RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Specialty clinics can be challenging for students on the internal medicine clerkship. They often lack the specialized knowledge necessary to fully engage in the clinic and may be pushed into an observational role, rather than being afforded meaningful opportunities. These peripheral roles undermine self-efficacy, and, therefore, education and interest. We sought to improve self-efficacy of students attending non-malignant hematology clinic, as well as to enhance interest in hematology and internal medicine. METHODS: We developed a flipped visit model analogous to the flipped classroom. Students each received pre-readings accompanied and pre-assigned cases with delineated reasons for referral and learning objectives. This model allowed students to prepare the hematology content for visits prior to arrival and then focus their time in clinic on executing visits. Participating students completed pre- and post-clinic surveys. These surveys covered core concepts in self-efficacy and interest in hematology and internal medicine on a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of 103 students attending hematology clinic, 38 students (37%) opted to participate. Two of the 38 did not complete the post-clinic survey. Students had a statistically significant increase in four of six measures of self-efficacy: evaluation of research relevant to patient care and practicing cost-effective care (p = 0.008 and 0.001, respectively); and creation of a differential diagnosis and treatment plan specific to hematology (both p < 0.001). While pre-clinic student responses expressed interest in more exposure to hematology or a possible career in hematology or internal medicine, this was not changed post-clinic. When comparing their experience to other clinics, 75% and 71% students rated hematology clinic slightly or much better than other medicine clinics and non-medicine clinics, respectively. The flipped visit improved self-efficacy both specific to hematology and more generally. While students rated the experience more highly than other clinics, there was no impact on career interest in hematology or internal medicine. CONCLUSION: A flipped visit approach to incorporating medical students into hematology clinic that included pre-assigned cases and readings improved self-efficacy and was preferred by students. They may be adopted easily in other ambulatory education settings.
Assuntos
Estágio Clínico , Medicina Interna , Autoeficácia , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Medicina Interna/educação , Hematologia/educação , Competência Clínica , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Feminino , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) recently redesigned the Canadian neurosurgery residency training curriculum by implementing a competency-based model of training known as Competence by Design (CBD) centered around the assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). This sequential explanatory mixed-methods study evaluated potential benefits and pitfalls of CBD in Canadian neurosurgery residency education. METHODS: Two four-month interval surveys were distributed to all Canadian neurosurgery residents participating in CBD. The surveys assessed important educational components: CBD knowledge of key stakeholders, potential system barriers, and educational/psychological impacts on residents. Paired t-tests were done to assess changes over time. Based on longitudinal survey responses, semi-structured interviews were conducted to investigate in-depth residents' experience with CBD in neurosurgery. The qualitative analysis followed an explanatory approach, and a thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Surveys had 82% average response rate (n = 25). Over time, most residents self-reported that they retrospectively understood concepts around CBD intentions (p = 0.02). Perceived benefits included faculty evaluations with more feedback that was clearer and more objective (53% and 51%). Pitfalls included the amount of time needed to navigate through EPAs (90%) and residents forgetting to initiate EPA forms (71%). There was no significant change over time. During interviews, five key themes were found. Potential solutions identified by residents to enhance their experience included learning analytics data availability, mobile app refinement, and dedicated time to integrate EPAs in the workflow. CONCLUSION: This study was the first to assess resident-perceived benefits and pitfalls of the neurosurgery CBD training program in an educational framework context. In general, residents believed that theoretical principles behind CBD were valuable, but that technological ability and having enough time to request EPA assessments were significant barriers to success. Long-term studies are required to determine the definitive outcomes of CBD on residents' performance and ultimately, on patient care.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Neurocirurgia , Canadá , Competência Clínica , Educação Baseada em Competências/métodos , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Although awareness of implicit bias and its influence on providers and patients is increasing, the effects of implicit bias on the field of pediatric hematology-oncology are less clear. This Special Report reviews the literature on implicit bias in pediatrics and medical oncology and further provides case examples and suggestions on what can be done to address implicit bias. There is a need for further research on how implicit bias impacts the complex care of pediatric hematology-oncology patients.
Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Neoplasias/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
Interprofessional trust is essential for effective team-based care. Medical students are transient members of clinical teams during clerkship rotations and there may be limited focus on developing competency in interprofessional collaboration. Within a pediatric clerkship rotation, we developed a novel simulation activity involving an interprofessional conflict, aiming to foster trusting interprofessional relationships. Active participants included a nurse educator and a medical student participant, with additional students using a checklist to actively observe. The debrief focused on teaching points related to interprofessional competencies and conflict resolution. Students completed a written evaluation immediately following the simulation. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze Likert-type scale questions. Conventional content analysis was used to analyze open-ended responses. Two hundred and fourteen students participated in the simulation between June 2018-June 2019. Most students indicated that the simulation was effective (86%) and improved their confidence to constructively manage disagreements about patient care (88%). Students described anticipated changes in practice including developing their role on the interprofessional team as a medical student, developing a shared mental model, and establishing a shared goal. Our findings suggest that simulation-based learning may present an opportunity for developing interprofessional trust in academic health centers.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Increasing census and work compression on the pediatric inpatient hematologic malignancy (IHM) service yielded resident dissatisfaction, impaired learning, and decreased perceived quality of patient care. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a service redesign on resident perceptions of (a) the educational value of the rotation and (b) the safety of patient care. As a secondary objective, we evaluated the impact on the time of day of patient discharge. PROCEDURE: A bundled intervention on the IHM service was instituted, including decreased patient volumes, intentional patient assignment, intentional faculty selection, and increased weekend staffing. We distributed an annual survey to end-of-the-year junior residents. We compared responses from residents who experienced the redesign (2017) with residents whose experience predated the redesign (2016). We compared the time of day of patient discharge before and after the redesign. RESULTS: Survey completion rates were 70% (28/40) in 2016 and 57% (29/51) in 2017. Redesign residents rated their educational experience and perceived ability to care for patients on the nights and weekends significantly higher than previous residents. Redesign residents reported that their clinical education was compromised by excessive service less frequently than previous residents (24% vs 82%, P < 0.001). The time of day of patient discharge after the redesign was 35 minutes earlier than before the redesign (4:06 pm vs 4:41 pm, P = 0.01, 95% CI = -63, -6). CONCLUSIONS: A redesign initiative of an oncology service led to improved resident perceptions of the educational value of the rotation and ability to provide safe care to patients, along with earlier discharge times.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Internato e Residência , Oncologia/educação , Pediatria/educação , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
Phenomenon: Learning to assume ownership of patient care is a critical objective of medical training. However, little is known about how ownership is best defined and measured or about its value to trainees. The authors aimed to define ownership and elucidate the significance of developing ownership skills over the course of pediatric residency training. Approach: Focus groups and phone interviews were held with pediatric residency program directors (N = 18) and pediatric residents (N = 14). Focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and qualitatively analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings: Program directors and residents characterized ownership as essential to good patient care. Ownership was defined as including personal responsibility, a connection to patients/families, and follow-up and follow-through. For many, ownership was most conspicuous in its absence. Respondents found meaning in their work when exerting ownership and lack of ownership was linked to burnout and frustration. Ownership was recognized as a critical skill that requires development during training to form a professional identity, avoid burnout, become an independent practitioner and function as an integral member of medical teams. Insights: Pediatric residents and faculty considered ownership a cornerstone of patient care and critical to forming a professional identity. The defining characteristics of patient care ownership-personal responsibility, connections with patients and families, and continuity of care-can be used to develop an instrument to assess trainee development of ownership. These findings reinforce the value of ownership in graduate medical education and support creating curricular interventions to foster ownership.