Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Avian Dis ; 59(1): 64-70, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26292536

RESUMO

Avian influenza (AI) viruses cause disease in domestic and wild bird species. Although these viruses have been reported to occur in poultry in Uganda, risk factors for their introduction and spread were largely unknown. We investigated the seroprevalence and risk factors for exposure of free-range poultry to AI viruses in Important Bird Areas (IBAs) in the country. A structured questionnaire was administered to 664 respondents, and 1342 sera were collected from poultry. Sera were analyzed for antibody titers against AI using competitive ELISA. AI antibody prevalence was 7.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-9.0) in the Lake Victoria Basin, 8.4% (95% CI: 7.0-9.8) in the southwestern region, and none (0/432) in the Kyoga region. High proportions of risky practices were observed among respondent farmers. Significant predictors for exposure of poultry to AI viruses were the source of restocking poultry, method of disposal of inedible parts of slaughtered poultry, and waterfowl visits to a nearby body of water. In addition, visits by waterbirds to a nearby body of water during October-December were more associated with exposure to AI viruses (odds ratio = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.42-9.23) compared with January-March visits'. These results suggested the existence of several risk factors for exposure of free-range to AI viruses in IBAs in Uganda.


Assuntos
Criação de Animais Domésticos , Galinhas , Patos , Vírus da Influenza A/classificação , Influenza Aviária/virologia , Animais , Influenza Aviária/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Uganda/epidemiologia
2.
Res Vet Sci ; 97(2): 218-25, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25066802

RESUMO

We explored observed risk factors and drivers of infection possibly associated with African swine fever (ASF) epidemiology in Uganda. Representative sub-populations of pig farms and statistics were used in a case-control model. Indiscriminate disposal of pig viscera and waste materials after slaughter, including on open refuse dumps, farm-gate buyers collecting pigs and pig products from within a farm, and retention of survivor pigs were plausible risk factors. Wire mesh-protected windows in pig houses were found to be protective against ASF infection. Sighting engorged ticks on pigs, the presence of a lock for each pig pen and/or a gate at the farm entrance were significantly associated with infection/non-infection; possible explanations were offered. Strict adherence to planned within-farm and community-based biosecurity, and avoidance of identified risk factors is recommended to reduce infection. Training for small-scale and emerging farmers should involve multidimensional and multidisciplinary approaches to reduce human-related risky behaviours driving infection.


Assuntos
Vírus da Febre Suína Africana , Febre Suína Africana/epidemiologia , Febre Suína Africana/transmissão , Adulto , Febre Suína Africana/prevenção & controle , Animais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Abrigo para Animais , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Eliminação de Resíduos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sus scrofa , Suínos , Uganda/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA