RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical factors, including resection of Gerota's fascia, R0-resection, and lymph node yield, may be associated with survival after distal pancreatectomy (DP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but evidence from large multicenter studies is lacking. This study aimed to identify predictors for overall survival after DP for PDAC, especially those related to surgical technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from an international retrospective cohort including patients from 11 European countries and the USA who underwent DP for PDAC (2007-2015) were analyzed. Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed and included Gerota's fascia resection, R0 resection, lymph node ratio, extended resection, and a minimally invasive approach. RESULTS: Overall, 1200 patients from 34 centers with median follow-up of 15 months [interquartile range (IQR) 5-31 months] and median survival period of 30 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 27-33 months] were included. Gerota's fascia resection [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; p = 0.019], R0 resection (HR 0.70; p = 0.006), and decreased lymph node ratio (HR 0.28; p < 0.001) were associated with improved overall survival, whereas extended resection (HR 1.75; p < 0.001) was associated with worse overall survival. A minimally invasive approach did not improve survival as compared with an open approach (HR 1.14; p = 0.350). Adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.67; p = 0.003) was also associated with improved overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: This international cohort identified Gerota's fascia resection, R0 resection, and decreased lymph node ratio as factors associated with improved overall survival during DP for PDAC. Surgeons should strive for R0 resection and adequate lymphadenectomy and could also consider Gerota's fascia resection in their routine surgical approach.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is still unclear, and whether robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) offers benefits over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is unknown because large multicentre studies are lacking. This study compared perioperative outcomes between RDP and LDP. METHODS: A multicentre international propensity score-matched study included patients who underwent RDP or LDP for any indication in 21 European centres from six countries that performed at least 15 distal pancreatectomies annually (January 2011 to June 2019). Propensity score matching was based on preoperative characteristics in a 1 : 1 ratio. The primary outcome was the major morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or above). RESULTS: A total of 1551 patients (407 RDP and 1144 LDP) were included in the study. Some 402 patients who had RDP were matched with 402 who underwent LDP. After matching, there was no difference between RDP and LDP groups in rates of major morbidity (14.2 versus 16.5 per cent respectively; P = 0.378), postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (24.6 versus 26.5 per cent; P = 0.543) or 90-day mortality (0.5 versus 1.3 per cent; P = 0.268). RDP was associated with a longer duration of surgery than LDP (median 285 (i.q.r. 225-350) versus 240 (195-300) min respectively; P < 0.001), lower conversion rate (6.7 versus 15.2 per cent; P < 0.001), higher spleen preservation rate (81.4 versus 62.9 per cent; P = 0.001), longer hospital stay (median 8.5 (i.q.r. 7-12) versus 7 (6-10) days; P < 0.001) and lower readmission rate (11.0 versus 18.2 per cent; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The major morbidity rate was comparable between RDP and LDP. RDP was associated with improved rates of conversion, spleen preservation and readmission, to the detriment of longer duration of surgery and hospital stay.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Idoso , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreatectomia/mortalidade , Pontuação de Propensão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A radical left pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may require extended, multivisceral resections. The role of a laparoscopic approach in extended radical left pancreatectomy (ERLP) is unclear since comparative studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after laparoscopic vs open ERLP in patients with PDAC. METHODS: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study including patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open ERLP (L-ERLP; O-ERLP) for PDAC was performed (2007-2015). The ISGPS definition for extended resection was used. Primary outcomes were overall survival, margin negative rate (R0), and lymph node retrieval. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2015, 320 patients underwent ERLP in 34 centers from 12 countries (65 L-ERLP vs. 255 O-ERLP). After propensity-score matching, 44 L-ERLP could be matched to 44 O-ERLP. In the matched cohort, the conversion rate in L-ERLP group was 35%. The L-ERLP R0 resection rate (matched cohort) was comparable to O-ERLP (67% vs 48%; P = 0.063) but the lymph node yield was lower for L-ERLP than O-ERLP (median 11 vs 19, P = 0.023). L-ERLP was associated with less delayed gastric emptying (0% vs 16%, P = 0.006) and shorter hospital stay (median 9 vs 13 days, P = 0.005), as compared to O-ERLP. Outcomes were comparable for additional organ resections, vascular resections (besides splenic vessels), Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications, or 90-day mortality (2% vs 2%, P = 0.973). The median overall survival was comparable between both groups (19 vs 20 months, P = 0.571). Conversion did not worsen outcomes in L-ERLP. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach may be used safely in selected patients requiring ERLP for PDAC, since morbidity, mortality, and overall survival seem comparable, as compared to O-ERLP. L-ERLP is associated with a high conversion rate and reduced lymph node yield but also with less delayed gastric emptying and a shorter hospital stay, as compared to O-ERLP.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Humanos , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Postoperative pancreatic fistulae (POPF) present a serious and life-threatening complication after pancreatic head resections (PD). Therefore, reliable risk stratification to identify those at risk is urgently needed. The aim of this study was to identify postoperative laboratory parameters for the prediction of POPF in the early postoperative period. METHODS: One hundred eighty-two patients who underwent PD from 2012 until 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was performed using the GLM (general linear model) method for model building. Two nomograms were created based on the GLM models of postoperative day one and postoperative day one to five. A cohort of 48 patients operated between 2018 and 2019 served as internal validation. RESULTS: Clinically relevant pancreatic fistulae (CR-POPF) were present in 16% (n = 29) of patients. Patients with CR-POPF experienced significantly more insufficiencies of gastroenterostomies, delayed gastric emptying, and more extraluminal bleeding than patients without CR-POPF. Multivariate analysis revealed multiple postoperative predictive models, the best one including ASA, main pancreatic duct diameter, operation time, and serum lipase as well as leucocytes on day one. This model was able to predict CR-POPF with an accuracy of 90% and an AUC of 0.903. Two nomograms were created for easier use. CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant fistula can be predicted using simple laboratory and clinical parameters. Not serum amylase, but serum lipase is an independent predictor of CR-POPF. Our simple nomograms may help in the identification of patients for early postoperative interventions.
Assuntos
Fístula Pancreática , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Humanos , Nomogramas , Fístula Pancreática/diagnóstico , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Indication for pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer can be challenging. Wrong decisions in indication processes lead to significant health impairments. Computerized decision support systems can take over parts of decision-making processes, making them more accurate. MEBDAS® is a decision-supporting software that predicts outcomes of proposed treatments. AIM: to determine the decision concordance between MEBDAS® and multidisciplinary tumour board (MTB) and the impact of MEBDAS® on in-hospital outcome at different indication thresholds. METHODS: 126 patients with pancreatoduodenectomy from a high-volume university hospital were included. Outcome indicators were in-hospital mortality, Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), therapy-related loss of "Quality-Adjusted-Life-Day" (QALD-loss) and prognostic gain of treatment-related "Quality-Adjusted-Life-Year" (QALY-gain). RESULTS: The concordance of decisions was 94.4% at the indication threshold of 0. By raising the indication threshold to 1 year, the concordance decreased to 0%, the in-hospital-mortality dropped from 2.52% to 0%, the CCI® decreased from 26.47 to 13.90, the therapy-related QALD-loss declined from 21.53 to 16.22 days and the prognostic QALY-gain increased from 0.374 to 0.906 years. At IT = 0.250 years, the concordance was 61.11% and differences between MTB and MEBDAS®-group were highly significant (p < 0.001) for all outcome parameters: mortality (3.97% vs. 1.30%), CCI® (28.96 vs. 18.29), therapy-related QALD-loss (24.41 vs. 15.19 days) and QALY-gain (0.351 vs. 0.501 years). CONCLUSION: MEBDAS® decisions are superior to those of MTB in terms of in-hospital-outcome. The inclusion of MEBDAS® in decision procedure makes the indication more accurate and reduces morbidity and mortality. In addition, MEBDAS® can increase patients' competence by involving them in decision-making process.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões Assistida por Computador , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
