Elective Cardioversion in the Era of Novel Oral Anticoagulants - Does a Nurse Administered Verbal Questionnaire for Compliance Negate the Need for Routine Transoesophageal Echocardiography?

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation prior to elective external direct current cardioversion (EDCCV) is mandatory. The inability to monitor compliance with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) raises a potential safety issue. We aimed to evaluate whether a structured, nurse-led assessment of compliance prior to EDCCV ensures safety without the need for routine transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE). METHODS: Data was prospectively collected on consecutive patients undergoing EDCCV during 2014-2015. All procedures were supervised by an electrophysiology clinical nurse consultant (EPCNC). Drug compliance was verbally assessed using a standardised questionnaire by the EPCNC. Novel oral anticoagulants compliance was required for a continuous period of 3 weeks prior to EDCCV; otherwise a TOE-guided EDDCV was performed. All patients had follow-up 30 days post-procedure. RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven cardioversions were performed on 256 patients in whom 154 (49.5%) were prescribed a NOAC (rivaroxaban (n=105; 68.2%), dabigatran (n=38; 24.7%), apixaban (n=11; 7.1%)). Median age was 63 years (24-94 yrs), mean CHADS2-Vasc score was 2.0±1.5 and 138 (89.6%) were outpatients. One hundred and twenty-nine (83.8%) EDCCV were for atrial fibrillation and 25 (16.2%) for atrial flutter. Sinus rhythm was achieved in 90.3% of cases. Fourteen patients (9%) assessed as non-compliant underwent TOE. 129 (83.8%) EDCCV were performed without prior TOE. No stroke or systemic embolism was identified in any patient treated with either warfarin or a NOAC. CONCLUSIONS: A standardised, verbal questionnaire can be administered to detect NOAC non-compliance in patients undergoing EDCCV. With appropriate compliance assessment a nurse-led EDCCV without routine TOE did not significantly compromise safety in this study group.

Using the Surface ECG to Identify Right Ventricular Pacing Lead Position: A Cautionary Tale.

Chronic right ventricular (RV) apical pacing may lead to the development of heart failure in some patients. Although pacing of the RV septum has been proposed as an alternative, positioning a lead in the true septum has proven challenging. In addition to fluoroscopy at implant, it has been suggested that 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) can be used to determine septal lead position; however, studies show this may be inaccurate. We present a case where a change in the ECG QRS axis late after pacemaker insertion with an active fixation lead highlights the difficulties of ECG localization of pacing leads.

Surface ECG and Fluoroscopy are Not Predictive of Right Ventricular Septal Lead Position Compared to Cardiac CT.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal lead position for chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing. Placing a lead at the RV septum relies upon fluoroscopy assisted by a surface 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). We compared the postimplant lead position determined by ECG-gated multidetector contrast-enhanced computed tomography (MDCT) with the position derived from the surface 12-lead ECG. METHODS: Eighteen patients with permanent RV leads were prospectively enrolled. Leads were placed in the RV septum (RVS) in 10 and the RV apex (RVA) in eight using fluoroscopy with anteroposterior and left anterior oblique 30° views. All patients underwent MDCT imaging and paced ECG analysis. ECG criteria were: QRS duration; QRS axis; positive or negative net QRS amplitude in leads I, aVL, V1, and V6; presence of notching in the inferior leads; and transition point in precordial leads at or after V4. RESULTS: Of the 10 leads implanted in the RVS, computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed seven to be at the anterior RV wall, two at the anteroseptal junction, and one in the true septum. For the eight RVA leads, four were anterior, two septal, and two anteroseptal. All leads implanted in the RVS met at least one ECG criteria (median 3, range 1-6). However, no criteria were specific for septal position as judged by MDCT. Mean QRS duration was 160 ± 24 ms in the RVS group compared with 168 ± 14 ms for RVA pacing (P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the surface ECG is not sufficiently accurate to determine RV septal lead tip position compared to cardiac CT.