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Assistência ao Paciente , Adulto , Esgotamento Profissional , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Profissionalismo , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Clinician educators at academic medical centers often lack the community, mentorship, and faculty development to support their missions around education scholarship and teaching. Inadequate support for clinician educators can lead to professional dissatisfaction and slowed academic advancement. In 2014, ASH conducted a needs assessment of medical school hematology course directors, hematology-oncology fellowship program directors, and other ASH members identified as educators to determine this community's desire for faculty development in medical education. These data furthered the development of an annual faculty development program for hematology educators offering an interactive curriculum and support for an educational scholarly project. The needs assessment indicated that over 70% of respondents would be personally interested in a faculty development opportunity for hematology educators and only 11% had previously participated in such a program. A steering committee designed an intervention blending didactics, interactive small group exercises, webinars, mentorship for a scholarly project, 360-degree feedback for each participant, and a forum to discuss common career development goals. Of 42 applicants, 20 participants were chosen for the inaugural workshop. Following successful execution of the workshop, participants reported significant increase in confidence in the knowledge, skills, and attitudes targeted by the curriculum. A series of follow-up webinars have been developed to deliver additional content not covered during the workshop and to continue mentorship relationships. The curriculum will be further refined based on feedback from faculty and participants. Long-term outcome measurement will include tracking all participants' publications and presentations, time to promotion, and involvement in national medical education initiatives.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/normas , Currículo/normas , Educação Médica/normas , Docentes de Medicina/normas , Hematologia/educação , Avaliação das Necessidades , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Academias e Institutos , Bolsas de Estudo , Humanos , Mentores , Projetos Piloto , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the Test of Ethics Knowledge in Neonatology (TEK-Neo) with good internal consistency reliability, item performance, and construct validity that reliably assesses interprofessional staff and trainee knowledge of neonatal ethics. STUDY DESIGN: We adapted a published test of ethics knowledge for use in neonatology. The novel instrument had 46 true/false questions distributed among 7 domains of neonatal ethics: ethical principles, professionalism, genetic testing, beginning of life/viability, end of life, informed permission/decision making, and research ethics. Content and correct answers were derived from published statements and guidelines. We administered the voluntary, anonymous test via e-mailed link to 103 participants, including medical students, neonatology fellows, neonatologists, neonatology nurses, and pediatric ethicists. After item reduction, we examined psychometric properties of the resulting 36-item test and assessed overall sample performance. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 27% (103 of 380). The test demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach α = 0.66), with a mean score of 28.5 ± 3.4 out of the maximum 36. Participants with formal ethics training performed better than those without (30.3 ± 2.9 vs 28.1 ± 3.5; P = .01). Performance improved significantly with higher levels of medical/ethical training among the 5 groups: medical students, 25.9 ± 3.7; neonatal nurses/practitioners, 27.7 ± 2.7; neonatologists, 28.8 ± 3.7; neonatology fellows, 29.8 ± 2.9; and clinical ethicists, 33.0 ± 1.9 (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The TEK-Neo reliably assesses knowledge of neonatal ethics among interprofessional staff and trainees in neonatology. This novel tool discriminates between learners with different levels of expertise and can be used interprofessionally to assess individual and group performance, track milestone progression, and address curricular gaps in neonatal ethics.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Ética Médica/educação , Internato e Residência , Neonatologia/educação , Psicometria/educação , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have been conducted to assess the quality of orientation practices for ethics advisory committees that conduct ethics consultation. This survey study focused on several Harvard teaching hospitals, exploring orientation quality and committee members' self-evaluation in the American Society of Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) ethics consultation competencies. METHODS: We conducted a survey study that involved 116 members and 16 chairs of ethics advisory committees, respectively (52% and 62.5% response rates). Predictor variables included professional demographics, duration on committees and level of training. Outcome variables included familiarity with and preparedness in the ASBH competencies and satisfaction with orientations. We hypothesised that responses would be associated with both the aforementioned predictors and whether or not participants had encountered the ASBH competencies in training. RESULTS: A majority of respondents found their orientation curricula to be helpful (62%), although a significant portion of respondents did not receive any orientation (24%) or were unsatisfied with their orientation (14%). Familiarity with ASBH competencies was a statistically significant predictor of respondents' self-evaluation in particular categories (54% had heard of the competencies). Standard educational materials were reported as offered during orientation, such as readings (50%) and case studies (41%); different medium resources were less evidenced such as videos on ethics consultation (19%). CONCLUSIONS: Institutions should re-evaluate orientation practices for ethics committee members that perform ethics consultation. Integrating ASBH competencies and useful methods into a resourceful pedagogy will help improve both member satisfaction with orientation and preparation in consultation.