The term neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) encompasses a molecularly and biologically very heterogeneous group of tumors, which have in common their origin in neuroendocrine cells. The also very heterogeneous subgroup of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) is the best classified and investigated group. This article provides a systematic review of the current classification, diagnostics and treatment options of GEP-NEN. In order to achieve a better overview, it was consciously decided not to use an approach based on the primary localization. Instead, a thematic organization according to classification, clinical phenotype, diagnostics and treatment was chosen.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Neoplasias Intestinais/patologia , Neoplasias Intestinais/terapia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nationwide audits facilitate quality and outcome assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy. Differences may exist between countries but studies comparing nationwide outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy based on audits are lacking. This study aimed to compare the German and Dutch audits for external data validation. METHODS: Anonymized data from patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy between 2014 and 2016 were extracted from the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery StuDoQ|Pancreas and Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, and compared using descriptive statistics. Univariable and multivariable risk analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: Overall, 4495 patients were included, 2489 in Germany and 2006 in the Netherlands. Adenocarcinoma was a more frequent indication for pancreatoduodenectomy in the Netherlands. German patients had worse ASA fitness grades, but Dutch patients had more pulmonary co-morbidity. Dutch patients underwent more minimally invasive surgery and venous resections, but fewer multivisceral resections. No difference was found in rates of grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula, grade C postpancreatectomy haemorrhage and in-hospital mortality. There was more centralization in the Netherlands (1·3 versus 13·3 per cent of pancreatoduodenectomies in very low-volume centres; P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, both hospital stay (difference 2·49 (95 per cent c.i. 1·18 to 3·80) days) and risk of reoperation (odds ratio (OR) 1·55, 95 per cent c.i. 1·22 to 1·97) were higher in the German audit, whereas risk of postoperative pneumonia (OR 0·57, 0·37 to 0·88) and readmission (OR 0·38, 0·30 to 0·49) were lower. Several baseline and surgical characteristics, including hospital volume, but not country, predicted mortality. CONCLUSION: This comparison of the German and Dutch audits showed variation in case mix, surgical technique and centralization for pancreatoduodenectomy, but no difference in mortality and pancreas-specific complications.
Assuntos
Auditoria Médica , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Países Baixos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/mortalidade , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mortality rates after liver surgery are not well documented in Germany. More than 1000 hospitals offer liver resection, but there is no central regulation of infrastructure requirements or outcome quality. METHODS: Hospital mortality rates after liver resection were analysed using the standardized hospital discharge data (Diagnosis-Related Groups, ICD-10 and German operations and procedure key codes) provided by the Research Data Centre of the Federal Statistical Office and Statistical Offices of the Länder in Wiesbaden, Germany. RESULTS: A total of 110 332 liver procedures carried out between 2010 and 2015 were identified. The overall hospital mortality rate for all resections was 5·8 per cent. The mortality rate among 17 574 major hepatic procedures was 10·4 per cent. Patients who had surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) had the lowest mortality rate among those with malignancy (5·5 per cent), followed by patients with gallbladder cancer (7·1 per cent), hepatocellular carcinoma (9·3 per cent) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (11·0 per cent). Patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had the highest mortality rate (14·6 per cent). The mortality rate for extended hepatectomy was 16·2 per cent and the need for a biliodigestive anastomosis increased this to 25·5 per cent. Failure to rescue after complications led to mortality rates of more than 30 per cent in some subgroups. There was a significant volume-outcome relationship for CRLM surgery in very high-volume centres (mean 26-60 major resections for CRLMs per year). The mortality rate was 4·6 per cent in very high-volume centres compared with 7·5 per cent in very low-volume hospitals (odds ratio 0·60, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 0·77; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: This analysis of outcome data after liver resection in Germany suggests that hospital mortality remains high. There should be more focused research to understand, improve or justify factors leading to this result, and consideration of centralization of liver surgery.
ANTECEDENTES: En Alemania, los datos de mortalidad después de la cirugía no están bien documentados. En más de 1.000 hospitales se realizan resecciones hepáticas, pero no existe una regulación central de los prerrequisitos estructurales necesarios y de la calidad de los resultados. MÉTODOS: Las tasas de mortalidad hospitalaria relacionadas con las resecciones hepáticas se analizaron utilizando los datos estandarizados del alta hospitalaria (Diagnóstico de grupos relacionados, DRG), la clasificación internacional de enfermedades 10 (ICD10) y la clave de procedimientos y operaciones (códigos OPS) proporcionados por el RDC de la Oficina Federal de Estadística y Oficinas de Estadística de Länder en Wiesbaden, Alemania. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron un total de 110.332 procedimientos hepáticos (de 2010 a 2015). La tasa global de mortalidad hospitalaria para todas las resecciones fue del 5,8%. Las resecciones hepáticas mayores (n = 15.333) presentaron una mortalidad del 10,4%. Los pacientes con metástasis hepáticas colorrectales (colorectal liver metastases, CRLM) tuvieron la mortalidad más baja de entre los pacientes con neoplasias malignas (5,5%), seguidos de los pacientes con cáncer de vesícula biliar (7,1%), colangiocarcinoma intrahepático (intrahepatic colangiocarcinoma, iCC) (11,0%) y carcinoma hepatocelular (hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC) (9,3%). Los pacientes con colangiocarcinoma extrahepático (extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, eCC) presentaron la mortalidad más alta (14,6%). Las hepatectomías extendidas (16,2%) y la necesidad de una anastomosis biliodigestiva (biliodigestive anastomosis, BDA) aumentaron la mortalidad a un 25,5%. La falta de solución de algunas complicaciones llevó a tasas de mortalidad de más del 30% en algunos subgrupos. Hubo una relación significativa volumen-resultado para las CRLM en centros de alto volumen (25,3 a 59,7 resecciones mayores/año; razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR 0,60, i.c. del 95%: 0,42-0,77; P < 0,001), lo que resultó en una disminución en las tasas de mortalidad de 7,5/6,4/7,5/6,5% a 4,6%. CONCLUSIÓN: El análisis de los resultados después de la resección hepática en Alemania muestra una alta mortalidad hospitalaria inesperada. Este análisis indica la necesidad de efectuar una investigación más específica para comprender, mejorar o justificar los factores que determinan estos hallazgos.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/mortalidade , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidade , Colangiocarcinoma/cirurgia , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hepatectomia/métodos , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Hepatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of initially conservative therapy compared to immediate appendectomy for acute appendicitis with abscess in terms of medical and economic outcomes. METHODS: Of all the patients treated for appendicitis from January 2009 to December 2017 in five German hospitals, 240 were included in the study. Fifty-three patients received conservative (CON) and 195 patients received surgical (SUR) therapy as initial treatment. RESULTS: Length of stay was similar (12.5 days in CON vs. 13.3 days in SUR, p = 0.530). Readmission rate was higher in the conservative group (54.7% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). The majority (53.7%) of the 41 operations in CON group were appendectomies (22 procedures), 1 (4.5%) of them was in the first hospital stay because of persisting symptoms, 21 (95.5%) after a recovery interval. Seven (33.3%) of the recovery appendectomies were performed due to persisting or recurrent symptoms and 14 (66.7%) due to the request of patient. Twenty-one patients (39.6%) in the CON group did not need surgery. The rates of complication-related operations per patient (0.04 versus 0.58, p < 0.001), conversions of surgical technique (1.9% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.0287), and extended resections (1.9% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.001) were higher in SUR group. Furthermore, morbidity, hospital costs, and loss in quality of life were significantly higher in the surgical group (17.0% vs. 66.2%, p < 0.001; 5044 vs. 8457, p < 0.001, and 4.3 days vs. 7.5 days, p < 0.001, CON vs. SUR). CONCLUSION: Initially, conservative treatment for acute appendicitis with abscess is preferable to immediate surgical treatment in reduction of morbidity, hospital costs, and loss in quality of life.
