Unmet clinical needs and burden of disease in hidradenitis suppurativa: real-world experience from EU5 and US.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, debilitating skin disease characterized by painful deep lesions and associated with substantial disease burden. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe physician- and patient-reported clinical unmet needs from a real-world perspective. METHODS: This study used data from the Adelphi HS Disease Specific Programme, a point-in-time survey of dermatologists and their patients with HS in Europe and the United States. Dermatologists completed patient record forms (PRFs) for 5-7 consecutively consulting patients with HS; patients or carers of patients also optionally completed a patient/carer self-completion questionnaire (PSC/CSC). Data collection included demographics, symptomatology and impact on quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Dermatologists (N = 312) completed PRFs for 1787 patients with HS; patient- and carer-reported questionnaires (PSC/CSC) were completed for 33.1% (591/1787) of patients. The mean age was 34.4 ± 12.2 years and 57.6% of patients were female (1029/1787). Physician-judged disease severity at sampling was categorized as mild in 66.0% (1179/1787), moderate in 29.3% (523/1787) and severe in 4.7% (85/1787) of patients. Deterioration or unstable condition over the previous 12 months was described by 17.1% [235/1372] and 12.6% [41/325] of physician- and patient/carer-reported cases, respectively. Despite receiving treatment, high proportions of patients still experienced symptoms at sampling (general pain/discomfort [49.5%, 885/1787]; inflammation/redness of lesions/abscesses [46.1%, 823/1787] and itching [29.9%, 535/1787]); these symptoms were more frequent in patients with moderate or severe disease. Patients reported a mean Dermatology Life Quality Index score of 5.9 ± 5.4 (555/591; mild, 4.1 ± 4.3; moderate, 9.4 ± 5.4; severe, 13.3 ± 5.5) and a mean Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life score of 11.0 ± 10.6 (518/591; mild, 7.6 ± 8.3; moderate, 17.7 ± 10.0; severe, 31.0 ± 15.4) indicating a substantial impact on QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HS experienced a high disease burden despite being actively treated by a dermatologist. This study demonstrates that the burden of HS disease is generally poorly managed with a considerable impact observed on patients' QoL.

Psoriasis severity: commonly used clinical thresholds may not adequately convey patient impact.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis severity is usually evaluated using quantitative and qualitative measures, including per cent body surface area (BSA) involvement, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), a patient-reported questionnaire. However, standardized definitions for psoriasis severity categories have not been well established. A PASI of 10 or 12 has remained the minimal severity threshold defining eligibility for psoriasis treatments. In the present study, the validity of this cut-off was re-evaluated in the context of quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the thresholds commonly used to define moderate psoriasis (PASI of 10-12 and BSA of 10) are supported by patient-reported DLQI data. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials that enrolled mild or moderate patients published between January 2000 and June 2017 was used to assess correlations between provider and patient-generated severity at baseline. RESULTS: For subject groups with high impact on quality of life (DLQI > 10), the mean weighted BSA was 7.6 (Range: 7.1-8.4) and the mean weighted DLQI was 11 (Range: 10.2-12.2). Similarly, the mean weighted PASI for patients with DLQI > 10 was 8.7 (Range: 7.1-10.1) and the mean weighted DLQI was 10.9 (Range: 10.1-12.2). CONCLUSION: Patients with PASI or BSA scores less than 10 can have major quality of life impairment. In general, the objective measures of BSA and PASI alone, when excluding DLQI, may not fully capture the impact of disease severity.

