Adjuvant S-1 compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (JCOG1202, ASCOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: S-1 has shown promising efficacy with a mild toxicity profile in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether adjuvant S-1 improved overall survival compared with observation for resected biliary tract cancer. METHODS: This open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial was conducted in 38 Japanese hospitals. Patients aged 20-80 years who had histologically confirmed extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, ampullary carcinoma, or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a resected specimen and had undergone no local residual tumour resection or microscopic residual tumour resection were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo observation or to receive S-1 (ie, 40 mg, 50 mg, or 60 mg according to body surface area, orally administered twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest for four cycles). Randomisation was performed by the minimisation method, using institution, primary tumour site, and lymph node metastasis as adjustment factors. The primary endpoint was overall survival and was assessed for all randomly assigned patients on an intention-to-treat basis. Safety was assessed in all eligible patients. For the S-1 group, all patients who began the protocol treatment were eligible for a safety assessment. This trial is registered with the University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000011688). FINDINGS: Between Sept 9, 2013, and June 22, 2018, 440 patients were enrolled (observation group n=222 and S-1 group n=218). The data cutoff date was June 23, 2021. Median duration of follow-up was 45·4 months. In the primary analysis, the 3-year overall survival was 67·6% (95% CI 61·0-73·3%) in the observation group compared with 77·1% (70·9-82·1%) in the S-1 group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·51-0·94; one-sided p=0·0080). The 3-year relapse-free survival was 50·9% (95% CI 44·1-57·2%) in the observation group compared with 62·4% (55·6-68·4%) in the S-1 group (HR 0·80, 95% CI 0·61-1·04; two-sided p=0·088). The main grade 3-4 adverse events in the S-1 group were decreased neutrophil count (29 [14%]) and biliary tract infection (15 [7%]). INTERPRETATION: Although long-term clinical benefit would be needed for a definitive conclusion, a significant improvement in survival suggested adjuvant S-1 could be considered a standard of care for resected biliary tract cancer in Asian patients. FUNDING: The National Cancer Center Research and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan.

Early Tumor Shrinkage and Depth of Response as Predictors of Survival for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of JCOG1113.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) reflect outcomes of chemotherapy in various cancers. This study evaluated the association of ETS and DpR with clinical outcomes using data from JCOG1113, which demonstrated the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) for chemotherapy-naïve advanced biliary tract cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 354 (289 with measurable target lesions) patients enrolled in JCOG1113 were divided into ETS-unachieved and ETS-achieved groups (≥20% tumor reduction at week 6) and DpR-low and DpR-high groups (≥40% maximum shrinkage) until 12 weeks after enrollment. The impact of ETS and DpR on survival outcome was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The proportions of patients in the ETS-achieved and DpR-high groups were similar between the 2 treatment arms. The hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the ETS-achieved group were 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.93) and 0.60 (95%CI, 0.44-0.81), respectively. The HRs of PFS and OS for the DpR-high group were 0.67 (95%CI, 0.48-0.94) and 0.64 (95%CI, 0.46-0.90), respectively. In the subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot analysis, most patients in the ETS-achieved group in the GC arm did not experience disease progression after 12 weeks from the landmark. CONCLUSION: As on-treatment markers, ETS and DpR were effective tools. ETS was clinically useful, because it can be used to evaluate the outcomes of treatment early at a specific time.

A randomized phase III trial of postoperative surveillance for pathological stage II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG2012, PHOENIX).

The goal of postoperative surveillance following non-small cell lung cancer surgery is to detect recurrence and second primary malignancies while curative treatment is still possible. Although several guidelines recommend that patients have computed tomography (CT) scans every 6 months for the first 2 years after resection, then once a year, there is no evidence that it is effective for survival, especially in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In October 2022, we launched a multi-institutional, randomized controlled phase III trial for pathological stage II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients to confirm the non-inferiority of less intensive surveillance with less frequent CT scans versus standard surveillance in terms of overall survival. The primary endpoint is overall survival. We intend to enroll 1100 patients from 45 institutions over 4 years. The trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials under the code jRCT1030220361 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1030220361).

A phase III randomized controlled trial comparing local field with additional prophylactic irradiation in chemoradiotherapy for clinical-T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: ARMADILLO trial (JCOG1904).

Chemoradiotherapy has been considered as one of the standard treatment options for clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with organ preservation. However, 20% of patients develop locoregional recurrence after chemoradiotherapy, which requires salvage treatment including salvage surgery and endoscopic resection. Salvage surgery can cause complications and treatment-related death. Interestingly, chemoradiotherapy with elective nodal irradiation has been reported to reduce the locoregional recurrence of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Hence, we are conducting a clinical trial to confirm whether modified chemoradiotherapy with elective nodal irradiation was superiority to that without elective nodal irradiation for the patients with cT1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The primary endpoint is major progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to the date of death or disease progression, excluding successful curative resection through salvage endoscopic resection. We plan to enroll 280 patients from 54 institutions over 4 years. This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031200067).

Protocol for the 2ND-STEP study, Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1802: a randomized phase II trial of second-line treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma comparing trabectedin, eribulin and pazopanib.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare type of malignancy comprising a variety of histological diagnoses. Chemotherapy constitutes the standard treatment for advanced STS. Doxorubicin-based regimens, which include the administration of doxorubicin alone or in combination with ifosfamide or dacarbazine, are widely accepted as first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS. Trabectedin, eribulin, pazopanib, and gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD), which is the empirical standard therapy in Japan, are major candidates for second-line chemotherapy for advanced STS, although clear evidence of the superiority of any one regimen is lacking. The Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) conducts this trial to select the most promising regimen among trabectedin, eribulin, and pazopanib for comparison with GD as the test arm regimen in a future phase III trial of second-line treatment for patients with advanced STS. METHODS: The JCOG1802 study is a multicenter, selection design, randomized phase II trial comparing trabectedin (1.2 mg/m2 intravenously, every 3 weeks), eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks), and pazopanib (800 mg orally, every day) in patients with unresectable or metastatic STS refractory to doxorubicin-based first-line chemotherapy. The principal eligibility criteria are patients aged 16 years or above; unresectable and/or metastatic STS; exacerbation within 6 months prior to registration; histopathological diagnosis of STS other than Ewing sarcoma, embryonal/alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, well-differentiated liposarcoma and myxoid liposarcoma; prior doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for STS, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-control rate, response rate, and adverse events. The total planned sample size to correctly select the most promising regimen with a probability of > 80% is 120. Thirty-seven institutions in Japan will participate at the start of this trial. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized trial to evaluate trabectedin, eribulin, and pazopanib as second-line therapies for advanced STS. We endeavor to perform a subsequent phase III trial comparing the best regimen selected by this study (JCOG1802) with GD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( jRCTs031190152 ) on December 5, 2019.

Phase II biomarker identification study of anti-VEGF agents with FOLFIRI for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Chemotherapy plus antiangiogenic agents, including bevacizumab, ramucirumab and aflibercept, is a standard second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but which specific agents should be selected is ambiguous due to a lack of clear evidence from prospective studies. Previous reports have suggested ramucirumab and aflibercept could be more effective than bevacizumab in patients with high VEGF-D and high VEGF-A, respectively. JCOG2004 is a three-arm, randomized, phase II study to identify predictive biomarkers for these agents in patients who have failed first-line treatment. The study will enroll 345 patients from 52 institutions for 2 years, with progression-free survival in high VEGF-D (bevacizumab vs ramucirumab) and high VEGF-A (bevacizumab vs aflibercept) serving as the primary end point. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031220058 (www.jrct.niph.go.jp).

A randomized phase II study comparing preoperative mFOLFOX6 versus FOLFOXIRI for locally advanced colon cancer: JCOG2006.

The prognosis of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) with surgical resection followed only by adjuvant chemotherapy is poor. Preoperative chemotherapy for LACC patients with risk factors such as cT4bN+ or cT3-4aN2-3 has attracted attention. Here, the authors describe the rationale and design of JCOG2006, a randomized phase II study comparing preoperative chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 versus FOLFOXIRI for LACC. Their efficacy and safety are evaluated and a determination of which is the more promising treatment will be conducted in a subsequent phase III trial. A total of 86 patients will be accrued from 44 institutions over 2 years. The primary end point is the proportion of patients with a Tumor Regression Score of 0-2, and secondary end points include overall survival, response rate and adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs031210365 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/).

Final analysis of a randomized phase II/III trial of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab versus dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab, in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma (JCOG1311).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of dose-dense weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin in metastatic or recurrent cervical carcinoma, we conducted a phase II/III randomized controlled study comparing dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab to conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab. However, at the primary analysis of the phase II part, the response rate in the dose-dense arm was not higher than in the conventional arm and the study was terminated early before starting phase III. After a further 2 years of follow-up, we conducted this final analysis. METHODS: 122 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional or dose-dense arm. After bevacizumab was approved in Japan, patients in both arms received bevacizumab if not contraindicated. In the final analysis, overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events were updated. RESULTS: The median follow-up of surviving patients was 34.8 months (range 19.2-64.8). Median overall survival in the conventional arm was 17.7 months and in the dose-dense arm 18.5 months (p=0.71). Median progression-free survival in the conventional arm was 7.9 months and in the dose-dense arm 7.2 months (p=0.64). A platinum-free interval within 24 weeks and treatment without bevacizumab were identified as prognostic factors for overall and progression-free survival. Grade 3 to 4 non-hematologic toxicity occurred in 46.7% of patients who received the conventional regimen and in 43.3% of patients who received the dose-dense regimen. Adverse events related to bevacizumab in 82 patients included fistula in five (6.1%) and gastrointestinal perforation in three (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: It was confirmed that dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin for metastatic or recurrent cervical carcinoma is not superior to conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin. Patients who had early refractory disease after prior chemoradiotherapy had the poorest prognosis. The development of treatments that improve the prognosis of such patients remains an important issue. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: jRCTs031180007.

Perioperative Adriamycin plus ifosfamide vs. gemcitabine plus docetaxel for high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: randomised, phase II/III study JCOG1306.

BACKGROUND: This randomised phase II/III trial aimed to determine whether perioperative chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD) is non-inferior to the standard Adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS: Patients with localised high-risk STS in the extremities or trunk were randomised to receive AI or GD. The treatments were repeated for three preoperative and two postoperative courses. The primary endpoint was OS. RESULTS: Among 143 enrolled patients who received AI (70 patients) compared to GD (73 patients), the estimated 3-year OS was 91.4% for AI and 79.2% for GD (hazard ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.80-8.14, P = 0.78), exceeding the prespecified non-inferiority margin in the second interim analysis. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival was 79.1% for AI and 59.1% for GD. The most common Grade 3-4 adverse events in the preoperative period were neutropenia (88.4%), anaemia (49.3%), and febrile neutropenia (36.2%) for AI and neutropenia (79.5%) and febrile neutropenia (17.8%) for GD. CONCLUSIONS: Although GD had relatively mild toxicity, the regimen-as administered in this study-should not be considered a standard treatment of perioperative chemotherapy for high-risk STS in the extremities and trunk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCTs031180003.

Management of elderly patients with early gastric cancer in Japan.

Management of elderly patients with early gastric cancer is an important issue in an aging society such as Japan. While endoscopic resection is recommended as the standard treatment for early gastric cancers with extremely low risk of lymph node metastasis (<1%), gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is recommended for the other early gastric cancers as the standard treatment even in elderly patients. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the most recommended endoscopic resection procedure because of its high ability for 'en bloc' resection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection can reportedly provide favorable short-term outcomes in elderly patients. In terms of patient prognosis, the importance of considering patients' physical and nutritional conditions before endoscopic submucosal dissection has recently attracted attention. With respect to gastrectomy, the nationwide data in Japan have demonstrated relatively low 5-year overall survival and non-negligible post-operative 90-day mortality in men aged ≥75 years and women aged ≥80 years compared with those in younger patients. Among these elderly patients, 20% or more reportedly died within 5 years after gastrectomy mostly due to other diseases. These facts suggested the necessity of a less invasive management option for the elderly patients. Efforts are being made to provide a non-invasive follow-up option without gastrectomy following endoscopic resection in elderly patients. To avoid the increase in gastric cancer-related deaths, the selection of patients with relatively low lymph node metastasis risk is essential, and several tools to estimate the lymph node metastasis risk from early gastric cancers have been developed. To avoid overtreatment with gastrectomy in more elderly early gastric cancer patients, new endoscopic submucosal dissection indications for them are also warranted.

Study protocol for JCOG1807C (DEEP OCEAN): a interventional prospective trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab before and after operation or durvalumab as maintenance therapy after chemoradiotherapy against superior sulcus non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Superior sulcus tumours (SSTs) are relatively uncommon and one of the most intractable lung cancers among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We planned a multicenter, single-arm confirmatory trial of new multidisciplinary treatment using immune-checkpoint inhibitor. The aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new multidisciplinary treatment with perioperative durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: The primary endpoint is 3-year overall survival. Patients receive induction CRT with sequential two courses of durvalumab, followed by surgical resection for resectable SST. The regimen for CRT is two courses of cisplatin and S-1, and concurrent radiotherapy (66 Gy/33 Fr). After surgery, 22 courses of post-operative durvalumab therapy are administered. For unresectable SST, an additional 22 courses of durvalumab are administered after induction durvalumab. RESULTS: In two cases as a safety cohort, the safety of intervention treatment up to 30 days after surgery was examined, and there were no special safety signals. Patient enrollment has now resumed in the main cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study may contribute to the establishment of a new standard of care for SST, which is an intractable NSCLC.

