Approaches to asthma management. Realities and recommendations.

As asthma prevalence continues to increase, so does its impact on public health and on health care systems. Despite the prescription of more antiasthma medications than ever before, morbidity and mortality associated with asthma continue to increase. The focus of asthma therapy is changing, with a greater emphasis on control of the inflammatory rather than the bronchoconstrictive component. Several sets of guidelines recently developed by groups of asthma specialists clearly reflect this new focus. While such recommendations are intended to help physicians more accurately diagnose asthma by severity and better manage its symptoms, uniformity in both areas is lacking. Disparities are seen not only among physicians overall but also among primary care physicians compared with subspecialists. New survey data help to illustrate how reality--the clinical approaches of these physician subgroups--differs from current recommendations. Physicians who treat patients with asthma may find that their approaches are in agreement with those of their peers. Nonetheless, they may also find that they deviate from guidelines that could improve clinical outcome for a substantial number of patients with asthma.

Dose-related protection of exercise bronchoconstriction by montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene-receptor antagonist, at the end of a once-daily dosing interval.

The dose-related protective effects of montelukast, a potent and selective cysteinyl leukotriene-receptor antagonist, against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction were investigated in a five-period, randomized, incomplete-block, crossover study with montelukast (0.4, 2, 10, 50 mg) and placebo. The study subjects were 27 nonsmoking, healthy stable patients with asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 82.0% predicted) who demonstrated a > or = 20% decrease in FEV1 while beta-agonist was withheld for 6 hours before treadmill exercise. The standard exercise challenge was performed 20 to 24 hours, and again 32 to 36 hours, after the second of two once-daily doses. The effect of oral montelukast on exercise was measured by the area above the postexercise percentage decrease in FEV1 versus time curve from 0 to 60 minutes [AUC(0-60)], the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 after exercise, and time after maximal decrease to recovery of FEV1 to within 5% of the preexercise baseline. Twenty to 24 hours after administration, montelukast caused dose-related protection, while providing similar protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction at the two highest doses. The AUC(0-60) values (mean +/- SD) were 637 +/- 898, 715 +/- 870, 988 +/- 1147, and 927 +/- 968 min. % for 50, 10, 2, and 0.4 mg montelukast, respectively, and 1193 +/- 1097 min. % for placebo (p = 0.003). No important clinical effect was present 36 hours after dosing. Montelukast was generally well tolerated at all dose levels. In conclusion, montelukast caused dose-related protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction at the end of a once-daily dosing interval. Protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction can be used to determine appropriate dose selection.

Flunisolide aerosol for treatment of severe, chronic asthma in steroid-independent children.

The efficacy and safety of flunisolide aerosol were studied in 46 steroid-independent children with asthma inadequately controlled by nonsteroid drugs. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study lasting eight weeks. Patients were randomly assigned either flunisolide by inhalation, 0.5 mg twice a day, or placebo. Effectiveness was evaluated daily by symptom scores, by Wright peak flow measurements twice daily, and weekly by spirometry and physical examination. Adrenal function and throat cultures for Candida were evaluated before and after the test-drug treatment period. Flunisolide was administered to 25 patients and 21 received placebo. Most symptom scores were statistically significantly better in flunisolide-treated than in placebo-treated patients; these included severity of wheezing (P = .01), chest tightness (P = .01) and shortness of breath (P = .02), and frequency (P = .001) and severity of asthma attacks (P = .03). In addition, placebo-treated patients used significantly more bronchodilators than flunisolide-treated patients. In the final therapeutic effectiveness evaluation, 72% of flunisolide-treated patients received very good or good ratings, whereas only 29% of placebo-treated patients received these ratings (P = .005). No patient developed thrush, evidence of adrenal suppression, or other severe adverse reaction. Flunisolide aerosol was shown to be effective and safe in controlling asthma in children who were candidates for oral steroid therapy.

Guidelines update: where do the new therapies fit in the management of asthma? NHLBI and WHO Global Initiative for Asthma.

The new leukotriene (LT) modifiers have been shown to be effective, safe and convenient 'controller' medications in patients with asthma. However, their use in asthma is recommended only in the most recent US guidelines, and then only as alternative long term controllers in patients with mild persistent asthma. In fact, as has now been shown in a number of studies, LT modifiers are effective in a variety of other asthma settings, and it is expected that expanded roles for these agents will be described in future asthma guidelines. Until then, clinicians aware of the advantages of individualising asthma therapy might consider LT modifiers for the diverse range of patients with asthma who are likely to benefit from the use of these agents.

