Use of GLP-1 agonists in high risk patients prior to bariatric surgery: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Body mass index (BMI) > 50 kg/m2 is associated with relatively increased morbidity and mortality with bariatric surgery (BS). There is reluctance to consider these patients operative candidates without preoperative weight loss. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have demonstrated effective weight loss in the post-BS setting. This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of GLP-1 agonists in the pre-habilitation of patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of bariatric surgery patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 from a single bariatric center. Patients were compared by preoperative GLP-1 therapy status. All patients received medical, surgical, psychiatric, and nutritional evaluation and counseling. Preoperative BMI, change in weight from program intake until surgery, time to surgery, and perioperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: 31 patients were included in the analysis. 18 (58%) received a GLP-1 agonist preoperatively. GLP-1 agonist use was associated with a 5.5 ± 3.2-point reduction in BMI compared to 2.9 ± 2.4 amongst controls (p = 0.026). There was no difference in the mean length of time in the bariatric program prior to surgery between groups (p = 0.332). There were no reported complications related to GLP-1 use in the preoperative setting and no difference in perioperative complications between groups (p = 0.245). DISCUSSION: GLP-1 agonist use in patients with a BMI > 50 kg/m2 results in significantly more weight loss prior to bariatric surgery, without increased time to surgery or complication rate. Further study is required to evaluate the long-term impact of preoperative GLP-1 agonist use prior to bariatric surgery. This therapy may improve perioperative and long-term outcomes in the very high-risk BMI population.

Medical student preparation for the operating room.

BACKGROUND: This study examines student perceptions of preparedness for the operating room (OR), resources used, and time spent in preparation. METHODS: Third-year medical and second-year physician assistant students across two campuses at a single academic institution were surveyed to assess perceptions of preparedness, time spent in preparation, resources used, and perceived benefits of preparation. RESULTS: 95 responses (response rate 49%) were received. Students reported being most prepared to discuss operative indications and contraindications (73%), anatomy (86%), and complications (70%), but few felt prepared to discuss operative steps (31%). Students spent a mean of 28 min preparing per case, citing UpToDate and online videos as the most used resources (74%; 73%). On secondary analysis, only the use of an anatomic atlas was weakly correlated with improved preparedness to discuss relevant anatomy (p = 0.005); time spent, number of resources or other specific resources were not associated with increased preparedness. CONCLUSION: Students felt prepared for the OR, though there is room for improvement and a need for student-oriented preparatory materials. Understanding the deficits in preparation, preference for technology-based resources, and time constraints of current students can be used to inform optimisation for medical student education and resources to prepare for operating room cases.

Bariatric surgery is associated with a lower rate of death after myocardial infarction and stroke: A nationwide study.

AIM: To assess the potential protective effect of bariatric surgery on mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample (2007-2014), 2218 patients with a principal discharge diagnosis of acute MI and 2168 patients with ischaemic CVA who also had history of prior bariatric surgery were identified. Utilizing propensity scores, these patients were matched 1:5 with patients who had similar principal diagnoses but no history of bariatric surgery (controls). Control group-1 included participants with obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 ) only and participants in control group-2 were matched according to post-surgery BMI with the bariatric surgery group. The primary and secondary endpoints were in-hospital all-cause mortality and length of hospital stay, respectively. Outcomes after MI and CVA were separately compared among groups in multivariate regression models. RESULTS: A total of 48 300 (weighted) participants were included in the analysis. The distribution of covariates was well balanced after propensity matching. Mortality rates after MI were significantly lower in patients with a history of bariatric surgery compared with control group-1 (1.85% vs 3.03%; odds ratio (OR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44-0.86; P = 0.004) and with control group-2 (2.00% vs 3.26%; OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88; P = 0.008). Similarly, in-hospital mortality rates after CVA were significantly lower in patients with a history of bariatric surgery compared with control group-1 (1.43% vs 2.74%; OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.79; P = 0.001) and with control group-2 (1.54% vs 2.59%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.91; P = 0.015). Furthermore, length of stay was significantly shorter in the bariatric surgery group for all comparisons (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prior bariatric surgery is associated with significant protective effect on survival after MI and CVA.

