Addressing the Continuum of Dysglycaemia and Vascular Complications in Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: Need for Early and Intensive Treatment.

The onset of type 2 diabetes increases the risk of vascular complications and death. We know now that that this risk begins long before the diabetes diagnosis. Prediabetes and type 2 diabetes are not separate entities in practice and exist within a continuum of dysglycaemia and vascular risk that increases in severity over time. This excess risk requires early intervention with lifestyle therapy supported with pharmacologic antidiabetic therapy, intensified promptly where necessary throughout the duration of the diabetes continuum. Metformin is an evidence-based treatment for preventing prediabetes and improves cardiovascular outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes from diagnosis onwards. Newer agents (SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists) are appropriate for people presenting with type 2 diabetes and significant cardiovascular comorbidity. Additional therapies should be used without delay to achieve patients' individualised HbA1c goals and to minimise cardiovascular risk.

Management of neuropathic pain in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and low back pain in Saudi Arabia: Evidence and gaps.

We report existing evidence and gaps in neuropathic pain management in Saudi Arabia, the prevalence and patient management stages in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and low back pain (LBP) with a neuropathic component. A semi-systematic approach was adopted to identify data on neuropathic pain. A structured search was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases to identify articles published in English between January 2010 and December 2019. Unstructured search was conducted through various sources including Google Scholar and Saudi Arabia's Ministry of Health website. Studies including populations ≥18 years and neuropathic pain were included; data gaps were supplemented with anecdotal data from local experts. Weighted or simple means were calculated for overall data; synthesized evidence was represented as an evidence gap map. Of 37 articles retrieved from structured search, none were eligible for final analyses. Thirteen articles from unstructured search and two anecdotal data sources were included for final analyses. The majority of articles included were of cross-sectional design (n = 10) in diabetes patients. The mean (range; number of articles) DPN prevalence was estimated as 33.6% (5.6%-65.3%; n = 8). Data on DPN patient management stages were limited; synthesized evidence indicated that 37.2% (0.41%-80.0%; n = 3) of patients had DPN awareness, 17.8% (n = 1) underwent screening, 22.4% (18.4%-65.3%; n = 2) had DPN diagnosis, and 45.1% (0.0%-62.7%; n = 2) received treatment for pain management. Data on LBP with neuropathic component were scarce (prevalence, 41.0% [n = 1]; diagnosis, 54.7% [n = 1]). Data are limited, so more studies are needed to accurately estimate the prevalence and stages of patient management for neuropathic pain in the country.

The Efficacy of Perindopril/Amlodipine in Reaching Blood Pressure Targets: Results of the CONTROL Study.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate blood pressure (BP) control remains a serious concern worldwide. Recent evidence suggests that the combination of a calcium channel blocker (CCB) with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) in patients with essential hypertension provides effective BP control with decreased adverse cardiac and renal events. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed dose combination of perindopril and amlodipine in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on a population of patients with essential hypertension, as well as to identify the predictors of BP control in this population. METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter, open-label cohort study of patients with essential hypertension with or without diabetes mellitus, treated with a fixed dose combination of perindopril and amlodipine. Patients were followed up in four-week intervals for a total of 12 weeks. They were initially started on the lowest dose of the ACEi/CCB combination and up-titrated at each follow-up according to their response to treatment. The primary end-point of the study was the percentage of patients with controlled BP at study termination (week 12). RESULTS: A total of 1996 patients completed the study. Both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) control was observed in 93.3% of patients at week 12. As for the predictors of BP control, it was found that female gender was associated with more BP control [odds ratio (OR) = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.14-2.70, p value = 0.01], whereas older age was associated with less BP control (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00, p value = 0.02). Similarly, having type I and type II diabetes mellitus was also associated with less BP control (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.45, p < 0.0001 and OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.22-0.48, p < 0.0001, respectively). In a qualitative assessment, both investigators and patients perceived efficacy and tolerability of perindopril/amlodipine to be excellent. CONCLUSION: We found that a fixed combination of perindopril/amlodipine is effective in controlling BP in patients with essential hypertension, with older age, male gender, and diabetes mellitus being independent risk factors for less BP control.