Dose-response study of nebulized bitolterol mesylate solution in asthmatic patients.

Bitolterol mesylate, a new beta 2 adrenergic bronchodilator, is a "pro-drug" which is activated by esterases in the lung. In order to determine the optimal bronchodilator dose of bitolterol, six doses, (0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg, 2.5 mg and 3.0 mg), were administered by closed-port, intermittent-flow nebulization (CPIF) to asthmatic patients on different days. For most patients, the onset of bronchodilator activity (FEV1 increase of at least 15 percent above baseline) occurred within 5 minutes and lasted at least 8 hours. Maximum mean increases in FEV1 were 46-50 percent at the 1.0 mg to 3.0 mg doses. Beyond the 1.0 mg dose, there was no significant improvement in bronchodilator effect, but adverse effects, particularly tremor, increased at higher doses. The optimal dose of bitolterol administered by CPIF was determined to be 1.0 mg which is similar to the dose of bitolterol recommended for use by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) which is 0.7 mg to 1.1 mg. If continuous-flow nebulization is used, two-three times more drug may be needed for a comparable effect. Bitolterol appears to be a safe, effective and long-lasting bronchodilator when administered by jet nebulization.

Comparative efficacy and safety of albuterol sulfate Spiros inhaler and albuterol metered-dose inhaler in asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of albuterol administration using a Spiros Inhalation System (Dura Pharmaceuticals; San Diego, CA) dry powder inhaler (DPI) and albuterol (Ventolin; Glaxo Wellcome; Research Triangle Park, NC) administration using a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) in patients with asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a phase III, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of 283 adolescent and adult patients with mild to moderate asthma. The patients were randomized into one of three treatment groups: the Spiros group, who were given 108 microg/actuation of albuterol sulfate equivalent to 90 microg of albuterol base; the MDI group, who were given 90 microg/actuation of albuterol; and the placebo group. RESULTS: Over the length of the study, the Spiros and MDI groups were comparable in all FEV1 parameters. Both active treatment groups were superior to the placebo group for each FEV1 parameter at all visits. With the exception of differences at treatment week 0 for the maximum percent change in the FEV1, the duration of effect, and the area under the curve at baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between the Spiros and MDI groups for any FEV1 parameters. Using a repeated-measures analysis, the FEV1 parameters at week 0 for the Spiros group were not statistically significantly different from the parameters at weeks 4, 8, and 12. The same analysis effect at week 0 for the MDI group was greater for maximum percent change in the FEV1 from baseline (weeks 4, 8, and 12) and duration of effect. Adverse events and changes in clinical laboratory values, vital signs, ECG results, and physical examinations were reported with similar incidence in each of the three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Both active treatments were superior to the placebo treatment. The Spiros DPI was well tolerated and was as effective as the albuterol MDI in treating patients with moderate asthma.

Therapeutic effect of zafirlukast as monotherapy in steroid-naive patients with severe persistent asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the efficacy of the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast (Accolate), 20 mg twice daily, as monotherapy in patients with severe persistent asthma (defined by an FEV1 < 60% of predicted before treatment and frequent night-time symptoms). DESIGN: Data were analyzed from a subgroup of 261 steroid-naive patients (zafirlukast, n = 149; placebo, n = 112) from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 13-week trials with similar experimental designs, entry criteria, and clinical assessments. PATIENTS: These patients were mostly men (57%) older than 30 years (56%) with pulmonary obstruction, ie, FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 (79%), and reversible airway disease demonstrated by a 15% increase in FEV1 after inhaled bronchodilator use. RESULTS: At end point, patients who received zafirlukast monotherapy had significant (p < 0.05) improvements from baseline, and compared with placebo, in FEV1, morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), daytime asthma symptoms, nighttime awakenings, and beta2-agonist use. A stratified analysis based on the FEV1/FVC ratio showed an interaction between treatment and the amount of airflow obstruction for nighttime awakenings and mornings with asthma. Moreover, 37% of patients in both treatment groups had PEF variability > or = 20% (an indirect measure of airway inflammation). Zafirlukast patients with PEF variability > or = 20% had increases from baseline in the morning and evening PEF of approximately 40 and 11 L/min, respectively. For patients who take zafirlukast and who have a PEF variability of < 20%, the morning and evening PEF increased by 25 and 30 L/min, respectively. Regardless of the degree of PEF variability, zafirlukast significantly (p < 0.05) increased morning and evening PEF compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe persistent asthma who received zafirlukast as monotherapy had clinically significant improvements across all efficacy measures compared with placebo and significant reductions in PEF variability.

A 1-week dose-ranging study of inhaled salmeterol in patients with asthma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: A dose-ranging study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new long-acting, selective beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol. DESIGN: Adolescents and adults (N = 160) with mild-to-moderate asthma received salmeterol (10.5, 21, 42, or 84 micrograms) or placebo by metered-dose inhaler twice daily for 1 week. Twelve-hour serial spirometry measurements were performed on the first and last days of treatment, and patients recorded their peak expiratory flow (PEF) twice daily on diary cards. RESULTS: On day 1, salmeterol produced greater bronchodilation than placebo (p = 0.001), and both the 42-micrograms and 84-micrograms doses of salmeterol were significantly more effective in improving FEV1 responses than the two lower doses of salmeterol (p < 0.05). After 1 week of treatment, all but the 21-micrograms dose of salmeterol remained statistically superior to placebo (p < 0.01), but significant differences between salmeterol doses were no longer evident, despite an apparent dose-response effect. Only the 42-micrograms and 84-micrograms doses of salmeterol sustained bronchodilation for 12 h in the majority of patients at both treatment days. The degree of improvement in morning and evening PEF was also found to be dose related. There was no significant difference among treatment groups in the overall incidence of adverse events; however, pharmacologically predictable events (eg, tremor) occurred significantly more often with salmeterol, 84 micrograms. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol, 42 micrograms, was similar in efficacy to 84 micrograms but was associated with a lower incidence of adverse events. Salmeterol, 42 micrograms twice daily, is a safe and effective dosage for patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who are persistently symptomatic and require maintenance bronchodilator therapy.

Effect of long-term salmeterol therapy compared with as-needed albuterol use on airway hyperresponsiveness.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of long-term salmeterol aerosol therapy on airway hyperresponsiveness measured by methacholine challenge. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Thirty-one clinical centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Four hundred eight asthmatic patients > or = 12 years of age with baseline FEV1 of > or = 70% of predicted values. Patients were not using inhaled corticosteroids. INTERVENTIONS: Twice-daily salmeterol aerosol, 42 microg, or placebo via metered-dose inhaler for 24 weeks. Backup albuterol was available. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary function tests were performed before, during, and after treatment. Subjects recorded asthma-related symptoms, morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) levels, and use of supplemental albuterol daily on diary cards. Methacholine challenges were performed 10 to 14 h postdose at weeks 4, 12, and 24, and 3 and 7 days posttreatment. Over 24 weeks of treatment, salmeterol provided significant (p < 0.001) protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction of approximately one doubling dose of methacholine when compared to placebo with no evidence for a progressive decrease in protection. A rebound increase in airway hyperresponsiveness was not observed 3 and 7 days after cessation of salmeterol therapy. Salmeterol treatment resulted in sustained improvements of 0.21 to 0.26 L in morning premedication FEV1 and an improvement of 26.2 L/min in morning PEF when compared to placebo (p < 0.001). The use of salmeterol significantly reduced combined daytime asthma symptoms by 20% when compared to placebo (p = 0.005). A total of 34 and 48 exacerbations, respectively, were reported in the Salmeterol and placebo groups, and no evidence was present for a difference in the severity of asthma exacerbations between groups. Adverse event profiles were similar for the salmeterol and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Regular long-term use of salmeterol aerosol resulted in sustained improvements in pulmonary function and asthma symptom control over the 24-week treatment period. There was no increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness or loss of bronchoprotection at 24 weeks from that seen following 4 weeks of therapy. There was no evidence of rebound airway hyperresponsiveness after cessation of salmeterol treatment. Regular treatment with the long-acting beta-agonist salmeterol does not lead to clinical instability or vulnerability to unpredictable asthma attacks.

Assessment of tachyphylaxis following prolonged therapy of asthma with inhaled albuterol aerosol.

Controversy exists concerning possible tachyphylaxis of the acute bronchodilating effect of albuterol, especially with regard to the duration of its acute bronchodilating action. We evaluated 140 patients with bronchial asthma in a prospective double-blind controlled study of possible tachyphylaxis to albuterol aerosol as compared to isoproterenol aerosol. We demonstrated statistically significant tachyphylaxis with regard to duration of acute bronchodilating effect. We believe that this tachyphylaxis is not clinically significant because there was no tachyphylaxis with regard to peak bronchodilating effect and because the duration of bronchodilating effect remains significantly greater, both quantitatively and statistically, when compared to isoproterenol aerosol. Moreover, it appeared that most of the tachyphylaxis was present at four weeks of therapy. There was a small increment of tachyphylaxis after eight weeks of therapy, but no further increase in tachyphylaxis was demonstrated after 13 weeks of inhaled albuterol therapy. We therefore feel that clinically significant tachyphylaxis to inhaled albuterol aerosol must be quite unusual and that chronic therapy with inhaled albuterol aerosol is probably both safe and efficacious for bronchospastic disorders.

