The Association Between Antibody Responses and Prolonged Viable Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Shedding in Immunocompromised Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Immunocompromised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 were prospectively enrolled from March to November 2022 to understand the association between antibody responses and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 shedding. A total of 62 patients were analyzed, and the results indicated a faster decline in genomic and subgenomic viral RNA in patients with higher neutralizing and S1-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (both P < .001). Notably, high neutralizing antibody levels were associated with a significantly faster decrease in viable virus cultures (P = .04). Our observations suggest the role of neutralizing antibodies in prolonged virus shedding in immunocompromised patients, highlighting the potential benefits of enhancing their humoral immune response through vaccination or monoclonal antibody treatments.

Severe Human Parainfluenza Virus Community- and Healthcare-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults at Tertiary Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, 2010-2019.

The characteristics of severe human parainfluenza virus (HPIV)-associated pneumonia in adults have not been well evaluated. We investigated epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 143 patients with severe HPIV-associated pneumonia during 2010-2019. HPIV was the most common cause (25.2%) of severe virus-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia and the third most common cause (15.7%) of severe virus-associated community-acquired pneumonia. Hematologic malignancy (35.0%), diabetes mellitus (23.8%), and structural lung disease (21.0%) were common underlying conditions. Co-infections occurred in 54.5% of patients admitted to an intensive care unit. The 90-day mortality rate for HPIV-associated pneumonia was comparable to that for severe influenza virus-associated pneumonia (55.2% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.22). Ribavirin treatment was not associated with lower mortality rates. Fungal co-infections were associated with 82.4% of deaths. Clinicians should consider the possibility of pathogenic co-infections in patients with HPIV-associated pneumonia. Contact precautions and environmental cleaning are crucial to prevent HPIV transmission in hospital settings.

Validation of a new risk stratification system-based management for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: analysis of a multicentre prospective study.

PURPOSE: Distinguishing between complicated and uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is therapeutically essential. However, this distinction has limitations in reflecting the heterogeneity of SAB and encouraging targeted diagnostics. Recently, a new risk stratification system for SAB metastatic infection, involving stepwise approaches to diagnosis and treatment, has been suggested. We assessed its applicability in methicillin-resistant SAB (MRSAB) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of a 3-year multicentre, prospective cohort of hospitalised patients with MRSAB. We classified the patients into three risk groups: low, indeterminate, and high, based on the new system and compared between-group management and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 380 patients with MRSAB, 6.3% were classified as low-, 7.6% as indeterminate-, and 86.1% as high-risk for metastatic infection. No metastatic infection occurred in the low-, 6.9% in the indeterminate-, and 19.6% in the high-risk groups (P < 0.001). After an in-depth diagnostic work-up, patients were finally diagnosed as 'without metastatic infection (6.3%)', 'with metastatic infection (17.4%)', and 'uncertain for metastatic infection (76.3%)'. 30-day mortality increased as the severity of diagnosis shifted from 'without metastatic infection' to 'uncertain for metastatic infection' and 'with metastatic infection' (P = 0.09). In multivariable analysis, independent factors associated with metastatic complications were suspicion of endocarditis in transthoracic echocardiography, clinical signs of metastatic infection, Pitt bacteraemia score ≥ 4, and persistent bacteraemia. CONCLUSIONS: The new risk stratification system shows promise in predicting metastatic complications and guiding work-up and management of MRSAB. However, reducing the number of cases labelled as 'high-risk' and 'uncertain for metastatic infection' remains an area for improvement.

Safety and outcome of treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in liver transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: Liver transplant (LT) recipients have an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB), which is associated with higher mortality rates. This retrospective cohort study assessed the outcome and tolerability of screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in LT recipients. METHODS: Between March 2020 and February 2022, all adult LT candidates at our institution were screened for LTBI. The candidates who tested positive for interferon-γ-releasing assay or met epidemiological or clinical-radiological criteria for LTBI were treated and monitored. RESULTS: Among the 857 LT recipients, 199 (23.2%) were diagnosed with LTBI, of which 171 (85.9%) initiated LTBI treatment. The median duration of follow-up was 677 days. Adequate LTBI treatment occurred in 141/171 (82.5%) patients and was discontinued prematurely in 30/171 (17.5%) patients. The most common reason for discontinuation was liver enzyme elevation (11/30, 36.7%), although only five discontinued treatment due to suspicion of isoniazid-associated hepatotoxicity. None of the LTBI-treated patients developed active TB during the follow-up period, while 3.6% (1/28) of untreated LTBI patients and 0.6% (4/658) of patients without LTBI developed TB. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that LTBI screening and treatment is a safe and effective strategy to prevent TB in LT recipients. However, monitoring for adverse events and liver enzyme elevation is recommended.

The origin of sequence type 72 community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and fusidic acid (FA) resistant sequence type 5 MRSA: Analysis of FA resistance and spa type in a single center in South Korea.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the prevalence of fusidic acid (FA) resistance in MSSA and MRSA stratified by sequence (ST) and spa types, and determined the prevalence of FA resistance mechanisms. METHODS: From August 2014 to April 2020, S. aureus blood isolates were collected in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using broth microdilution and interpreted according to EUCAST's FA criteria. We performed spa typing for fusA mutation presence and acquired FA resistance determinants (fusB, fusC, and fusD) by PCR. RESULTS: Of the 590 MRSA isolates, 372 were FA resistant, and among 425 MSSA isolates, 136 were resistant. Of the 380 ST5-MRSA isolates, 350 were FA resistant, whereas only 1 of 14 ST5-MSSA isolates was FA resistant. Conversely, of the 163 ST72-MRSA isolates, only 8 were resistant, whereas 37 of 42 ST72-MSSA were resistant. The fusA mutation (80%) was the most common determinant. The one FA resistant ST5-MSSA isolate belonged to the t2460 spa type, the most common spa type (24 of 35 isolates) of FA resistant ST5-MRSA. In addition, t324 and t148, which are minor spa types of ST72-MSSA, were susceptible to FA, in contrast to other ST72-MSSA spa types, and the major spa type of ST72-MRSA (110 of 163 isolates). CONCLUSIONS: FA resistance was common in ST5-MRSA and ST72-MSSA, and rare in ST5-MSSA and ST72-MRSA. Our findings suggest that minor clones of ST5-MSSA isolates, with the fusA mutation and minor clones of ST72-MSSA susceptible to FA, may have evolved to harbor the mecA gene.

Clinical safety of remdesivir therapy in COVID-19 patients with renal insufficiency.

Though remdesivir benefits COVID-19 patients, its use in those with renal dysfunction is currently limited due to concerns about possible toxic effects of accumulated sulfobutylether-ß-cyclodextrin (SBECD) on liver and kidney. We examined renal and hepatic function for a month in renally-impaired COVID-19 patients who were treated or not treated with remdesivir to assess the safety of the drug. A retrospective study was performed in adult COVID-19 patients with glomerular filtration rates of <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 at admission to a tertiary care hospital between November 2020 and March 2022. Data on serum creatinine and liver chemistry were collected serially. A total of 101 patients with impaired renal function were analyzed, comprising 64 remdesivir-treated patients and 37 who did not receive any antiviral agent. Although remdesivir-treated patients were more likely to be infected with the Omicron variant (79.7% vs. 48.6%), baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among patients who initially did not require dialysis, 18.4% (7/38) of remdesivir-treated patients developed acute kidney injury (AKI) at days 4-6, compared with 51.7% (15/29) of non-remdesivir-treated patients. Liver injury severity worsened in 3.1% (2/64) of remdesivir-treated patients and 5.4% (2/37) of non-remdesivir-treated patients at days 4-6. In addition, there was no significant increase in AKI and liver injury over time in remdesivir-treated patients, and there were no cases of discontinuation of remdesivir due to adverse reactions. Concerns regarding the safety of SBECD should not lead to hasty withholding of remdesivir treatment in renally-impaired COVID-19 patients.

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Early and Delayed Transplantation After SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Our study analyzed 95 solid organ transplant (SOT) and 78 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients who underwent transplantation within 30 days of COVID-19 infection comprised the early group, and those who underwent transplantation post-30 days of COVID-19 infection comprised the delayed group. In the early transplantation group, no patient, whether undergoing SOT and HSCT, experienced COVID-19-associated complications. In the delayed transplantation group, one patient each from SOT and HSCT experienced COVID-19-associated complications. Additionally, among early SOT and HSCT recipients, two and six patients underwent transplantation within seven days of COVID-19 diagnosis, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes of these patients compared to those in other patients. Early transplantation following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection can be performed without increased risk of COVID-19-associated complications. Therefore, transplantation needs not be delayed by COVID-19 infection.

Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors for One Year Recurrence in Patient With Renal Cell Carcinoma After Partial or Radical Nephrectomy: Results of Korean Renal Cancer Study Group (KRoCS) Database.

BACKGROUND: We sought to identify prognostic risk factors for one year recurrence in patient with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after partial or radical nephrectomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 1,269 patients with RCC after partial or radical nephrectomy and diagnosed recurrence using Korean Renal Cancer Study Group (KRoCS) database between January 1991 and March 2017. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate independent prognostic factors for recurrence. RESULTS: The median patient age was 56 years and median follow-up period was 67 months. Multivariable analysis demonstrated BMI greater than or equal to 23 and less than 30 (vs. BMI less than 23, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.707, P = 0.020) reduced recurrence one year postoperatively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) greater than or equal to 1 (vs. ECOG PS 0, HR: 1.548, P = 0.007), high pathological T stage (pT2 vs. pT1, HR: 2.622, P < 0.001; pT3 vs. pT1, HR: 4.256, P < 0.001; pT4 vs. pT1, HR: 4.558, P < 0.001), and tumor necrosis (vs. no tumor necrosis, HR: 2.822, P < 0.001) were independent predictive factors for early recurrence within one year in patients with RCC. Statistically significant differences on RFS and OS were found among pathological T stages (pT2 vs. pT1; pT3 vs. pT1; pT4 vs. pT1, all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This large multicenter study demonstrated ECOG PS greater than or equal to 1, high pathological T stage, tumor necrosis and BMI less than 23 were significant prognostic risk factors of early recurrence within one year in patients with RCC who underwent nephrectomy.

Augmented humoral and cellular immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 after breakthrough infection in kidney transplant recipients who received 3 doses of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine.

Diminished immune response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and breakthrough infection (BI) is a major concern for solid organ transplant recipients. Humoral and cellular immune responses of kidney transplant (KT) recipients after a third COVID-19 vaccination were investigated compared to matched health care workers. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein antibody and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 specific interferon-gamma releasing assay (IGRA) were assessed. A total of 38 KT recipients, including 20 BI and 18 noninfection, were evaluated. In the KT BI group, antibody titers were significantly increased (median 5 to 724, binding antibody units/mL (P = 0.002) after the third vaccination, but IGRA responses were negligible. After BI, antibody titers increased (median 11 355 binding antibody unit/mL; P < 0.001) and there was a significant increase of IGRA responses to spike proteins (Spike1-Nil, median 0.05 to 0.41 IU/mL; P = 0.009). Antibody titers and IGRA responses were significantly higher in the BI than in the noninfection group after 6 months. Immune responses were stronger in the health care worker than in the KT cohort, but the gap became narrower after BI. In conclusion, KT recipients who experienced BI after 3 COVID-19 vaccinations acquired augmented humoral and cellular immune responses.

Triple immune modulator therapy for aberrant hyperinflammatory responses in severe COVID-19.