Assuntos
Abscesso/complicações , Apendicite/complicações , Apendicite/cirurgia , Tratamento Conservador , Hospitais , Doença Aguda , Apendicite/economia , Apendicite/mortalidade , Economia Hospitalar , Alemanha , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Morbidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) represent the variability of almost benign lesions either secreting hormones occurring as a single lesion up to malignant lesions with metastatic potential. Treatment of NET is usually performed by surgical resection. Due to the rarity of NET, surgical treatment is mainly based on the experience and recommendations of experts and less on the basis of prospective randomized studies. In addition, the development and establishment of new surgical procedures is made more difficult by their rarity. The development of laparoscopic-assisted surgery has significantly improved the treatment of many diseases. Due to the well-known advantages of laparoscopic surgery, this method has also been increasingly used to treat NET. However, due to limited comparative data, the assumed superiority of laparoscopic surgery in the area NET remains often unclear or not yet proven. This review focuses on the present usage of laparoscopic techniques in the area of NET. Relating to the current literature, this review presents the evidence of various laparoscopic procedures for treatment of adrenal, pancreatic and intestine NET as well as extraadrenal pheochromocytoma and neuroendocrine liver metastases. Further, this review focuses on recent new developments of minimally invasive surgery in the area of NET. Here, robotic-assisted surgery and single-port surgery are promising approaches.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the available evidence on the prognostic factors for the 5-year survival for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) following surgical resection. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of abstracts included in databases where relevant studies were published between January 2000 and August 2015. Risk ratios (RRs), 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs), and random-effects model were calculated using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 23 observational studies involving 2063 patients with DCC were analyzed. The meta-analysis showed that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was not confirmed as a prognostic factor, with similar 5-year survival rates between those receiving and not receiving chemotherapy (RR 0.71; 95 % CI 0.21-2.36; P = 0.57). Perineural invasion (RR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.40-0.64; P < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis (RR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.38-0.70; P < 0.0001), positive resection margin status (RR 2.11; 95 % CI 1.36-3.30; P = 0.001), and not-well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (RR 1.77; 95 % CI 1.39-2.25; P < 0.00001) were associated with shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS: Perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis, resection margin status, and tumor differentiation were the significant prognostic factors for the 5-year survival.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/mortalidade , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidade , Colangiocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Colangiocarcinoma/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Neoplasias de Tecido Nervoso/patologia , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with rectovaginal fistulas have a significantly reduced quality of life. Therefore, surgical therapy is often needed even in palliative cases. The aim of the present study was to perform an analysis of the results of the different treatment options available today. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent treatment for rectovaginal fistulas at the Department of Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck and the Department of Surgery, WKK Heide, between January 2000 and September 2016. Complication and recurrence rate were retrospectively evaluated. The median follow-up period was 13 months (range 3-36 months). RESULTS: During the observation period, 58 patients underwent surgery (53 curative, 5 palliative) for rectovaginal fistulas. All patients who underwent curative surgery had an omentoplasty, and 39 of 53 (73.6%) patients underwent a resection. Thirty of 39 (77.0%) resections were low anterior resection, while non-continence-preserving resection included subtotal colectomy (n = 5), pelvic exenteration (n = 2), and proctectomy (n = 2). The fistulas were mainly secondary to inflammatory bowel disease (n = 18) or diverticulitis (n = 13), while 19 fistulas were a complication of different cancers or precancerous lesions. The median follow-up time was 13 months (range 6-36). Four patients (6.9%) had fistula recurrence (3 recurrences after low anterior resection, 1 after primary fistula closure). The mortality rate was 6.9% (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Non-resecting methods should be used only in uncomplicated fistulas. Rectovaginal fistulas secondary to inflammatory or malignant disease mostly require extensive therapy. Omentoplasty is effective for the treatment of both high and low rectovaginal fistulas.
Assuntos
Neoplasias/complicações , Omento/cirurgia , Fístula Retovaginal/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colectomia , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Colostomia , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Diverticulite/complicações , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exenteração Pélvica , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/complicações , Fístula Retovaginal/etiologia , Recidiva , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate on the acceptance and frequency of laparoscopic surgery for the management of acute and chronic bowel obstruction in a general patient population in German hospitals. METHODS: To receive an authoritative opinion on laparoscopic treatment of bowel obstruction in Germany, a cross-sectional online study was conducted. We designed an online-based survey, supported by the German College of Surgeons (Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgen, BDC) to get multi-institutional-based data from various level providers of patient care. RESULTS: Between January and February 2014, we received completed questionnaires from 235 individuals (16.7 %). The participating surgeons were a representative sample of German hospitals with regard to hospital size, level of center size, and localization. A total of 74.9 % (n = 176) of all responders stated to use laparoscopy as the initial step of exploration in expected bowel obstruction. This procedure was highly statistically associated with the frequency of overall laparoscopic interventions and laparoscopic experience. The overall conversion rate was reported to be 29.4 %. CONCLUSIONS: This survey, investigating on the use of laparoscopic exploration or interventions in bowel obstruction, was able to show that by now, a majority of the responding surgeons accept laparoscopy as an initial step for exploration of the abdomen in the case of bowel obstruction. Laparoscopy was considered to be at least comparable to open surgery in an emergency setting. Furthermore, data analysis demonstrated generally accepted advantages and disadvantages of the laparoscopic approach. Indications for or against laparoscopy are made after careful consideration in each individual case.
Assuntos
Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Obstrução Intestinal/epidemiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Abdome/cirurgia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Tamanho das Instituições de Saúde , HumanosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Laparoscopy for colorectal cancer resection bares early post-operative advantages and results in equal oncologic long-term outcome. However, data on laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy is scarce. Aim of the present study was to analyze a well selected collective of patients with right-sided colon cancer treated open and laparoscopically with regard to peri-operative and long-term outcome. METHODS: We analyzed all patients who underwent right-sided hemi-colectomy for colon cancer between January 1996 and March 2013. Data was extracted from our prospective database. Inclusion criteria were tumor localization in the ascending colon, oncologic resection, histology of an adenocarcinoma, tumors UICC I-III, and R0 resection. Exclusion criteria were multiple malignancies including colon, emergency operation, adenoma or pT0 status, and UICC IV. For the matched pairs approach between patients undergoing laparoscopic (LAP) or open (OPEN) surgery, the parameters age, UICC stage, tumor grading, and sex were applied. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients was included in the analysis with n = 94 in both the LAP and the OPEN group. Some peri-operative results demonstrated advantages for laparoscopy including median return to liquid (p < 0.0001) and solid diet (p = 0.008), median length of ICU stay (p < 0.0001), and median length of hospital stay (p = 0.022). No significant differences were revealed for complication rates, rates of anastomotic leakage, or 30-day mortality. Lymph node yield was identical. Also, no differences in oncologic long-term outcome were detected. Rates for local recurrence were 4.3 and 2.0 %. CONCLUSION: This matched pairs analysis verifies peri-operative advantages of laparoscopy explicitly for the sub-group of CRC patients undergoing right-sided hemi-colectomy in comparison to open surgery while demonstrating equivalent oncologic long-term results.
