RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Properly designed and implemented registry systems play an important role in improving health outcomes and reducing care costs, and can provide a true representation of clinical practice, disease outcomes, safety, and efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to redesign and develop a checklist with items for a patient registry software system (CIPROS) Checklist. METHOD: The study is descriptive-cross-sectional. The extraction of the data elements of the checklist was first done through a comprehensive review of the texts in PubMed, Science Direct and Scopus databases and receiving articles related to the evaluation of registry systems. Based on the extracted data, a five-point Likert scale questionnaire was created and 30 experts in this field were asked for their opinions using the two-step Delphi method. RESULTS: A total of 100 information items were determined as a registry software evaluation checklist. This checklist included 12 groups of software architecture factors, development, interfaces and interactivity, semantics and standardization, internationality, data management, data quality and usability, data analysis, security, privacy, organizational, education and public factors. CONCLUSION: By using the results of this research, it is possible to identify the defects and possible strengths of the registry software and put it at the disposal of the relevant officials to make a decision in this field. In this way, among the designers and developers of these softwares, the best and most appropriate ones are selected with the needs of the registry programs.
Assuntos
Lista de Checagem , Software , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Sistema de Registros , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity and the diversity of available treatments makes the development of a national obesity registry desirable. To do this, it is essential to design a minimal dataset to meet the needs of a registry. This review aims to identify the essential elements of a successful obesity registry. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis recommendations. Google Scholar, Scopus and PubMed databases and Google sites were searched to identify articles containing obesity or overweight registries or datasets of obesity. We included English articles up to January 2023. RESULTS: A total of 82 articles were identified. Data collection of all registries was carried out via a web-based system. According to the included datasets, the important features were as follows: demographics, anthropometrics, medical history, lifestyle assessment, nutritional assessment, weight history, clinical information, medication history, family medical history, prenatal history, quality-of-life assessment and eating disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the essential features in the obesity registry dataset were demographics, anthropometrics, medical history, lifestyle assessment, nutritional assessment, weight history and clinical analysis items.
RESUMO
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of telerehabilitation on improving physical activity, physical function, and quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). A systematic review of randomized controlled trial studies was conducted without a time limit by searching for keywords in the title, abstract, and study keywords in the scientific databases Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed on October 20, 2021. This study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Titles and abstracts were retrieved based on the inclusion, exclusion, and quality assessment criteria. Then, full texts were retrieved and reviewed independently by two separate authors based on the eligibility criteria. Disputes were resolved through discussion. A form with the same predefined elements was used to extract data. Totally, eight eligible articles were found through this review. The studies on telerehabilitation approaches were categorized into three categories, which are: home-based exercise programs by online mobile applications, sports counseling and physiotherapist support via telephone calls, and Internet-based exercise training (IBET). In four studies (57%), telerehabilitation was effective in the short term for some months and improved the performance, self-efficacy, and quality of life of participants. On the other hand, in the long-term effects, there was no difference in participants' improvement (43%). In long-term follow-up, there was no difference between the efficiency of traditional rehabilitation and telerehabilitation in improving the physical performance and quality of life. However, telerehabilitation can be a viable alternative to traditional physiotherapy in patients with OA.