RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This Phase 1b study (B2151002) evaluated the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor gedatolisib (PF-05212384) in combination with other anti-tumour agents in advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Patients with various malignancies were administered gedatolisib (90â310 mg intravenously every week [QW]) plus docetaxel (arm A) or cisplatin (arm B) (each 75 mg/m2 intravenously Q3W) or dacomitinib (30 or 45 mg/day orally). The safety and tolerability of combination therapies were assessed during dose escalation; objective response (OR) and safety were assessed during dose expansion. RESULTS: Of 110 patients enrolled, 107 received gedatolisib combination treatment. Seven of 70 (10.0%) evaluable patients had dose-limiting toxicities; the most common was grade 3 oral mucositis (n = 3). Based upon reprioritisation of the sponsor's portfolio, dose expansion focused on arm B, gedatolisib (180 mg QW) plus cisplatin in patients (N = 22) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). OR (95% CI) was achieved in four of ten patients in first-line (overall response rate 40.0% [12.2-73.8%]) and four of 12 in second/third-line (33.3% [9.9-65.1%]) settings. One patient in each TNBC arm (10%, first-line; 8.3%, second/third-line) achieved a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Gedatolisib combination therapy showed an acceptable tolerability profile, with clinical activity at the recommended Phase 2 dose in patients with TNBC. CLINICAL TRIAL: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01920061.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Humanos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Triazinas , Morfolinas/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Fosfoinositídeo-3 Quinase , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety/tolerability of sunitinib plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: Eligible patients received sunitinib 37.5 mg/day and trastuzumab administered either weekly (loading, 4 mg/kg; then weekly 2 mg/kg) or 3-weekly (loading, 8 mg/kg; then 3-weekly 6 mg/kg). Prior trastuzumab and/or lapatinib treatment were permitted. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled and evaluable for safety; 57 were evaluable for efficacy. The majority of patients (58%) had received no prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The ORR was 37%; the clinical benefit rate (CBR; percent objective response plus stable disease ≥ 24 weeks) was 56%. Among patients who were treatment-naïve or had received only adjuvant therapy, the ORR was 44% and the CBR was 59%. Overall, median overall survival had not been reached and the 1-year survival rate was 91%. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in severity. Forty percent of patients experienced AEs related to measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) declines, which occurred more frequently in patients who had received prior anthracycline treatment. Ten percent of patients exhibited symptoms related to LVEF declines. One patient died on study from cardiogenic shock. Antitumor response and several safety parameters appeared to correlate with sunitinib exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib plus trastuzumab demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with HER2-positive ABC, particularly those who were treatment-naïve or had only received prior adjuvant treatment. Sunitinib plus trastuzumab had acceptable safety and tolerability in patients with HER2-positive ABC who had not received prior anthracycline therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00243503.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Sunitinibe , Trastuzumab , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This phase 1 study evaluated PF-06753512, a vaccine-based immunotherapy regimen (PrCa VBIR), in two clinical states of prostate cancer (PC), metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) and biochemical recurrence (BCR). METHODS: For dose escalation, patients with mCRPC received intramuscular PrCa VBIR (adenovirus vector and plasmid DNA expressing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA)) with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs, tremelimumab 40 or 80 mg with or without sasanlimab 130 or 300 mg, both subcutaneous). For dose expansion, patients with mCRPC received recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of PrCa VBIR plus tremelimumab 80 mg and sasanlimab 300 mg; patients with BCR received PrCa VBIR plus tremelimumab 80 mg (Cohort 1B-BCR) or tremelimumab 80 mg plus sasanlimab 130 mg (Cohort 5B-BCR) without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The primary endpoint was safety. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were treated in dose escalation (mCRPC=38) and expansion (BCR=35, mCRPC=18). Overall, treatment-related and immune-related adverse events occurred in 64 (70.3%) and 39 (42.9%) patients, with fatigue (40.7%), influenza-like illness (30.8%), diarrhea (23.1%), and immune-related thyroid dysfunction (19.8%) and rash (15.4%), as the most common. In patients with mCRPC, the objective response rate (ORR, 95% CI) was 5.6% (1.2% to 15.4%) and the median radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was 5.6 (3.5 to not estimable) months for all; the ORR was 16.7% (3.6% to 41.4%) and 6-month rPFS rate was 45.5% (24.9% to 64.1%) for those who received RP2D with measurable disease (n=18). 7.4% of patients with mCRPC achieved a ≥50% decline in baseline PSA (PSA-50), with a median duration of 4.6 (1.2-45.2) months. In patients with BCR, 9 (25.7%) achieved PSA-50; the median duration of PSA response was 3.9 (1.9-4.2) and 10.1 (6.9-28.8) months for Cohorts 5B-BCR and 1B-BCR. Overall, antigen specific T-cell response was 88.0% to PSMA, 84.0% to PSA, and 80.0% to PSCA. CONCLUSIONS: PrCa VBIR overall demonstrated safety signals similar to other ICI combination trials; significant side effects were seen in some patients with BCR. It stimulated antigen-specific immunity across all cohorts and resulted in modest antitumor activity in patients with BCR without using ADT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02616185.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Vacinas , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia , Hormônios/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
This multicenter, open-label phase II study was conducted to evaluate sunitinib monotherapy in patients with either metastatic or locoregionally recurrent advanced breast cancer. Patients received sunitinib 37.5 mg on a continuous daily dosing schedule. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); the predefined target ORR was 25 %. All 83 patients enrolled into the study received study treatment. The majority of patients (90 %) had metastatic disease; 92 % had received prior systemic therapies, and 60 % had received two or more regimens for early and/or advanced disease. The ORR was 8 % (95 % exact CI, 4-17), comprising seven partial responses. In patients with superficial lesions (defined as cutaneous or palpable chest wall lesions), the ORR was 20 % (three of 15 evaluable patients), which was higher than that in patients with non-superficial disease (9 %; six of 64 patients). Median progression-free survival in the overall population was 3.6 months (95 % CI, 2.4-3.9); median overall survival was 15.6 months (95 % CI, 14.0-22.7). No new or unexpected safety findings were reported. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (60 %), diarrhea (54 %), and nausea (49 %). The most commonly reported grade 3/4 AEs were fatigue (17 %), neutropenia (16 %), and thrombocytopenia (11 %). Four patients (5 %) had a dose reduction due to an AE, and 39 patients (47 %) had temporary discontinuations of therapy due to AEs. Two on-study deaths were reported, one due to a pulmonary embolism (considered related to treatment) and one attributed to dyspnea and a myocardial infarction (considered unrelated to treatment). Patient-reported outcomes suggested that sunitinib treatment did not have a negative impact overall on patients' functional domains or the majority of symptom scales. The trial did not meet its prespecified primary endpoint, and in view of the negative results obtained in several other trials, sunitinib will not be developed further for this indication.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Fadiga/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Humanos , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Náusea/induzido quimicamente , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Sunitinibe , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sunitinib inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs), platelet-derived growth factor receptors, and stem cell factor receptor (KIT). The ability of soluble (s)KIT, VEGF-A, sVEGFR-2, and sVEGFR-3 to predict clinical outcome was analyzed in 61 patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a phase II study of sunitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00078000). METHODS: Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins were measured at baseline and during treatment with sunitinib 50 mg/day (4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off treatment). Baseline concentrations and maximal percent change during the first two treatment cycles were stratified by median values and evaluated for correlation with median time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). This latter fixed time period was chosen to avoid bias accruing from patients who were on study for longer periods of time. RESULTS: TTP was significantly longer in patients having median or higher