Zafirlukast for symptomatic mild-to-moderate asthma: a 13-week multicenter study. The Zafirlukast Trialists Group.

The efficacy of the oral leukotriene-receptor antagonist zafirlukast was assessed as maintenance therapy for patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. A total of 762 patients aged 12 to 76 years were enrolled in a 13-week, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial and randomly assigned to receive either zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily) or placebo. Patients were maintained on as-needed beta-agonist therapy throughout the study and had to have a cumulative daytime asthma symptoms score > or = 8 (on a daily scale of 0 to 3) over 7 consecutive days before randomization. Efficacy was assessed by changes in symptoms, beta-agonist use, and pulmonary function. Safety was assessed by adverse experiences, laboratory test results, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Zafirlukast significantly decreased daytime asthma symptoms scores (-26.5%), nighttime awakenings (-19.8%), mornings with asthma (-29.0%), and beta-agonist use (-22.3%) and significantly increased morning peak expiratory flow rate (6.9%) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (6.3%) compared with placebo. Changes in symptoms, beta-agonist use, and pulmonary function occurred within 2 days of zafirlukast treatment and continued throughout the trial. Zafirlukast was well tolerated. Pharyngitis and headache were the most common adverse events, occurring with similar frequency in both the zafirlukast and placebo groups. No clinically significant changes were observed in laboratory test results, findings on physical examination, or electrocardiographic findings. We conclude that zafirlukast produces early and sustained effects in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma.

Role of leukotriene receptor antagonists in pediatric asthma.

During the past decade, the inflammatory mechanisms that result in the clinical syndrome we call asthma have been emphasized in research, publications, and the various asthma management guidelines. This information clearly emphasizes the treatment of asthma with maintenance controller therapies early after the onset of symptoms in all but the very mildest of patients. Until the advent of the leukotriene receptor antagonists, nearly all of these maintenance therapies needed to be administered by inhalation through a variety of devices and spacers. Inhalation of medication was necessary to either increase the amount of drug reaching the airways or to increase the therapeutic index of drugs such as corticosteroids. Even under the best circumstances, this route of administration is difficult and expensive for many parents whose children have asthma. Now that oral controller therapies (leukotriene receptor antagonists) are available for children, their role in clinical practice needs to be examined. The latest asthma management guidelines classify asthma into four groups of severity, and base treatment recommendations on the intensity of symptoms, need for rescue medications, and pulmonary function as measured by peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)). The categories of mild intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent, and severe asthma in children will be addressed in this presentation by reviewing the available data on the use of the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast in children. Mild intermittent asthma can be typified by exercise-induced asthma, a common pediatric condition. In this often troublesome condition, montelukast demonstrated effectiveness at the end of a once a day dose by blocking the effects of this naturally occurring challenge. Drug regulatory approval of a new drug also includes patients with more regular symptoms who are usually classified as having persistent or moderate asthma. In these montelukast pediatric studies, approximately 40% of patients were already taking inhaled corticosteroids. Patients had improvements in FEV(1), symptoms, and rescue medication use, clearly showing an effect with once a day dosing. Pediatric data in severe asthma patients are more limited, but in such patients a therapeutic trial of montelukast would seem preferable to using systemic corticosteroids or increasing inhaled steroids to a level where adverse effects have an increasing potential of occurring. Montelukast has been available in the United States since March 1998 and has received excellent acceptance by physicians, parents, and patients. The 5-mg chewable tablet administered once a day in the evening in children aged 6-14 years apparently fills a previously unmet need in the treatment of pediatric asthma.

Dose-ranging study of a new steroid for asthma: mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.