Characteristics of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation for Atrial Flutter Guided by Novel Parameters Using a Contact Force Catheter.

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to investigate specific contact force (CF) parameters to guide cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation and compare the outcome with a historical control cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (30) undergoing CTI ablation were enrolled prospectively in the Study cohort and compared with a retrospective Control cohort of 30 patients. Ablation in the Study cohort was performed using CF parameters >10 g and <40 g and a Force Time Integral (FTI) of 800 ± 10 g. The Control cohort underwent traditionally guided CTI ablation. Traditional parameters (electrogram and impedance change) were assessed in both cohorts. All ablations regardless of achieving targets were included in data analysis. Bidirectional CTI block was achieved in all of the Study and 27 of the Control cohort. Atrial flutter recurred in 3 (10%) patients (follow-up 564 ± 212 days) in the study cohort and in 3 (10%) patients (follow-up 804 ± 540 days) in the Control cohort. There were no major complications in either cohort. Traditional parameters correlated poorly with CF parameters. In the Study cohort, flutter recurrence was associated with significantly lower FTI and ablation duration, but was not associated with total average CF. CONCLUSION: CTI ablation can be safely performed using CF parameters guiding ablation, with similar long-term results to a historical ablation control group. Potentially CF parameters may provide adjunctive information to enable a more efficient CTI ablation. Further research is required to confirm this.

Effect of right ventricular pacing lead site on left ventricular function in patients with high-grade atrioventricular block: results of the Protect-Pace study.

AIM: Chronic right ventricle (RV) apical (RVA) pacing is standard treatment for an atrioventricular (AV) block but may be deleterious to left ventricle (LV) systolic function. Previous clinical studies of non-apical pacing have produced conflicting results. The aim of this randomized, prospective, international, multicentre trial was to compare change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between right ventricular apical and high septal (RVHS) pacing over a 2-year study period. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 240 patients (age 74 ± 11 years, 67% male) with a high-grade AV block requiring >90% ventricular pacing and preserved baseline LVEF >50%, to receive pacing at the RVA (n = 120) or RVHS (n = 120). At 2 years, LVEF decreased in both the RVA (57 ± 9 to 55 ± 9%, P = 0.047) and the RVHS groups (56 ± 10 to 54 ± 10%, P = 0.0003). However, there was no significant difference in intra-patient change in LVEF between confirmed RVA (n = 85) and RVHS (n = 83) lead position (P = 0.43). There were no significant differences in heart failure hospitalization, mortality, the burden of atrial fibrillation, or plasma brain natriutetic peptide levels between the two groups. A significantly greater time was required to place the lead in the RVHS position (70 ± 25 vs. 56 ± 24 min, P < 0.0001) with longer fluoroscopy times (11 ± 7 vs. 5 ± 4 min, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In patients with a high-grade AV block and preserved LV function requiring a high percentage of ventricular pacing, RVHS pacing does not provide a protective effect on left ventricular function over RVA pacing in the first 2 years. PROTECT-PACE: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00461734.