maximal percent sKIT change compared with patients with less than the median change (21.7 vs. 7.9 weeks; p < 0.0001). Similarly, OS was significantly longer in patients having median or higher sKIT change versus less than the median change (53.7 vs. 25.7 weeks; p = 0.018). Significant prolongation of OS (62.6 vs. 32.3 weeks; p = 0.032), but not TTP, was observed in patients with a median or higher maximal percent VEGF-A change compared with less than the median change. Maximal percent change of sVEGFR-2 or sVEGFR-3 concentrations and baseline concentrations of all four proteins were not predictive of clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory analysis suggests that changes in sKIT and possibly VEGF-A early during sunitinib treatment may be predictive of clinical outcome in MBC.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-kit/sangue , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/sangue , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Sunitinibe , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial (planned enrollment: 700 patients) was conducted to test the hypothesis that single-agent sunitinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine as treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients with HER2-negative ABC that recurred after anthracycline and taxane therapy were randomized (1:1) to sunitinib 37.5 mg/day or capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) (1,000 mg/m(2) in patients >65 years) BID on days 1-14 q3w. The independent data-monitoring committee (DMC) determined during the first interim analysis (238 patients randomized to sunitinib, 244 to capecitabine) that the trial be terminated due to futility in reaching the primary endpoint. No statistical evidence supported the hypothesis that sunitinib improved PFS compared with capecitabine (one-sided P = 0.999). The data indicated that PFS was shorter with sunitinib than capecitabine (median 2.8 vs. 4.2 months, respectively; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87; two-sided P = 0.002). Median overall survival (15.3 vs. 24.6 months; HR, 1.17; two-sided P = 0.350) and objective response rates (11 vs. 16%; odds ratio, 0.65; P = 0.109) were numerically inferior with sunitinib versus capecitabine. While no new or unexpected safety findings were reported, sunitinib treatment was associated with higher frequencies and greater severities of many common adverse events (AEs) compared with capecitabine, resulting in more temporary discontinuations due to AEs with sunitinib (66 vs. 51%). The relative dose intensity was lower with sunitinib than capecitabine (73 vs. 95%). Based on these efficacy and safety results, sunitinib should not be used as monotherapy for patients with ABC.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/análogos & derivados , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Capecitabina , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Genes erbB-2 , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , SunitinibeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The NOTCH signaling pathway may be involved in the survival of stem cell-like tumor-initiating cells and contribute to tumor growth. In this phase Ib, open-label, multicenter study (NCT01876251), we evaluated PF-03084014, a selective gamma-secretase inhibitor in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS: The dose-finding part was based on a 2×3 matrix design using the modified toxicity probability interval method. Oral PF-03084014 was administered twice daily continuously in combination with intravenous docetaxel given on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Primary endpoint was first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for the dose-finding part and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) for the expansion cohort treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response, and pharmacokinetics of the combination. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The MTD was estimated to be PF-03084014 100 mg twice daily / docetaxel 75 mg/m2. At this dose level, combination treatment was generally well tolerated (one DLT, grade 3 diarrhea, among eight DLT-evaluable patients). The most common all-grade, treatment-related adverse events reported in all patients (N = 29) were neutropenia (90%), fatigue (79%), nausea (72%), leukopenia (69%), diarrhea (59%), alopecia (55%), anemia (55%), and vomiting (48%). No effect was observed on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel when administered in combination with PF-03084014. Four (16%) of 25 response-evaluable patients achieved a confirmed partial response; nine (36%) patients had stable disease, including five patients with unconfirmed partial response. In the expansion cohort, median PFS was 4.1 (95% CI 1.3-8.1) months (6-month PFS rate 17.1% [95% CI 0.8-52.6%]).