The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) with its advantages continues to gain popularity among surgeons. This study analyzed the increased costs of RAS in common surgical procedures using the National Inpatient Sample. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the 2012-2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-NIS was performed for the following laparoscopic/robotic procedures: cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair, right and left hemicolectomy, sigmoidectomy, abdominoperineal resection, and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Patients with additional concurrent procedures were excluded. Costs were compared between the laparoscopic procedures and their RAS counterparts. Total costs and charges for cholecystectomy (the most common procedure in the dataset) were compared based on the payer and characteristics of hospital (region, rural/urban, bed size, and ownership). RESULTS: A total of 91,630 surgeries (87,965 laparoscopic, 3665 robotic) were analyzed. The average cost for the laparoscopic group was $10,227 ± $4986 versus $12,340 ± $5880 for the robotic cases (p < 0.001). The overall and percentage increases for laparoscopic versus robotic for each procedure were as follows: cholecystectomy $9618 versus $10,944 (14%), ventral hernia repair $10,739 versus $13,441 (25%), right colectomy $12,516 versus $15,027 (20%), left colectomy $14,157 versus $17,493 (24%), sigmoidectomy $13,504 versus $16,652 (23%), abdominoperineal resection $17,708 versus $19,605 (11%), and TAH $9368 versus $9923 (6%). Hysterectomy was the only procedure performed primarily using RAS and it was found to have the lowest increase in costs. Increased costs were associated with even higher increases in charges, especially in investor-owned private hospitals. CONCLUSION: RAS is more costly when compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. Additional costs may be lower in centers that perform a higher volume of RAS. Further analysis of long-term outcomes (including reoperations and readmissions) is needed to better compare the life-long treatment costs for both surgical approaches.

The Physician Attrition Crisis: A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Risk Factors for Reduced Job Satisfaction Among US Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: A physician shortage is on the horizon, and surgeons are particularly vulnerable due to attrition. Reduced job satisfaction leads to increased job turnover and earlier retirement. The purpose of this study is to delineate the risk factors that contribute to reduced job satisfaction. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of US surgeons was conducted from September 2016 to May 2017. Screening for job satisfaction was performed using the abridged Job in General scale. Respondents were grouped into more and less satisfied using the median split. Twenty-five potential risk factors were examined that included demographic, occupational, psychological, wellness, and work-environment variables. RESULTS: Overall, 993 respondents were grouped into more satisfied (n = 502) and less satisfied (n = 491) cohorts. Of the demographic variables, female gender and younger age were associated with decreased job satisfaction (p = 0.003 and p = 0.008). Most occupational variables (specialty, experience, academics, practice size, payment model) were not significant. However, increased average hours worked correlated with less satisfaction (p = 0.008). Posttraumatic stress disorder, burnout, wellness, all eight work-environment variables, and unhappiness with career choice were linked to reduced job satisfaction (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: A surgeon shortage has serious implications for health care. Job satisfaction is associated with physician retention. Our results suggest women and younger surgeons may be at increased risk for job dissatisfaction. Targeted work-environment interventions to reduce work-hours, improve hospital culture, and provide adequate financial reimbursement may promote job satisfaction and wellness.