A randomized phase III trial of denosumab before curettage for giant cell tumor of bone. JCOG1610.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of JCOG1610 (randomized controlled phase III trial) was to confirm the superiority of preoperative denosumab to curettage with adjuvant local therapy for patients with giant cell tumor of bone without possible post-operative large bone defect. METHODS: The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival and the total sample size was set at 106 patients. Patient accrual began in October 2017. However, the accrual was terminated in December 2020 due to a recommendation from the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee because of poor patient accrual. Now, we report the descriptive results obtained in this study. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients had been registered from 13 Japanese institutions at the time of termination on December 2020. Eleven patients were assigned to Arm A (curettage and adjuvant local therapy) and 7 to Arm B (preoperative denosumab, curettage and adjuvant local therapy). Median follow-up period was 1.6 (range: 0.5-2.8) years. Protocol treatment was completed in all but one patient in Arm A who had a pathological fracture before surgery. All patients in Arm B were treated with five courses of preoperative denosumab. Relapse-free survival proportions in Arm A and B were 90.0% (95% confidence interval: 47.3-98.5) and 100% (100-100) at 1 year, and 60.0% (19.0-85.5) and 62.5% (14.2-89.3) at 2 years, respectively [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.51 (0.24-9.41)]. CONCLUSION: In terms of relapse-free survival, the superiority of preoperative denosumab was not observed in patients with giant cell tumor of bone without possible post-operative large bone defect.

Prospective evaluation of watchful waiting for early-stage lung cancer with ground-glass opacity: a single-arm confirmatory multicenter study: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1906 (EVERGREEN study).

Among early-stage lung cancers that show ground-glass nodules on chest computed tomography, the lung cancer surgical study group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group previously reported that nodules of ≤2 cm with a consolidation/tumor ratio of ≤0.25 were considered radiologically non-invasive cancers with a low risk of metastasis. However, there is no consensus based on high-quality evidence about the optimal timing of surgical intervention for radiologically non-invasive cancers. In June 2020, we launched a multi-institutional, single-arm confirmatory trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of watchful waiting for patients with radiologically non-invasive lung cancer. It is planned that a total of 720 patients will be enrolled from 49 institutes over a 5-year period. The primary endpoint is 10-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints are 5-year OS, operation-free survival, proportion of extensive lung resection, proportion of unresectable progression, lung cancer-specific survival and adverse events.

A multi-institutional randomized phase III trial comparing postoperative radiotherapy to observation after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pathological N2 Stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1916 (J-PORT study).

The standard treatment for pathological N2 Stage III non-small cell lung cancer with negative surgical margins in Japan is cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. However, recent studies suggest that the addition of thoracic radiotherapy after adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival. While thoracic radiotherapy is considered to prolong survival by improving locoregional control, it is known to increase radiation-induced adverse events. We began a randomized controlled trial in January 2021 in Japan to confirm the superiority of radiotherapy over observation after adjuvant chemotherapy in pathological N2 Stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative surgical margins. We aim to accrue 330 patients from 47 institutions over 5 years. The primary endpoint is relapse-free survival; the secondary endpoints are overall survival, proportion of patients completing radiotherapy in the radiotherapy arm, early adverse events, late adverse events in the radiotherapy arm, serious adverse events and local recurrence.

A multi-institutional randomized phase III study comparing weekly carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel and daily low-dose carboplatin as regimens for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1914.

Daily low-dose carboplatin plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is the standard treatment for elderly patients with unresectable clinical stage (c-Stage) III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. However, a phase I study by Omori et al. suggests that weekly carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy have comparable efficacy outcomes with more manageable adverse events. In December 2020, we initiated a randomized controlled trial in Japan to confirm whether the weekly carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel regimen is noninferior to the daily low-dose carboplatin regimen for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with unresectable c-Stage III NSCLC. We plan to enroll 166 patients from 50 institutions in 3.5 years. The primary endpoint is overall survival. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, response rate, proportion of patients starting maintenance durvalumab therapy, adverse events, site of progression, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Trial Outcome Index deterioration and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living deterioration.

The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on supportive care for oral mucositis: current concepts and practice.

