Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Reflects Diminished Bone Quality in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Oral Glucocorticoid Therapy.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a texture parameter that measures the grayscale variation within dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, and has been shown to significantly correlate with the 3-dimensional bone microarchitecture. The objective of this study was to determine whether TBS is a better clinical tool than traditionally used bone mineral density (BMD) to detect the skeletal deterioration seen in patients with diabetes (DM), patients undergoing oral glucocorticoid (GC) therapy, and patients who are both diabetic and taking steroids (GC + DM). We performed retrospective, cross-sectional study using DXA images of patients who visited UTHealth Department of Internal Medicine DXA clinic in Houston, TX, from May 30, 2014 to May 30, 2016. A total of 477 men and women, who were 55 years or older, were included in the study. Lumbar spine (LS) BMD and TBS were collected. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect clinical information for each patient. When both men and women were analyzed as a single group, LS-BMD was significantly higher in the diabetic group than in the control group (1.14 vs 1.10, p = 0.038), whereas mean TBS of L1-L4 was significantly lower in the diabetic group (1.21 vs 1.26, p = 0.004). LS-TBS was also significantly lower in diabetic women than in nondiabetic women (1.20 vs 1.26, p = 0.002). Receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curve indicated that LS-TBS provided better ability than LS-BMD to discriminate between control subjects and those in the DM, GC, or GC + DM groups (areas under the curve between 0.645 and 0.697, p < 0.010 for all). LS-TBS is a BMD-independent parameter that is capable of capturing a larger portion of bone quality deterioration undetected by BMD alone in patients with DM and undergoing oral GC therapy.

The AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) scapula fracture classification system: focus on body involvement.

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive system has been developed by the AO Classification Advisory Group to allow in-depth classification of scapular fractures for clinical research and surgical decision making. This paper evaluates a detailed classification system of scapular body fractures to better address the need for clinical relevance. METHODS: Seven experienced shoulder and orthopaedic trauma specialist surgeons participated in a follow-up series of agreement studies to specify and to evaluate the involvement of the body in scapula fractures. The last evaluation was conducted on a consecutive collection of 120 scapula fractures. RESULTS: There was agreement in 82% of the 120 cases with an overall κ of 0.75 when the surgeons identified body (B) fractures. Surgeons were in full agreement about involvement of the lateral inferior, medial, and superior borders in 72%, 51%, and 69% of the 101 cases identified with body involvement, respectively. The proportion of correctly classified cases with lateral inferior, medial, and superior border involvements was 78% or greater. CONCLUSION: Body involvement can be reliably identified by use of 3-dimensional computed tomography images. Surgeons could reliably and accurately identify superior, medial, and lateral border involvement, which is considered clinically relevant and likely sufficient for the treatment decision process and outcome prognosis. It should be applied by surgeons with a special interest in the shoulder in the framework of clinical routine as well as in research activities.

A Data-Driven Methodology to Comprehensively Assess Bone Drilling Using Radar Plots.

Background: The study aims to develop a data-driven methodology to assess bone drilling in preparation for future clinical trials in residency training. The existing assessment methods are either subjective or do not consider the interdependence among individual skill factors, such as time and accuracy. This study uses quantitative data and radar plots to visualize the balance of the selected skill factors. Methods: In the experiment, straight vertical drilling was assessed across 3 skill levels: expert surgeons (N = 10), intermediate residents (postgraduate year-2-5, N = 5), and novice residents (postgraduate year-1, N = 10). Motion and force were measured for each drilling trial, and data from multiple trials were then converted into 5 performance indicators, including overshoot, drilling time, overshoot consistency, time consistency, and force fluctuation. Each indicator was then scored between 0 and 10, with 10 being the best, and plotted into a radar plot. Results: Statistical difference (p < 0.05) was confirmed among 3 skill levels in force, time, and overshoot data. The radar plots revealed that the novice group exhibited the most distorted pentagons compared with the well-formed pentagons observed in the case of expert participants. The intermediate group showed slight distortion that was between the expert and novice groups. Conclusion/Clinical Relevance: This research shows the utility of radar plots in drilling assessment in a comprehensive manner and lays the groundwork for a data-driven training scheme to prepare novice residents for clinical practice.

The AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) scapula fracture classification system: focus on glenoid fossa involvement.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the glenoid frequently require surgical treatment. A comprehensive and reliable scapula classification system involving the glenoid fracture patterns is needed to describe the underlying pathology. The AO Scapula Classification Group introduces an appropriate novel system that is presented along with its inter-rater reliability and accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An iterative consensus process (involving a series of face-to-face meetings and agreement studies) with an international group of 7 experienced shoulder surgeons was used to specify and evaluate a scapular fracture classification system with a focus on fracture patterns of the glenoid fossa. The last evaluation was conducted on a consecutive collection of 120 scapular fractures documented by both plain radiographs and computed tomography scans including 3-dimensional surface rendering. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed with κ statistics, and accuracy was estimated by latent class modeling. RESULTS: Of 120 scapular fractures, 46 involved the glenoid (38%), with 38 classified as F1 articular rim fractures. The overall median sensitivity and specificity in identifying these fractures were 95% and 93%, respectively. Surgeons' accuracy in classifying F1 fractures ranged from 86% to 100% (median, 94%). Subsequently, classification of simple F1 fractures resulted in a proportion of 36% of anterior rim fractures, 19% of posterior rim fractures, and 45% of short oblique fractures, with accuracies ranging from 85% to 98%. CONCLUSION: This new system for scapular glenoid fractures has proved to be sufficiently reliable and accurate when applied by experienced shoulder surgeons. Further validation of the most detailed system, as well as involvement of surgeons with different levels of training in the framework of clinical routine and research, however, should be considered.

Improvement of research quality in the fields of orthopaedics and trauma: a global perspective.

The international orthopaedic community aims to achieve the best possible outcome for patient care by constantly modifying surgical techniques and expanding the surgeon's knowledge. These efforts require proper reflection within a setting that necessitates a higher quality standard for global orthopaedic publication. Furthermore, these techniques demand that surgeons acquire information at a rapid rate while enforcing higher standards in research performance. An international consensus exists on how to perform research and what rules should be considered when publishing a scientific paper. Despite this global agreement, in today's "Cross Check Era", too many authors do not give attention to the current standards of systematic research. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to describe these performance standards, the available choices for orthopaedic surgeons and the current learning curve for seasoned teams of researchers and orthopaedic surgeons with more than three decades of experience. These lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the topics that will significantly influence the research development as we arrive at an important globalisation era in orthopaedics and trauma-related research.

Where Are We in 2022? A Summary of 11,000 Open Tibia Fractures Over 4 Decades.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the infection and nonunion rates for open tibia fracture treatment over the past 4 decades since the introduction of the Gustilo-Anderson (GA) open fracture classification. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were reviewed using the PRISMA checklist for articles between 1977 and September 2018. STUDY SELECTION: One hundred sixty-one articles meeting the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between 1977 and 2018, reported infection rates, reported nonunion rates, and fractures classified by the GA open fracture criteria were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: All articles were thoroughly evaluated to extract infection and nonunion data for open tibia fractures. DATA SYNTHESIS: Due to variability in the data reviewed, statistical evaluation could not be reliably done. RESULTS: 11,326 open tibia fractures were reported with 17% type I, 25.2% type II, 25.3% type IIIA, and 32.5% type IIIB/C. The average infection rate over 4 decades was 18.3%, with 24.3% superficial, 11.2% deep, and 14.7% pin tract. The infection rate by decade was 14% for 1977-1986, 16.2% for 1987-1996, 20.5% for 1997%-2006%, and 18.1% from 2007 to 2017. The overall nonunion rate was 14.1%. The nonunion rate was 13% for 1977-1986, 17% for 1987-1996, 12.8% for 1997%-2006%, and 12.3% for 2007-2017. CONCLUSIONS: This in-depth summary has demonstrated that the percentage rate for infections and nonunion has remained similar over the past 40 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

An objective assessment for bone drilling: A pilot study on vertical drilling.