Assuntos
Comitês Consultivos/ética , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Eticistas , Consultoria Ética/normas , Pessoal de Saúde , Faculdades de Medicina/ética , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Comitês de Ética Clínica , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Competência Profissional , Faculdades de Medicina/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Synchronous cancers are extraordinarily rare in pediatric patients and present a therapeutic challenge. Patient A presented with synchronous unilateral Wilms tumor (WT) and standard-risk (SR) B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Genetic testing revealed bialleleic BRCA2/FANCD1 mutations. Patient B, after SR B-precursor ALL induction therapy, was noted on fever workup to have a renal mass; pathology demonstrated lesion indeterminate between WT and nephrogenic rest. Therapy was customized for each patient to treat both cancers. Both patients have ongoing remission from their cancers, without excessive toxicity. We report two regimens for treating synchronous WT and ALL and recommend screening such patients for cancer predisposition.
Assuntos
Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Tumor de Wilms/terapia , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Anemia de Fanconi/complicações , Anemia de Fanconi/patologia , Anemia de Fanconi/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/complicações , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/genética , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/patologia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/complicações , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/patologia , Tumor de Wilms/complicações , Tumor de Wilms/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Educators in pediatric hematology-oncology lack rigorously developed instruments to assess fellows' skills in humanism and professionalism. PROCEDURE: We developed a novel 15-item self-assessment instrument to address this gap in fellowship training. Fellows (N = 122) were asked to assess their skills in five domains: balancing competing demands of fellowship, caring for the dying patient, confronting depression and burnout, responding to challenging relationships with patients, and practicing humanistic medicine. An expert focus group predefined threshold scores on the instrument that could be used as a cutoff to identify fellows who need support. Reliability and feasibility were assessed and concurrent validity was measured using three established instruments: Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Flourishing Scale (FS), and Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE). RESULTS: For 90 participating fellows (74%), the self-assessment proved feasible to administer and had high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.81). It was moderately correlated with the FS and MBI (Pearson's r = 0.41 and 0.4, respectively) and weakly correlated with the JSPE (Pearson's r = 0.15). Twenty-eight fellows (31%) were identified as needing support. The self-assessment had a sensitivity of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31-69) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI: 65-87) for identifying fellows who scored poorly on at least one of the three established scales. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel assessment instrument for use in pediatric fellowship training. The new scale proved feasible and demonstrated internal consistency reliability. Its moderate correlation with other established instruments shows that the novel assessment instrument provides unique, nonredundant information as compared to existing scales.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Humanismo , Médicos/psicologia , Profissionalismo , Psicometria/métodos , Habilidades Sociais , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Humanos , Oncologia/métodosRESUMO
Communication is central to pediatric oncology care. Pediatric oncologists disclose life-threatening diagnoses, explain complicated treatment options, and endeavor to give honest prognoses, to maintain hope, to describe treatment complications, and to support families in difficult circumstances ranging from loss of function and fertility to treatment-related or disease-related death. However, parents, patients, and providers report substantial communication deficits. Poor communication outcomes may stem, in part, from insufficient communication skills training, overreliance on role modeling, and failure to utilize best practices. This review summarizes evidence for existing methods to enhance communication skills and calls for revitalizing communication skills training within pediatric oncology.
