Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Nat Methods ; 16(5): 421-428, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31011184

RESUMO

Binding protein generation typically relies on laborious screening cascades that process candidate molecules individually. We have developed NestLink, a binder selection and identification technology able to biophysically characterize thousands of library members at once without the need to handle individual clones at any stage of the process. NestLink uses genetically encoded barcoding peptides termed flycodes, which were designed for maximal detectability by mass spectrometry and support accurate deep sequencing. We demonstrate NestLink's capacity to overcome the current limitations of binder-generation methods in three applications. First, we show that hundreds of binder candidates can be simultaneously ranked according to kinetic parameters. Next, we demonstrate deep mining of a nanobody immune repertoire for membrane protein binders, carried out entirely in solution without target immobilization. Finally, we identify rare binders against an integral membrane protein directly in the cellular environment of a human pathogen. NestLink opens avenues for the selection of tailored binder characteristics directly in tissues or in living organisms.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Transporte/genética , Código de Barras de DNA Taxonômico/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Biblioteca de Peptídeos , Proteínas da Membrana Bacteriana Externa/genética , Cromatografia Líquida , Legionella pneumophila/genética , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
2.
Environ Sci Technol ; 46(16): 8952-9, 2012 Aug 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22816735

RESUMO

Reliable, sensitive, quantitative, and mobile rapid screening methods for pathogenic organisms are not yet readily available, but would provide a great benefit to humanitarian intervention units in disaster situations. We compared three different methods (immunofluorescent microscopy, IFM; flow cytometry, FCM; polymerase chain reaction, PCR) for the rapid and quantitative detection of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum (oo)cysts in a field campaign. For this we deployed our mobile instrumentation and sampled canal water and vegetables during a 2 week field study in Thailand. For purification and concentrations of (oo)cysts, we used filtration and immunomagnetic separation. We were able to detect considerably high oo(cysts) concentrations (ranges: 15-855 and 0-240 oo(cysts)/liter for Giardia and Cryptosporidium, respectively) in 85 to 300 min, with FCM being fastest, followed by PCR, and IFM being slowest due to the long analysis time per sample. FCM and IFM performed consistently well, whereas PCR reactions often failed. The recovery, established by FCM, was around 30% for Giardia and 13% for Cryptosporidium (oo)cysts. It was possible to track (oo)cysts from the wastewater further downstream to irrigation waters and confirm contamination of salads and water vegetables. We believe that rapid detection, in particular FCM-based methods, can substantially help in disaster management and outbreak prevention.


Assuntos
Cryptosporidium/isolamento & purificação , Giardia/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Citometria de Fluxo , Microscopia de Fluorescência , Oocistos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase
3.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 77(15): 5420-7, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21685159

RESUMO

Giardia lamblia is an important waterborne pathogen and is among the most common intestinal parasites of humans worldwide. Its fecal-oral transmission leads to the presence of cysts of this pathogen in the environment, and so far, quantitative rapid screening methods are not available for various matrices, such as surface waters, wastewater, or food. Thus, it is necessary to establish methods that enable reliable rapid detection of a single cyst in 10 to 100 liters of drinking water. Conventional detection relies on cyst concentration, isolation, and confirmation by immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM), resulting in low recoveries and high detection limits. Many different immunomagnetic separation (IMS) procedures have been developed for separation and cyst purification, so far with variable but high losses of cysts. A method was developed that requires less than 100 min and consists of filtration, resuspension, IMS, and flow cytometric (FCM) detection. MACS MicroBeads were used for IMS, and a reliable flow cytometric detection approach was established employing 3 different parameters for discrimination from background signals, i.e., green and red fluorescence (resulting from the distinct pattern emitted by the fluorescein dye) and sideward scatter for size discrimination. With spiked samples, recoveries exceeding 90% were obtained, and false-positive results were never encountered for negative samples. Additionally, the method was applicable to naturally occurring cysts in wastewater and has the potential to be automated.


