Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and construct validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale.

RESULTS: 59 patients were included (61% with COPD and 39% with ILD). BPNES factor scores were not significantly different between raters' assessments (p > 0.05). The internal consistency was 0.70 for autonomy, 0.76 for competence, and 0.80 for relatedness. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were good to very good for autonomy (ICC = 0.78, 95%CI 0.62-0.87; ICC = 0.75, 95%CI 0.57-0.86, respectively), competence (ICC = 0.81, 95%CI 0.68-0.89; ICC = 0.65, 95%CI 0.43-0.80, respectively), and relatedness (ICC = 0.79, 95%CI 0.65-0.88; ICC = 0.70, 95%CI 0.50-0.83, respectively). Significant correlations were observed between BPNES factors and quality of life, anxiety, depression, and functional status. In conclusion, this study confirmed the reliability and construct validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the BPNES in patients with COPD and ILD.

The COVID-19 Pandemic Confronts the Motivation Fallacy within Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs.

Social distancing and quarantines have been implemented worldwide to reduce the spread of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). However, social distancing has had far-reaching health consequences, considering that the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed people to the hazard of physical inactivity and sedentary behavior. For patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), which is one of the main diseases at risk for COVID-19, the impact is even greater since outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs are temporarily closed. More than ever, patients' behavior change to exercise calls for urgent debate. We propose a theoretical discussion in light of Self-Determination Theory, aiming to make PR a setting that supports autonomous forms of motivation. The scenario will not be changed in the short-term; but if other conditions hinder the development of PR in its most traditional form, the PR community will be better prepared to overcome the barriers to maintain physical exercise.

Reliability of Volumetry and Perimetry to Assess Knee Volume.

CONTEXT: The treatment of edema after a knee injury is usually 1 of the main objectives during rehabilitation. To assess the success of treatment, 2 methods are commonly used in clinical practice: volumetry and perimetry. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the intra- and interassessor reliability of volumetry and perimetry to assess knee volume. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 45 healthy participants (26 women) with mean age of 22.4 ± 2.8 y. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knee volume was assessed by 3 assessors (A, B, and C) with 3 methods (lower-limb volumetry [LLV], knee volumetry [KV], and knee perimetry [KP]). Assessor A was the most-experienced assessor, and assessor C, the least experienced. LLV and KV were performed with participants in the orthostatic position, while KP was performed with participants in supine. RESULTS: For the interassessor analysis, the ICC2,1 was high (.82) for KV and very high for LLV (.99) and KP (.99). For the intra-assessor analysis, ICC2,1 ranged from moderate to high for KV (.69-.83) and was very high for LLV (.99) and KP (.97-.99). CONCLUSION: KV, LLV, and KP are reliable methods, both intra- and interassessor, to measure knee volume.

Reliability and validity of the online application of London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale in assessing dyspnea-related functional impairment in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19.

PURPOSE: To investigate the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the LCADL scale applied via online form in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: Methodological study. After hospitalization for COVID-19 individuals completed the LCADL via online form at two separate times. They also answered the post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS), dyspnea, fatigue, and health perception scales, modified Medical Research Council (MRCm), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). Hospitalization data were collected from the individual's medical record. RESULTS: 104 individuals participated in the study (57 men, 45.2 ± 11.9 years). The LCADL showed moderately to high test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.73-0.86; p < 0.001), there was no difference in scores between test and retest (p > 0.05), the mean difference between the applications was smaller than the standard error of measurement and the internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.94). In addition, it demonstrated adequate construct validity, showing correlations with PCFS, dyspnea perception, fatigue and health scales, mMRC, SF-36, and length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (p < 0.05). The LCADL as percentage of the total score presented a significant floor effect (25%). CONCLUSION: The LCADL applied online was reliable and valid for assessing limitations due to dyspnea in ADL in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19.

The London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale applied online is a method of evaluation of dyspnea-related ADL limitations that is valid and reliable after hospitalization for COVID-19 and can be used both in the telerehabilitation environment and in-person rehabilitation;The online form provides a more sustainable means of data storage, since no paper is needed, and saves time during in-person rehabilitation.

Impact of COVID-19 critical illness on functional status, fatigue symptoms, and health-related quality of life one-year after hospital discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence and severity of impairments in functional status, fatigue, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among critical COVID-19 survivors one-year after hospital discharge. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021258356), with searches in eight databases. Observational studies were selected. The prevalence meta-analysis of abnormalities was performed using random-effects models. Risk of bias was evaluated using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tool. Results: Twenty studies were included, with data collected between 12 and 13.5 months after hospital discharge and a total of 1828 participants. Of these, 71% were men, and 77.7% were intubated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Impairments and sequelae were identified in varying prevalence and degrees, with greater impact on functional capacity and physical components of fatigue and HRQoL. The prevalence of abnormalities of 32.3% [95% CI 23.9; 41.9] found in the meta-analysis is substantially high. Most studies were classified as having fair and poor quality. Conclusion: Critical COVID-19 survivors experience impairments in functional status, fatigue, and HRQoL to varying degrees one-year after hospital discharge, particularly among patients who stayed in the ICU and on MV for a prolonged period.

Critical COVID-19 survivors exhibit persistent impairments one-year post-discharge.Functional status, fatigue, and health-related quality of life are impaired to varying degrees in approximately one-third of patients.Long-term follow-up care for critical COVID-19 survivors should be prioritized.

Minimally Important Difference of the 20-m 6-Minute Walk Test in Individuals With COPD.

BACKGROUND: The 20-m 6-min-walk test (6MWT20) is a valid, reliable alternative for functional capacity assessment; however, its responsiveness and minimally important difference (MID) have yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the responsiveness and MID of the 6MWT20 in individuals with COPD. METHODS: Fifty-three subjects completed the study from August 2011-March 2020. The following were assessed: lung function, activities of daily living (ADLs), functional capacity 6MWT20, dyspnea, health status, quality of life, and limitations in ADLs. The primary outcome was the 6MWT20 distance. RESULTS: The study demonstrated that the 6MWT20 is responsive to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), with an average improvement of 39 ± 36.3 m (P < .001) and an effect size of 1.07. The learning effect declined to 1.45% after PR, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated a cutoff point of 20 m for the MID of the 6MWT20 based on the MIDs for the modified St George Respiratory Questionnaire (sensitivity 87%, specificity 69%, area under the curve 0.80 [95% CI 0.66-0.90], P < .001, Youden index 0.56) and the number of steps (sensitivity 92%, specificity 73%, area under the curve 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.92], P < .01, Youden index 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The 6MWT20 is responsive to PR, and the MID for the test is 20 m (17-47 m).

Breaking barriers to rehabilitation: the role of behavior change theories in overcoming the challenge of exercise-related behavior change.

BACKGROUND: Promoting exercise-related behavior change in rehabilitation is a challenge. The lack of integration between rehabilitation program prescriptions, behavior change interventions, and behavioral change theories is profound. Using behavior change theories properly is crucial for better adherence and promoting positive outcomes. Therefore, it is essential to bring theories that support the understanding of exercise-related behavioral change to the attention of rehabilitation practitioners. OBJECTIVE: This masterclass article aims to provide the theoretical background of theories and strategies for exercise behavior change within the physical therapy context based on acknowledged behavioral change theoretical models. METHODS: This is a narrative review that examines six behavior theories; five of them well-established, and a new (and promising) theory that has exhibited the most favorable outcomes in rehabilitation settings. The development process for this masterclass included conversations between authors, reviewing behavior theories, summarizing and discussing the theories' concepts and strategies for physical therapy. RESULTS: The included theories were self-determination theory, social-cognitive theory, the transtheoretical model, the theory of planned behavior, the health belief model, and the unifying theory of physical activity. Each theory offers a unique perspective on exercise behavior change within rehabilitation, exploring constructs such as motivation, self-efficacy, stages of change, behavioral intention, perceived threat, and the core elements of physical activity expression. CONCLUSION: These theoretical models provide a foundation for understanding and developing strategies for promoting exercise behavior change in rehabilitation. Knowing and using these theories is important for respecting the patient's individuality.

