RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Understanding the clinical features of myocarditis in various age groups is required to identify age-specific disease patterns. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine differences in sex distribution and clinical outcomes in patients with myocarditis of various ages. METHODS: Patients with acute or chronic myocarditis in 3 centers in Berlin, Germany from 2005 to 2021 and in the United States (National Inpatient Sample) from 2010 to 2019 were included. Age groups examined included "prepubescent" (below 11 years for females and below 13 years for males), adolescents (11 [female] or 13 [male] to 18 years), young adults (18-35 years), "middle-aged adults" (35-54 years), and older adults (age >54 years). In patients admitted to the hospital, hospital mortality, length of stay, and medical complication rates were examined. RESULTS: Overall, 6,023 cases in Berlin and 9,079 cases in the U.S. cohort were included. In both cohorts, there were differences in sex distribution among the 5 age categories, and differences in the distribution were most notable in adolescents (69.3% males vs 30.7% females) and in young adults (73.8% males vs 26.3% females). Prepubescent and older adults had the highest rates of in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and medical complications. In the Berlin cohort, prepubescent patients had higher levels of leukocytes (P < 0.001), antistreptolysin antibody (P < 0.001), and NT-proBNP (P < 0.001) when compared to young adults. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that sex differences in myocarditis and clinical features of myocarditis were age-dependent.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Guidelines advocate the use of extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in selected patients with cardiac arrest. Effects of concomitant left-ventricular (LV) unloading with Impella® (ECMELLA) remain unclear. This is the first study to investigate whether treatment with ECMELLA was associated with improved outcomes in patients with refractory cardiac arrest caused by acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: This study was approved by the local ethical committee. Patients treated with ECMELLA at three centers between 2016 and 2021 were propensity score (PS)-matched to patients receiving VA-ECMO based on age, electrocardiogram rhythm, cardiac arrest location and Survival After Veno-Arterial ECMO (SAVE) score. Cox proportional-hazard and Poisson regression models were used to analyse 30-day mortality rate (primary outcome), hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (secondary outcomes). Sensitivity analyses on patient demographics and cardiac arrest parameters were performed. RESULTS: 95 adult patients were included in this study, out of whom 34 pairs of patients were PS-matched. ECMELLA treatment was associated with decreased 30-day mortality risk (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.53 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.31-0.91], P = 0.021), prolonged hospital (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) 1.71 [95% CI 1.50-1.95], P < 0.001) and ICU LOS (IRR 1.81 [95% CI 1.57-2.08], P < 0.001). LV ejection fraction significantly improved until ICU discharge in the ECMELLA group. Especially patients with prolonged low-flow time and high initial lactate benefited from additional LV unloading. CONCLUSIONS: LV unloading with Impella® concomitant to VA-ECMO therapy in patients with therapy-refractory cardiac arrest due to AMI was associated with improved patient outcomes.