Patient perceptions of urgency of their pelvic floor disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many surgical societies released guidelines that included cancellation of elective cases. The aim of this study was to better understand our patients' perceptions of the severity of their pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) and to determine what factors influenced this perception. We also aimed to better understand who might be amenable to telemedicine visits and what factors influenced this decision. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional quality improvement study that included women at least 18 years of age diagnosed with a pelvic floor disorder being evaluated within a university Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients whose appointments and procedures were being cancelled were queried on whether they would be willing to answer a telephone questionnaire developed by the clinical and research teams. We gathered descriptive data from 97 female patients with PFDs using a primary phone questionnaire. The data were analyzed using proportions and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 97 patients, the majority (79%) viewed their conditions as non-urgent. Factors that influenced patients' perception of urgency included race (p=0.037), health status (p≤0.001), a history of diabetes (p=0.011), and willingness to attend an in-person appointment (p=0.010). Further, 52% of respondents were willing to attend a tele-health appointment. Statistically significant factors influencing this decision were ethnicity (p=0.019), marital status (p=0.019), and willingness to attend an in-person appointment (p=0.011). CONCLUSION: The majority of women did not view their conditions as urgent during the COVID-19 pandemic and were amenable to a telehealth appointment.

Comparing One-Stage vs Two-Stage Approaches for the Management of Choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: The management of symptomatic choledocholithiasis remains a controversial issue. At present, the three most common management options for choledocholithiasis include a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy and stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, then by either an intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy or a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. The purpose of this study was to assess the consequences of the decision to pursue each of these three methods. METHODS: We conducted a review of the existing data comparing these three management options. The literature from 2009 to 2021 pertaining to these three methods was reviewed for data on duct clearance, morbidity, mortality, recurrence rate, length of stay, and operative time. Next, we constructed decision trees for each method using a utility score analysis, and these utility scores were used to create a sensitivity analysis based on stone clearance rate. RESULTS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography had a utility score of 0.9910, a stone clearance rate of 95.5%, a morbidity of 6.3%, and a mortality of 0.2%. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a utility score of 0.9629, a stone clearance rate of 85.5%, a morbidity of 13.3%, and a mortality of 0.8%. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration had a utility score of 0.9882, a stone clearance rate of 88.3%, a morbidity of 12.9%, and a mortality of 0.3%. CONCLUSION: We have shown that a laparoscopic cholecystectomy with an intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is associated with the best overall outcomes.

Successful treatment of a rare 6.5-cm true profunda femoris artery aneurysm with aneurysmectomy and interposition bypass.

Profunda femoris artery aneurysms (PFAAs) are rare and account for only 0.5% of all peripheral artery aneurysms. Potential complications include compression of surrounding nerves and veins, limb ischemia, and rupture. Currently there are no guidelines on the management of true PFAAs, and suggested treatment modalities include endovascular, open, and hybrid approaches. We report a case of an 82-year-old male with a history of aneurysmal disease who presented with a symptomatic 6.5-cm PFAA. He underwent successful aneurysmectomy and interposition bypass, which remains an effective method for treatment of this rare pathology.