Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Qual Health Res ; 30(3): 409-422, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31328642

RESUMO

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals face a long-term, multifaceted process if they choose to begin a gender affirmation journey. Decisions to go on hormone therapy and/or have a surgical procedure necessitate the TGD individual to set up an appointment with a health care provider. However, when TGD patients interact with health care practitioners, problems can arise. This article documents and categorizes the types of unmet expectations that are common in the TGD patient-health care provider social dynamic in the Central Great Plains of the United States. Utilizing a community-based participatory research model, qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with 27 TGD individuals about their health care experiences. From this, the researchers identified four main themes of unmet expectations: probing, gatekeeping, stigmatizing stance, and misgendering/deadnaming. Steps that can be taken by both the health care provider and the TGD individual to have a more successful encounter are discussed.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos , Motivação , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Estigma Social , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv ; 33(1): 1-15, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34140762

RESUMO

Recommendations for health care providers working with transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals emphasize affirming clients' identities, such as using correct pronouns and name, however it is unknown how often gender specialists adhere to such recommendations. Websites and intake forms of gender specialists were coded for use of affirming language, asking for pronouns and chosen name, and mention of TGD specialties and resources. Most websites identified the provider's specialty to work with TGD individuals, though much fewer provided additional resources concerning TGD issues and only half of intake forms included affirming language. Given previous research that has demonstrated providers working in states with legal protections for TGD individuals use affirming language more often than providers in locales without protections, association with state legal climate is also examined.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA