospitalization, while postoperative complication and prolonged hospitalization also predicted re-hospitalization.

Comparison of flexible ureterorenoscopy and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for moderately size lower-pole stones.

PURPOSE: To present a retrospective comparative clinical study of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) versus flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) in treatment of moderate-size lower-pole stones (LPSs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on patients with isolated LPSs ≤2 cm in diameter treated with F-URS and/or microperc in two referral centers. Patients were divided into two groups by treatment modality: F-URS (Group 1) and microperc (Group 2). Demographics and perioperative parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients with isolated LPSs were treated via F-URS (Group 1, n = 59) and microperc (Group 2, n = 68). Mean patient age in microperc group was slightly lower than in F-URS group (p = 0.112). We found no statistically significant difference in terms of either the size or number of stones in two groups (p = 0.113 and p = 0.209, respectively). Operative time was shorter in microperc, whereas fluoroscopy time was shorter in F-URS (60.1 ± 26.2 vs. 46.2 ± 24.3 min, p < 0.001; and 28.3 ± 19.1 vs. 108.9 ± 65.2 s, p < 0.001). Mean fall in hemoglobin level was statistically significantly lower in F-URS and hospitalization time was also significantly shorter in F-URS (0.68 ± 0.51 vs. 1.29 ± 0.88 mg/dL, p < 0.001; and 23.0 ± 58.1 vs. 33.8 ± 17.2 h, p < 0.001, respectively). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were 74.5 % (44/59) in Group 1 and 88.2 % (60/68) in Group 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that microperc was safe and efficacious when used to treat moderate-size LPSs and may be considered as an alternative to F-URS, affording a higher SFR. Our study supports the notion that microperc should play an increasing role in treatment of LPSs.

Comparison of the efficacy of diclofenac, acupuncture, and acetaminophen in the treatment of renal colic.

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to compare the analgesic effects of diclofenac, acetaminophen, and acupuncture in urolithiasis-driven renal colic pain relief. METHODS: Renal colic patients were divided randomly into 3 groups. Patients in group I (n = 40) were treated with intravenous acetaminophen, those in group II (n = 41) with acupuncture, and those in group III (n = 40) with a 75-mg intramuscular injection diclofenac sodium. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS) were used to assess pain intensity after 10, 30, 60, and 120 minutes. RESULTS: No significant differences in baseline VAS or VRS were found with regard to age or sex. After 10 minutes, all 3 groups experienced a significant decrease in VAS and VRS scores, with the most drastic decrease occurring in group II. After 30 minutes, there was a significantly higher decrease in group III than in group I (P = .001). After 60 minutes, mean VAS scores of groups I and III (P = .753) were similar. The mean VAS score of group III was lower than that of group II (P = .013). After 120 minutes, the difference in the VAS scores was (P = .000) between groups I and II and between groups II and III. Yet, the VAS evaluation made after 120 minutes revealed statistically similar outcomes for groups I and III (P = .488). The statistical findings for VRS evaluations made after 10, 30, 60, and 120 were similar to those for VAS. CONCLUSIONS: In renal colic patients with a possible nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and acetaminophen side effect risk, acupuncture emerges as an alternative treatment modality.

Management of patients with retroperitoneal tumors and a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal tumors (RTs) develop insidiously and are generally seen as large masses, and 50% of RTs are larger than 20 cm at the time of diagnosis. In this article, we share our experience of 5 years of surgical management of RTs. METHODS: We evaluated 28 RT cases operated on in three education hospitals in Turkey from January 2008 onwards, with regard to patients' demographic characteristics, complaints, weight loss figures, the location and size of the tumor, blood transfusion, intra-operational time, metastases (in malignant cases), additional organ resection, histological grade, local recurrences, average life expectancy, and post-operative treatment methods. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 49 years (range, 18 to 78 years). Twenty (71.43%) were female, and 8 (28.57%) were male. The primary complaint was abdominal pain in 18 patients (64.28%). CT scans were performed in 17 (61%) patients, 10 (35.4%) underwent abdominal MR imaging, and 1 (3.6%) underwent both abdominal CT and abdominal MR imaging. A mass was palpated in the pelvis (suprapubic region) in seven (25%) of the patients during physical examination. The largest tumors were detected in the left lumbar area. The mean tumor size was 12.78 cm (range, 2 to 30 cm). The mean intra-operational time was 192 min (range, 70 to 380 min). The mean hospitalization period was 11 days (range, 8 to 23 days). Seven (25%) patients were reported to have benign tumors, while 21 (75%) were reported to have malignant tumors. The most frequently seen malignant pathology was liposarcoma (eight cases; 38.09%) followed by leiomyosarcoma (five cases; 23.8%) and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (four cases; 19.04%). The earliest local recurrence was detected in the 12th month and the latest in the 28th month. A total of 11 (52.3%) of the total of 21 malignant cases experienced local recurrence within 3 years. The 3-year average life expectancy was 85.7% in the 18 malignant cases. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the low response rate of all but two types of RT to chemotherapy, the best remaining treatment option is surgery with wide resection margins, whereby all macroscopic traces of tumor are removed.