Assessment of the effects of immunogenicity on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated antidrug antibody (ADA) development in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis from three clinical trials of tildrakizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody (P05495, reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2). OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of immunogenicity on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab. METHODS: In 1400 (weeks 12-16) and 780 (weeks 52-64) evaluable patients randomized to tildrakizumab 100 or 200 mg, treatment-emergent ADA-positive (TE-POS) patients were identified and characterized for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy were evaluated by ADA status. RESULTS: In patients treated with tildrakizumab 100 or 200 mg continuously, < 7% were inconclusive at 52-64 weeks. In long-term data through 52-64 weeks, the incidence of TE-POS was 6·5% (100 mg) and 8·2% (200 mg) and the incidence of TE-POS NAb-POS was 2·5% (100 mg) and 3·2% (200 mg). TE-POS NAb-POS patients had modestly increased median tildrakizumab clearance (36·5%) compared with ADA-NEG patients. Percentage Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvements in TE-POS NAb-POS vs. ADA-NEG patients on continuous treatment through week 52 were 76% (n = 10) vs. 91% (n = 342) for 100 mg and 77% (n = 12) vs. 87% (n = 299) for 200 mg. The incidence of potential immunogenicity-related adverse events did not indicate a clear trend in any positive ADA patient category compared with ADA-NEG patients through weeks 52-64. The effects of ADA on pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety at 12-16 weeks were also summarized. CONCLUSIONS: ADA development with tildrakizumab treatment for 52-64 weeks was low; around 3% of patients developed TE-POS NAb-POS ADAs and showed lower serum concentrations and corresponding reduced efficacy. No relationship between ADAs and safety was observed. What's already known about this topic? Unwanted immune responses - for example immunogenicity and antidrug antibodies (ADAs) - have been observed with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and can affect efficacy and safety. Tildrakizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23 and is currently approved for patients with plaque psoriasis. What does this study add? ADA development in tildrakizumab-treated patients with psoriasis over 52 weeks was low. The small proportion of patients who had treatment-emergent ADAs and had neutralizing antibodies experienced lower serum tildrakizumab concentrations and reduced efficacy. No relationship between ADAs and safety events was observed.

Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for plaque psoriasis with continuous dosing, treatment interruption, dose adjustments and switching from etanercept: results from phase III studies.

BACKGROUND: Chronic psoriasis may require medication adjustments over time. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy/safety of tildrakizumab in subgroups from the reSURFACE studies (N = 1862) that received continuous dosing, higher/lower dosing, treatment interruption/reinitiation and initiation. METHODS: Responders [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 75%] and partial responders (PASI ≥ 50% to < 75%) in Part 3 of the reSURFACE studies (weeks 28-52 or week 64) who received tildrakizumab 200 mg or 100 mg were rerandomized to the same dosage (T100/T100 or T200/T200), a higher/lower dosage (T100/T200 or T200/T100) or placebo (PBO) (T100/PBO or T200/PBO). Patients receiving PBO who relapsed were reinitiated to tildrakizumab. Etanercept (ETN) week-28 partial responders and nonresponders (PASI < 50%) received tildrakizumab 200 mg (ETN/T200). RESULTS: Among T100/T100 and T200/T200 week-28 partial responders, the proportion of patients who achieved as-observed PASI 75 responses increased over time. Among T100/T200 week-28 partial responders, PASI 75 responses increased from week 32 (38·5%) to week 52 (63·2%) and remained consistent in T200/T100 week-28 responders. Among patients who relapsed in the T100/PBO and T200/PBO groups, 86% and 83% of those who reinitiated tildrakizumab achieved PASI 75 by week 64, respectively. Among ETN/T200 week-28 partial responders, PASI 75 responses (nonresponder imputation) increased from week 32 (24·1%) to week 52 (74·7%). PASI 90, PASI 100 and Physician's Global Assessment responses were consistent with PASI 75 results. Treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Patients generally fared well with tildrakizumab maintenance, reinitiation, dose adjustment or initiation. What's already known about this topic? Tildrakizumab demonstrated significant efficacy vs. placebo with a positive safety profile during the first 28 weeks of treatment in two randomized double-blind trials. What does this study add? Treatment scenarios with tildrakizumab, such as long-term continuous dosing (up to 64 weeks), treatment interruption/reinitiation and switching from another biologic, can be part of the management of plaque psoriasis with a reasonable expectation of efficacy and tolerability.