The purpose of this study is to propose a quantitative assessment scheme to help with surgical bone drilling training. This pilot study gathered and compared motion and force data from expert surgeons (n = 3) and novice residents (n = 6). The experiment used three-dimensional printed bone simulants of young bone (YB) and osteoporotic bone (OB), and drilling overshoot, time, and force were measured. There was no statistically significant difference in overshoot between the two groups (p = 0.217 for YB and 0.215 for OB). The results, however, show that the experts took less time (mean = 4.01 s) than the novices (mean = 9.98 s), with a statistical difference (p = 0.003 for YB and 0.0001 for OB). In addition, the expert group performed more consistently than the novices. The force analysis further revealed that experts used a higher force to drill the first cortical section and a noticeably lower force in the second cortex to control the overshoot (approximate reduction of 5.5 N). Finally, when drilling time and overshoot distance were combined, the motion data distinguished the skill gap between expert and novice drilling; the force data provided insight into the drilling mechanism and performance outcomes. This study lays the groundwork for a data-driven training scheme to prepare novice residents for clinical practice.

Adaptation of the Centers for Disease Control Surgical Wound Classification System for Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a proposed orthopaedic-specific surgical wound classification system (SWCS) and the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) system in a series of detailed clinical vignettes and to identify the degree of satisfaction with CDC SWCS and desire for institution of an orthopaedic-specific SWCS. METHODS: Forty-five clinical vignettes and a 5-question survey were distributed to current and past members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's Classification Committee. Respondents were asked to provide wound class for each vignette using the CDC system and orthopaedic-specific SWCS. RESULTS: The orthopaedic-specific and CDC SWCS had interclass correlations of 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. When the systems were compared, in 34% of cases, there was no grade change; in 63% of cases, the wound was graded higher using the orthopaedic-specific SWCS. When only the procedure was changed between vignettes, wound classification was infrequently affected. There was near universal dissatisfaction with the CDC SWCS and desire for an orthopaedic-specific system. CONCLUSIONS: Both the CDC SWCS and orthopaedic-specific SWCS have excellent interobserver reliability. Incorporation of orthopaedic-specific language affects wound classification. There is low satisfaction with the current CDC SWCS and a desire exists for further development and validation of an orthopaedic-specific SWCS.

Comparison of the Neer classification to the 2018 update of the Orthopedic Trauma Association/AO fracture classification for classifying proximal humerus fractures.

Background: The classification of fractures is necessary to ensure a reliable means of communication for clinical interaction, education and research. The Neer classification is the most commonly used classification for proximal humerus fractures. In 2018 the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) and the AO Foundation provided an update to the OTA/AO Fracture Classification Scheme addressing many of the concerns about the previous versions of the classification. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the rater reliability of the 2 classifications and if the classifications subjectively better characterized the fracture patterns. Methods: X-rays and CT scans of 24 proximal humerus fractures were given to 7 independent raters for classification according to the Neer and 2018 OTA/AO classification. Both full-forms and short-forms of the classifications were tested. The Fleiss Kappa statistic was used to assess inter-rater agreement and intra-rater consistency for the 2 classifications. For each case the raters subjectively commented on how well each classification was able to characterize the fracture pattern. Results: All raters graded the 2018 OTA/AO classification as good as or better than the Neer classification for an adequate description of the fracture patterns. The short-form 2018 OTA/AO classification had the most 4 rater and 5 rater agreement cases and the second most 6 rater agreement cases. The short-form Neer classification had the second most 4 rater and 5 rater agreement cases and the most 6 rater agreement cases. The full 2018 OTA/AO had the least 4, 5, or 6 rater agreement cases of all the classification systems. Inter-rater agreement was fair for the full and short form of both the Neer and 2018 OTA/AO classification. The full and short Neer classifications together with the short 2018 OTA/AO classification had moderate intra-rater consistency, while the full 2018 OTA/AO classification only had slight intra-rater consistency. Conclusions: The 2018 OTA/AO classification is equivalent in its short-form to the Neer classification in inter-rater reliability and intra-rater consistency; and is superior in its full form for characterizing specific fracture types. The low inter-rater reliability of the full 2018 OTA/AO classification is a concern that may need to be addressed in the future.

The injury characteristics of open pilon fractures predictive of complications.