A dysregulated hyperinflammatory response is a key pathogenesis of severe COVID-19, but optimal immune modulator treatment has not been established. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of double (glucocorticoids and tocilizumab) and triple (plus baricitinib) immune modulator therapy for severe COVID-19, a retrospective cohort study was conducted. For the immunologic investigation, a single-cell RNA sequencing analysis was performed in serially collected PBMCs and neutrophil specimens. Triple immune modulator therapy was a significant factor in a multivariable analysis for 30-day recovery. In the scRNA-seq analysis, type I and II IFN response-related pathways were suppressed by GC, and the IL-6-associated signature was additionally downregulated by TOC. Adding BAR to GC and TOC distinctly downregulated the ISGF3 cluster. Adding BAR also regulated the pathologically activated monocyte and neutrophil subpopulation induced by aberrant IFN signals. Triple immune modulator therapy in severe COVID-19 improved 30-day recovery through additional regulation of the aberrant hyperinflammatory immune response.

Routine ophthalmologic examination in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia is not necessary: incidence of and risk factors for ocular involvement.

Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia is known to present a virulent clinical course, including multiple metastatic infections, which is not uncommon in Asia. However, there are limited data on the incidence and risk factors for ocular involvement in K. pneumoniae bacteremia. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients with K. pneumoniae bacteremia who underwent ophthalmologic examination in a tertiary center in Seoul, Korea, from February 2012 to December 2020. Two retinal specialists reviewed the findings of the ophthalmologic examinations and classified them as endophthalmitis, chorioretinitis, and no ocular involvement. Of 689 patients, 56 [8.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.2-10.4] had ocular involvement, and 9 (1.3%; 95% CI 0.6-2.5) were diagnosed with endophthalmitis. Of 47 patients with chorioretinitis, 45 (95.7%) improved with systemic antibiotic therapy alone. Community-onset bacteremia (100% vs 62.1% vs 57.4%, P = 0.04), cryptogenic liver abscess (55.6% vs 11.8% vs 8.5%, P = 0.003), and metastatic infection (66.7% vs 5.8% vs 10.6%, P < 0.001) were more common in endophthalmitis than in no ocular involvement or chorioretinitis. In the multivariable analysis, cryptogenic liver abscess [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 6.63; 95% CI 1.44-35.20] and metastatic infection (aOR, 17.52; 95% CI 3.69-96.93) were independent risk factors for endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis was not associated with 30-day mortality. Endophthalmitis is rare in Asian patients with K. pneumoniae bacteremia. Targeted ophthalmologic examination in those with cryptogenic liver abscess, metastatic infection, or ocular symptoms may be more appropriate than routine examination of all patients.

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Clinical Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Camostat Mesylate (DWJ1248) in Adult Patients with Mild to Moderate COVID-19.

Although several antiviral agents have become available for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment, oral drugs are still limited. Camostat mesylate, an orally bioavailable serine protease inhibitor, has been used to treat chronic pancreatitis in South Korea, and it has an in vitro inhibitory potential against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients. We randomly assigned patients to receive either camostat mesylate (DWJ1248) or placebo orally for 14 days. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement of subject symptoms within 14 days, measured using a subjective 4-point Likert scale. Three hundred forty-two patients were randomized. The primary endpoint was nonsignificant, where the median times to clinical improvement were 7 and 8 days in the camostat mesylate group and the placebo group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.43; P = 0.50). A post hoc analysis showed that the difference was greatest at day 7, without reaching significance. In the high-risk group, the proportions of patients with clinical improvement up to 7 days were 45.8% (50/109) in the camostat group and 38.4% (40/104) in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.77 to 2.31; P = 0.31); the ordinal scale score at day 7 improved in 20.0% (18/90) of the camostat group and 13.3% (12/90) of the placebo group (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 0.75 to 3.78; P = 0.21). Adverse events were similar in the two groups. Camostat mesylate was safe in the treatment of COVID-19. Although this study did not show clinical benefit in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, further clinical studies for high-risk patients are needed. (This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT04521296).