Baseline patient-reported outcomes from UNITE: an observational, international, multicentre registry to evaluate hidradenitis suppurativa in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory, skin condition associated with many comorbidities and often has a substantial impact on patients' lives. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at baseline in patients with HS in an observational, real-world, clinical setting using several tools including a validated HS-specific instrument. METHODS: This study evaluated HRQoL data from the international UNITE HS disease registry. Administration of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and collection of data were executed per local regulations. All data were assessed using descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: PRO data from 529 adults and 65 adolescents were evaluated. Most adults (64.5%) and adolescents (73.8%) were classified as Hurley Stage II with substantial disease burden at baseline. HS had a large effect (mean DLQI = 12.6) and moderate effect (mean CDLQI = 6.9) on the lives of adults and adolescents, respectively. Approximately 58% of adults and 41% of adolescents had anxiety scores beyond the normal range; 30% of adults and 16% of adolescents exhibited symptoms of depression. Based on HSSA and HSIA scores, approximately 30% of adults reported a substantial burden of multiple HS clinical symptoms and more than 45% reported a significant emotional impact of HS that adversely affected their intimate relationships. Only 60% of adults were employed and of those, 64% reported at least some degree of impairment while working because of HS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on PROs collected from patients enrolled in the UNITE registry, a real-world, clinical setting, HS has a significant negative impact on the everyday lives of patients affected by this disease.

Publication trends in hidradenitis suppurativa from 2008 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: Increased interest in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) research is encouraging. A critical analysis of the state of HS literature may demonstrate the strength of existing knowledge and highlight current gaps. OBJECTIVES: To analyse changes in HS literature from 2008 to 2018 with focus on quantity and quality of annual publications. METHODS: Review of all indexed publications reporting on HS on PubMed. Publications were categorized based on study design, study topic and treatment type where applicable. Publications were dichotomized into high level of evidence and low level of evidence groups. Linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the change in publication number over time. Annual average growth rate and distribution of high versus low level of evidence publications were calculated. RESULTS: Publication number increased over time overall (R2  = 0.64, P = 0.003) and for all publication types except randomized clinical trials. Case reports and case series represented the majority of HS publications (n = 479, 40.3%). Treatment was the main focus of publications (n = 445, 37.6%) with increasing interest in medical management evident in recent years. Distribution of low level of evidence studies (n = 974) compared with high level of evidence studies over time (n = 209) was significant (x2 : 11.45, P = 0.0007). High level of evidence studies had a higher average annual growth rate (49.9%) compared with low level of evidence studies (23.7%). Few randomized clinical trials were performed (n = 16), focusing equally on medical or procedural treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Hidradenitis suppurativa research is undergoing a tremendous shift, suggesting rapid maturation of the field. Current HS literature, however, remains primarily based on limited clinical observation data, with a particular lack of randomized clinical trials. Despite this, the increase in high level of evidence studies is encouraging and may herald a shift towards improved disease understanding and treatment paradigms.

Safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated through 100 weeks: a pooled analysis from the randomized VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies.