A new formulation of mometasone furoate (MF) for administration by dry powder inhaler (DPI) was evaluated for the treatment of asthma. A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study compared the efficacy and safety of three doses of MF DPI (100, 200 and 400 mcg b.i.d) with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168 mcg b.i.d. administered by metered dose inhaler in 365 adult or adolescent patients being treated with inhaled glucocorticoids. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) was the primary efficacy variable. Secondary efficacy variables included other objective measures of pulmonary function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow 25-75% (FEV25-75%.) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)] as well as subjective measures of therapeutic response (patients' daily evaluation of asthma symptoms and physicians' evaluation). At endpoint, all four active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo (P < 0.01) in improving FEV1 (MF DPI 5 to 7%, BDP 3%, placebo -6.6%) and all other measures of pulmonary function (FVC: MF DPI 4 to 5%, BDP 2%, placebo -4.7%; FEF25-75%: MF DPI 6 to 18%, BDP 7.5%, placebo -9.5%; PEFR (AM): MF DPI 5 to 10%, BDP 5.7%, placebo -7%). A consistent trend was observed for better improvement in patients treated with MF DPI 200 mcg b.i.d. than with MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d., with no apparent additional benefit of MF DPI 400 mcg b.i.d. Results for the MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d. and BDP 168 mcg b.i.d. treatment groups were similar. Patients' and physicians' subjective evaluations of symptoms found similar improvement in the MF DPI 200 and 400 mcg b.i.d. treatment groups, which were slightly better than that in the MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d. group. Symptoms tended to worsen in the placebo group. MF DPI was well tolerated at all dose levels and the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse effects were headache, pharyngitis and oral candidiasis. No evidence of HPA-axis suppression was detected in any treatment group. In summary, all doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and significantly improved lung function and MF DPI 400 mcg (200 mcg b.i.d.) was the optimal dose in this study of patients with moderate persistent asthma.

Safety and clinical efficacy of zileuton in patients with chronic asthma.

Zileuton, a leukotriene pathway inhibitor used to treat asthma, improves lung function, relieves symptoms, and is well tolerated. The purpose of this 12-month, parallel-group, open-label study was to assess the efficacy of zileuton and evaluate liver function in patients treated with this drug (approximately 2% of patients treated with zileuton in controlled trials had reversible liver enzyme elevations). A total of 2,947 patients at 233 centers in the United States were randomly assigned in a 5:1 ratio to treatment with zileuton plus usual asthma care or usual asthma care alone. Efficacy variables included asthma exacerbations; need for alternative treatment, steroid rescue, emergency care, and hospitalizations; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1); and asthma symptom scores. The safety evaluation included measurement of alanine aminotransferase levels. Patients treated with zileuton had significantly fewer corticosteroid rescues (P < 0.001), required less emergency care (P < 0.05), had fewer hospitalizations, and had greater increases in FEV1 (P = 0.048). They also had significantly greater improvements in asthma symptoms. Increases in alanine aminotransferase levels to three times or more the upper limit of normal occurred in 4.6% of patients treated with zileuton and 1.1% of those receiving usual care (P < 0.001); most increases occurred during the first 2 to 3 months. Alanine aminotransferase levels decreased to less than two times the upper limit of normal or to baseline levels during zileuton treatment or after drug cessation. Jaundice or chronic liver disease did not develop in any patient. Adding zileuton to the therapeutic regimens of patients with asthma is likely to improve asthma control and lower utilization of healthcare resources.

Leukotriene receptor antagonists for the treatment of asthma.

Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are novel medications that provide symptom control in patients with persistent asthma. Current guidelines recommend the use of LTRAs as a treatment option for patients with mild-persistent asthma of at least 12 years of age. As illustrated by the results of controlled, multicenter clinical trials with zafirlukast and montelukast, as well as studies with pranlukast in Japan, LTRAs reduce daytime and night time asthma symptoms, improve pulmonary function, lower beta-adrenergic agonist use, and reduce asthma morbidity in patients with mild-intermittent to moderate-persistent asthma. Moreover, several recent clinical studies demonstrate that these agents are effective in preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children, and in improving disease control in symptomatic patients taking inhaled steroids. Based on clinical results to date, LTRAs appear to be safe and well tolerated in patients with mildto- moderate asthma. These agents represent an important addition to the drug armamentarium against asthma.

A comparative tolerance study of terfenadine-pseudoephedrine combination tablets and pseudoephedrine tablets in patients with allergic or vasomotor rhinitis.

In this multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, 315 patients with allergic or vasomotor rhinitis were treated on a twice daily dosing schedule with either a 60 mg terfenadine-120 mg pseudoephedrine hydrochloride combination or 120 mg pseudoephedrine hydrochloride (extended release) for 2 weeks. No clinically significant differences between the two groups were noted in body weight, temperature, respiration rate or blood pressure following the treatment period. An increase in mean heart rate of approximately 5 beats/min from entry to the final clinic visit was noted in both treatment groups. No clinically significant changes were noted in either treatment group when pre- and post-treatment electrocardiograms were compared. There were also no clinically significant alterations in laboratory values, which included serum chemistry, haematology and urinalysis, within or between either group. The adverse events profiles for both groups were similar. The most frequent adverse event was insomnia, in 40 (25.3%) patients given the terfenadine-pseudoephedrine combination and in 42 (26.8%) of those given pseudoephedrine. No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported.