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of rifampicin-resistant MRSA bacteraemia.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical significance of rifampicin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus infections has not been demonstrated. Here, we evaluated the clinical characteristics of rifampicin-resistant S. aureus infection. METHODS: Data were collected from adult patients who were hospitalized with MRSA bacteraemia between March 2007 and May 2020 at a tertiary hospital in South Korea. The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients infected with rifampicin-resistant MRSA were compared with those of rifampicin-susceptible isolates. All-cause death and recurrence of MRSA infection were assessed for 90 days. RESULTS: Of the 961 patients with MRSA bacteraemia, 61 (6.3%) were infected by rifampicin-resistant isolates. The type of infection focus and duration of bacteraemia did not significantly differ between the two groups. Rifampicin-resistant MRSA isolates were more likely to have multidrug resistance and a higher vancomycin MIC relative to the rifampicin-susceptible isolates. The 90-day recurrence rate was higher in the patients infected with rifampicin-resistant MRSA compared with those with rifampicin-susceptible MRSA (18.0% versus 6.2%, P < 0.001), whereas the 90-day mortality was comparable between the two groups (27.9% versus 29.2%, P = 0.94). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, rifampicin resistance was significantly associated with 90-day recurrence (subdistributional HR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.05-5.10; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Rifampicin-resistant MRSA isolates showed distinct microbiological features in terms of multidrug resistance and a high vancomycin MIC. Although the management of MRSA bacteraemia was not significantly different between the two groups, recurrence was significantly more common in the rifampicin-resistant group. Rifampicin resistance may play a significant role in infection recurrence.

Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Intravesical Mitomycin-C Therapy Immediately Before Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor in Patients With Nonmuscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Preliminary Results of a Prospective, Randomized Phase II Study.

PURPOSE: Intravesical mitomycin-C is recommended immediately after transurethral resection of bladder tumor for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, a lack of compliance occurs due to the associated complications. Here, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravesical mitomycin-C before transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label, parallel-arm, randomized phase II clinical trial in patients with suspected nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer before transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2 doses of intravesical mitomycin-C (40 mg/20 mL) 1 day and 4 hours before transurethral resection of bladder tumor (n = 49) or no treatment (n = 50) with block randomization (size 2 and 4), stratified by bacillus Calmette-Guérin/intravesical mitomycin-C. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and adverse events in the per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (33, intervention; 38, control) were well matched for baseline characteristics. Sixty-one had been followed without recurrence for at least 10.4 months; 3 and 8 patients showed recurrence in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The 1-year recurrence-free survival rate was 97% and 89% for the intervention and control groups, respectively. Neoadjuvant intravesical mitomycin-C resulted in a reduction (63%) in the relative recurrence risk (hazard ratio, 0.37; 80% 1-sided confidence interval, -∞-0.65, P = .11). Disease progression occurred in 3 patients in the control group (P = .051) but not in the intervention group. Neoadjuvant intravesical mitomycin-C was well tolerated, and adverse events were local and of grade 1/2. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of neoadjuvant intravesical mitomycin-C are safe and effective in reducing nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence and progression after transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

Comparison of secondary attack rate and viable virus shedding between patients with SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants: A prospective cohort study.

There are limited data comparing the transmission rates and kinetics of viable virus shedding of the Omicron variant to those of the Delta variant. We compared these rates in hospitalized patients infected with Delta and Omicron variants. We prospectively enrolled adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary care hospital in South Korea between September 2021 and May 2022. Secondary attack rates were calculated by epidemiologic investigation, and daily saliva samples were collected to evaluate viral shedding kinetics. Genomic and subgenomic SARS-CoV-2 RNA was measured by PCR, and virus culture was performed from daily saliva samples. A total of 88 patients with COVID-19 who agreed to daily sampling and were interviewed, were included. Of the 88 patients, 48 (59%) were infected with Delta, and 34 (41%) with Omicron; a further 5 patients gave undetectable or inconclusive RNA PCR results and 1 was suspected of being coinfected with both variants. Omicron group had a higher secondary attack rate (31% [38/124] vs. 7% [34/456], p < 0.001). Survival analysis revealed that shorter viable virus shedding period was observed in Omicron variant compared with Delta variant (median 4, IQR [1-7], vs. 8.5 days, IQR [5-12 days], p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that moderate-to-critical disease severity (HR: 1.96), and immunocompromised status (HR: 2.17) were independent predictors of prolonged viral shedding, whereas completion of initial vaccine series or first booster-vaccinated status (HR: 0.49), and Omicron infection (HR: 0.44) were independently associated with shorter viable virus shedding. Patients with Omicron infections had higher transmission rates but shorter periods of transmissible virus shedding than those with Delta infections.

Virological characteristics and the rapid antigen test as deisolation criteria in immunocompromised patients with COVID-19: A prospective cohort study.

There are limited data supporting current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for the isolation period in moderate to severely immunocompromised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Adult COVID-19 patients who underwent solid organ transplantation (SOT) or received active chemotherapy against hematologic malignancy were enrolled and weekly respiratory samples were collected. Samples with positive genomic real-time polymerase chain reaction results underwent virus culture and rapid antigen testing (RAT). A total of 65 patients (40 with hematologic malignancy and 25 SOT) were enrolled. The median duration of viable virus shedding was 4 weeks (interquartile range: 3-7). Multivariable analysis revealed that B-cell depletion (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.76) was associated with prolonged viral shedding, and COVID-19 vaccination (≥3 doses) was negatively associated with prolonged viral shedding (HR: 0.22). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RAT for viable virus shedding were 79%, 76%, 74%, and 81%, respectively. The negative predictive value of RAT was only 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33-65) in the samples from those with symptom onset ≤20 days, but it was as high as 92% (95% CI: 85-96) in the samples from those with symptom onset >20 days. About half of immunocompromised COVID-19 patients shed viable virus for ≥4 weeks from the diagnosis, and virus shedding was prolonged especially in unvaccinated patients with B-cell-depleting therapy treatment. RAT beyond 20 days in immunocompromised patients had a relatively high negative predictive value for viable virus shedding.

Clinical utility of quantitative immunoassays and surrogate virus neutralization tests for predicting neutralizing activity against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 variants.

Developing new antibody assays for emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants is challenging. SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization tests (sVNT) targeting Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 have been devised, but their performance needs to be validated in comparison with quantitative immunoassays. First, using 1749 PRNT-positive sera, we noticed that log-transformed optical density (OD) ratio of wild-type (WT) sVNT exhibited better titer-correlation with plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) than % inhibition value. Second, we tried 798 dilutional titration tests with 103 sera, but nonlinear correlation between OD ratio and antibody concentration limited titration of sVNT. Third, the titer-correlations of two sVNT kits for BA.1 and two quantitative immunoassays for WT were evaluated with BA.1 and BA.5 PRNT. All tested kits exhibited a linear correlation with PRNT titers, but the sVNT kits exhibited high false-negative rates (cPass-BA.1 kit, 45.4% for BA.1 and 44.2% for BA.5; STANDARD F-BA.1 kit, 1.9% for BA.1 and 2.2% for BA.5), while quantitative immunoassays showed 100% sensitivity. Linear mixed-effects model suggested superior titer-correlation with PRNT for quantitative immunoassays compared to sVNT kits. Taken together, the use of quantitative immunoassays for WT, rather than rapid development of new kits, would be practical for predicting neutralizing activities against emerging new variants.

Clinical significance and outcomes of Clostridium tertium bacteremia: analysis of 62 cases in neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients.