BACKGROUND: Long-term evaluation is required to confirm the safety profile of newer biologic agents. OBJECTIVES: To report on pooled safety data from the ongoing VOYAGE 1 (NCT02207231) and VOYAGE 2 (NCT02207244) trials through 100 weeks of follow-up. METHODS: Patients were randomized to either guselkumab 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter; placebo at weeks 0, 4, 12 followed by guselkumab 100 mg at weeks 16 and 20 and every 8 weeks thereafter; or adalimumab 80 mg at week 0, 40 mg at week 1, and 40 mg every 2 weeks thereafter. Patients who received adalimumab crossed over to guselkumab at week 52 (VOYAGE 1) and at/after week 28 based on clinical response (VOYAGE 2). Open-label extensions, in which all patients received guselkumab, started at week 52 (VOYAGE 1) and week 76 (VOYAGE 2). Rates of adverse events (AEs) per 100 patient-years (PYs) are presented through 100 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: Through week 52, observed rates for guselkumab- and adalimumab-treated patients, respectively, were 262·45 per 100 PYs and 328·28 per 100 PYs for AEs, 6·20 per 100 PYs and 7·77 per 100 PYs for serious AEs (SAEs), 1·22 per 100 PYs and 1·79 per 100 PYs for serious infections (SIs), 0·28 per 100 PYs and 0·40 per 100 PYs for malignancies other than nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), 0·56 per 100 PYs and 0·40 per 100 PYs for NMSCs, and 0·47 per 100 PYs and 0·40 per 100 PYs for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Rates among patients treated with guselkumab through week 52 and week 100, respectively, were 262·45 per 100 PYs and 210·41 per 100 PYs for AEs, 6·20 and 6·29 per 100 PYs, for SAEs, 1·22 per 100 PYs and 1·06 per 100 PYs for SIs, 0·28 per 100 PYs and 0·38 per 100 PYs for malignancies, 0·56 per 100 PYs and 0·39 per 100 PYs for NMSCs, and 0·47 per 100 PYs and 0·38 per 100 PYs for MACEs. Among patients treated with adalimumab, rates of AEs, SAEs, SIs, malignancies, NMSCs, and MACEs showed some variability before and after crossover to guselkumab, although no new safety signals were noted after crossover. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile for guselkumab remains favourable through 100 weeks of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Adalimumab medium-term dosing strategy in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: integrated results from the phase III randomized placebo-controlled PIONEER trials.

BACKGROUND: Weekly adalimumab (Humira® ) is approved for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) based on the 12-week placebo-controlled periods of the two phase III PIONEER trials. OBJECTIVES: Using PIONEER integrated trial results, we aimed to evaluate the optimal medium-term adalimumab maintenance dosing strategy for moderate-to-severe HS. METHODS: Each trial had two double-blind periods; 12-week Period A and 24-week Period B. Patients randomized to adalimumab 40 mg every week (ADAew) (Period A), were rerandomized in Period B to ADAew (ADAew/ew), ADA every other week (ADAew/eow), or placebo (ADAew/pbo). Placebo-randomized patients were reassigned in Period B to ADAew (PIONEER I) or placebo (PIONEER II). The primary outcome was HS Clinical Response (HiSCR). Patients who lost response during Period B were discontinued from the study and offered an option to enter the open-label extension (OLE) to receive ADAew. Results are reported across the two study periods, and data were combined from the two study periods and the OLE. RESULTS: For week-12 HiSCR achievers, the HiSCR week-36 rate was 48·1% (ADAew/ew) vs. 46·2% (ADAew/eow) and 32·1% (ADAew/pbo). Combining (post hoc) these patients with week-12 partial responders further differentiated outcomes in Period B (ADAew/ew 55·7% vs. ADAew/eow 40·0% and ADAew/pbo 30·1%). Period-B adverse-event rates were ADAew/ew 59·6% vs. ADAew/eow 57·4% and ADAew/pbo 65·0%. One patient (ADAew/ew) reported a serious infection. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly adalimumab treatment, effective throughout 36 weeks, was the optimal maintenance medium-term dosing regimen for this population. At least partial response after 12 weeks with continued weekly dosing had better outcomes than dose reduction or interruption. Patients who do not show at least a partial response to weekly adalimumab by week 12 are unlikely to benefit from continued therapy. No new safety risks were identified. What's already known about this topic? Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease, commonly misinterpreted as an infection and treated with long-term antibiotic regimens or surgical incisions. Based on the chronicity of HS and the lack of evidence for efficacious and safe long-term HS treatments, it is important to evaluate medium- to long-term therapies for HS. Weekly adalimumab (Humira® ) is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe HS based on the two phase III PIONEER trials. What does this study add? This study pooled data from the two PIONEER trials, providing a more robust assessment of outcomes. After at least partial treatment success with weekly adalimumab short-term therapy (12 weeks), continuing weekly dosing during the subsequent 24 weeks had better outcomes than dose reduction or treatment interruption. Patients who do not show at least a partial response to weekly adalimumab by week 12 are unlikely to benefit from continued therapy.