Who Should Get Extended Thromboprophylaxis After Bariatric Surgery?: A Risk Assessment Tool to Guide Indications for Post-discharge Pharmacoprophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors for 30-day postdischarge venous thromboembolism (VTE) after bariatric surgery and to identify potential indications for extended pharmacoprophylaxis. BACKGROUND: VTE is among most common causes of death after bariatric surgery. Most VTEs occur after hospital stay; still a few patients receive extended pharmacoprophylaxis postdischarge. METHODS: From American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we identified 91,963 patients, who underwent elective primary and revisional bariatric surgery between 2007 and 2012. Regression-based techniques were used to create a risk assessment tool to predict risk of postdischarge VTE. The model was validated using the 2013 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (N = 20,575). Significant risk factors were used to create a user-friendly online risk calculator. RESULTS: The overall 30-day incidence of postdischarge VTE was 0.29% (N = 269). In those experiencing a postdischarge VTE, mortality increased about 28-fold (2.60% vs 0.09%; P < 0.001). Among 45 examined variables, the final risk-assessment model contained 10 categorical variables including congestive heart failure, paraplegia, reoperation, dyspnea at rest, nongastric band surgery, age ≥60 years, male sex, BMI ≥50 kg/m, postoperative hospital stay ≥3 days, and operative time ≥3 hours. The model demonstrated good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P = 0.71) and discrimination (c-statistic = 0.74). Nearly 2.5% of patients had a predicted postdischarge VTE risk >1%. CONCLUSIONS: More than 80% of post-bariatric surgery VTE events occurred post-discharge. Congestive heart failure, paraplegia, dyspnea at rest, and reoperation are associated with the highest risk of post-discharge VTE. Routine post-discharge pharmacoprophylaxis can be considered for high-risk patients (ie, VTE risk >0.4%).

Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in patients with obesity: an American College of Surgeons NSQIP clinical outcomes analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has proven beneficial in reducing postoperative pain and facilitating earlier return to normal activity. Except for indications such as recurrent or bilateral inguinal hernias, there remains a paucity of data that specifically identities patient populations that would benefit most from the laparoscopic approach to IHR. Nevertheless, previous experience has shown that obese patients have increased wound morbidity following open surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a laparoscopic versus open surgical approach to IHR on early postoperative morbidity and mortality in the obese population using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS: All IHRs were identified within the NSQIP database from 2005 to 2013. Obesity was defined as a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2. A propensity score matching technique between the laparoscopic and open approaches was used. Association of obesity with postoperative outcomes was investigated using an adjusted and unadjusted model based on clinically important preoperative variables identified by the propensity scoring system. RESULTS: A total of 7346 patients met inclusion criteria; 5573 patients underwent laparoscopic IHR, while 1773 patients underwent open IHR. On univariate analysis, obese patients who underwent laparoscopic IHR were less likely to experience a deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, or return to the operating room compared with those who underwent an open IHR. In both the adjusted and unadjusted propensity score models, there was no difference in outcomes between those who underwent laparoscopic versus open IHR. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach to IHR in obese patients has similar outcomes as an open approach with regard to 30-day wound events. Preoperative risk stratification of obese patients is important to determining the appropriate surgical approach to IHR. Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of the open and laparoscopic approaches to IHR in the obese population.

Safety analysis of primary bariatric surgery in patients on chronic dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Due to the steady increase in patients on chronic dialysis, more of these patients are undergoing elective operations. The literature on safety and postoperative outcomes in dialysis-dependent patients following elective bariatric surgery is scant. We compared the 30-day major morbidity and mortality rates in dialysis-dependent (DD) and non-dependent (ND) patients after primary bariatric surgery. METHODS: From American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we identified patients, who underwent primary bariatric surgery between 2005 and 2013. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared between DD and ND patients. Logistic regression was used to determine the prognostic impact of dependence on chronic dialysis on the 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-four DD and 113,677 ND patients were analyzed. DD patients had a higher baseline risk profile compared to ND patients. Thirty-day mortality rates for DD and ND patients were 0.43 and 0.11 %, respectively (P = 0.134). DD patients had a higher 30-day major morbidity compared to ND patients (5.98 vs. 2.31 %; P < 0.001, respectively). Despite a crude OR of 2.70 (95 % CI 1.57-4.63) after adjusting for confounding, dependence on dialysis was not found to be an independent predictor of major morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Primary bariatric surgery is safe in patients dependent on dialysis with an acceptable 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. Even though dependence on dialysis does not independently increase the risk of 30-day adverse outcomes following primary bariatric surgery, the comorbid conditions in this patient population render them at risk. The higher prevalence of major morbidities in this group is mainly due to the impact from older age, male sex, higher BMI, cardiac comorbidities, and hypertension.

Predictors of readmission after laparoscopic gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.

