Anti-cancer peptide-based therapeutic strategies in solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, conventional medical treatments such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy cannot cure all types of cancer. A promising approach to treat solid tumors is the use of tumor-targeting peptides to deliver drugs or active agents selectively. RESULT: Introducing beneficial therapeutic approaches, such as therapeutic peptides and their varied methods of action against tumor cells, can aid researchers in the discovery of novel peptides for cancer treatment. The biomedical applications of therapeutic peptides are highly interesting. These peptides, owing to their high selectivity, specificity, small dimensions, high biocompatibility, and easy modification, provide good opportunities for targeted drug delivery. In recent years, peptides have shown considerable promise as therapeutics or targeting ligands in cancer research and nanotechnology. CONCLUSION:  This study reviews a variety of therapeutic peptides and targeting ligands in cancer therapy. Initially, three types of tumor-homing and cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are described, and then their applications in breast, glioma, colorectal, and melanoma cancer research are discussed.

Potential promising of synthetic lethality in cancer research and treatment.

Cancer is a complex disease driven by multiple genetic changes, including mutations in oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, DNA repair genes, and genes involved in cancer metabolism. Synthetic lethality (SL) is a promising approach in cancer research and treatment, where the simultaneous dysfunction of specific genes or pathways causes cell death. By targeting vulnerabilities created by these dysfunctions, SL therapies selectively kill cancer cells while sparing normal cells. SL therapies, such as PARP inhibitors, WEE1 inhibitors, ATR and ATM inhibitors, and DNA-PK inhibitors, offer a distinct approach to cancer treatment compared to conventional targeted therapies. Instead of directly inhibiting specific molecules or pathways, SL therapies exploit genetic or molecular vulnerabilities in cancer cells to induce selective cell death, offering benefits such as targeted therapy, enhanced treatment efficacy, and minimized harm to healthy tissues. SL therapies can be personalized based on each patient's unique genetic profile and combined with other treatment modalities to potentially achieve synergistic effects. They also broaden the effectiveness of treatment across different cancer types, potentially overcoming drug resistance and improving patient outcomes. This review offers an overview of the current understanding of SL mechanisms, advancements, and challenges, as well as the preclinical and clinical development of SL. It also discusses new directions and opportunities for utilizing SL in targeted therapy for anticancer treatment.

Expression analysis elucidates the roles of Nicastrin, Notch4, and Hes1 in prognosis and endocrine-therapy resistance in ER-positive breast cancer patients.

Background and purpose: Although some proposed mechanisms responsible for tamoxifen resistance have already been present, further study is needed to determine the mechanisms underlying tamoxifen resistance more clearly. The critical role of Notch signaling has been described in promoting resistance in therapeutics, but there is little information about its role in tamoxifen resistance progression. Experimental approach: In the present study, the expression of Notch pathway genes, including Notch4, nicastrin and the Notch downstream target Hes1 was evaluated using quantitative RT-PCR in 36 tamoxifen-resistant (TAM-R) and 36 tamoxifen-sensitive (TAM-S) patients. Expression data were correlated with the clinical outcome and survival of patients. Findings/Results: mRNA levels of Notch4 (fold change = 2.7), nicastrin (fold change = 6.71), and Hes1 (fold change= 7.07) were significantly higher in TAM-R breast carcinoma patients compared to sensitive cases. We confirmed all these genes were co-expressed. Hence, it seems that Notch signaling is involved in tamoxifen resistance in our TAM-R patients. Obtained results showed that Hes1, nicastrin, and Notch4 mRNA upregulation was correlated with the N stage. The extracapsular nodal extension was associated with nicastrin and Notch4 overexpression. Moreover, nicastrin overexpression was correlated with perineural invasion. Hes1 upregulation was also associated with nipple involvement. Finally, the Cox regression proportional hazard test revealed that overexpression of nicastrin was an independent worse survival factor. Conclusion and implications: Presumably, upregulation of the Notch pathway may be involved in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer patients.