Long-term safety profile of ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: an integrated analysis from 11 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis in many patients is a chronic and recalcitrant disease that requires long-term treatment, reinforcing the importance of long-term safety data. Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A, is approved for treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To determine long-term safety of ixekizumab in psoriasis. METHODS: Integrated safety data are presented from 12-week induction period, 12-60-week maintenance period, and from all ixekizumab-treated patients from 11 clinical studies. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 5689 patients accounted for 12 061.5 patient-years of ixekizumab exposure from 11 studies. Over 156 weeks, a total of 83.9% (n = 4775) of patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). Most opportunistic infections (IR [95% confidence interval; CI] 1.8 [1.6, 2.1]) reported were mucocutaneous candidiasis. The IR (95% CI) for oral Candida infection was 0.9 (0.8, 1.1). There was no trend of increase in IR of AEs of special interest. Serious AEs were reported in 11.8% of patients; death occurred in 0.4% (n = 23) of patients. CONCLUSION: The 3-year, long-term maintenance treatment with ixekizumab did not show any new safety signals in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Efficacy of tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials at weeks 12 and 28.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of tildrakizumab for plaque psoriasis was demonstrated in randomized, placebo-controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To consolidate tildrakizumab efficacy results by pooling data. METHODS: Data (N = 2081) from tildrakizumab 100 mg, tildrakizumab 200 mg and placebo groups in three trials were pooled. RESULTS: Proportions of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 responders at week 12 were better with tildrakizumab 100 mg (62.3%) and tildrakizumab 200 mg (64.8%) vs. placebo (5.6%; P < 0.0001) and for PASI 90, PASI 100 and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) 'clear' or 'minimal' vs. placebo (P < 0.0001). Responses increased from weeks 12 to 28. Week 12 PASI and PGA responses to tildrakizumab vs. placebo were numerically greater in patients with lower vs. higher bodyweight and were better with tildrakizumab 200 mg than tildrakizumab 100 mg for patients with higher bodyweight. Week 12 PASI 75 responses vs. placebo with tildrakizumab 100 mg were similar between patients with (55.0%) or without (56.7%) prior biologics. PASI 90, PASI 100 and PGA responses were generally higher in patients without prior biologics. Week 8 PASI 50 response predicted PASI 90 response. CONCLUSION: Pooled data confirmed the efficacy of tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: a practical framework for treatment optimization - systematic review and recommendations from the HS ALLIANCE working group.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)/acne inversa is a debilitating chronic disease that remains poorly understood and difficult to manage. Clinical practice is variable, and there is a need for international, evidence-based and easily applicable consensus on HS management. We report here the findings of a systematic literature review, which were subsequently used as a basis for the development of international consensus recommendations for the management of patients with HS. A systematic literature review was performed for each of nine clinical questions in HS (defined by an expert steering committee), covering comorbidity assessment, therapy (medical, surgical and combinations) and response to treatment. Included articles underwent data extraction and were graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria. Evidence-based recommendations were then drafted, refined and voted upon, using a modified Delphi process. Overall, 5310 articles were screened, 171 articles were analysed, and 65 were used to derive recommendations. These articles included six randomized controlled trials plus cohort studies and case series. The highest level of evidence concerned dosing recommendations for topical clindamycin in mild disease (with systemic tetracyclines for more frequent/widespread lesions) and biologic therapy (especially adalimumab) as second-line agents (following conventional therapy failure). Good-quality evidence was available for the hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) as a dichotomous outcome measure in inflammatory areas under treatment. Lower-level evidence supported recommendations for topical triclosan and oral zinc in mild-to-moderate HS, systemic clindamycin and rifampicin in moderate HS and intravenous ertapenem in selected patients with more severe disease. Intralesional or systemic steroids may also be considered. Local surgical excision is suggested for mild-to-moderate HS, with wide excision for more extensive disease. Despite a paucity of good-quality data on management decisions in HS, this systematic review has enabled the development of robust and easily applicable clinical recommendations for international physicians based on graded evidence.

