A quality improvement intervention to decrease the decline in renal function in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts long-term morbidity in pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients. The prevalence of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (eGFR < 90) at our institution was 25% at 1 year post-LT; thus, quality improvement (QI) project was initiated, aiming to decrease the prevalence of eGFR < 90 by at least 20% at 1 year-post LT. METHODS: Children post-LT under 19 years from 2010 to 2018 were included. Three QI interventions were implemented starting 1/2016: documentation of blood pressure percentile (BP%) and eGFR, documentation of a kidney management plan if either was abnormal, and amlodipine initiation prior to hospital discharge after LT. We compared the prevalence of eGFR < 90 at 3, 12, and 24 months after LT in the pre- and post-intervention period. RESULTS: 68 patients in pre- and 42 in post-intervention periods met inclusion criteria. Pre-intervention BP%, eGFR, and kidney management plan were documented at 25%, 10%, and 22%, compared to 71%, 83%, and 71% post-intervention, respectively. 22% of patients were started on amlodipine prior to discharge from LT in the pre- versus 74% in the post-intervention period. Prevalence of eGFR < 90 at 3 m post-LT was 19% in pre- versus 14% in the post-intervention period (p = .31); at 12 months 24% versus 7% (p = .01) and at 24 months 16% versus 6% (p = .13), respectively. Significant non-modifiable risk factors for eGFR < 90 were malignancy (RR = 4.5, p < .0001), metabolic disorder (RR = 2.6, p = .02), and age at transplant (7% increased risk per year of age, p = .007). CONCLUSION: By improving documentation of BP%, eGFR, and kidney management plan, the prevalence of eGFR < 90 was decreased by a relative 74% and 60% at 12 and 24 months post-LT, respectively.

Equity factors in pediatric transplant listing: Initial findings from a single center review.

BACKGROUND: In order to improve transparency within the patient selection process, a transplant listing advisory committee was formed within the Boston Children's Hospital Pediatric Transplant Center. Its mission is to promote equity in access to organ transplantation by ensuring that the institutional transplant selection criteria are fair, unbiased, and nondiscriminatory. The committee conducts comprehensive case and data review of individual characteristics and reviews in aggregate to identify potential systems bias. METHODS: Charts for 256 patients evaluated for transplant from 3/2016 to 3/2019 were reviewed. Among these, 64 (25%) patients were declined for transplant. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify demographic variables and vulnerable status factors associated with being declined. Odds ratios (OR) are reported. RESULTS: Among all patients, median age was 8.5 years and 58% were male. Asian patients were more likely to be declined than White patients (OR = 5.3, Wald p = .007). Socioeconomic factors that affected likelihood of listing decline included concerns for caregivers' ability to manage and understand care requirements (OR = 3.8, p = .011), caregiver employment status (OR = 1.9, p = .042), and use of public assistance programs (OR = 2.2, p = .05). Patients with severe neurodevelopmental delay were more likely to be declined for listing (OR = 3.7, p = .019). CONCLUSION: This analysis identified areas of potential bias related to race, socioeconomic status, and neurodevelopmental delay where initiatives can be targeted. Advisory committees are an important aspect of evaluating equity in transplant center selection policy and practice.

Utilization of the Boston Children's Hospital SRTR Cohort Visualization Tool to increase team understanding of reporting cohorts.

BACKGROUND: While reviewing outcomes metrics and data from the SRTR, it became apparent that prospective assessment of the SRTR reporting cohorts would be an important proactive strategy for internal quality control. It was particularly important to identify the number of patient deaths and graft failures within 1 year of transplant that would result in being flagged by the UNOS and the MPSC. METHODS: A simple Microsoft Excel line graph was created to visually display retrospective, current, and future SRTR cohorts. Data provided by the SRTR CUSUM (https://securesrtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/srtr-reports/cusum-charts/) Reports and the SRTR 1 Year Expected Survival Excel Worksheet (https://securesrtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/srtr-reports/current-release/) were leveraged to identify whether programs were in jeopardy of being flagged by UNOS/MPSC for outcomes. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: The creation of this visual tool has greatly improved team understanding of SRTR report cohorts, as well as the risk of being flagged by regulatory agencies, for adverse outcomes.

Utilization of increased risk for transmission of infectious disease donor organs in solid organ transplantation: Retrospective analysis of disease transmission and safety.

The inadequate supply of transplantable organs necessitates new approaches to organ availability. Serologies and nucleic acid testing (NAT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are used in microbiologic screening of potential organ donors. Organs from donors considered at "high risk" (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC 1994) or "increased risk" (U.S. Public Health Service, PHS 2013) for transmission of viral infection to recipients may provide an expanded source of organs for transplantation. We review a single-center experience with 257 adult organ recipients of organs from donors meeting either CDC 1994 or PHS 2013 risk criteria between 2011 and 2016. Tracking these transplants required modification of the Transplant Center electronic database to identify all recipients of increased-risk donor (IRD) organs, documentation of informed consent, and microbiologic testing data. No transmissions of HIV, HBV, or HCV were identified by NAT or clinically. Nine patients developed positive serologic assays for one of the tested viruses; all recipients were retested and remain negative by NAT. Notably, post-transplant HBV core serologies reverted to negative on re-testing; these positive serologies are likely false positives caused by receipt of blood products. Use of IRD organs can be performed safely with appropriate informed consent and rigorous pre- and post-transplant microbiological testing.