The clinical significance of Clostridium tertium bacteremia is still uncertain. We evaluated the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of C. tertium bacteremia and identified differences between neutropenia and non-neutropenia. All adult patients with C. tertium bacteremia in a 2700-bed tertiary center between January 2004 and November 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The first episode of C. tertium bacteremia in each patient was included in the analysis. Among 601 patients with Clostridium species bacteremia, 62 (10%) had C. tertium bacteremia, and of these 62 patients, 39 (63%) had had recent chemotherapy, and 31 (50%) had neutropenia or hematologic malignancy. C. tertium bacteremia originated frequently from a gastrointestinal tract infection such as enterocolitis (34%), primary bacteremia (29%), and secondary peritonitis (18%), and 34% of patients had polymicrobial bacteremia. Hematologic malignancy, prior antibiotic treatment, neutropenic enterocolitis, and primary bacteremia were significantly associated with C. tertium bacteremia in neutropenic patients, whereas solid tumor, hepatobiliary disease, secondary peritonitis, polymicrobial bacteremia, and a higher frequency of eradicable infection foci were significantly associated with C. tertium bacteremia in non-neutropenic patients. There was 15% 30-day mortality. APACHE II score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.1) and secondary peritonitis (aOR, 25.9; 95% CI, 3.0-224.7) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. The prevalence of C. tertium bacteremia is low, and the characteristics of C. tertium bacteremia are significantly different between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients. Appropriate investigation for gastrointestinal mucosal injury should be performed to improve treatment outcomes in this form of bacteremia.

Clinical impact of metformin exposure during Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients with diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: Increasing evidence has suggested that metformin may play positive roles in a wide range of infectious diseases. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of metformin exposure during Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) in patients with diabetes. METHODS: A 3-year observational cohort study of 452 patients (aged ≥ 16 years) with SAB was performed at a tertiary care hospital. Metformin exposure was defined as receiving metformin during SAB, regardless of metformin use before the onset of bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 452 patients, 51 (11.3%) were classified in Group A (diabetes with metformin exposure), 115 (25.4%) in Group B (diabetes without metformin exposure), and 286 (63.3%) in Group C (no diabetes). The 30-day mortality rate in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (3.9% [2/51] versus 14.8% [17/115]; p = 0.04) and lower than that in Group C (3.9% [2/51] versus 17.1% [49/286]; p = 0.02). The mortality rates did not differ between Group B and Group C (14.8% [17/115] versus 17.1% [49/286]; p = 0.57). The rates of persistent and recurrent bacteremia were comparable among the three groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that metformin exposure was significantly associated with reduced mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.88; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin exposure during SAB appears to be an independent predictor of survival in patients with diabetes.

False positive Aspergillus galactomannan assay results caused by specific parenteral nutrition.

In September 2022, the proportion of clinically false positive results with high index values for the galactomannan (GM) assay increased dramatically in our hospital and remained high until November 2022. We aimed to identify the possible causative agent that led to the dramatic increase in false positivity in GM assay. A case-control-control study was conducted, and patients admitted to two intensive care units between September and November 2022 were included. We defined each time point at which the GM assay was conducted in a patient as an episode and classified episodes into strong-positive (≥10.0 index; case), positive (control), and negative (<0.5 index; control) groups. We compared the medications administered in three groups and measured GM levels in relevant medications, including parenteral nutrition (PN). In total, 118 episodes in 33 patients were classified into three groups. There were 46 negative, 23 positive, and 49 strong-positive episodes, and there was a significant difference in the use of Winuf® PNs (P < .001) between the three groups. Forty episodes (82%) in the strong-positive group received Winuf®, compared with three (6.5%) in the negative group and one (4.3%) in the positive group (P < .001). All samples of Winuf® PNs used in the five patients whose GM results were repeatedly strong-positive were strongly positive for GM. False positivity in GM assay can be caused by the administration of specific PNs. A thorough investigation of prescribed medications should be considered when there is an abrupt increase in the proportion of strong-positive or positive GM results.