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Tetra-Hidronaftalenos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Valina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Docetaxel , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia/epidemiologia , Taxoides/efeitos adversos , Tetra-Hidronaftalenos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , Valina/administração & dosagem , Valina/efeitos adversos , Vômito/induzido quimicamente , Vômito/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This phase I, four-arm, open-label study (NCT01347866) evaluated the PI3K/mTOR inhibitors PF-04691502 (arms A, B) and gedatolisib (PF-05212384; arms C, D) in combination with the MEK inhibitor PD-0325901 (arm A, D) or irinotecan (arm B, C) in patients with advanced solid tumors. OBJECTIVES: Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity with each combination. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose escalation followed a 3 + 3 design in arm C and a zone-based design in arm D. RESULTS: The PF-04691502 combination arms were closed prematurely due to low tolerability, and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) were not determined for either arm. The MTD for the combination of gedatolisib with irinotecan 180 mg/m2 was estimated to be 110 mg weekly and for the combination with PD-0325901 was not reached at the highest dose evaluated (gedatolisib 154 mg weekly). Plasma concentrations of gedatolisib were generally similar across dose groups in arm C (with irinotecan) and arm D (with PD-0325901). Frequent dose delays or dose reductions were required for both combinations, potentially preventing sustained therapeutic drug concentrations. Gedatolisib plus irinotecan produced a response rate of ~5% and clinical benefit in 16% of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (progression-free survival, 2.8 months). Preliminary evidence of clinical activity was observed with gedatolisib plus PD-0325901 in patients with ovarian cancer (three partial responses, n = 5) or endometrial cancer (one partial response, n = 1) and KRAS mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluations of gedatolisib are warranted in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Difenilamina/análogos & derivados , Morfolinas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/genética , Inibidores de Fosfoinositídeo-3 Quinase , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/antagonistas & inibidores , Triazinas/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Benzamidas/farmacologia , Camptotecina/farmacologia , Camptotecina/uso terapêutico , Difenilamina/farmacologia , Difenilamina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Irinotecano , Masculino , Morfolinas/farmacologia , Neoplasias/patologia , Triazinas/farmacologiaRESUMO
Breakthrough therapy designation (BTD) is a new approach created by the US Congress and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as part of the FDA Innovation and Safety Act of 2012 to expedite the drug development process for serious illness, including cancer. By law, to qualify for BTD, a new molecular entity must demonstrate substantial clinical improvement over existing therapies. Although the administrative requirements for granting BTD have been made available by the FDA, the actual trial designs, end points, and quantitative therapeutic thresholds involved in the granting process have not been made public. This literature review evaluates nine oncology new molecular entities granted BTD involved in 10 accelerated approvals and summarizes the key factors in clinical trial design leading to successful BTD applications. This information can be used by oncology research teams to set goals for BTD when developing clinical trial designs and thresholds in expedited drug development programs.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Aprovação de Drogas , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Rucaparib is a potent Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitor currently under clinical development. The objectives of this analysis were to establish population PK and PK/PD models for rucaparib, and to evaluate the predictability of PARP activity in PBL for PARP activity in tumor tissues. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Rucaparib concentrations and PARP activity in human PBLs and tumor issues were obtained from 32 patients with solid tumors in a Phase 1 First-in-Patient study. Simulations were conducted to evaluate different dosing regimens. RESULTS: A 3-compartment PK model best described the PK of rucaparib. An Emax model best described the exposure and PARP inhibition relationship. The maximum PARP inhibition (Imax) achieved in PBLs and in tumors were 90.9% and 90.0% of the baseline PARP activity, and the IC50 values were 1.05 ng/mL and 1.10 ng/mL, respectively. PAR polymer baseline value was found to be a covariate of Emin. CONCLUSION: Population PK and PK/PD models have been established to describe population PK of rucaparib and the relationship between rucaparib plasma concentration and PARP inhibition in both PBLs and tumor issues. Results from this trial indicated that PARP inhibition in PBLs can be used as a substitute for PARP inhibition in melanoma tumor tissues.
Assuntos
Indóis/farmacocinética , Linfócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/farmacocinética , Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Simulação por Computador , Esquema de Medicação , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Indóis/sangue , Infusões Intravenosas , Linfócitos/enzimologia , Modelos Biológicos , Neoplasias/sangue , Neoplasias/enzimologia , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/sangueRESUMO
PURPOSE: To estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for continuous oral administration of the γ-secretase inhibitor PF-03084014, determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and evaluate safety and preliminary activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This open-label, phase I study consisted of a dose-finding portion based on a 3+3 design, followed by an expansion cohort. PF-03084014 was administered orally, twice daily (BID) for 21 continuous days. Tested doses ranged from 20 to 330 mg BID. In the expansion cohort, patients were to receive the estimated MTD or a lower dose of PF-03084014. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients received treatment. The MTD was estimated to be 220 mg BID. The RP2D was determined to be 150 mg BID, based on the better safety profile versus the 220-mg BID dose, given comparable NOTCH-related target inhibition. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, vomiting, rash, and decreased appetite, which were generally mild to moderate in severity. One patient with advanced thyroid cancer had a complete response, and five of seven response-evaluable patients with desmoid tumor achieved a partial response (71.4% objective response rate). Tumor responses were mostly durable, ranging from 1.74+ to 24+ months. PF-03084014 demonstrated a generally dose-dependent pharmacokinetic profile at doses ranging from 20 to 330 mg BID. Consistent downmodulation of NOTCH-related HES4 gene expression was observed in peripheral blood from all evaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Further development of PF-03084014 for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors is warranted and currently under evaluation.