OBJECTIVE: Determine predictive injury factors for wound complications in open pilon fractures (OTA/AO 43B and 43C). DESIGN: Retrospective Case Series. SETTING: Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 61 open pilon fractures in 60 patients were evaluated after meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: The majority of injuries underwent a staged protocol with immediate antibiotics, debridement, irrigation and external fixation. Following soft tissue stabilization, internal fixation was performed and wound closure achieved in a coordinated fashion depending on the type of closure required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Early amputation rate, 90-day major (wound dehiscence or deep infection requiring operative intervention) and minor (superficial infection) wound complications. RESULTS: Four patients incurred early amputations, 11 had major wound complications and 5 had minor wound complications. An early amputation was more likely if they presented with an OTA Open Fracture Classification (OTA-OFC) Bone Loss Grade 3. A major wound complication was more likely if they presented with a fall from > 3 m, a multifragmentary articular surface, a segmental fibula fracture, or an OTA-OFC Contamination Grade 3. A multifragmentary articular surface was also predictive of developing any wound complication. CONCLUSIONS: Open pilon fractures are severe, limb-threatening injuries and are at risk for wound complications. Patients presenting with these injuries and a predictive factor should be counseled regarding the possibility of early limb loss or experiencing a wound complication that will require additional treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Reformatting of Computed Tomography Scans Parallel to the S1 End Plate Increases Visualization of Trans Sacral Pathway in the First Sacral Segment, Especially With Dysmorphism.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether reformatted computed tomography (CT) scans would increase surgeons' confidence in placing a trans sacral (TS) screw in the first sacral segment. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: There were 50 patients with uninjured pelvises who were reviewed by 9 orthopaedic trauma fellowship-trained surgeons and 5 orthopaedic residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The overall percentage of surgeons who believe it was safe to place a TS screw in the first sacral segment with standard (axial cuts perpendicular to the scanner gantry) versus reformatted (parallel to the S1 end plate) CT scans. RESULTS: Overall, 58% of patients were believed to have a safe corridor in traditional cut axial CT scans, whereas 68% were believed to have a safe corridor on reformatted CT scans ( P < 0.001). When grouped by dysplasia, those without sacral dysplasia (n = 28) had a safe corridor 93% of the time on traditional scans and 93% of the time with reformatted CT scans ( P = 0.87). However, of those who had dysplasia (n = 22), only 12% were believed to have a safe corridor on original scans compared with 35% on reformatted scans ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT scan reformatting parallel to the S1 superior end plate increases the likelihood of identifying a safe corridor for a TS screw, especially in patients with evidence of sacral dysplasia. The authors would recommend the routine use of reformatting CT scans in this manner to provide a better understanding of the upper sacral segment osseous fixation pathways.

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the long-term outcomes research gap Delphi survey.

BACKGROUND: In the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 report on trauma care, the establishment of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research was recommended. To address this recommendation, the Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on long-term outcomes. METHODS: Experts in long-term outcomes were recruited to identify current gaps in long-term trauma outcomes research, generate research questions, and establish the priority for these questions using a consensus-driven, Delphi survey approach from February 2021 to August 2021. Panelists were identified using established Delphi recruitment guidelines to ensure heterogeneity and generalizability including both military and civilian representation. Panelists were encouraged to use a PICO format to generate research questions: Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome model. On subsequent surveys, panelists were asked to prioritize each research question on a 9-point Likert scale, categorized to represent low-, medium-, and high-priority items. Consensus was defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. RESULTS: Thirty-two subject matter experts generated 482 questions in 17 long-term outcome topic areas. By Round 3 of the Delphi, 359 questions (75%) reached consensus, of which 107 (30%) were determined to be high priority, 252 (70%) medium priority, and 0 (0%) low priority. Substance abuse and pain was the topic area with the highest number of questions. Health services (not including mental health or rehabilitation) (64%), mental health (46%), and geriatric population (43%) were the topic areas with the highest proportion of high-priority questions. CONCLUSION: This Delphi gap analysis of long-term trauma outcomes research identified 107 high-priority research questions that will help guide investigators in future long-term outcomes research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level IV.

The Competitive Orthopaedic Trauma Fellowship Applicant: A Program Director's Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, orthopaedic trauma had the lowest match rate among orthopaedic subspecialties. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of factors evaluated by orthopaedic trauma fellowship directors when ranking applicants after the interview. METHODS: An electronic survey was submitted to fellowship directors and consisted of 16 factors included in a fellowship application. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of these factors for applicants they interviewed on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, with 1 being not at all important and 5 being critical. RESULTS: Thirty-seven fellowship directors responded (63.8%). The highest-rated factor was the applicant interview (mean score 4.82), followed by the quality of letters of recommendation (4.69), personal connections made to the applicant (3.89), and potential to be leader (3.86). Fellowship directors at academic programs rated interest in an academic career (P = 0.003), research experience (P = 0.023), and exposure to well-known orthopaedic traumatologists (P = 0.003) higher than their counterparts at private institutions. Programs with more than one fellow rated potential to be a leader higher than programs with one fellow (P = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Trainees may use this study when compiling an application to optimize their chances of matching at the program of their choice.