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) markedly affected the way healthcare professionals approach patients with cancer worldwide, not only in terms of therapeutic decision-making but also in terms of supportive care. With the rapid appearance of signs and symptoms and the need of close re-assessment, standard management of oral mucositis has been challenged by physical distancing and limited resources due to the global crisis. Building on the clinical experience developed during the acute phase by members of the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO), the implications of COVID-19 on the prevention, assessment, and treatment of mucositis are critically reported. Inspired by the restructuring of supportive care measures in response to the pandemic, suggestions for new models of approaching acute side effects are also discussed.

Study protocol for a multi-institutional randomized phase III study comparing combined everolimus plus lanreotide therapy and everolimus monotherapy in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1901 (STARTER-NET study).

Everolimus is recognized as one of the standard drugs for the treatment of unresectable or recurrent gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET). However, recent evidence has suggested that addition of somatostatin analogs to everolimus may yield better survival outcomes as compared to everolimus alone. In April 2020, we have initiated a randomized phase III trial in Japan, to confirm the superiority of combined everolimus plus lanreotide therapy over everolimus monotherapy in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastroenteropancreatic NETs with poor prognostic factors (Ki-67 labeling index: LI 5%-20% or Ki-67 LI < 5% with diffuse liver metastases). We plan to enroll a total of 250 patients from 76 institutions over an accrual period of 5 years. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. The key secondary endpoint is overall survival, with response rate, disease control rate, and proportion of patients with adverse events as the other secondary endpoints. This trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCT1031200023 [https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1031200023].

A randomized phase III study comparing continuation and discontinuation of PD-1 pathway inhibitors for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG1701, SAVE study).

The development of PD-1 pathway inhibitors has dramatically altered the treatment of advanced/recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer patients. However, the prognostic significance of their ongoing usage is controversial, especially for patients who have not progressed for a period of time. If discontinuation has no negative impact on survival, suspension may reduce side effects from toxicity and help alleviate the economic burdens on health insurance systems and patients. This randomized controlled trial enrolls patients who have responded well to PD-1 pathway inhibitors for >12 months. The aim is to confirm the non-inferiority of discontinuation of PD-1 pathway inhibitors, relative to continuation, in terms of overall survival. A total of 216 patients will be enrolled over 3 years. This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials as jRCT1031190032 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/). An ancillary study examining the prognostic and predictive role of circulating tumor DNA using Guardant360® is planned.

Systematic review of antimicrobials, mucosal coating agents, anesthetics, and analgesics for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines.

PURPOSE: To update the clinical practice guidelines for the use of antimicrobials, mucosal coating agents, anesthetics, and analgesics for the prevention and/or treatment of oral mucositis (OM). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. The findings were added to the database used to develop the 2014 MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines. Based on the evidence level, the following guidelines were determined: Recommendation, Suggestion, and No Guideline Possible. RESULTS: A total of 9 new papers were identified within the scope of this section, adding to the 62 papers reviewed in this section previously. A new Suggestion was made for topical 0.2% morphine for the treatment of OM-associated pain in head and neck (H&N) cancer patients treated with RT-CT (modification of previous guideline). A previous Recommendation against the use of sucralfate-combined systemic and topical formulation in the prevention of OM in solid cancer treatment with CT was changed from Recommendation Against to No Guideline Possible. Suggestion for doxepin and fentanyl for the treatment of mucositis-associated pain in H&N cancer patients was changed to No Guideline Possible. CONCLUSIONS: Of the agents studied for the management of OM in this paper, the evidence supports a Suggestion in favor of topical morphine 0.2% in H&N cancer patients treated with RT-CT for the treatment of OM-associated pain.

Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to update the clinical practice guidelines for the use of basic oral care (BOC) interventions for the prevention and/or treatment of oral mucositis (OM). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention in each cancer treatment setting was assigned an evidence level. The findings were added to the database used to develop the 2013 MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: Recommendation, Suggestion, No guideline possible. RESULTS: A total of 17 new papers across six interventions were examined and merged with a previous database. Based on the literature, the following guidelines were possible. The panel suggests that the implementation of multi-agent combination oral care protocols is beneficial for the prevention of OM during chemotherapy, head and neck (H&N) radiation therapy (RT), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Level of Evidence III). The panel suggests that chlorhexidine not be used to prevent OM in patients undergoing H&N RT (Level of Evidence III). No guideline was possible for professional oral care, patient education, saline, and sodium bicarbonate, and expert opinion complemented these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supports the use of multi-agent combination oral care protocols in the specific populations listed above. Additional well-designed research is needed on the other BOC interventions prior to guideline formulation.