Assuntos
Educação Médica/métodos , Oncologia/educação , Pediatria/educação , Relações Médico-Paciente , Comunicação , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between recently trained paediatricians' ethics knowledge and exposure to a formal ethics or professionalism curriculum during residency. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of recently trained paediatricians which included a validated 23-item instrument called the Test of Residents' Ethics Knowledge for Pediatrics. The sample included paediatricians who completed medical school in 2006-2008, whose primary specialty was paediatrics or a paediatric subspecialty, and who completed paediatric residency training in 2010-2011. This sample was stratified based on residency programme variables: presence of a formal curriculum in ethics or professionalism, programme size and American Board of Pediatrics certifying exam passage rate. Paediatricians were randomly selected from each stratum for survey participation. RESULTS: Among the 370 responding paediatricians (55%), the mean knowledge score was 17.3 (SD 2.2) out of a possible 23. Presence of a formal curriculum in ethics and/or professionalism was not significantly associated with knowledge. Knowledge was lowest on items about parental requests for a child to undergo genetic testing (2 items, 44% and 85% incorrect), preserving patient confidentiality over email (55% incorrect), decision-making regarding life-sustaining technologies (61% incorrect), and decision-making principles such as assent and parental permission (2 items, 47% and 49% incorrect). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights several areas in which paediatricians' knowledge may be low and that are amenable to targeted educational interventions. These findings should prompt discussion and research among ethicists and educators about how ethics and professionalism curricula can more consistently influence paediatricians' knowledge.
Assuntos
Currículo , Ética Médica/educação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Internato e Residência , Pediatras , Profissionalismo/educação , Adulto , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação Educacional , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pediatria , Relações Médico-Paciente , Faculdades de Medicina , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Humanism and professionalism are virtues intrinsic to the practice of medicine, for which we lack a standard, evidence-based approach for teaching and evaluation. Pediatric hematology-oncology (PHO) fellowship training brings new and significant stressors, making it an attractive setting for innovation in humanism and professionalism training. PROCEDURE: We electronically surveyed a national sample of PHO fellows to identify fellows' educational needs in humanism and professionalism. Next, we developed a case-based, faculty-facilitated discussion curriculum to teach this content within pilot fellowship programs. We assessed whether fellowships would decide to offer the curriculum, feasibility of administering the curriculum, and satisfaction of fellow and faculty participants. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 187 fellows (35%). A minority (29%) reported that their training program offers a formal curriculum in humanism and/or professionalism. A majority desires more formal teaching on balancing clinical practice and research (85%), coping with death/dying (85%), bereavement (78%), balancing work and personal life (75%), navigating challenging relationships with patients (74%), and depression/burn out (71%). These six topics were condensed into four case-based modules, which proved feasible to deliver at all pilot sites. Ten fellowship programs agreed to administer the novel curriculum. The majority (90%) of responding fellows and faculty reported the sessions touched on issues important for training, stimulated reflective communication, and were valuable. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric hematology-oncology fellows identify numerous gaps in their training related to humanism and professionalism. This curriculum offers an opportunity to systematically address these educational needs and can serve as a model for wider implementation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:335-340. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Hematologia/educação , Humanismo , Oncologia/educação , Profissionalismo/educação , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Currículo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The deterioration of humanism and professionalism during graduate medical training is an acknowledged concern, and programs are required to provide professionalism education for pediatric fellows. We conducted a needs assessment survey in a national sample of 138 first- and second-year gastroenterology fellows (82% response rate). Most believed that present humanism and professionalism education met their needs, but this education was largely informal (eg, role modeling). Areas for formal education desired by >70% included competing demands of clinical practice versus research, difficult doctor-patient relationships, depression/burnout, angry parents, medical errors, work-life balance, and the patient illness experience. These results may guide curricula to formalize humanism and professionalism education in pediatric gastroenterology fellowships.
Assuntos
Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Bolsas de Estudo , Gastroenterologia/educação , Humanismo , Pediatria/educação , Competência Profissional , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , MédicosRESUMO
PROBLEM: Interprofessional education (IPE) is valued but difficult to deliver, given logistical and other barriers. Centering IPE around patients and grounding it in authentic practice settings are challenging within early undergraduate medical education. APPROACH: This intervention facilitated student-patient conversations to elicit patient reflections on the health care professionals who keep them healthy and care for them when they are unwell. After being introduced to the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) core competencies, first-year medical (n = 127) and dental (n = 34) students conducted a brief semistructured patient interview, using an interview card with guiding questions, during a precepted outpatient clinic session in March-May 2021. Students transcribed patients' stories and wrote their own reflections on the interview card. These reflections were used as a stimulus for a class IPE discussion. The authors employed a pragmatic qualitative research approach to explore what students learned about interprofessional collaboration from reflecting on patients' stories. OUTCOMES: Of the 161 students, 158 (98%) completed an interview card. Sixteen health professions were represented in patients' stories. The patients' stories prompted students to recognize and expand their understanding of the IPEC competencies. Students' responses reflected synthesis of the competencies into 3 themes: students value patient-centered holistic care as the goal of interprofessional collaboration; students reflect emerging professional and interprofessional identities in relating to patients, teams, and systems; and students appreciate interprofessional care is complex and challenging, requiring sustained effort and commitment. NEXT STEPS: Next steps include continuing to integrate patient voices through structured conversations across the undergraduate and graduate medical education spectrum and adapting the model to support conversations with other health professionals engaged in shared patient care. These experiences could foster ongoing deliberate reflection by students on their professional and interprofessional identity development but would require investments in student time and faculty development.
Assuntos
Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Estudantes de Odontologia , Humanos , Educação Interprofissional , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Comunicação , Relações InterprofissionaisRESUMO
Background Medical educators face many challenges, including the absence of defined roles, lack of standard career paths, and limited support in systems that generally prioritize research and clinical productivity over educational activities. Providers also teach to widely varying degrees. This study was designed to specifically examine the professional rewards and obstacles experienced by physicians who have dedicated significant energy and career focus to medical education. Methodology A phenomenological approach was used in this qualitative study. Purposeful sampling was utilized to identify medical educators from different institutions and geographical areas. Participants were categorized by gender and career stage. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes across items and participants. Results Twenty-two medical educators were interviewed (11 males, 11 females), with an average age of 51 (range: 38-72) years. The average time from completion of training was 18 years (range: <1 to 41 years). Two main themes were constructed, which related to medical educators' career motivations and challenges: (1) Joy and purpose (subthemes: Interaction with learners, Impact, and Innovation) and (2) Everyone teaches (subthemes: Lack of recognition, Lack of reward, Malalignment of metrics) Conclusions The greatest source of motivation and satisfaction for medical educators is linked to the work itself; in addition to interactions with learners, educators derive pleasure from the innovation, collaboration, and systems thinking involved in their work. Importantly, participants also experience dissatisfaction, primarily due to a lack of recognition and reward, and metrics that do not consistently demonstrate their achievements. Participants provided examples of metrics that more accurately reflected the work of education; they identified clear benefits of academic promotion; and they highlighted significant challenges in the promotional system. The implementation of appropriate systems of measurement and reward is needed to better support the work of medical educators. Our aim should be not only to increase opportunities for satisfaction but also to reduce factors that cause frustration and limit advancement.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Minimal research has explored the pandemic's impact on health professions educators (HPEs). Given that health professions educator academies provide centralised support and professional development to HPEs through communities of practice and promoting education at their institutions, it is important to examine how academies met HPEs' needs during the pandemic. This study investigates the COVID-19 pandemic's effects on HPEs and examines how academies supported HPEs' educational roles during the pandemic. METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach, the authors surveyed United States educator academy members on changes in HPEs' activities, emphasising clinical and educational tasks and work-life integration. Participants shared their academies' innovations and support responses. Data were analysed using chi-square and content analyses. FINDINGS: Twenty percent of 2784 recipients (n = 559) completed the survey. Most respondents indicated the pandemic caused them to spend more time on clinical and education leadership/administration than before the pandemic. HPEs integrated innovative instructional strategies, yet many shifted away from teaching, mentoring and scholarship. Over half were dissatisfied with work-life integration during the pandemic. Females, especially, reported that professional work was compromised by personal caregiving. Academies increased their range of member services; however, they did not fully meet their members' needs, including providing expanded professional development and advocating on HPE's behalf for increased protected time dedicated to educator responsibilities. DISCUSSION: HPEs faced unprecedented challenges in their personal and professional lives during the COVID-19 pandemic. Neglecting the needs of HPEs amidst global crises poses a substantial threat to the quality of education for upcoming generations of health care professionals.