Assessment of extremely premature lambs supported by the Extrauterine Environment for Neonatal Development (EXTEND).

BACKGROUND: Our team has previously reported physiologic support by the EXTra-uterine Environment for Neonatal Development (EXTEND) of 105 to 117 days gestational age (GA) lambs for up to 28 days with normal organ maturation. However, the fetal lamb brain matures more rapidly, requiring the study of 90-105 day GA fetal lambs to assess more neurodevelopmentally equivalent lambs to the 23-25 week GA extreme premature infant. METHODS: Extremely preterm lambs (90-95 days of GA) were delivered by C-section and supported by EXTEND. Estimated circuit flows were maintained at around 325 ml/kg/min. After support on EXTEND, MRI and histopathologic analysis were performed and compared to 105-112 days GA control lambs. RESULTS: The extremely preterm group includes 10 animals with a mean GA of 91.6 days, a mean weight at cannulation of 0.98 kg and a mean length of stay on EXTEND of 13.5 days (10-21 days). Hemodynamics and oxygenation showed stable parameters. Animals showed growth and physiologic cardiac function. MRI volumetric and diffusion analysis was comparable to controls. Histologic brain analysis revealed no difference between study groups. CONCLUSION: EXTEND appears to support brain and cardiac development in an earlier gestation, less mature, lamb model. IMPACT: Prolonged (up to 21 days) physiological support of extremely preterm lambs of closer neurodevelopmental equivalence to the 24-28 gestational week human was achieved using the EXTEND system. EXTEND treatment supported brain growth and development in extremely preterm fetal lambs and was not associated with intraventricular hemorrhage or white matter injury. Daily echocardiography demonstrated physiologic heart function, absence of cardiac afterload, and normal developmental increase in cardiac chamber dimensions. This study demonstrates hemodynamic and metabolic support by the EXTEND system in the extremely preterm ovine model.

Outcomes in elderly patients undergoing hepatic resection compared to ablative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hepatic resection is an excellent option in the care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Elderly patients often forego hepatic resection in favor of liver-directed ablative therapies due to the increased likelihood of adverse postoperative outcomes due to age. We sought to determine long-term outcomes in patients who underwent hepatic resection compared to liver-directed ablative therapy in this patient population. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database for elderly patients (≥70 years) diagnosed with HCC between 2004 and 2018. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) computed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: A total of 10 032 patients were included in this analysis. On unadjusted analysis (p < 0.001) as well as multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.73), hepatic resection was associated with improved OS. The protective association between hepatic resection and OS persisted after 1:1 propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection is associated with improved survival for well-selected elderly patients with HCC. While age is often thought of as influencing the decision to offer surgery, our study, in combination with others, demonstrates that it should not. Instead, other objective indicators of performance and functional status may be considered.

Outcomes in elderly patients undergoing hepatic resection compared to liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection (HR) is an excellent option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For patients meeting the Milan criteria, a liver transplant (LT) is also a viable option for patients with HCC, especially those with end-stage liver disease. With increasing rates of LTs amongst the elderly, we sought to determine long-term outcomes in patients who underwent HR compared to LTs in this patient population. METHODS: We queried the national cancer database for elderly patients (≥70 years) diagnosed with HCC between 2004 and 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) computed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. One-to-one propensity score matching was conducted on the basis of clinicodemographic features to account for baseline differences between patients undergoing each procedure. RESULTS: Of the 5090 patients included, 4674 (91.8%) and 416 (8.2%) patients underwent HR and LT, respectively. Compared with HR patients, patients receiving LT had better OS (p < 0.001) and greater median survival time (65.6 months HR vs. 97.9 months LT, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a LT was independently associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.76, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LT is associated with improved survival for well-selected elderly patients with HCC. Age alone should not be used as the sole parameter for the candidacy of LT in elderly patients.

Impact of Medicaid Expansion on the Treatment and Outcomes of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The Affordable Care Act increased insurance coverage for patients residing in states that expanded Medicaid coverage, but its impact on the outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is not clear. Therefore, we examine the impact of Medicaid expansion (ME) on access to treatment and outcomes of ICC. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) data for patients with a diagnosis of ICC (2010-2018). Difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was performed to assess the impact of January 2014 ME on curative-intent surgical resection, multimodal therapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 30-day mortality, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 2150 patients included in the study,1574 (73.2%) and 576 (26.8%) patients lived in non-ME and ME states, respectively. On adjusted DID, ME was independently associated with receipt of curative-intent surgical resection (DID coefficient: 0.05, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.04-0.06, p = 0.002) and multimodal therapy (DID coefficient: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.06-0.10, p = 0.004). In addition, ME was associated with improved OS in ME states (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.87, p = 0.001) but not in non-ME states (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.80-1.12, p = 0.536). CONCLUSION: ME status consistently predicted increased utilization of care processes that improved ICC outcomes, including greater rates of curative-intent surgery and multimodal therapy.