Special considerations in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in adolescents: the role of antihistamine therapy.

The symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis often develop during adolescence. Teen-age students with seasonal allergic rhinitis may experience decreased academic performance and productivity from the disease or because of the sedative effects of some antihistamines. The pharmacologic effects of nonsedating second-generation antihistamines are compared with those of classical antihistamines. The effects of antihistamines on sedation and motor and cognitive function are discussed. The role of antiinflammatory agents, decongestants, and combination products is reviewed. Potential drug interactions must be considered along with factors such as drug-induced weight gain and the use of antihistamines in potentially pregnant patients in selecting appropriate antihistamine therapy for adolescent patients.

Allergy in children.

Two important and common allergic disorders of childhood, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma, are reviewed. Pertinent clinical features and laboratory evaluations useful in establishing their diagnosis are presented, with emphasis on items unique or relevant to children. Newer treatment approaches, both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic, are discussed, focusing mainly on outpatient management. Finally, a brief overview of immunotherapy and food hypersensitivity in children is given.

Zafirlukast in clinical practice: results of the Accolate Clinical Experience and Pharmacoepidemiology Trial (ACCEPT) in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Zafirlukast is an oral leukotriene receptor antagonist used in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate asthma. To investigate its effects in a clinical practice setting, we evaluated zafirlukast in a heterogeneous group of patients who had asthma of different degrees of severity and who were receiving concomitant asthma medications. METHODS: A total of 3759 patients were enrolled at 924 sites. Patients received zafirlukast 20 mg twice a day for 4 weeks. Pulmonary function was measured twice a day, and overall asthma symptom scores, number of nighttime awakenings, severity of morning asthma symptoms, and beta2-agonist use were recorded daily. RESULTS: In the efficacy analysis (3207 evaluable patients), all parameters showed statistically significant improvement that continued throughout the 4 weeks of the trial. A total of 71% of patients had improved pulmonary function and 72% had improved asthma symptoms. Improvement was consistent regardless of asthma severity category and regardless of concomitant asthma medication category. More than 70% of both physicians and patients indicated there was clinical improvement in pulmonary measures as well as in asthma symptoms. Common adverse events reported were headache (3.7%), nausea (1.4%), pharyngitis (1.4%), and sinusitis (1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Zafirlukast 20 mg twice a day is well tolerated and improves pulmonary function and asthma symptoms, regardless of asthma severity category and regardless of concomitant asthma medication category.

Distinct relationships of intramuscular and subcutaneous fat with cortical bone: findings from a cross-sectional study of young adult males and females.

CONTEXT: Intracellular fat within muscle and visceral tissue has been suggested to adversely influence bone development. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate associations between im fat, as reflected by muscle density as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography, and cortical bone parameters in young adults. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1703 males and 2243 females aged 17.8 years from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured cortical bone parameters from midtibial peripheral quantitative computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Muscle density (inversely related to im fat) was inversely associated with periosteal circumference (PC) (beta = -0.07 [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.1, -0.04]), cortical bone mineral density (BMDC) (beta = -0.21 [95% CI, -0.26, -0.17]), and cortical thickness (CT) (beta = -0.37 [95% CI, -0.42, -0.33]) (males and females combined, adjusted for age, height, gender, and muscle cross-sectional area). In contrast, sc fat area was positively associated with PC (beta = 0.10 [95% CI, 0.07, 0.12]), but no association was seen with BMDC or CT. To examine the role of candidate intermediary metabolic pathways, analyses were repeated after adjustment for insulin, C-reactive protein, and ß-C-telopeptides of type I collagen. Whereas similar associations were observed after adjustment for insulin and C-reactive protein, the association between muscle density and BMDC was partially attenuated by adjustment for ß-C-telopeptides of type I collagen (beta = -0.14 [95% CI, -0.20, -0.08]). CONCLUSION: Although im and sc fat were both positively associated with cortical bone mass, the nature of these relationships differed in that im fat was predominantly associated with CT and BMDC, whereas sc fat was mainly associated with PC. These relationships were largely independent of candidate metabolic pathways, such as altered bone resorption, insulin resistance, or inflammation.