RESUMO
The 8p23.1 duplication syndrome is a relatively rare genomic condition that has been confirmed with molecular cytogenetic methods in only 11 probands and five family members. Here, we describe another prenatal and five postnatal patients with de novo 8p23.1 duplications analyzed with oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (oaCGH). Of the common features, mild or moderate developmental delays and/or learning difficulties have been found in 11/12 postnatal probands, a variable degree of mild dysmorphism in 8/12 and congenital heart disease (CHD) in 4/5 prenatal and 3/12 postnatal probands. Behavioral problems, cleft lip and/or palate, macrocephaly, and seizures were confirmed as additional features among the new patients, and novel features included neonatal respiratory distress, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), ocular anomalies, balance problems, hypotonia, and hydrocele. The core duplication of 3.68 Mb contains 31 genes and microRNAs of which only GATA4, TNKS, SOX7, and XKR6 are likely to be dosage sensitive genes and MIR124-1 and MIR598 have been implicated in neurocognitive phenotypes. A combination of the duplication of GATA4, SOX7, and related genes may account for the variable penetrance of CHD. Two of the duplications were maternal and intrachromosomal in origin with maternal heterozygosity for the common inversion between the repeats in 8p23.1. These additional patients and the absence of the 8p23.1 duplications in published controls, indicate that the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome may now be considered a pathogenic copy number variation (pCNV) with an estimated population prevalence of 1 in 58,000.
Assuntos
Anormalidades Múltiplas/diagnóstico , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/diagnóstico , Deficiências da Aprendizagem/diagnóstico , Trissomia/diagnóstico , Cariótipo Anormal , Anormalidades Múltiplas/genética , Adulto , Criança , Cromossomos Humanos Par 8/genética , Hibridização Genômica Comparativa , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Deficiências da Aprendizagem/genética , Masculino , Síndrome , Trissomia/genéticaRESUMO
Here, we report the prenatal detection of a compound heterozygous deletion at chromosome 15q15.3 by clinical chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing that included the CATSPER2 male infertility gene. However, given the low resolution of CMA at this homologous locus, it was unclear if the neighboring STRC hearing loss gene was also affected. Therefore, we developed a novel allele-specific PCR strategy, which narrowed the proximal breakpoint of the maternally inherited deletion to a 310 bp interval that was 440 bp upstream from the STRC transcription start site.
Assuntos
Deleção Cromossômica , Cromossomos Humanos Par 15 , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/genética , Infertilidade Masculina/genética , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intercelular/genética , Deleção de Sequência , Adulto , Alelos , Canais de Cálcio/genética , Quebra Cromossômica , Feminino , Dosagem de Genes , Heterozigoto , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Proteínas de Plasma Seminal/genéticaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the contemporary procedure-related loss rate after midtrimester amniocentesis using a database generated from patients who were recruited to the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk for Aneuploidy trial. METHODS: A total of 35,003 unselected patients from the general population with viable singleton pregnancies were enrolled in the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk for Aneuploidy trial between 10 3/7 and 13 6/7 weeks gestation and followed up prospectively for complete pregnancy outcome information. Patients who either did (study group, n=3,096) or did not (control group, n=31,907) undergo midtrimester amniocentesis were identified from the database. The rate of fetal loss less than 24 weeks of gestation was compared between the two groups, and multiple logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: The spontaneous fetal loss rate less than 24 weeks of gestation in the study group was 1.0% and was not statistically different from the background 0.94% rate seen in the control group (P=.74, 95% confidence interval -0.26%, 0.49%). The procedure-related loss rate after amniocentesis was 0.06% (1.0% minus the background rate of 0.94%). Women undergoing amniocentesis were 1.1 times more likely to have a spontaneous loss (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.5). CONCLUSION: The procedure-related fetal loss rate after midtrimester amniocentesis performed on patients in a contemporary prospective clinical trial was 0.06%. There was no significant difference in loss rates between those undergoing amniocentesis and those not undergoing amniocentesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.