Is Micropercutaneous Nephrolithotomy Technique Really Efficacicous for the Treatment of Moderate Size Renal Calculi? Yes.

OBJECTIVE: To present our clinical experiences with micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of moderate-sized renal calculi from a single center. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the patients with moderate-sized renal calculi who underwent micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy between December 2012 and Septermber 2013. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients and 70 renal units underwent microperc procedure. Mean age of patients was 41.4 ± 18.8. The mean stone size was 122 ± 83 mm(2). The operations were performed under spinal anesthesia in 89.7% of the patients. Stone-free rate was 95.7 % (67/70). Clinically significant residual fragments were observed in three patients. The average duration of operation and mean fluoroscopy time was 40 ± 23 min and 108 ± 72 s, respectively. The mean postoperative drop in hemoglobin was 0.95 ± 0.7 while no patient required blood transfusion. Patients were discharged after an average hospitalization time of 27.5 ± 12.4 h. A total of 4 complications (5.7%), including urinary tract infection (Clavien I) in one patient and renal colics requiring stent insertion (Clavien IIIa) in three patients, were observed postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Microperc technique is safe, feasible, and efficacious. We suggest that micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be considered for the treatment of moderate-sized renal stones as an alternative to SWL and RIRS failures and also may be considered even primarily.

"Snodgraft" technique for the treatment of primary distal hypospadias: pushing the envelope.

PURPOSE: "Snodgraft" modification has been proposed to reduce the risk of meatal/neourethral stenosis in distal hypospadias. We applied the Snodgraft technique by using inner preputial graft in primary distal hypospadias repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 102 consecutive patients undergoing the Snodgraft procedure were prospectively studied between 2006 and 2011. Mean patient age was 7.2 years. Localization of the meatus was glanular in 5 patients, coronal in 49, subcoronal in 45 and mid penile in 3. In all patients the posterior urethral plate was incised, and the graft harvested from the inner prepuce was sutured from the old meatus to the tip of the glans. A neourethra was created over a urethral catheter using 6-zero polyglactin suture. An interpositional flap was laid over the urethra as a second barrier. All patients were followed at 3 to 6-month intervals for cosmetic and functional results. RESULTS: At a mean of 2.4 years of followup no patient had meatal stenosis or diverticulum at the inlay graft site. However, urethrocutaneous fistula was observed in 10 patients (9.8%). A slit-like appearance of neomeatus was achieved in all patients. During followup no obstructive urinary flow pattern was detected, and early and long-term maximum urine flow rates were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: No meatal/neourethral stenosis was observed in any patient undergoing a Snodgraft procedure. A randomized trial will be needed to prove that the incidence of meatal/neourethral stenosis is lower after Snodgraft repair compared to routine tubularized incised plate repair.

Combined micro-and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal calculi.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to present the technique of combination of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) with microperc for achieving higher success rates without increasing complication rates in the management of complex renal calculi. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients who underwent microperc procedure as a complementary procedure to standard PNL for complex kidney stones in two reference hospitals between 2013 and 2015, were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: All patients underwent a total of two accesses one for standard PNL and one for microperc. The mean stone size was measured as 54.3 mm. The procedures were completed after an average operative time of 88.2 minutes and fluoroscopy time of 5.3 minutes. Stone free status was achieved in 18 cases (78.2%) and small residual fragments (≤4 mm) were detected in 3 cases (13.1%). Complications were seen in three patients (13%) as hemorrhage in one and postoperative fever in two patients. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations of this study, the combination of standard PNL and microperc might reduce the complication rates and increase the success rates when treating complex kidney stones. Future prospective and comparative studies are needed.

Comparison of Anesthesia Methods in Treatment of Staghorn Kidney Stones with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in the treatment of staghorn calculi (SC) under spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with SC who treated with PNL from 2011 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 100 patients were divided into 2 groups according to anesthesia type: SA (group 1, n = 47) and GA (group 2, n = 53). Demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative analgesic requirements were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, or stone size between the two groups (P = .40, .30, .18, .20, and .50, respectively). The mean procedure times were 84.7 and 87.5 min in the SA and GA groups, respectively (P = .68). The complication rates were similar in the SA and GA groups (19.1% vs. 13.2%, respectively; P = .421). The stone-free rates were also similar in the SA and GA groups (61.7% vs. 52.8%, respectively; P = .374). No statistically significant difference was found in analgesic requirements. CONCLUSION: SA is a safe method without the risks of GA and may be used for conditions in which GA is contraindicated or in patients with concerns about GA. Our outcomes indicated that SC can be treated safely and effectively under SA.