Assuntos
Secretases da Proteína Precursora do Amiloide/antagonistas & inibidores , Inibidores Enzimáticos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Tetra-Hidronaftalenos/administração & dosagem , Valina/análogos & derivados , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacocinética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/patologia , Tetra-Hidronaftalenos/efeitos adversos , Tetra-Hidronaftalenos/farmacocinética , Resultado do Tratamento , Valina/administração & dosagem , Valina/efeitos adversos , Valina/farmacocinéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated the utility, accuracy, and advantages of a subareolar (SA) site of injection for blue dye compared with an intraparenchymal site. In later studies we advocated the additional use of preoperative SA-injected technetium 99m-labeled sulfur colloid as a directional aid in finding blue-stained sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Paramount to the usefulness of this dual-tracer, same-site technique is the degree to which SA-injected blue dye and SA-injected radiocolloid migrate concordantly and are deposited within the same sentinel nodes. The purpose of this study was to document the correlation and accuracy of SLN biopsy using blue dye and radiocolloid when both nodal markers are injected by the same SA route. STUDY DESIGN: Between September 1999 and February 2002 (29 months), 185 consecutive patients with 187 operable breast cancers underwent 187 attempted SLN biopsies by a dual-tracer, same-site injection technique using the SA approach for both agents. Unfiltered technetium 99m-labeled sulfur colloid (1 mCi [37 MBq]) was SA-injected 30 to 45 minutes preoperatively; and just after anesthetic induction, 3 mL of 1% isosulfan blue dye was injected by the same SA route. SLN biopsies or complete axillary dissections were carried out, and SLNs identified during these procedures were classified as containing both blue dye and radioactivity ("blue-hot" nodes), radioactivity alone ("hot-only" nodes), or blue dye alone ("blue-only" nodes). Cases were categorized and tabulated based on the presence or absence of these three types of SLNs. RESULTS: Of the 187 procedures, a SLN was identified successfully in 184 cases, indicating an SLN identification rate of 98.4% (95% confidence interval, 96.6% to 100.2%). In these 184 cases, a blue-hot node was present in 94.5% (n = 174 of 184). An SLN was positive in 50 cases, or 27.2% of the total group (n = 50 of 184). A blue-hot node was the only positive SLN in 43 of these 50 cases, or 86% of the node-positive cases. There were no false negatives in 20 confirmatory axillary node dissections carried out to document the findings of a negative SLN. A correlation analysis revealed that in 98.9% of cases (174 of 176), blue nodes were also radioactive ("blue-hot" case concordance = 98.9%). In 95.1% of cases (174 of 183), hot nodes had also taken up blue dye ("hot-blue" case concordance = 95.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Using SA injections of both blue dye and radiocolloid, we achieved an SLN identification rate of 98.4% (184 of 187 cases), a false-negative rate of 0% (0 of 20 cases), and an accuracy in predicting the malignant status of the axilla of 100% (70 of 70 cases). The case concordance rate ranged between 98.9% ("blue-hot concordance") and 95.1% ("hot-blue concordance"). The present study is the first to evaluate dual-tracer, same-site SA injections of blue dye and radiocolloid. By demonstrating a high case concordance rate, a high SLN identification rate, and a 0% false-negative rate, this study adds further support to the validity and accuracy of same-site SA injections of both blue dye and radiocolloid during SLN biopsy in breast cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Corantes de Rosanilina , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Coloide de Enxofre Marcado com Tecnécio Tc 99m , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Axila , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cintilografia , Corantes de Rosanilina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
PURPOSE: This randomized, open-label phase II study compared the efficacy of sunitinib monotherapy with that of single-agent standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: Patients with advanced TNBC, relapsed after anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy, were randomized to receive either sunitinib (37.5 mg/day) or the investigator's choice of SOC therapy. Progression-free survival was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival was 2.0 months with sunitinib and 2.7 months with SOC chemotherapy (one-sided P = 0.888). Median overall survival was not prolonged with sunitinib (9.4 months) compared with SOC chemotherapy (10.5 months; one-sided P = 0.839). The objective response rate was 3% with sunitinib and 7% with SOC chemotherapy (one-sided P = 0.962). CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib monotherapy did not improve efficacy compared with SOC chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced TNBC, for which identification of effective treatments and therapeutic targets remains an urgent need. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00246571.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antraciclinas/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Capecitabina , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Fadiga/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Fluoruracila/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Mão-Pé/etiologia , Humanos , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Indóis/farmacocinética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/farmacocinética , Sunitinibe , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , GencitabinaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains an incurable illness in the majority of cases, despite major therapeutic advances. This may be related to the ability of breast tumors to induce neoangiogenesis, even in the face of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Sunitinib, an inhibitor of key molecules involved in neoangiogenesis, has an established role in the treatment of metastatic renal cell and other cancers and demonstrated activity in a phase II trial in MBC. We performed a randomized phase III trial comparing sunitinib plus capecitabine (2,000 mg/m2) with single-agent capecitabine (2,500 mg/m2) in patients with heavily pretreated MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included MBC, prior therapy with anthracyclines and taxanes, one or two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease or early relapse after a taxane plus anthracycline adjuvant regimen, and adequate organ function and performance status. The primary end point was progression-free survival, for which the study had 90% power to detect a 50% improvement (from 4 to 6 months). RESULTS: A total of 442 patients were randomly assigned. Progression-free survival was not significantly different between the treatment arms, with medians of 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.5 to 6.0) for the sunitinib plus capecitabine arm and 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.6) for the capecitabine monotherapy arm (hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.58; one-sided P = .941). There were no significant differences in response rate or overall survival. Toxicity, except for hand-foot syndrome, was more severe in the combination arm. CONCLUSION: The addition of sunitinib to capecitabine does not improve the clinical outcome of patients with MBC pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Capecitabina , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Estudos Prospectivos , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Sunitinibe , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This exploratory study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of sunitinib combined with docetaxel and trastuzumab. METHODS: Patients with unresectable, locally recurrent or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ breast cancer received sunitinib plus docetaxel and trastuzumab. Sunitinib was administered at 37.5 mg/day for 2 weeks on treatment followed by 1 week off (Schedule 2/1). The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients enrolled; 24 received at least one dose of sunitinib plus docetaxel and trastuzumab, and one patient received one dose of docetaxel and trastuzumab only. These 25 treated patients were evaluable for safety. Twenty-three patients discontinued the study, primarily due to disease progression. The planned dose of sunitinib was maintained in 10 patients and reduced at least once to 25 mg/day in 14 patients. The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events were fatigue/asthenia (28%), diarrhea (16%), stomatitis (12%), vomiting (8%) and dyspnea (8%). Neutropenia was reported in all 24 evaluable patients; most events were grade 4. Three grade 1-3 cardiac adverse events occurred. Sunitinib and docetaxel levels were consistent with known single-agent levels, suggesting that there were no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. Of 22 evaluable patients, 16 (73%) experienced an objective response (all confirmed partial responses). CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib combined with docetaxel and trastuzumab had an acceptable toxicity profile and showed preliminary antitumor activity as first-line treatment for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Esquema de Medicação , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Infusões Intravenosas , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Sunitinibe , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Trastuzumab , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This exploratory study examined the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity of sunitinib plus docetaxel in patients with HER-2-negative advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HER-2-negative disease who had received prior adjuvant anthracycline-based therapy received docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of each 3-week cycle followed by sunitinib (37.5 mg/day for 2 weeks on Schedule 2/1) starting on day 2 (day 3 on cycle 2). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions were observed. The most common non-hematologic AE (any grade) was fatigue/asthenia. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 20/22 patients (91%; n = 7 had neutropenic fever). The safety profile was similar to each agent given individually. 14/19 (73.7%) evaluable patients had a PR and 5/19 (26.3%) had SD. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib plus docetaxel on Schedule 2/1 did not result in any clinically significant drug-drug interactions. This combination was manageable and exhibited antitumor activity.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Lobular/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Lobular/metabolismo , Docetaxel , Esquema de Medicação , Interações Medicamentosas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Indóis/farmacocinética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/farmacocinética , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Sunitinibe , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Taxoides/efeitos adversos , Taxoides/farmacocinética , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate whether sunitinib plus docetaxel improves clinical outcomes for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) versus docetaxel alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase III study, patients were randomly assigned to open-label combination therapy (sunitinib 37.5 mg/d, days 2 to 15 every 3 weeks; and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1 every 3 weeks) or monotherapy (docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-six patients were randomly assigned to combination therapy, and 297 patients were assigned to monotherapy. Median PFS times were 8.6 and 8.3 months with combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.92; one-sided P = .265). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher with the combination (55%) than with monotherapy (42%; one-sided P = .001). Duration of response was similar in both arms (7.5 months with the combination v 7.2 months with monotherapy). Median overall survival (OS) times were 24.8 and 25.5 months with combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively (one-sided P = .904). There were 107 deaths with the combination and 91 deaths with monotherapy. The frequency of common adverse events (AEs) was higher with the combination, as were treatment discontinuations caused by AEs. CONCLUSION: The combination of sunitinib plus docetaxel improved ORR but did not prolong either PFS or OS compared with docetaxel alone when given to an unselected HER2/neu-negative cohort as first-line treatment for ABC. Sunitinib combination therapy may also have resulted in AEs that yield an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio. The sunitinib-docetaxel regimen evaluated in this study is not recommended for further use in ABC.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Lobular/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/secundário , Carcinoma Lobular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Lobular/secundário , Docetaxel , Feminino , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Agências Internacionais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Sunitinibe , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A multicenter, open-label phase III study was conducted to test whether sunitinib plus paclitaxel prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with HER2(-) advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HER2(-) advanced breast cancer who were disease free for ≥ 12 months after adjuvant taxane treatment were randomized (1:1; planned enrollment 740 patients) to receive intravenous (I.V.) paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2) every week for 3 weeks in 4-week cycles plus either sunitinib 25 to 37.5 mg every day or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg I.V. every 2 weeks. [corrected] RESULTS: The trial was terminated early because of futility in reaching the primary endpoint as determined by the independent data monitoring committee during an interim futility analysis. At data cutoff, 242 patients had been randomized to sunitinib-paclitaxel and 243 patients to bevacizumab-paclitaxel. Median PFS was shorter with sunitinib-paclitaxel (7.4 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-2.25]; 1-sided P = .999). At a median follow-up of 8.1 months, with 79% of sunitinib-paclitaxel and 87% of bevacizumab-paclitaxel patients alive, overall survival analysis favored bevacizumab-paclitaxel (HR 1.82 [95% CI, 1.16-2.86]; 1-sided P = .996). The objective response rate was 32% in both arms, but median duration of response was shorter with sunitinib-paclitaxel (6.3 vs. 14.8 months). Bevacizumab-paclitaxel was better tolerated than sunitinib-paclitaxel. This was primarily due to a high frequency of grade 3/4, treatment-related neutropenia with sunitinib-paclitaxel (52%) precluding delivery of the prescribed doses of both drugs. CONCLUSION: The sunitinib-paclitaxel regimen evaluated in this study was clinically inferior to the bevacizumab-paclitaxel regimen and is not a recommended treatment option for patients with advanced breast cancer.