BACKGROUND: Readmission rate is an indicator of quality in surgical practice. We aimed to determine the predictors of unplanned early readmissions following stapling bariatric surgeries. METHODS: From the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we identified morbidly obese patients, who underwent either laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in 2012 and 2013. Demographic, comorbidities, operative and postoperative parameters of the readmitted (within 30 days) and non-readmitted patients were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 35,655 patients (17,101 LSG and 18,554 LRYGB) were analyzed. Of those, 1758 patients (4.9 %) were readmitted within 30 days of surgery. Multivariate analysis showed the following significant predictors for readmission: Non-Hispanic black ethnicity (OR: 1.56, 95 % CI:1.34-1.81), Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 1.29, 95 % CI:1.05-1.58), totally or partially dependent functional status (OR: 1.94, 95 % CI:1.06-3.55), higher preoperative creatinine (OR: 1.13, 95 % CI:1.04-1.22), lower serum albumin (OR: 0.78, 95 % CI:0.68-0.90), diabetes mellitus on insulin (OR: 1.28, 95 % CI:1.09-1.51), steroid or immunosuppressant use for a chronic condition (OR: 1.61, 95 % CI:1.11-2.33), history of cardiac disease with intervention (OR: 2.05, 95 % CI:1.10-3.83), bleeding disorders (OR: 1.71, 95 % CI:1.15-2.54), LRYGB versus LSG (OR: 1.63, 95 % CI:1.44-1.85), longer operative time (OR: 1.13, 95 % CI:1.07-1.20), concurrent splenectomy (OR: 4.10, 95 % CI:1.05-16.01), and occurrence of any postoperative complication during index admission (OR: 2.61, 95 % CI:1.99-3.42). CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity, baseline functional status, comorbidities, type and duration of surgical procedure, and postoperative complications occurred in the index admission can predict risk of early readmission following LRYGB and LSG.

Risk factors for the development of complicated appendicitis in adults.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the patient's history and physical examination information to find out risk factors associated with complicated appendicitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred patients who were admitted with complicated appendicitis (including abscess, phlegmon, and generalized peritonitis) were retrieved from our database. Two hundred patients with non-complicated acute appendicitis were randomly selected from the same period. These two groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, past medical history, and presenting symptoms. We made a multivariate analysis model using binary logistic regression and backward stepwise elimination. RESULTS: Based on multivariate analysis, risk factors for complicated appendicitis included presenting with epigastric pain (OR=3.44), diarrhea (OR=23.4) or malaise (OR=49.7), history of RLQ pain within the past 6 months (OR=4.93), older age (OR=1.04), being married (OR=2.52), lack of anorexia (OR=4.63) and longer interval between onset of symptoms and admission (OR=1.46). Conversely, higher (academic) education was associated with decreased odds for complicated appendicitis (OR=0.26). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a surgeon's clinical assessment is more reliable to make a judgment. "Bedside evaluation" is a useful, cheap, quick and readily available method for identifying those at risk for developing complicated acute appendicitis.

Early initiation of oral feeding following upper gastrointestinal tumor surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Despite increasing trends toward the early initiation of oral feeding after gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries, current evidence has not been convincing. The present randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of early oral feeding (EOF) with late oral feeding (LOF) following surgery for upper GI tumors. METHODS: One hundred and nine consecutive patients with esophageal or gastric tumors undergoing surgical resection in two hospitals in Tehran, Iran, were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial, and were randomly assigned to a group starting EOF on the first postoperative day and another group that remained nil by mouth until the return of bowel sounds (LOF group). The clinical and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The clinical outcomes were significantly better in the patients in the EOF group (p < 0.05). Repeated nil per os (14.8 vs. 30.9 %) and re-hospitalization (1.8 vs. 7.3 %) were more common in LOF group (p < 0.0001). Additionally, gas passage, nasogastric tube (NGT) discharge, a decrease in intravenous serum to less than 1000 ml per day, the time to start a soft diet and hospital discharge following surgery occurred significantly earlier in the EOF group than in the LOF group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Early oral feeding after the surgical resection of esophageal and gastric tumors is safe, and is associated with favorable early in-hospital outcomes and a sooner return to physiological GI function and hospital discharge.

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical trial study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical technique using small-diameter instruments and single-incision laparoscopy are two new options for less invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In this study, we have compared mini-LC (MLC) with single-incision LC (SILC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a randomized clinical trial conducted on the patients diagnosed with symptomatic cholelithiasis who underwent LC. Forty patients were randomized to two equal groups of MLC and SILC. They were compared in terms of demographic data, operation time, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in two groups. Operation time in MLC was significantly shorter than that in SILC (45.1 ± 69 min vs 63.75 ± 7.57 min, P-value < 0.001). Also, the total length of the wound in SILC group was shorter than that in MLC group (P-value < 0.003). Postoperative pain scores were similar in two groups. Hospital stay was shorter in MLC (1.2 ± 0.6 days vs 1.6 ± 0.8 days, P < 0.021). There was no difference in postoperative complications in two groups. CONCLUSION: MLC because of less operation time is preferred than SILC. Also, by subjective measures, it was a more comfortable method compared to SILC.

Using 360-degree multi-source feedback to evaluate professionalism in surgery departments: An Iranian perspective.

BACKGROUND: Medical professionalism helps physicians adopt a proper and good healing action for the patients based on their particular circumstance. This study was conducted to assess professionalism in surgical residents, using a 360-degree evaluation technique in several teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran. METHODS: This study was conducted on all the second and third year surgery residents from three university teaching hospitals in Tehran. Multi-source feedback questionnaire contained 10 questions on the residents' professional behavior and was completed by the faculty and staff members (nurses, operation room staff, and medical assistants) as well as other surgery residents, interns and patients to evaluate each resident. Response rates were used to determine feasibility for each of the respondent groups and the mean and standard deviation score for each question was computed to determine the viability of the items. Reliability was assessed using alpha Cronbach coefficient for each respondent group. The correlation between these scores and the residents' final and OSCE grade was also assessed. RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability for 360-degree rating was 0.889. There was no significant difference in the residents' score in different hospitals. While male residents obtained higher total score, there was no significant difference between them. The residents, however, obtained lower scores compared to the staff. The highest score was recorded for question 6, suggesting that the residents treated the patients regardless of their socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a strong agreement between the results gathered from different respondents, confirming the reliability of the questionnaire and the respondents' unbiased response. It also revealed that the residents did well in the whole test, showing they were conscientious and learning to become medical professionals.

Identifying causes for high readmission rates after stoma reversal.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned readmissions after colorectal surgery impact patient and financial outcomes. Our goal was to identify factors related to readmission in ostomy reversal patients. METHODS: Review of a prospective department database was performed from 2006 to 2012 to identify patients who underwent an ostomy reversal. Patients were stratified into nonreadmitted and readmitted within 30 days of ostomy reversal. The main outcome measures were predictors of readmission and characteristics of patients readmitted and not readmitted. RESULTS: A total of 351 ostomy reversals (86 % ileostomy and 14 % colostomy) were analyzed; 44 patients were readmitted (12.5 %). Readmitted and nonreadmitted patients were similar in age, body mass index, gender, comorbidities, indications for the index operation, and time to ostomy reversal. Readmitted patients had longer operative times (p = 0.002) and length of stay (p = 0.001), more intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.003), intraoperative complications (p = 0.005), ICU requirements (p < 0.0001), need for temporary nursing at discharge (p < 0.001), and higher total hospital costs than nonreadmitted patients (p = 0.0162). Longer operative time [odds ratio (OR) 1.006, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.001-1.012], intraoperative complications (OR 7.334, 95 % CI 1.23-43.761), ICU stay (OR 1.291, 95 % CI 1.18-1.893), delayed discharge (OR 1.085, 95 % CI 1.003-1.173), and discharge to skilled nursing facility (OR 6.936, 95 % CI 1.531-31.332) were independent predictors of readmission. Ostomy type had no independent effect on readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in perioperative and outcomes variables exist between readmitted and nonreadmitted patients after ostomy reversal. Longer operative times, intraoperative complications, intensive care unit care, longer length of stay, and skilled nursing at discharge were independently predictive of readmission. These findings can be used to identify high-risk patients prospectively, potentially improving clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization.

Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes for rectal cancer resection by operative approach. Our hypothesis is that laparoscopic (LAP) and LAP converted to open (OPEN) rectal cancer resections have excellent patient and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: Review of a prospective database identified curative rectal cancer resections. Patients were stratified by operative approach: LAP, OPEN, or CONVERTED. Oncologic and clinical outcomes data was examined for each operative approach. RESULTS: Overall, 294 patients were analyzed-116 LAP (39.5%), 153 OPEN (52.0%), and 25 (8.5%) CONVERTED. Groups were comparable in demographics. Mean distal margin, circumferential resection margin, and lymph nodes harvested were comparable. The median length of stay was 4 days (range 1-20) LAP, 6 days (range 3-13) CONVERTED, and 8 days (range 1-35) OPEN (p < 0.01). More OPEN had postoperative complications (p < 0.01)-complication rates were 43.8% OPEN, 32.0% CONVERTED, and 21.5 % LAP. Unplanned readmissions and reoperations were similar (21.6% OPEN, 16.0% CONVERTED, 12.1% LAP). Overall 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 98.3%, and local recurrence rate was 2.0%. By approach, DFS was 100% CONVERTED, 93.1% LAP, and 87.6% OPEN (p = 0.31). Overall survival (OS) was 100 % CONVERTED, 99.1% LAP, and 97.4%. OPEN. Local recurrence was 0% CONVERTED, 2% OPEN, and 2.6% LAP. 3-year DFS for LAP and CONVERTED was superior to OPEN (p = 0.05), with comparable local recurrence (p = 0.07) and OS rates (0.43). CONCLUSIONS: LAP and converted procedures have comparable or superior clinical and oncologic outcomes. More procedures should be approached through a LAP approach. If the procedure cannot be completed laparoscopically, outcomes are not compromised for converted patients.

Peripheral lymphadenopathy: approach and diagnostic tools.

Peripheral lymph nodes, located deep in the subcutaneous tissue, clean antigens from the extracellular fluid. Generally, a normal sized lymph node is less than one cm in diameter. Peripheral lymphadenopathy (LAP) is frequently due to a local or systemic, benign, self-limited, infectious disease. However, it could be a manifestation of underlying malignancy. Seventy-five percent of all LAPs are localized, with more than 50% being seen in the head and neck area. LAP may be localized or generalized. Cervical lymph nodes are involved more often than the other lymphatic regions. Generally, it is due to infections, but most of the supraclavicular lymphadenopathies are associated with malignancy. Based on different geographical areas, the etiology is various. For example, in tropical areas, tuberculosis (TB) is a main benign cause of LAP in adults and children. Complete history taking and physical examination are mandatory for diagnosis; however, laboratory tests, imaging diagnostic methods, and tissue samplings are the next steps. Tissue diagnosis by fine needle aspiration biopsy or excisional biopsy is the gold standard evaluation for LAP. We concluded that in patients with peripheral LAP, the patient's age and environmental exposures along with a careful history taking and physical examination can help the physician to request step by step further work-up when required, including laboratory tests, imaging modalities, and tissue diagnosis, to reach an appropriate diagnosis.

Appendicitis after colonoscopy-a case report, literature review, and synopsis of the pitfalls in diagnosis.

A case is described in which appendicitis presented in a 73-year-old woman the day after a colonoscopy. Possible mechanisms for appendicitis aggravated by colonoscopy include barotrauma, irritation by residual glutaraldehyde type solution used for cleaning the endoscope, fecalith, and/or appendicolith being pushed into the orifice of the appendix by insufflation during the colonoscopy. This rare complication is likely most often unavoidable due to the pressure required to properly visualize the colon (which typically ranges from 9 to 57 mmHg) and the manipulation required to visualize and cannulate the ileocecal valve. Physicians should consider possibility of acute appendicitis after colonoscopy when evaluating abdominal pain after a recent colonoscopy.

The Impact of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery on Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

PURPOSE: There is a strong association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and obesity which are both important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The current study aimed to assess the association of MBS with different CVDs in patients with MASLD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed by using ICD-10 codes. A propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was done to match the MBS and non-MBS groups. RESULTS: After weighted analysis, 1,124,155 and 68,215 patients were included in non-MBS and MBS groups, respectively. MBS was associated with significantly lower risk of hospitalization for coronary artery disease (OR 0.633 (0.569-0.703), p value < 0.001), acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.606 (0.523-0.701), p value < 0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 0.578 (0.489-0.682), p value < 0.001), and thrombolysis (OR 0.765 (0.589-0.993), p value = 0.044) compared to the non-MBS group in patients with MASLD. Furthermore, MBS was associated with 52% reduced risk of hospitalization for hemorrhagic stroke in patients with MASLD (OR 0.481, 95% CI 0.337-0.686, p value < 0.001). However, ischemic stroke was not significant between the two groups (OR 1.108 (0.905-1.356), p value = 0.322). In addition, MBS was associated with 63% and 60% reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with MASLD (OR 0.373, 95% CI 0.300-0.465 and OR 0.405, 95% CI 0.325-0.504, p value < 0.001 for both), respectively. CONCLUSION: The current study showed that MBS is significantly associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization for CVD in patients with MASLD.

The association of bariatric surgery with myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization: a propensity score match analysis of National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) not only leads to a durable weight loss but also lowers mortality, and reduces cardiovascular risks. OBJECTIVES: The current study aims to investigate the association of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) with admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), as well as, coronary revascularization procedures, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and thrombolysis. SETTING: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS: The NIS data from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. A propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was performed to match patients with history of MBS with non-MBS group. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-three thousand seven hundred twenty-nine patients from the non-MBS group were matched with 233,729 patients with history of MBS. The MBS group had about 52% reduced odds of admission for AMI compared to the non-MBS group (adjusted odd ratio: .477, 95% confidence interval: .454-.502, P value <.001). In addition, the odds of STEMI and NSEMI were significantly lower in the MBS group in comparison to the non-MBS group. Also, the MBS group had significantly lower odds of CABG, PCI, and thrombolysis compared to the non-MBS group. In addition, in patients with AMI, MBS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odd ratio: .627, 95% confidence interval: .469-.839, P value = .004), length of hospital stays, and total charges. CONCLUSIONS: History of MBS is significantly associated with reduced risk of admission for AMI including STEMI and NSTEMI, as well as the, need for coronary revascularization such as PCI and CABG.

Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high-risk patients for wound dehiscence: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wound dehiscence (WD) is a postoperative complication with high mortality and morbidity rates. Retention sutures are often used in surgical take-back for dehiscence. The aim of this study was to assess the reduced rate of dehiscence in midline laparotomy using prophylactic retention sutures in high-risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred high-risk patients with at least two risk factors for dehiscence who underwent midline laparotomy between 2008 and 2010 were randomly divided into two groups. In the control group, the fascia was continuously repaired using a running looped #1 nylon suture. For the intervention group, we added retention sutures that included the skin, subcutaneous tissue, rectus muscle, and abdominal fascia. We compared the rates of WD, evisceration, wound infection, postoperative pain, postdehiscence mortality, and late incisional hernia for these two groups. RESULTS: After accounting for early mortalities, 147 patients were followed in the intervention group and 148 patients in the control group. WD occurred in 6 patients (4%) in the intervention group and 20 control patients (13.3%) (P = 0.007). Abdominal evisceration after surgery occurred in 1 patient (0.7%) with retention sutures and 4 control patients (2.7%) (P = 0.371). There was no significant difference in wound infection and incisional hernia between the two groups. Postoperative pain scores between the two groups did not differ significantly during the first 3 d, but did differ on the fourth day. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic retention sutures reduce the occurrence of WD following midline laparotomy in high-risk patients with multiple risk factors for impaired wound healing without imposing remarkable postoperative complications.