A comparison of right ventricular non-apical defibrillator lead position with traditional right ventricular apical position: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads have traditionally been placed at the right ventricular apex (RVA). An important minority of patients with an ICD may develop a future requirement for bradycardia support. Pacing from the RVA may be detrimental, promoting heart failure and mortality. Increasingly non-apical right ventricular (RVNA) lead positions have been suggested as an alternative pacing site. METHODS: A retrospective review of 512 patients who received an ICD at our institution between 1999 and 2011 was conducted. A comparison of lead performance characteristics was performed between RVNA sites and those at RVA. Data were collated from chart review and the pacing database. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period in the RVNA cohort was 40.4±25.9 months and in the RVA cohort it was 38±31.8 months (p=0.43). The RVNA cohort consisted of 144 leads and 368 leads in the RVA cohort. The groups had similar baseline clinical characteristics. No significant difference was detected in the proportion of patients receiving an appropriate ICD defibrillation (RVNA 10.4% vs. RVA 16.8%; p=0.07), inappropriate defibrillation (RVNA 7.6% vs. RVA 7.6%; p=0.99) or an unsuccessful defibrillation (RVNA 0% vs. RVA 1.7%; p=0.12). There was also no significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving successful anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) (RVNA 13.2% vs. RVA 17.4%; p=0.49) or failed ATP (RVNA 2.7% vs. RVA 4.1%; p=0.25). There was no significant difference in lead impedance (p=0.99), sensing (p=0.59) and pacing threshold (p=0.34). CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective study, RVNA ICD lead had similar stability and therapy efficacy compared to the traditional RVA position. This potentially has important implications for the suitability of RVNA as an alternative site for ICD leads.

Seven years experience of a nurse-led elective cardioversion service in a tertiary referral centre: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally the provision of elective external direct current cardioversion (EDCCV) for patients with atrial arrhythmias has been doctor-led. Increasing demands on hospital beds and time pressures for doctors has driven the desire for an alternative approach. We established a nurse-led cardioversion service in 2006 and present our experience. METHODS: A prospective database of patients undergoing elective EDCCV between July 2006 and July 2013 was collected. Demographic data, arrhythmia, success and immediate complications of cardioversion were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 974 EDCCV were performed on 772 patients. The mean patient age was 62.7 years, 564 (73.1%) were male. In 530 patients (69.0%) AF was the primary arrhythmia, in 242 (31.0%) atrial flutter. All EDCCVs were performed in a high dependency unit. Sinus rhythm was obtained in 692 patients (89.6%). Of 640 outpatients, 629 (98.3%) were discharged on the same day of their procedure. Eleven patients (1.7%) required admission to hospital. No patients required urgent temporary transvenous or permanent pacing, and there were no deaths in association with this procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led elective EDCCV is a safe and effective way of restoring sinus rhythm in patients with AF or atrial flutter, with additional benefits to resource provision.

Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage-guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Novel ablation catheters with mini electrode (ME) sensing have become available but their utility is unclear. We investigated whether ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) for atrial flutter (AFL) would be improved using ME signals. METHODS: Sixty-one patients (76% male, 63 ± 10 years) with CTI-dependent AFL underwent ablation using a maximum voltage-guided approach, randomized to either standard 8 mm non-irrigated catheter with bipolar signals or IntellaTip MiFi catheter using ME signals alone. RESULTS: Acute bidirectional block was achieved in 97%. Mean follow-up was 16.7 ± 10 months. The median number of ablation lesions was 13 in both groups (range 3-62 vs. 1-43, p = .85). No significant differences were observed in AFL recurrences (17% vs. 11%, p = .7), median procedure durations (97 min [interquartile range (IQR), 71-121] vs. 87 min [IQR, 72-107], p = .55) or fluoroscopy times (31 min [IQR, 21-52] vs. 38 min [IQR, 25-70], p = .56). Amplitudes of ME signals were on average 160% greater than blinded bipolar signals. In 23.7% of lesions where bipolar signals were difficult to interpret, 13.6% showed a clear ME signal. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the effectiveness of CTI ablation guided by ME signals, compared with using bipolar signals from a standard 8 mm ablation catheter. While ME signal amplitudes were larger and sometimes present when the bipolar signal was unclear, this did not improve procedural characteristics or outcomes. The results suggest future research should focus on lesion integrity rather than signal sensing.

Advances in atrioventricular and interventricular optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy - what's the gold standard?

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most important advances in heart failure management in the last twenty years. Approximately one-third of patients appear not to respond to therapy. Although there are a number of possible mechanisms for non-response, an important factor is suboptimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) timing intervals. There remains controversy over whether routinely optimizing intervals is necessary and there is no agreed gold standard methodology. Optimization has classically been performed using echocardiography which has limits related to resource use, time-cost and variable reproducibility. Newer optimization methods using device-based sensors and algorithms show promise in reducing heart-failure hospitalization compared with echocardiography. Areas covered: This review outlines the rationale for optimization, the principles of AV and VV optimization, the standard echocardiographic approach and newer device-based algorithms and the evidence base for their use. Expert commentary: The incremental gains of optimization are likely to be real, but small, compared to the overall improvement gained from cardiac resynchronization itself. At this time routine optimization may not be mandatory but should be performed where there is no response to CRT. Device-based optimization algorithms appear to be practical and in some cases, deliver superior clinical outcomes compared to echocardiography.

The effect of altering heart rate on ventricular function in patients with heart failure treated with beta-blockers.

BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers are effective for the treatment of heart failure, but their mechanism of action is unresolved. Heart rate reduction may be a central mechanism or a troublesome side effect. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel group study comparing chronic higher-rate (80 pulses per minute) with lower-rate (60 pulses per minute) pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients with symptomatic left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, receiving beta-blockers. Gated radionuclide ventriculography (RNVG) was performed at baseline and after at least 9 months. The primary outcome was change in LV volumes, as a marker of beneficial reverse remodeling, from baseline to follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomized. Mean age was 74 +/- 6 years and with LV ejection fraction of 26% +/- 9% at baseline. During 14 +/- 13 months of follow-up, 21 patients (43%) died and 25 (51%) completed the study protocol: 12 in the higher-rate and 13 in the lower-rate group. Mean LV end-diastolic (higher rate +20 +/- 104 mL vs lower rate -65 +/- 92 mL, P = .03) and systolic (higher rate +29 +/- 83 mL vs lower rate -60 +/- 74 mL, P = .006) volumes increased with higher-rate versus lower-rate pacing, whereas LV ejection fraction declined (higher rate -4.2% +/- 4.4% vs lower rate +2.2% +/- 5.4%, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Reversal of beta-blocker-induced bradycardia has deleterious effects on ventricular function, suggesting heart rate reduction is an important mediator of their effects. The prognosis of patients with pacemakers and heart failure is poor.

The atrial fibrillation paradox of heart failure.

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF) is high, but longitudinal studies suggest that the incidence of AF is relatively low. The authors investigated this paradox prospectively in an epidemiologically representative population of patients with HF and persistent AF. In all, 891 consecutive patients with HF [mean age, 70+/-10 years; 70% male; left ventricular ejection fraction, 32%+/-9%] were enrolled. The prevalence of persistent AF at baseline was 22%. The incidence of persistent AF at 1 year was 26 per 1000 person-years, ranging from 15 in New York Heart Association class I/II to 44 in class III/IV. AF occurred either at the same time or prior to HF in 76% of patients and following HF in 24%. A risk score was developed to predict the occurrence of persistent AF. The annual risk of persistent AF developing was 0.5% (0%-1.3%) for those in the low-risk group compared with 15% (3.4%-26.6%) in the high-risk group. Despite a high prevalence of persistent AF in patients with HF, the incidence of persistent AF is relatively low. This is predominantly due to AF coinciding with or preceding the development of HF. The annual risk of persistent AF developing can be estimated from clinical variables.

Sudden cardiac death: history, aetiology and management.

Despite being a relatively common medical condition, sudden cardiac death suffers a widespread lack of knowledge and understanding among general physicians. This article fills this knowledge gap, outlining risk factors, causes and preventative strategies.

Four years experience of a nurse-led elective cardioversion service within a district general hospital setting.

AIMS: External direct current cardioversion is an effective method of restoring sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with persistent atrial arrhythmias. Increasing demand for hospital beds, together with a reduction in junior doctors' hours, has adversely affected cardioversion provision. A regular nurse-led cardioversion service conducted in a dedicated hospital day-unit was introduced to resolve these constraints. There are limited data on the safety or efficacy of such a service. METHODS AND RESULTS: All cardioversions between October 2000 and October 2004 were performed by an appropriately trained specialist nurse, under general anaesthesia. Patients attended a pre-assessment clinic. Energy requirements for initial and subsequent defibrillations were guided by a local protocol in accordance with the guidelines from American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Rectilinear biphasic defibrillation was introduced in January 2004 with an appropriate protocol amendment. In the absence of complications, the aim was to discharge patients the same day. A total of 578 cardioversions (475 monophasic; 103 biphasic) were performed on 464 patients [72.1% male, mean (+/- SD) age 67.8 +/- 9.4 years] with atrial fibrillation (AF) (89.7%) and atrial flutter (10.3%). SR was restored in 84.0 and 100% of patients with AF and atrial flutter, respectively, which increased to 90.2 and 100% following the introduction of biphasic defibrillation. Biphasic shocks cardioverted AF with less energy (163 +/- 22 vs. 289 +/- 81 J) and less cumulative energy (230 +/- 139 vs. 455+/-255 J) than monophasic (P < 0.001 for both), despite no difference in the duration of AF (P = 0.26) or patient age (P = 0.78). Two patients required hospital admission due to transient bradycardia; both were discharged within 72 h, without the need for permanent pacing. A total of 99.6% of patients was discharged home the same day; there were no deaths. CONCLUSION: The provision of a nurse-led elective cardioversion service is feasible and effective, without compromising safety.

Shock coil failure secondary to external irradiation in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

The use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in the management of malignant ventricular arrhythmia is well established. Radiation treatment is common in malignant neoplasms, but the direct effect of irradiation in ICD is largely not well understood. We describe a case where radiation treatment probably led to shock coil failure.

Prevalence and incidence of arrhythmias and sudden death in heart failure.

Patients with heart failure are prone to a variety of arrhythmias, symptomatic and asymptomatic, that are prognostically significant and have an important bearing on the management of these patients. However there are some inherent problems in assessing the frequency of these arrhythmias within a large patient population, due to a lack of uniformity in defining heart failure and the transient nature of these rhythms. Patients with heart failure commonly die suddenly. The causes of these deaths are difficult to ascertain accurately and are often presumed arrhythmic. With the advent of effective interventions to prevent sudden death, accurately defining the causal relationship between the arrhythmias and sudden death has assumed great importance to appropriately target therapy. Several attempts have been made to predict such deaths on the basis of non-invasive and invasive diagnostic investigations with variable success. In this article we review the incidence and prevalence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and sudden deaths in epidemiological studies, surveys and randomised control trials of patients with heart failure. We discuss the prognostic significance of these arrhythmias, the inherent problems in their diagnosis and whether their presence predicts the risk of sudden deaths and the mode of such deaths in the heart failure population. The role of various investigations in risk stratification of sudden death has also been discussed.

The prevalence of heart failure and asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a typical regional pacemaker population.

AIMS: To assess the prevalence of heart failure and asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the chronically paced population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred and seven patients were identified from attendance at routine pacemaker follow-up clinic. Subjects underwent a medical history and examination, 6-minute walk test and echocardiography. 94 (31%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, of whom 83 had symptoms of heart failure (70% NYHA II, 26% NYHA III and 4% NYHA IV). Heart failure was more prevalent in patients with single chamber compared to dual chamber pacemakers, (DDD(R) 18% vs 35% VVI(R), p<0.008), and those with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to those with sinus rhythm (42% vs 21%, p=0.003). Decreasing 6-minute walk distance, history of ischaemic heart disease and years of pacing were independently associated with the presence of heart failure (combined R=0.572, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction is common in the paced population. Only a minority of these had a pre-existing diagnosis and a smaller proportion were on 'optimal' therapy. Echocardiographic screening of this high-risk population is justified to improve rates of diagnosis and treatment of heart failure.