Maintenance of Compression With a Positional Screw Versus Compression Generated With a Lag Screw.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a position screw will maintain the interfragmentary compression force obtained by a reduction clamp across an anatomically reduced cortical bone fracture and determine whether this compressive force is equivalent to that generated by a lag screw (LS). METHODS: Oblique fractures were created in 6 composite cortical bone models. Interfragmentary compression was measured using force sensors within the fracture after reduction with a clamp. A position screw was then placed perpendicular to the fracture, and force measurements were repeated with both the clamp and the screw. Finally, the clamp was removed, and force measurements were taken with the screw only to measure maintenance of initial compression. After these measurements, the screw was removed, and the near fragment was overdrilled to allow LS placement by technique. Compression force measurements were repeated for clamp only, clamp + screw, and screw only. RESULTS: The mean force of clamp alone across all 12 trials was 139.77 N. Application of an LS increased the compression across the fracture (P = 0.01) which was unchanged when the clamp was removed. The position screw had the opposite effect, reducing compression, and the removal of the clamp further reduced the compression (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: A reduction clamp will initially compress a fracture to an average of 139 N. An LS will significantly increase this interfragmentary compression. A position screw will not maintain the compression created by the clamp and in fact will significantly decrease interfragmentary compression.

Improved Intraoperative Fluoroscopy for Pelvic and Acetabular Surgery.

Over the past 3 decades, the evolution of pelvic and acetabular surgery has been supported by the advances in intraoperative pelvic fluoroscopic imaging technology. The new Ziehm RFD 3D C-arm unit provides routine fluoroscopic pelvic imaging but also offers rapid and high-quality real-time axial, sagittal, and coronal intraoperative imaging. This technology allows the surgeon to accurately assess fracture reduction, loose body removal, and implant locations while the patient is still under anesthesia. In this way, any necessary corrections can be performed before the patient leaves the operating room. Essentially, this technology should eliminate the need for revision surgeries. In this report, we present our initial experience using this new device.

Is the Cranial and Posterior Screw of the "Inverted Triangle" Configuration for Femoral Neck Fractures Safe?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency where a posterior and cranial screw in a femoral neck that appeared contained on fluoroscopy violates the cortex. METHODS: Ten specimens including the hemipelvis with the proximal femur were obtained from unidentified embalmed specimens that were to be cremated after an institutional review board waiver was granted. Under fluoroscopy, the posterior and cranial screw of the inverted triangle configuration for the femoral neck was placed using standard technique with a cannulated 6.5-mm screw. Anterior-posterior and lateral images of the final screw placement were blinded to 2 orthopaedic traumatologists and 1 musculoskeletal radiologist who were asked to determine whether the screw radiographically breached the posterior and cranial cortex. Cadavers were stripped of soft tissues and inspected for screw perforation. Screws were grouped as contained, thread extrusion, or core extrusion. RESULTS: Reviewers classified all 10 screws as radiographically contained within the femoral neck. Cadavers were inspected and found to show: 4 of 10 with core extrusion, 3 of 10 with thread extrusion, and 3 of 10 screws contained within the femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS: Seventy percent of screws that were judged to be radiographically contained had cortical breach near the area where the lateral epiphyseal vessels enter the femoral neck. We urge caution against placement of posterior-cranial implants with fluoroscopy alone even if they appear radiographically contained.

Electronically augmented gait abnormality assessment following lower extremity trauma.