Assuntos
Colo/patologia , Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Análise por Pareamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
Objective: The coeliac artery compression syndrome, first described by Harjola und Dunbar, results from the coeliac artery and plexus being compressed by the arcuate ligament at their origin. The clinical symptoms are postprandial pain and weight loss and the syndrome significantly restricts patients' quality of life. In rare cases, an epigastric bruit is detected on clinical examination. Laparoscopic division of the arcuate ligament is a successful option for the treatment of the coeliac artery compression syndrome. Indications: Laparoscopic decompression is indicated for patients with a symptom triad of postprandial pain, weight loss and epigastric bruit and radiologic confirmation of coeliac artery compression by duplex sonography, computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography. Procedure: The operative strategy is based on the division of the arcuate ligament following its visualisation above the origin of the coeliac artery from the abdominal aorta. Conclusion: The laparoscopic division of the arcuate ligament and the resection of the coeliac plexus are a largely uneventful, minimally-invasive option to treat the coeliac artery compression syndrome and restore patients' quality of life.
Assuntos
Artéria Celíaca/anormalidades , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Artéria Celíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Celíaca/cirurgia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Constrição Patológica/diagnóstico por imagem , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Angiografia por Ressonância Magnética , Síndrome do Ligamento Arqueado Mediano , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ultrassonografia Doppler DuplaRESUMO
Cancer cell invasion takes place at the cancer-host interface and is a prerequisite for distant metastasis. The relationships between current biological and clinical concepts such as cell migration modes, tumour budding and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) remains unclear in several aspects, especially for the 'real' situation in human cancer. We developed a novel method that provides exact three-dimensional (3D) information on both microscopic morphology and gene expression, over a virtually unlimited spatial range, by reconstruction from serial immunostained tissue slices. Quantitative 3D assessment of tumour budding at the cancer-host interface in human pancreatic, colorectal, lung and breast adenocarcinoma suggests collective cell migration as the mechanism of cancer cell invasion, while single cancer cell migration seems to be virtually absent. Budding tumour cells display a shift towards spindle-like as well as a rounded morphology. This is associated with decreased E-cadherin staining intensity and a shift from membranous to cytoplasmic staining, as well as increased nuclear ZEB1 expression.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Transição Epitelial-Mesenquimal , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Imuno-HistoquímicaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Over the last decade endovascular stenting of aortic aneurysm (EVAR) has been developed from single centre experiences to a standard procedure. With increasing clinical expertise and medical technology advances treatment of even complex aneurysms are feasible by endovascular methods. One integral part for the success of this minimally invasive procedure is innovative and improved vascular imaging to generate exact measurements and correct placement of stent prosthesis. One of the greatest difficulty in learning and performing this endovascular therapy is the fact that the three-dimensional vascular tree has to be overlaid with the two-dimensional angiographic scene by the vascular surgeon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We report the development of real-time navigation software, which allows a three-dimensional endoluminal view of the vascular system during an EVAR procedure in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm. We used the preoperative planning CT angiography for three-dimensional reconstruction of aortic anatomy by volume-rendered segmentation. At the beginning of the intervention the relevant landmarks are matched in real-time with the two-dimensional angiographic scene. During the intervention the software continously registers the position of the guide-wire or the stent. An additional 3D-screen shows the generated endoluminal view during the whole intervention in real-time. RESULTS: We examined the combination of hardware and software components including complex image registration and fibre optic sensor technology (fibre-bragg navigation) with integration in stent graft introducer sheaths using patient-specific vascular phantoms in an experimental setting. From a technical point of view the feasibility of fibre-Bragg navigation has been proven in our experimental setting with patient-based vascular models. Three-dimensional preoperative planning including registration and simulation of virtual angioscopy in real time are realised. CONCLUSION: The aim of the Nav-CARS-EVAR concept is reduction of contrast medium and radiation dose by a three-dimensional navigation during the EVAR procedure. To implement fibre-Bragg navigation further experimental studies are necessary to verify accuracy before clinical application.