Safety of tildrakizumab for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Short-term interleukin-23p19 inhibition by tildrakizumab improves plaque psoriasis and appears to be well tolerated. OBJECTIVES: Safety and tolerability were assessed for up to 64 weeks of tildrakizumab therapy using pooled data from three randomized controlled trials for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Data pools for the placebo-controlled (up to 16 weeks) and full trial periods (up to 64 weeks) were analysed (n = 2081). RESULTS: In the placebo-controlled period, frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; range 47·9-54·0%), serious TEAEs (range 1·4-2·3%), discontinuations due to AEs (range 0·6-1·9%), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; range 0·0-0·1%) and severe infections (range 0·0-0·3%) were comparable between tildrakizumab 100 mg, tildrakizumab 200 mg, placebo and etanercept. In the full trial period, exposure-adjusted rates (patients per 100 patient-years) for TEAEs, serious TEAEs and discontinuations due to AEs with tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg were lower than or comparable with the placebo rates, and lower than with etanercept. Exposure-adjusted rates of MACEs (range 0·0-0·5) and severe infections (range 0·9-2·0) were comparable among groups. No TEAEs of inflammatory bowel disease or suicide were reported. Candida skin infections were infrequent at frequencies of 0·1%, 0·3%, 0·0% and 0·0% for the tildrakizumab 100 mg, tildrakizumab 200 mg, placebo and etanercept groups, respectively, in the placebo-controlled period, and exposure-adjusted rates of 0·2, 0·7, 0·0 and 0·0, respectively, in the full trial period. Oral candidiasis was also infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 64 weeks of tildrakizumab was well tolerated, with low rates of serious TEAEs, discontinuations due to AEs, and AEs of clinical interest.

Reliability of the hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response in the assessment of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) is a validated clinical end point for measuring response to treatment in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Previous studies have reported on the validity, responsiveness and meaningfulness of the HiSCR. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the HiSCR for inter- and intrarater reliability characteristics. METHODS: A stand-alone, two-site, prospective, non-interventional observational study consisted of 22 patients, with self-reported severity between mild, moderate and severe HS. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) scale was completed by patients at Timepoint 2. Descriptive statistics of Hurley Stage, total abscesses, total draining fistulas, total inflammatory nodules and total AN count (sum of inflammatory nodules and lesions) were reported at two timepoints. Inter-rater reliability and intrarater reliability for the HS lesion count tool were evaluated at two timepoints (baseline and Day 7) using the HS lesion count tool. Intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients of lesion counts were calculated to evaluate inter- and intrarater reliability of lesion counts between pairs of dermatologists. RESULTS: The majority of patients demonstrated either no change or minimally worse PGI-C in HS scores. Descriptive statistics were similar between rater groups and timepoints assessed. Inter-rater ICC coefficients for abscess count at Timepoints 1 and 2 were 0.38 and 0.67. The ICC coefficients for draining fistula and AN count were ≥0.61 at both timepoints. In an exploratory model, ICC coefficients were ≥0.68 for all evaluated lesion counts. The test-retest reliability using ICC coefficients was ≥0.70 for total abscess, draining fistula, inflammatory nodule and AN count. CONCLUSION: The HS lesion count tool had an acceptable inter- and intrarater reliability, indicating that HiSCR has a strong degree of reproducibility and consistency in the evaluation of patients with HS.