Assuntos
Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Giardia lamblia/isolamento & purificação , Separação Imunomagnética/métodos , Água/parasitologia , Organismos Aquáticos/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Organismos Aquáticos/imunologia , Organismos Aquáticos/isolamento & purificação , Cryptosporidium/isolamento & purificação , Água Potável , Giardia lamblia/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Giardia lamblia/imunologia , Giardíase/prevenção & controle , Esgotos/parasitologia
4.
J AOAC Int ; 104(3): 776-789, 2021 Jun 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33609035

RESUMO

The L.p.SG1 DETECT Kit is a rapid, quantitative method for the detection and enumeration of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (L.p. SG1) bacteria from different water matrixes. The method is based on a combination of immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and flow cytometric (FCM) quantification. To this end, the method employs magnetic particles conjugated to anti-L.p. SG1 antibodies for the IMS of the target bacteria from environmental matrices and fluorescently labeled anti-L.p. SG1 antibodies for subsequent quantification by FCM. The IMS can be performed either manually with a magnetic rack (rqmicro.MIMS) or automated with the rqmicro.STREAM sample preparation instrument. Compared to the reference method ISO 11731:2017, which is based on culturing and enumeration of colony forming units (CFU) on agar plates, and can take up to 10 days until results are available, analysis with the L.p. SG1 DETECT Kit is culture-independent and delivers results within 2 h. This Performance Tested Method validation study demonstrates a robust method with recoveries exceeding 69%, inclusivity of 100%, exclusivity of 97.2%, and a shelf life of at least 6 months at 4°C or 40 days at 25°C. The Limit of Detection (LOD) was determined at 21 CFU/L and the Limit of Quantification (LOQ) at 80 CFU/L for potable water using the rqmicro.STREAM. The matrix study across three different types of water matrixes (potable, surface, and industrial process water), demonstrates superior repeatability and reproducibility, as well as equivalent or even superior detection of L.p. SG1 bacteria compared to the standard ISO 11731 method.


Assuntos
Água Potável , Legionella pneumophila , Legionella , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sorogrupo , Microbiologia da Água
5.
Cytometry A ; 77(3): 264-74, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20099248

RESUMO

Legionella is a pathogenic bacterium that establishes and proliferates well in water storage and distribution systems. Worldwide it is responsible for numerous outbreaks of legionellosis, which can be fatal. Despite recent advances in molecular and immunological methods, the official, internationally accepted detection method for Legionella spp. in water samples (ISO 11371) is still based on cultivation. This method has major disadvantages such as a long assay time of 10 days and the detection of cultivable cells only. Therefore, we developed a cultivation-independent, quantitative, and fast detection method for Legionella pneumophila in water samples. It consists of four steps, starting with (1) a concentrating step, in which cells present in one litre of water are concentrated into 5 ml by filtration (pore size 0.45 microm), (2) then cells are resuspended with sterile filtered buffer and double-stained with FITC- and Alexa-conjugated Legionella-specific antibodies, (3) subsequently, the cells are immunomagnetically caught, and (4) finally, fluorescently labeled Legionella cells were flow cytometrically detected and quantified. The efficiency of each step was tested separately. The whole method allows detection of L. pneumophila in 180 min with a detection limit of around 500 cells/l and a recovery of Legionella cells of 52.1 % out of spiked tap water. Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometric cell-counting correlated well.


Assuntos
Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Separação Imunomagnética/métodos , Legionella pneumophila/metabolismo , Acetatos/farmacologia , Anticorpos/química , Soluções Tampão , Calibragem , Cromonas/farmacologia , Filtração , Fluoresceína-5-Isotiocianato/farmacologia , Legionelose/diagnóstico , Legionelose/imunologia , Microscopia de Fluorescência/métodos , Microesferas , Água/análise , Microbiologia da Água
6.
Microb Biotechnol ; 5(6): 753-63, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23062200

RESUMO

We developed a rapid detection method for Legionella pneumophila (Lp) by filtration, immunomagnetic separation, double fluorescent staining, and flow cytometry (IMS-FCM method). The method requires 120 min and can discriminate 'viable' and 'membrane-damaged' cells. The recovery is over 85% of spiked Lp SG 1 cells in 1 l of tap water and detection limits are around 50 and 15 cells per litre for total and viable Lp, respectively. The method was compared using water samples from house installations in a blind study with three environmental laboratories performing the ISO 11731 plating method. In 53% of the water samples from different taps and showers significantly higher concentrations of Lp were detected by flow cytometry. No correlation to the plate culture method was found. Since also 'viable but not culturable' (VNBC) cells are detected by our method, this result was expected. The IMS-FCM method is limited by the specificity of the used antibodies; in the presented case they target Lp serogroups 1-12. This and the fact that no Lp-containing amoebae are detected may explain why in 21% of all samples higher counts were observed using the plate culture method. Though the IMS-FCM method is not yet fit to completely displace the established plating method (ISO 11731) for routine Lp monitoring, it has major advantages to plating and can quickly provide important insights into the ecology of this pathogen in water distribution systems.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Água Potável/microbiologia , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Separação Imunomagnética/métodos , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Coloração e Rotulagem/métodos , Corantes Fluorescentes/metabolismo , Viabilidade Microbiana , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA