RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Radical prostatectomy (RP) can generate multidimensional physiological changes, like decrease in physical and emotional functioning, as well as Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). However, only pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is commonly recommended as conservative treatment after RP. More comprehensive interventions than only PFMT, such as physiotherapy promoting general coordination, flexibility, strength, endurance, fitness and functional capacity may seem more relevant and patient-centered. AIM OF THE REVIEW: Our aim was to evaluate whether a more Comprehensive Functional Physical Therapy (CFPT) than PFMT alone, focused on lower limb and lumbo-pelvic exercises, would improve physical capacities and functions (including urinary continence (UI)), emotional functions and HRQoL in patients after RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, PEDro, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 2022. The PICO approach was used to determine the eligibility criteria. According to the quality of selected studies, levels of evidence were given. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eight clinical trials met the eligibility criteria. Regarding UI, all the studies reported positive outcomes for CFPT between pre- and post-physiotherapy (P<0.05). The selected studies reported positive outcomes for physical capacities as well as for physical and emotional functioning, and for HRQoL (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Current literature indicates that CFPT was shown to be safe, non-invasive, and particularly effective in terms of UI recovery. CFPT could result in more positive outcomes, including physical capacities, physical and emotional functioning and HRQoL, than PFMT alone. Further standardized, physiotherapist-guided and well-designed clinical trials conducted by experienced multidisciplinary clinicians are still called for.
Assuntos
Diafragma da Pelve , Incontinência Urinária , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Diafragma da Pelve/fisiologia , Prostatectomia , Qualidade de Vida , Incontinência Urinária/reabilitação , Incontinência Urinária/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to specify the potential association between age-related changes in sagittal spinal curvature and risk of pelvic organ prolapse in women. METHODS: A systematic review based on the PRISMA statement was performed. Keywords were chosen according to the eligibility criteria in line with the PICO model. For inclusion, studies had to be based on observational cohorts, case controls and cross sectional studies. The quality of the articles was assessed using the STROBE scale. RESULTS: Five papers from 1996 to 2021 were included in the present review with conflicting results. Four studies reported a positive association between anatomical pelvic organ prolapse at clinical examination, a loss of lumbar lordosis and an increase in thoracic kyphosis. The remaining study, using a questionnaire-based assessment of symptoms, found no association between prolapse-related symptoms and age-related changes in sagittal spinal curvatures. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, this systematic review suggested a very moderate evidence of association between the development of anatomical pelvic organ prolapse and age-related changes in sagittal spinal curvature in women. This review remains very limited by the small number and the heterogeneity of the studies included. Further studies in the lifetime continunm, with high quality methodology are needed to better understand the physiopathology of pelvic organ prolapse.
Assuntos
Cifose , Lordose , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Curvaturas da Coluna Vertebral , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lordose/etiologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/etiologia , Curvaturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite international initiatives like Orphanet, it remains difficult to find up-to-date information about rare diseases. The aim of this study is to propose an exhaustive set of queries for PubMed based on terminological knowledge and to evaluate it versus the queries based on expertise provided by the most frequently used resource in Europe: Orphanet. METHODS: Four rare disease terminologies (MeSH, OMIM, HPO and HRDO) were manually mapped to each other permitting the automatic creation of expended terminological queries for rare diseases. For 30 rare diseases, 30 citations retrieved by Orphanet expert query and/or query based on terminological knowledge were assessed for relevance by two independent reviewers unaware of the query's origin. An adjudication procedure was used to resolve any discrepancy. Precision, relative recall and F-measure were all computed. RESULTS: For each Orphanet rare disease (n = 8982), there was a corresponding terminological query, in contrast with only 2284 queries provided by Orphanet. Only 553 citations were evaluated due to queries with 0 or only a few hits. There were no significant differences between the Orpha query and terminological query in terms of precision, respectively 0.61 vs 0.52 (p = 0.13). Nevertheless, terminological queries retrieved more citations more often than Orpha queries (0.57 vs. 0.33; p = 0.01). Interestingly, Orpha queries seemed to retrieve older citations than terminological queries (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The terminological queries proposed in this study are now currently available for all rare diseases. They may be a useful tool for both precision or recall oriented literature search.
Assuntos
Bibliografias como Assunto , PubMed , Doenças Raras , Terminologia como Assunto , Vocabulário Controlado , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medline/PubMed is the most frequently used medical bibliographic research database. The aim of this study was to propose a new generic method to limit any Medline/PubMed query based on the relative impact factor and the A & B categories of the SIGAPS score. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The entire PubMed corpus was used for the feasibility study, then ten frequent diseases in terms of PubMed indexing and the citations of four Nobel prize winners. The relative impact factor (RIF) was calculated by medical specialty defined in Journal Citation Reports. The two queries, which included all the journals in category A (or A OR B), were added to any Medline/PubMed query as a central point of the feasibility study. RESULTS: Limitation using the SIGAPS category A was larger than the when using the Core Clinical Journals (CCJ): 15.65% of PubMed corpus vs 8.64% for CCJ. The response time of this limit applied to the entire PubMed corpus was less than two seconds. For five diseases out of ten, limiting the citations with the RIF was more effective than with the CCJ. For the four Nobel prize winners, limiting the citations with the RIF was more effective than the CCJ. CONCLUSION: The feasibility study to apply a new filter based on the relative impact factor on any Medline/PubMed query was positive.
Assuntos
Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/métodos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/normas , Fator de Impacto de Revistas , MEDLINE/estatística & dados numéricos , PubMed/estatística & dados numéricos , Publicações Seriadas/normas , Viés , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Viés de Seleção , Publicações Seriadas/provisão & distribuiçãoRESUMO
Objective This work presents a review of the literature on reporting, practice and misuse of knowledge-based and data-driven variable selection methods, in five highly cited medical journals, considering recoding and interaction unlike previous reviews. Study Design and Setting Original observational studies with a predictive or explicative research question with multivariable analyses published in N. Engl. J. Med., Lancet, JAMA, Br. Med. J. and Ann. Intern. Med. between 2017 and 2019 were searched. Article screening was performed by a single reader, data extraction was performed by two readers and a third reader participated in case of disagreement. The use of data-driven variable selection methods in causal explicative questions was considered as misuse. Results 488 articles were included. The variable selection method was unclear in 234 (48%) articles, data-driven in 78 (16%) articles and knowledge-based in 176 (36%) articles. The most common data-driven methods were: Univariate selection (n = 22, 4.5%) and model comparisons or testing for interaction (n = 17, 3.5%). Data-driven methods were misused in 51 (10.5%) of articles. Conclusion Overall reporting of variable selection methods is insufficient. Data-driven methods seem to be used only in a minority of articles of the big five medical journals.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/normas , Editoração/estatística & dados numéricos , Editoração/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , HumanosRESUMO
Among the numerous new functionalities of the Internet, commonly called Web 2.0, Web syndication illustrates the trend for better and faster information sharing. Web feeds (a.k.a RSS feeds), which were used mostly on weblogs at first, are now also widely used in academic, scientific and institutional websites such as PubMed. As very few French language feeds were listed or catalogued in the Health field by the year of 2007, it was decided to implement them in the quality-controlled health gateway CISMeF ([French] acronym for Catalogue and Index of French Language Health Resources on the Internet). Furthermore, making full use of the nature of Web syndication, a Web feed aggregator was put online in to provide a dynamic news gateway called "CISMeF actualités" (http://www.chu-rouen.fr/actualites/). This article describes the process to retrieve and implement the Web feeds in the catalogue and how its terminology was adjusted to describe this new content. It also describes how the aggregator was put online and the features of this news gateway. CISMeF actualités was built accordingly to the editorial policy of CISMeF. Only a part of the Web feeds of the catalogue were included to display the most authoritative sources. Web feeds were also grouped by medical specialties and by countries using the prior indexing of websites with MeSH terms and the so-called metaterms. CISMeF actualités now displays 131 Web feeds across 40 different medical specialities, coming from 5 different countries. It is one example, among many, that static hypertext links can now easily and beneficially be completed, or replaced, by dynamic display of Web content using syndication feeds.
Assuntos
Catalogação , Bases de Dados Bibliográficas , Disseminação de Informação , Internet , França , Humanos , MEDLINE , Linguagens de Programação , PubMed , Controle de Qualidade , Unified Medical Language System , Estados Unidos , Vocabulário ControladoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Each year, the International Medical Informatics Association Yearbook recognizes significant scientific papers, labelled as "best papers", published the previous year in the subfields of biomedical informatics that correspond to the different section topics of the journal. For each section, about fifteen pre-selected "candidate" best papers are externally peer-reviewed to select the actual best papers. Although based on the available literature, little is known about the pre-selection process. OBJECTIVE: To move toward an explicit formalization of the candidate best papers selection process to reduce variability in the literature search across sections and over years. METHODS: A methodological framework is proposed to build for each section topic specific queries tailored to PubMed and Web of Science citation databases. The two sets of returned papers are merged and reviewed by two independent section editors and citations are tagged as "discarded", "pending", and "kept". A protocolized consolidation step is then jointly conducted to resolve conflicts. A bibliographic software tool, BibReview, was developed to support the whole process. RESULTS: The proposed search strategy was fully applied to the Decision Support section of the 2013 edition of the Yearbook. For this section, 1124 references were returned (689 PubMed-specific, 254 WoS-specific, 181 common to both databases) among which the 15 candidate best papers were selected. CONCLUSIONS: The search strategy for determining candidate best papers for an IMIA Yearbook's section is now explicitly specified and allows for reproducibility. However, some aspects of the whole process remain reviewer-dependent, mostly because there is no characterization of a "best paper".
Assuntos
Associação , Distinções e Prêmios , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Políticas Editoriais , Aplicações da Informática Médica , Editoração , Metodologias Computacionais , PubMed , SoftwareRESUMO
Infobuttons are context-specific links between clinical information systems and other online information resources. The objective of this study is to describe a French Infobutton, which will be sold in the French-speaking Health Information market.