Patient-reported symptoms and signs of moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab or adalimumab: results from the randomized VOYAGE 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: How patients experience the symptoms/signs of psoriasis is highly relevant for assessing treatment response. OBJECTIVES: Compare outcomes with guselkumab, placebo and adalimumab utilizing the novel, validated Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD). METHODS: VOYAGE 1 is an ongoing, phase III, double-blinded, controlled trial of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patients were randomized to guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks; placebo-to-guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks; or adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks. The PSSD was self-administered to assess symptoms (i.e. itch, skin tightness, burning, stinging and pain) and signs (i.e. dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding/flaking, redness and bleeding) of psoriasis (0-10 [absent-to-worst-imaginable]) every 24 h. Symptom and sign summary scores were derived (0-100) based on average scores of the individual symptoms and signs. Proportions of patients with clinically meaningful improvements and symptom- and sign-free scores of 0 were evaluated across treatment groups at weeks 16, 24 and 48. RESULTS: At baseline, 652 of 837 randomized patients had PSSD scores. The proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements in PSSD summary scores was significantly higher in the guselkumab group compared with the placebo group at week 16 (P < 0.001) and compared with the adalimumab group at weeks 24 (P = 0.002) and 48 (P < 0.001). The proportions of patients achieving PSSD symptom and sign summary scores of 0 (i.e. symptom- and sign-free) were significantly higher for guselkumab vs. placebo at week 16 and vs. adalimumab at weeks 24 and 48 (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on PSSD scores, greater improvements in symptoms and signs of psoriasis were reported by patients treated with guselkumab compared with placebo at week 16 or adalimumab through 48 weeks.

Psychometric properties of the Itch Numeric Rating Scale in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Itching is a profoundly distressing symptom for many patients with psoriasis, but it has not been rigorously studied using validated tools for this condition. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Itch Numeric Rating Scale (Itch NRS), a single-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measuring the worst itching severity due to psoriasis in the past 24 h. METHODS: Using disease-specific clinician-rated and PRO data from one phase II and three phase III randomized clinical studies of subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, the Itch NRS was evaluated for test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness. A responder definition was explored using anchor- and distribution-based methods. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability analyses supported the reproducibility of the measure (intraclass correlation coefficient range 0·71-0·74). To support the construct validity of the Itch NRS, large cross-sectional correlations with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Symptoms and Feelings domain (r ≥ 0·60 at baseline and r ≥ 0·80 at week 12) supported a priori hypotheses, while large correlations (r ≥ 0·71) between changes in Itch NRS scores and changes in DLQI Symptoms and Feelings domain scores from baseline to week 12 established responsiveness. A 4-point change was optimal for demonstrating a level of clinically meaningful improvement in itch severity after 12 weeks of treatment, which corresponds with marked clinical improvements in plaque psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS: The Itch NRS demonstrated sufficient reliability, validity and responsiveness, and appropriate interpretation standards for evaluating change over time in itch severity among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis when validated using clinical trial data for this condition.

HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response): a novel clinical endpoint to evaluate therapeutic outcomes in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa from the placebo-controlled portion of a phase 2 adalimumab study.

BACKGROUND: Determining treatment response for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can be challenging due to limitations of current disease activity evaluations. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the novel, validated endpoint, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) and its utility as an outcome measure. METHODS: Patients with baseline total abscess and inflammatory nodule count (AN count) of at least three and draining fistula count of 20 or fewer comprised the post hoc subpopulation analysed. HiSCR (at least a 50% reduction in total AN count, with no increase in abscess count, and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline) and HS-PGA Response [Hidradenitis Suppurativa-Physician's Global Assessment score of clear, minimal, or mild, with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline] were used to evaluate patient response after adalimumab treatment weekly, every other week, or placebo (1 : 1 : 1). RESULTS: The subpopulation included 132 (85.7%) patients; 70.5% women and 73.5% white. At week 16, HiSCR was achieved by 54.5% receiving weekly adalimumab, 33.3% every other week, and 25.6% placebo and HS-PGA Response was achieved by 20.5% receiving weekly adalimumab, 6.7% every other week and 2.3% placebo. CONCLUSION: HiSCR was more responsive to change than HS-PGA Response in this subpopulation.