An online behavior change intervention to promote physical activity in adults with asthma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Behavior change interventions have been the focus of recent studies, and the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of online interventions. However, no previous studies have investigated behavior change techniques to improve physical activity in adults with asthma through online intervention. METHODS: This double-blind clinical trial will investigate the effectiveness of an online behavior change intervention in increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior in adults with asthma, as well as in improving other clinical outcomes in short and medium terms. Patients with clinically stable moderate to severe asthma, who are physically inactive and do not have cardiovascular and/or osteoneuromuscular impairments will be randomized into control or intervention groups (23 in each). Both groups will carry out an online educational program (1 h). Additionally, the intervention group will receive weekly individual online sessions for 12 weeks of motivation-based behavior change intervention to promote an increase in physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior based on both self-determination theory and transtheoretical model. The intervention group will also receive an activity monitor with specific strategies related to it. Both groups will be reassessed immediately after the intervention and 6 months after that. The primary outcomes are physical activity and sedentary behavior, which will be objectively assessed by a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph wGT3X-BT). Secondary outcomes are Asthma Control Questionnaire, Incremental Step Test, Sit-To-Stand, Timed Up-and-Go, 4-Metre Gait Speed, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Actiwatch 2, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. DISCUSSION: The intervention is unprecedented and was carefully developed to joint most characteristics and techniques of both behavioral strategies (transtheoretical model and self-determination theory). Therefore, this intervention has the potential to improve physical activity levels and asthma management and reduce sedentary behavior. As a consequence, this novel intervention will improve global health in this population and support its use in clinical practice. The intervention will be carried out online with direct weekly contact with the therapist. Consequently, it has low implementation costs, might improve patient's attendance, and has the potential to be largely offered elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05241223 . Registered on January 22, 2022.

Modified Medical Research Council and COPD Assessment Test Cutoff Points.

BACKGROUND: The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) are assessment instruments associated with level of physical activity of daily living (PADL) in patients with COPD. This study aimed to identify mMRC and CAT cutoff points to discriminate sedentary behavior and PADL level of subjects with COPD and verify whether these cutoff points differentiate pulmonary function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and mortality index in subjects with COPD. METHODS: Subjects (N = 131, FEV1: 36.7 ± 16.1% predicted) were assessed for lung function, mMRC, CAT, HRQOL, functional status, and mortality index. PADL was monitored using a triaxial accelerometer, and subjects were classified as sedentary/nonsedentary (cutoff point of 8.5 h/d in PADL < 1.5 metabolic equivalent of task [MET]), physically active/inactive (cutoff point of 80 min/d in PADL ≥ 3 METs), and with/without severe physical inactivity (cutoff point of 4,580 steps/d), according to variables provided by accelerometer. RESULTS: ROC curve indicated mMRC cutoff point of ≥ 2 (P < .05) for physical inactivity (sensitivity = 66%, specificity = 56%, AUC = 0.62), severe physical inactivity (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 66%, AUC = 0.76), and sedentary behavior (sensitivity = 61%, specificity = 70%, AUC = 0.65). The identified CAT cutoff points were ≥ 16 and ≥ 20, considering severe physical inactivity (sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 54%, AUC = 0.69, P < .001) and sedentary behavior (sensitivity = 51%, specificity = 90%, AUC = 0.71, P = .001), respectively. Subjects who had mMRC ≥ 2 and CAT ≥ 16 or ≥ 20 presented worse pulmonary function, HRQOL, functional status, and mortality index compared with those who scored mMRC < 2 and CAT <16 or < 20. CONCLUSIONS: mMRC cutoff point of ≥ 2 is recommended to discriminate PADL level and sedentary behavior, whereas CAT cutoff points of ≥ 16 and ≥ 20 discriminated severe physical inactivity and sedentary behavior, respectively. These cutoff points differentiated subjects with COPD regarding all the outcomes assessed in this study.

Reliability of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on domiciliary oxygen therapy.

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and learning effect of the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STSt) in severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients on domiciliary oxygen therapy compare the results with those of COPD patients not on such therapy. Methods: Twenty-eight COPD patients were included in the domiciliary oxygen therapy group (DOTG) and 17 in the control group (CG). The participants of the groups were paired by age, sex, body mass index, and lung function. The groups performed two 5STSt (5STSt1 and 5STSt2). Results: In total, 96% of the patients in the DOTG performed better on the second 5STSt (5STSt2) (17.1 ± 4.63s), with an average reduction of 3.87 ± 3.50 s (p < 0.001) and a learning effect of 18.4%. In the CG, 82.3% of patients had better performance on the 5STSt2 (15.06 ± 3.45 s), with an average reduction of 1.38 ± 2.51 s (p = 0.035) and a learning effect of 8.39%. The 5STSt had an ICC of 0.79 (95%CI: 0.02-0.93; p < 0.001) in the DOTG and of 0.89 (95%CI: 0.65-0.96; p < 0.001) in the CG. Conclusion: The 5STSt is reliable in patients with severe and very severe COPD on domiciliary oxygen therapy, with learning effect of nearly 18% in the DOTG. Thus, performing two tests is recommended to achieve the patient´s best performance in this population.

