Assessment of Patient Characteristics Influencing the Analgesic Effects of Ibuprofen Gargle After Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.

Introduction In our previous work, we investigated the analgesic effects of ibuprofen gargle after mandibular third molar extractions. However, a subsequent detailed review of individual patient data revealed variations in postoperative pain reduction among patients. Consequently, the present study was designed to conduct post-hoc subanalyses that identified factors contributing to variation in the analgesic response to ibuprofen gargle after third molar extractions. Materials and methods This study involved thirty-five Japanese patients from a prior randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, which focused on the analgesic effects of ibuprofen gargle after mandibular third molar extractions. Participants were categorized as responders (n = 13) and non-responders (n = 22) based on the within-subject difference (ibuprofen-placebo, IP) of visual analog scale (VAS) changes. Baseline characteristics were compared, along with variables, such as age, sex, the reason for extraction, extraction site, Pell Gregory (space and depth) classification, Winter's classification, surgeon's experience, and surgery time. Baseline characteristics predicting responder status were examined using multivariate logistic regression. Results In the univariate analysis, variables such as age, sex, and baseline VAS scores with p-values <0.2 were evaluated using a stepwise approach. This analysis identified age (per -10 years) with an odds ratio of 4.163 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.170-31.952, p = 0.0233) and sex (female) with an odds ratio of 9.977 (95% CI: 1.336-208.256, p = 0.0213) as significant predictors of responder status. Conclusions In young and female patients, ibuprofen gargle decreased postoperative pain after mandibular third molar extractions.

Gold Nanoparticles Enhance the Tumor Growth-Suppressing Effects of Cetuximab and Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer In Vitro and In Vivo.

INTRODUCTION: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy with the aim of eradicating cancer cells without affecting normal tissues. HNSCC expresses epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cetuximab, an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, has been approved for the treatment of HNSCC. However, cetuximab has low reactivity and induces serious side effects. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were reported to enhance the local antitumor effects of radiotherapy without damaging normal cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study investigated the in vitro effects of single and combination therapy with AuNPs (1.0 nM), cetuximab (30 nM), and radiotherapy (4 Gy) on a human HNSCC cell line, HSC-3. Combination treatment of AuNPs + cetuximab + radiotherapy markedly reduced HSC-3 numbers and proliferation and enhanced apoptosis compared with single and double combination treatments. Furthermore, the in vivo combination treatment (AuNPs + cetuximab + radiotherapy) of a xenograft model of HSC-3 cells transplanted into nude mice (BALB/cAJcl-nu/nu) reduced the tumor volume compared with the controls. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated the presence of AuNPs in tumor tissues and toxicity analysis indicated that AuNPs had no toxic effect on normal tissues. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that AuNPs alone do not have a tumor-suppressing effect, but they sensitize tumors to radiotherapy and bind to cetuximab, leading to enhanced antitumor effects.

Which symptoms negatively affect the oral health-related quality of life in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw?

OBJECTIVES: One of the treatment goals for osteonecrotic lesions of the jaw, such as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) or osteoradionecrosis (ORN), is restoration of quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to identify symptoms that negatively affect QOL in patients with unhealed MRONJ or ORN. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study included patients who were previously diagnosed with MRONJ or ORN and who underwent treatment at the Kobe University Hospital between June 2015 and February 2016. Patient QOL was measured by using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). The predictor variable was disease status (stage and healing). The outcome variable was OHIP-14. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test were performed. RESULTS: The study included 74 patients (37 men and 37 women; mean age 70 years). Although there was no significant difference between the OHIP-14 scores of unhealed MRONJ and ORN (stages 1-3) and those of healed ones, the "worsened sense of taste" resulted in significant differences among stages in patients with unhealed MRONJ (P = .027) and the "painful mouth aching" in patients with unhealed ORN (P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: Worsened sense of taste and pain negatively affected QOL in patients with unhealed MRONJ and ORN.

Gold Nanoparticles Enhance EGFR Inhibition and Irradiation Effects in Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma Cells.

Cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EI), is currently the only targeted molecular therapy used in combination with radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are expected to enhance radiotherapy effects in cancers. To investigate whether AuNPs combined with AG1478, an EI, enhanced irradiation effects on HNSCC cells, we first examined AG1478 adsorption on AuNP surfaces, using surface-enhanced Raman scattering, which indicated an adsorption equilibrium of AG1478 to AuNPs. We then used transmission electron microscopy to find internalization rates of AuNP alone and AuNP+AG1478; we found that intracellular uptake of AuNP alone and AuNP+AG1478 did not significantly differ. We compared cell numbers, proliferation, apoptosis, and migration between control cells and those treated with or without 60 nm AuNP (1.0 nM), AG1478 (0.5 µM), and irradiation (4 Gy). We found that AuNP+AG1478 inhibited proliferation more than AG1478 alone; the combination of irradiation+AuNP+AG1478 significantly reduced total cell numbers compared with the combination of irradiation+AuNP; AuNP+AG1478 increased apoptotic reaction to irradiation; the combinations of AuNP+AG1478 and irradiation+AuNP induced more apoptosis than AG1478+irradiation. Whereas AuNP+AG1478 enhanced cytotoxicity in human HNSCC cells by inhibiting proliferation, irradiation+AuNP enhanced cytotoxicity by inducing apoptosis.