BACKGROUND: Objective evaluation of patient outcomes has become an essential component of patient management. Along with patient-reported outcomes, performance-based measures (PBMs) such as gait analysis are an important part of this evaluation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of utilizing a wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) in an outpatient clinic setting to assess its ability to provide clinically relevant data in patients with altered gait resulting from lower extremity trauma. METHODS: Five orthopaedic trauma patients with varying degrees of gait pathologies were compared to 5 healthy control subjects. Kinematic data were simultaneously recorded by the IMU and a gold standard Vicon video motion analysis system (Vicon Motion Systems Ltd, Oxford, UK) during a modified 10-m walk test. Raw data captured by the IMU were directly compared to Vicon data. Additionally, 5 objective gait parameters were compared for controls and the 5 trauma patients. RESULTS: The IMU data streams strongly correlated with Vicon data for measured variables used in the subsequent gait analysis: vertical acceleration, vertical displacement, pitch angular velocity, and roll angular velocity (Pearson r-value > 0.9 for all correlations). Quantitative kinematic data in post-trauma patients significantly differed from control data and correlated with observed gait pathology. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to the gold standard motion capture reference system (Vicon), an IMU can reliably and accurately measure clinically relevant gait parameters and differentiate between normal and pathologic gait patterns. This technology is easily integrated into clinical settings, requires minimal time, and represents a performance-based method for quantifiably assessing gait outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level 1.

Improvement of Orthopedic Residency Programs and Diversity: Dilemmas and Challenges, an International Perspective.

BACKGROUND: To date, little has been published comparing the structure and requirements of orthopedic training programs across multiple countries. The goal of this study was to summarize and compare the characteristics of orthopedic training programs in the U.S.A., U.K., Canada, Australia, Germany, India, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iran. METHODS: We communicated with responders using a predetermined questionnaire regarding the national orthopedic training program requirements in each respondent's home country. Specific items of interest included the following: the structure of the residency program, the time required to become an orthopedic surgeon, whether there is a log book, whether there is a final examination prior to becoming an orthopedic surgeon, the type and extent of faculty supervision, and the nature of national in-training written exams and assessment methods. Questionnaire data were augmented by reviewing each country's publicly accessible residency training documents that are available on the web and visiting the official website of the main orthopedic association of each country. RESULTS: The syllabi consist of three elements: clinical knowledge, clinical skills, and professional skills. The skill of today's trainees predicts the quality of future orthopedic surgeons. The European Board of Orthopedics and Traumatology (EBOT) exam throughout the European Union countries should function as the European board examination in orthopedics. We must standardize many educational procedures worldwide in the same way we standardized patient safety. CONCLUSION: Considering the world's cultural and political diversity, the world is nearly unified in regards to orthopedics. The procedures (structure of the residency programs, duration of the residency programs, selection procedures, using a log book, continuous assessment and final examination) must be standardized worldwide, as implemented for patient safety. To achieve this goal, we must access and evaluate more information on the residency programs in different countries and their needs by questioning them regarding what they need and what we can do for them to make a difference.

Locked plating of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures.

Fifty periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty were reviewed. Fractures were closed Lewis and Rorabeck type II with a stable prosthesis. Twenty-nine patients (group I), were treated with locked condylar plating. Twenty-one patients (group II) were treated with nonlocked plating systems or intramedullary fixation. Minimum follow-up was 1.7 years. There were 5 malunions (20%) in group I and 9 (47%) in group II (P < .05). There were no nonunions in group I and 3 (16%) in group II. Complication rates were 12% in group I, compared to 42% in group II. Group I patients had less operative blood loss, healed in better alignment, and had greater knee motion. All 7 patients treated with a retrograde intramedullary nail developed a malunion or nonunion. Locked plating is a reliable treatment for periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures. We experienced a lower complication, revision, malunion, and nonunion rate with locked plating versus conventional treatment options.

Hip Fracture Nonunions: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Special Considerations in Elderly Patients.

In the United States, more than 300,000 hip fractures occur annually in the elderly population with associated significant morbidity and mortality. Both intracapsular and extracapsular hip fractures have inherent treatment challenges and therefore are at risk of nonunion complications. A systematic assessment including radiographic, metabolic, and infectious evaluations should be completed for all patients suspected of nonunion. Failed internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures is typically treated with arthroplasty, while extracapsular proximal femur nonunions may be amenable to revision internal fixation or arthroplasty. While not a classic hip fracture, bisphosphate associated subtrochanteric femur fractures affect a similar patient population and are historically difficult to treat. Atypical subtrochanteric femur fractures are at increased risk of nonunion given the altered biologic environment secondary to bisphosphonate use; therefore adjuvant therapies may be beneficial in setting of revision fixation. Having a thorough understanding of nonunion risks, recognition, evaluation, and treatment is necessary for appropriate patient care.