Assuntos
Angioplastia/instrumentação , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aortografia/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Fluoroscopia/instrumentação , Doses de Radiação , Software , Stents , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Angioscopia/instrumentação , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imageamento Tridimensional , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Fibras Ópticas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Interface Usuário-ComputadorRESUMO
UNLABELLED: The persistent air leak is a common and sometimes difficult to manage complication after major pulmonary resections. Especially in cases with lung emphysema spontaneous sealing of the lung surface under conservative therapy can be prolonged or even fail and a reoperation to close the damaged visceral pleura might be necessary. An ideal surgical solution to deal with this problem is not known, all of the techniques have advantages but also limitations and additional operations should be avoided in this group of frail patients. In this paper a new surgical method to seal the lung surface is presented based on two exemplary cases and our clinical experience. Basically, two stripes of fleece bounded fibrin based sealant are put on the visceral pleura parallel to the wound, which will be then closed by multiple stitches of absorbable suture line inserted through the stripes. Afterwards, a second layer of the same sealant will be placed over it to cover the suture with a narrow overlapping in all directions to the adjacent visceral pleura (Sandwich-Technique). In our experience, this technique can be used to successfully prevent or treat persistent air leaks especially in patients with lung emphysema in whom otherwise treatment options are limited. ABBREVIATIONS: VATS = video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery POD = postoperative day LVRS = lung volume reduction surgery FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in the first second DLCO = diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide.
Assuntos
Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/administração & dosagem , Pneumonectomia/métodos , Enfisema Pulmonar/cirurgia , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/métodos , Adesivos Teciduais/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The pilot project RehaFuturReal of the Deutsche Rentenversicherung Westfalen (DRV) has been in progress since 1st April, 2011 and constitutes the implementation of the results of the na-tionwide development process RehaFutur in the consultation practice of the DRV Westfalen. In order to achieve and secure employability, this pilot project aims at sustained implementation of improved individualisation, flexibility and orientation towards integration, in the framework of the rehabilitation process. The participants are mostly recruited (75%) from different fields of medical rehabilitation (foremost orthopaedy, cardiology). They all meet the 3 selection criteria, which are present employment, current problems concerning occupational integration as well as a demand for occupational rehabilitation. They all have received support and guidance by individualised and structured rehab-management. The average age of the participants was 47.3 years (age range: 33-57 years), which is a rather old age for occupational rehabilitation. In spite of enduring physical disadvantages (83%), it turned out, that the participants had a high level of motivation concerning occupational rehabilitation services and the continuation of their employment, By offering intensive consultation and support, as well as accompanying vocational training, an occupational perspective either with the old employer or with a new employer could be reached for a large number of participants (74%). In the framework of close cooperation between the funding social security institutions, the vocational training institutions, the employers and the receivers of the services, a network has been created, which allows individualised, modularised and flexible integration solutions. In line with the pilot project RehaFuturReal of DRV Westfalen it became apparent, that in order to make occupational rehabilitation future-proof and sustainable, the already developed concepts should be transferred in actual acts of implementation consequently and interdisciplinary.
Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência/reabilitação , Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Ocupacional/métodos , Terapia Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Reabilitação Vocacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Retorno ao Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The pancreatic anastomosis seems to be the most difficult and dangerous anastomosis in general surgery, especially in a soft pancreas. Many techniques have been described. The techniques most often used are: anastomosis of the pancreas to the jejunum as a pancreatico-jejunostomy (duct-to-mucosa anastomosis) or as a pancreato-jejunostomy (invaginating anastomosis). Another widely used anastomosis for reconstruction after pancreatic head resection is from the stomach to the pancreas, i.e., pancreato-gastrostomy. In literature the data concerning postoperative complications (pancreatic fistula, postoperative bleeding and others) are not consistent. INDICATIONS: Reconstruction after pancreatic head resection. PROCEDURE: Anastomosis between small intestine or stomach and the pancreas. CONCLUSION: There is no gold standard for pancreatic anastomosis. Thus, of the different commonly used techniques, in our opinion, the best technique for each surgeon seems to be the one that he/she is most familiar with.