Interventional Radiology: Indications and Best Practices.

Interventional radiology employs image-guided techniques to perform minimally invasive procedures for diagnosis and treatment. Interventional radiology is often used to place central venous catheters and subcutaneous ports, with some evidence of benefit over surgical placement. Arterial embolization procedures are used to manage many types of hemorrhage and are highly effective for severe postpartum hemorrhage. Vascular interventions, such as endovascular treatment of varicosities, acute limb ischemia, and pulmonary embolism, are superior to surgical interventions. For chronic limb ischemia and deep venous thrombosis, the choice of therapy is not as clear. Inferior vena cava filters can be placed and removed endovascularly, but there is a significant risk of complications that increases over time. Vascular interventions can be effective for scrotal varicocele and uterine fibroids, although fibroid treatment is limited by high recurrence rates. Image-guided percutaneous drainage and biopsy have become standard of care. Interventional approaches are being used in oncology for local diagnosis and treatment. Percutaneous ablation and targeted delivery of chemotherapy and radiation therapy are being developed as alternatives when surgery is not practical. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty provide significant pain and functional improvement in patients with spinal metastases.

Metastasis to the Heart: A Radiologic Approach to Diagnosis With Pathologic Correlation.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluating metastatic disease to the heart and pericardium, from detection to diagnosis, often requires a multimodality imaging approach. A radiologist's ability to evaluate cardiac metastases hinges on an understanding of the epidemiology, anatomy, and imaging features of this disease process. CONCLUSION: On surveillance imaging of patients with cancer or when metastatic disease is suspected, detection of metastatic disease may be greatly enhanced by an understanding of which primary tumors metastasize to the heart and the most common routes of spread.

Ectopic variceal bleeding from chronic superior mesenteric vein thrombosis after hemorrhagic pancreatitis.

Varices are a common cause of gastrointestinal (GI) bleed. When ectopic, there is often a delay in diagnosis as it is difficult to localize these varices. Ectopic small bowel varices usually arise from portal hypertension, which commonly develops in the setting of cirrhosis. This case presents a much rarer cause of bleeding ectopic varices with portal hypertension secondary to chronic superior mesenteric vein (SMV) thrombosis that developed after an episode of hemorrhagic pancreatitis. An 81-year-old man with a past medical history of a recent GI bleeds secondary to an arteriovenous malformation presented to the hospital with continued melena after a recent admission at another hospital for the same symptom. Upper endoscopy and colonoscopy showed no evidence of active bleeding. Subsequently computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed bleeding from collaterals in the third part of the duodenum, consistent with ectopic varices. The CTA also showed SMV thrombosis. The patient underwent an ultrasound-guided transhepatic venogram with coiling and sclerosant embolization of SMV varices and distal SMV balloon angioplasty. Capsule endoscopy after showed no evidence of further bleeding. The patient was discharged 72 h after the intervention with stabilized hemoglobin and resolved melena. Ectopic varices should be on the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with a GI bleed that remains nonlocalized after endoscopy and colonoscopy. EGD or colonoscopy is the first-line intervention for the treatment of bleeding ectopic varices. If unreachable by these means, percutaneous coil embolization is an alternative way to stabilize the patient. As no general management guidelines exist, treatment of bleeding ectopic varices should continue to be case-dependent and involve a multidisciplinary team.

Uterine artery embolization: A review of current concepts.

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) has gained traction as a safe and effective treatment modality for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata since its introduction nearly two decades ago. This review includes an overview of current concepts with regard to patient selection, technique, and outcomes following UAE. Specific topics also include the impact of this procedure on fertility and pregnancy, the emerging role of UAE in the treatment of adenomyosis, and how UAE compares with surgical intervention for the treatment of symptomatic leiomyomata.