The minimal important difference for Glittre-ADL test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine Glittre-ADL test minimal important difference in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: This is quasi-experimental study. Sixty patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (age 64.1, SD=9.09 years; forced expiratory volume in the first second 37.9, SD=13.0% predicted participated in a pulmonary rehabilitation program based on physical training, conducted over 24 sessions supervised, three times a week, including aerobic training in treadmill and resistance training for upper limbs and lower limbs. The main outcomes were the Glittre-ADL test and six-minute walk test, before and after 24 sessions of pulmonary rehabilitation. The minimal important difference was established using the distribution and anchor-based methods. RESULTS: Patients improved their functional capacity after the pulmonary rehabilitation. The effect sizes of Glittre-ADL test and six-minute walk test improvement were similar (0.45 vs 0.44, respectively). The established minimal important differences ranged from -0.38 to -1.05. The reduction of 0.38min (23s) corresponded to a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 69% with an area under the curve of 0.66 (95%CI 0.51-0.81; p=0.04). Subjects who achieved the minimal important difference of -0.38min for the Glittre-ADL test had a superior improvement of approximately 42m in the six-minute walk test when compared to patients who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest -0.38min as the minimal important difference in the time spent in the Glittre-ADL test after 24 sessions of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03251781 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03251781).

Body mass index, asthma, and respiratory symptoms: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of respiratory symptoms and asthma, according to body mass index (BMI), as well as to evaluate factors associated with physician-diagnosed asthma, in individuals ≥ 40 years of age. METHODS: This was a population-based cross-sectional study conducted in Florianópolis, Brazil, with probability sampling. Data were collected during home visits. Demographic data were collected, as were reports of physician-diagnosed asthma, respiratory symptoms, medications in use, and comorbidities. Anthropometric measurements were taken. Individuals also underwent spirometry before and after bronchodilator administration. Individuals were categorized as being of normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 kg/m2 ≥ BMI < 30 kg/m2), or obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). RESULTS: A total of 1,026 individuals were evaluated, 274 (26.7%) were of normal weight, 436 (42.5%) were overweight, and 316 (30.8%) were obese. The prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma was 11.0%. The prevalence of obesity was higher in women (p = 0.03), as it was in respondents with ≤ 4 years of schooling (p < 0.001) or a family income of 3-10 times the national minimum wage. Physician-diagnosed asthma was more common among obese individuals than among those who were overweight and those of normal weight (16.1%, 9.9%, and 8.0%, respectively; p = 0.04), as were dyspnea (35.5%, 22.5%, and 17.9%, respectively; p < 0.001) and wheezing in the last year (25.6%, 11.9%, and 14.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). These results were independent of patient smoking status. In addition, obese individuals were three times more likely to report physician-diagnosed asthma than were those of normal weight (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A report of physician-diagnosed asthma showed a significant association with being ≥ 40 years of age and with having a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Being obese tripled the chance of physician-diagnosed asthma.

Baseline characteristics associated to improvement of patients with COPD in physical activity in daily life level after pulmonary rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Knowing the patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that increase the physical activity of daily living (PADL) after pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a challenge. AIMS: to compare baseline characteristics between patients who achieved and failed to achieve the minimal important difference (MID) of PADL post-PR; to verify which baseline variables better predict the change and identify a cut-off point to discriminate MID achievers. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with COPD (FEV1: 38.3; 95%CI 34.4-42.2%pred) were evaluated for spirometry, dyspnea, quality of life, functional capacity, mortality risk and PADL level. After 24 sessions of PR had their PADL level revaluated. RESULTS: The MID achievers presented lower FEV1, functional capacity, time walking, number of steps, active time, energy expenditure (EE) walking, time on PADL≥3 metabolic equivalent of task (METs) and higher time on PADL<1.5MET. Inactive patients and with severe physical inactivity presented a hazard ratio of 4.27 and 6.90 (95%CI: 1.31-13.9, p = 0.02; 95%CI: 1.99-23.9, p = 0.002; respectively) for achieving the MID. The variables of predictive model for the change in the PADL were EE walking and time on PADL<1.5MET (R2: 0.37; p = 0.002). The cut-off point of 6525 steps [sensitivity = 95%; specificity = 61%; AUC = 0.82 (95%CI: 0.71-0.93), p < 0.001] was able to discriminate patients who achieved and failed to achieve the MID. CONCLUSION: Patients with worse lung function, functional capacity and lower PADL level before PR are those that improve the PADL level. EE walking and time on PADL<1.5MET better predict this change. The cut-off point of 6525 steps can help to identify patients with higher chances of improving the PADL level.

Impact of Home Oxygen Therapy on the Level of Physical Activities in Daily Life in Subjects With COPD.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hypoxemia in patients with COPD is a limiting factor that is associated with disease progression and significantly contributes to decreased physical activity. Although correction of hypoxemia results in physiological improvements, oxygen therapy may be related to social isolation and inactivity. However, few studies have objectively investigated the level of physical activity in daily life (PADL) in these patients. The objective of this study was to compare the level of PADL in subjects with COPD on home oxygen therapy and in subjects with no oxygen therapy, and to investigate whether home oxygen therapy is associated with the level of PADL. METHODS: In this study, 29 subjects with COPD composed the home oxygen therapy group, and 30 subjects with COPD composed the control group. All of them underwent assessment of anthropometric measurements, spirometry, peripheral muscle strength, limitations in activities of dalily living, perception of dyspnea, health status, as well as PADL monitoring. RESULTS: Home oxygen therapy subjects showed less time walking (P = .001), in active physical activities (P = .003), in physical activities ≥ 3 METs (P = .001), and in physical activities < 1.5 METs (P = .042), as well as fewer steps (P = .001). Physical inactivity was present in 24 home oxygen subjects (82.8%) and 18 control subjects (60%). Oxygen therapy was associated with severe physical inactivity (Cramer's V = 0.29, P = .040). The time using oxygen therapy (h/d) was the strongest predictor of the level of PADL (r2 = 0.38-0.43, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Subjects with COPD using oxygen at home showed reduced level of PADL. The results indicate that oxygen therapy is associated with severe physical inactivity and may be a predictor of the level of PADL.

Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale in GOLD Classification Better Reflects Physical Activities of Daily Living.

BACKGROUND: In multidimensional Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification, the choice of the symptom assessment instrument (modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale [mMRC] or COPD assessment test [CAT]) can lead to a different distribution of patients in each quadrant. Considering that physical activities of daily living (PADL) is an important functional outcome in COPD, the objective of this study was to determine which symptom assessment instrument is more strongly associated with and differentiates better the PADL of patients with COPD. METHODS: The study included 115 subjects with COPD (GOLD 2-4), who were submitted to spirometry, the mMRC, the CAT, and monitoring of PADL (triaxial accelerometer). Subjects were divided into 2 groups using the cutoffs proposed by the multidimensional GOLD classification: mMRC < 2 and ≥ 2 and CAT < 10 and ≥ 10. RESULTS: Both mMRC and CAT reflected the PADL of COPD subjects. Subjects with mMRC < 2 and CAT < 10 spent less time in physical activities < 1.5 metabolic equivalents of task (METs) (mean of the difference [95% CI] = -62.9 [-94.4 to -31.4], P < .001 vs -71.0 [-116 to -25.9], P = .002) and had a higher number of steps (3,076 [1,999-4,153], P < .001 vs 2,688 [1,042-4,333], P = .002) than subjects with mMRC > 2 and CAT > 10, respectively. Physical activities ≥ 3 METs differed only between mMRC < 2 and mMRC ≥ 2 (39.2 [18.8-59.6], P < .001). Furthermore, only the mMRC was able to predict the PADL alone (time active, r2 = 0.16; time sedentary, r2 = 0.12; time ≥ 3 METs, r2 = 0.12) and associated with lung function (number of steps, r2 = 0.35; walking time, r2 = 0.37; time < 1.5 METs, r2 = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: The mMRC should be adopted as the classification criterion for symptom assessment in the GOLD ABCD system when focusing on PADL.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and reliability of the Understanding COPD questionnaire for use in Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To translate the Understanding COPD (UCOPD) questionnaire into Portuguese, adapt it for use in Brazil, and assess its reliability. METHODS: The UCOPD questionnaire consists of two sections, designated section A and section B. Section A comprises 18 items divided into three domains: "About COPD", "Managing Symptoms of COPD", and "Accessing Help and Support". Section B includes five questions regarding patient satisfaction with the educational component of pulmonary rehabilitation programs. The UCOPD questionnaire was applied twice on the same day by two different raters (with a 10-min interval between applications) and once again 15-20 days later. The Wilcoxon test was used in order to compare the scores among applications. Reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 50 COPD patients (35 men; mean age, 65.3 ± 7.91 years; mean FEV1, 36.4 ± 16.2% of the predicted value). Inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients for section A total scores and domain scores ranged from moderate to high. Section A scores and domain scores had no significant differences regarding test-retest reliability (p < 0.05). The test-retest and inter-rater Cronbach's alpha coefficients for section A total scores were 0.93 and 0.86, respectively (p < 0.001). There were no floor or ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the UCOPD questionnaire is reliable.

Validation of a bioelectrical impedance analysis system for body composition assessment in patients with COPD.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of an eight-contact electrode bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) system within a household scale for assessing whole body composition in COPD patients. METHODS: Seventeen patients with COPD (mean age = 67 ± 8 years; mean FEV1 = 38.6 ± 16.1% of predicted; and mean body mass index = 24.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2) underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and an eight-contact electrode BIA system for body composition assessment. RESULTS: There was a strong inter-method correlation for fat mass (r = 0.95), fat-free mass (r = 0.93), and lean mass (r = 0.93), but the correlation was moderate for bone mineral content (r = 0.73; p < 0.01 for all). In the agreement analysis, the values between DEXA and the BIA system differed by only 0.15 kg (-6.39 to 6.70 kg), 0.26 kg (-5.96 to 6.49 kg), -0.13 kg (-0.76 to 0.50 kg), and -0.55 kg (-6.71 to 5.61 kg) for fat-free mass, lean mass, bone mineral content, and fat mass, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The eight-contact electrode BIA system showed to be a valid tool in the assessment of whole body composition in our sample of patients with COPD.

Physiological Responses and Dynamic Hyperinflation Induced by Unsupported Arm Activities Involved in Multiple-Task Activities of Daily Living Test in Patients With COPD.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the isolated role of unsupported arm activities and the physiological responses and dynamic hyperinflation (DH) induced by activities of daily living in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Physiological responses and DH were compared using the Glittre activities of daily living test (TGlittre) and a modified protocol that emphasized unsupported arm activities and excluded squats and bending down to move objects on shelves (TGlittre-M). Data were also compared from the isolated shelf tasks of TGlittre (TSHELF) and TGlittre-M (TSHELF-M). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 30 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who performed the TGlittre, TGlittre-M, TSHELF and TSHELF-M. The physiological responses were evaluated during the 4 protocols and inspiratory capacity was measured before and immediately after the tests for evaluation of DH. RESULTS: Patients had higher oxygen uptake, ventilatory demand, dyspnea, and DH in the TGlittre than in the TGlittre-M (mean differences: 123 ± 119 mL/min; 0.11 ± 0.10, 1 [-1 to 3], and - 0.14 ± 0.22, respectively; P < .05 for all). Oxygen uptake, ventilatory demand, and dyspnea were also higher in the TSHELF than in the TSHELF-M (mean differences: 408 ± 185 mL/min; 0.26 ± 0.17; 1 [-1 to 3], respectively; P < .05 for all). However, DH was similar for both tasks (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the physiological demands during unsupported arm activities were lower than during the task performed with squatting and bending down; however, the magnitude of DH did not differ between them. These results suggest that the isolated arm activities contribute less to the TGlittre's physiological requirement than the lower-limb and trunk activities.

Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in adults with and without COPD, as well as to compare the CAT scores for nonsmokers, former smokers, and smokers without COPD with those for patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional population-based study (the Respira Floripa study). The study included adults ≥ 40 years of age residing in the city of Florianópolis, Brazil. A total of 846 households were surveyed. In addition to completing the Respira Floripa questionnaire and the CAT, participants underwent pulmonary function testing. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 1,057 participants (88.1% of the predicted sample size). A functional diagnosis of COPD was made in 92 participants (8.7%). Of those, 72% were unaware that they had COPD. The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in that of individuals without COPD (10.6 [95% CI: 8.8-12.4] vs. 6.6 [95% CI: 6.1-7.0]; p < 0.01). Individual item scores were significantly higher in the patients with COPD than in the individuals without COPD (p < 0.001), the exception being the scores for the items related to sleep (p = 0.13) and energy (p = 0.08). The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in nonsmokers (5.8 [95% CI: 5.3-6.4]) and former smokers (6.4 [95% CI: 5.6-7.2]; p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the mean CAT score between the group of COPD patients and smokers without COPD (9.5 [95% CI: 8.2-10.8]; p > 0.05), the exception being the mean scores for confidence leaving home (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: CAT scores were higher in the group of patients with COPD than in nonsmokers and former smokers without COPD. However, there were no significant differences in CAT scores between COPD patients and smokers without COPD. Smokers with an FEV1/FVC ratio > 0.70 have impaired health status and respiratory symptoms similar to those observed in COPD patients.