One- and 2-Year American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scores Do Not Vary Significantly After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of 1,567 Patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether there are clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcomes between 1 and 2 years' postoperatively after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospective, multicenter registry was queried for all patients who underwent RCR. Patients with preoperative, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were included. We evaluated mean postoperative ASES scores, Δ (change from preoperative) ASES, and the %MOI (% maximum outcome improvement). We also evaluated achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) for the ASES score, including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit, and patient-acceptable symptom state. RESULTS: There were 1,567 patients with complete data through 2-year follow-up. There were small differences in achievement of CSOs from 1 to 2 years: 88% to 91% for MCID, 81% to 83% for substantial clinical benefit, and 65% to 71% for patient-acceptable symptom state. There were statistically significant differences from 1 to 2 years in mean ASES (87 to 88, P < .001), Δ ASES (37 to 39, P < .001), and %MOI (72% to 76%, P < .001); however, these changes were well below the MCID of 11.1. From 1 to 2 years, the mean ASES improved only 1.7 points (P < .001). At 1 year, patients achieved, on average, 97% of their 2-year ASES. CONCLUSIONS: Both patient-reported outcomes and achievement of CSOs show small differences at 1 and 2 years after RCR. Given the large sample size, there were statistical differences, but these are unlikely to be clinically relevant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Predict Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Following Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) predict postoperative PROs and satisfaction following rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent a primary rotator cuff repair at a single institution. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to reach a preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score threshold predictive of postoperative ASES and satisfaction scores. We evaluated patients above and below the ROC threshold by comparing their final ASES scores, ASES change (Δ) from baseline, percent maximum outcome improvement (%MOI), and achievement of minimum clinically important differences (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Fischer exact tests were used to analyze categorical data, while continuous data were analyzed using t-test. RESULTS: A total of 348 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair were included in this study. The preop ASES value predictive of achieving SCB was 63 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 58-67; P < .001). Patients with preoperative ASES less than 63 were significantly more likely to achieve MCID (odds ratio [OR]: 4.7, P < .001) and SCB (OR:6.1, P < .001) and had significantly higher %MOI (63% vs 41%; P = 0.003) and Δ ASES scores (36 vs 12; P < .001). However, patients with preop ASES scores above 63 had significantly higher final ASES scores (86 vs 79; P = .003), were more likely to achieve PASS (59% vs 48%; P = .045), and had higher satisfaction scores (7.4 vs 6.7; P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high preop ASES scores achieve less relative improvement; however, these patients may be more likely to achieve PASS and may have higher satisfaction scores postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Physician Professional Fees Are Declining and Inpatient and Outpatient Facility Fees Are Increasing for Orthopaedic Procedures in the United States.

PURPOSE: To examine the trends in physician professional fees and inpatient and outpatient facility fees in orthopaedic surgery in the United States. METHODS: Physician professional fees and inpatient and outpatient facility fees were tracked from 2008 to 2021 for the most common orthopaedic procedures in each orthopaedic subspecialty. Using common procedure codes for physician and outpatient procedures and Medicare severity diagnosis related group codes for inpatient procedures, the Medicare Physician Fee Schedules were used to obtain the national payment amounts for physician professional fees and inpatient and outpatient facility fees. Trends in fees were tracked over time after adjustment for inflation. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2021, physician professional fees decreased by an average of 20%, whereas inpatient facility fees increased by 15%, and outpatient facility fees increased by 72%. The orthopaedic subspecialty with the largest decrease in physician professional fees was oncology, with an average decrease of 23.5%, followed by general orthopaedics (23.1%), and sports medicine (22.8%). The largest increase in outpatient facility fees was seen in the subspecialties of general orthopaedics (149.8%), spine (130.1%), and trauma (123.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 13 years, physician professional fees for the most common orthopaedic procedures have declined while inpatient and outpatient facility fees have increased. Understanding these changes is important to the practice of orthopaedic surgery in the United States. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, economic.

Nurses' Perceptions of Implant Barcode Scanning in Surgical Services.

The US Food and Drug Administration's 2013 Unique Device Identification System Rule requires manufacturers to label devices with unique identifiers. Implantable devices are now shipped with unique identifiers, and many electronic health records have fields to incorporate them. Health policy changes have prompted hospital systems to assess implementation of implant barcode scanning systems to capture unique device identifiers. Project aims were to assess predictors of operating room nurses' acceptance of a new implant barcode scanning system, describe operating room nurses' perceptions of the system value, and identify operating room nurses' perceived gaps in system implementation. An online survey was disseminated to operating room nurses, and focus groups were conducted with orthopedic operating room nurses in an academic medical center that had recently implemented an implant barcode scanning system in surgical services. Predictors of barcode scanning acceptance included perceived usefulness for patient care, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness (self). Nurses perceived the system to be more accurate and valuable for patient safety. Perceived gaps in system implementation related to communication, completeness of the system, consistency in process, and training. Understanding nurse perceptions of new barcode scanning systems and engaging them in the implementation process are key areas for success and optimization of these systems.

Comparison of Uninjured and Concussed Adolecent Athletes on the Concussion Balance Test (COBALT).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dizziness and balance problems are common symptoms following sports-related concussion (SRC). Most sports require high-level balance skills that integrate the sensory inputs used for balance. Thus, a comprehensive assessment of postural control following SRC is recommended as an integral part of evaluation and management of the injury. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine performance differences between uninjured and concussed athletes on the Concussion Balance Test (COBALT), as well as complete preliminary analyses of criterion-related validity and reliability of COBALT. METHODS: COBALT is an 8 condition test developed for both preseason and postinjury assessment using force plate technology to measure sway velocity under dynamic postural conditions that challenge the vestibular system. Retrospective COBALT data obtained through chart review for 132 uninjured athletes and 106 concussed age-matched athletes were compared. RESULTS: All uninjured athletes were able to complete the assessment, compared with only 55% of concussed athletes. Concussed athletes committed significantly more errors than uninjured athletes. Sway velocity for concussed athletes was higher (worse) than that for uninjured athletes on 2 conditions in COBALT. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: By examining an athlete's ability to complete the protocol, error rate, and sway velocity on COBALT postinjury, the clinician can identify balance function impairment, which may help the medical team develop a more targeted treatment plan, and provide objective input regarding recovery of balance function following SRC.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A204).

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Does Not Increase the Risk of Postsurgical Complication or Overall Cost.

Background: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has shown promise in reducing postsurgical limb pain in amputees. However, there has been little evidence on the increased risk of complications and cost as compared with traditional amputations. This study was designed to assess the rate of complications and healthcare costs between those treated with TMR and traditional amputations. Methods: Patients undergoing amputation were selected from the PearlDiver Mariner dataset and categorized into one of two treatment groups depending on the use of TMR versus traditional amputation. Rates of postsurgical complications and overall healthcare costs were compared between the two groups, while controlling for differences in patient demographics and comorbidities. Results: One hundred sixteen TMR procedures and 76,412 traditional amputations were included in the study. The rate of complications did not differ between groups, with a complication rate of 77% in the TMR and 87% in the traditional amputation groups. Overall healthcare costs also did not differ 1 year after surgery, with an average cost of $32,632 in the TMR group and $36,219 in the traditional amputation group. Conclusions: Amputees experience high rates of postsurgical complications, morbidity, and mortality. However, there is no increased risk of complications or cost with the use of TMR. TMR has the potential benefits of reducing overall postsurgical pain and reestablishing activities of daily living. Although TMR is more expensive up front, it may reduce the overall healthcare costs by reducing the need for subsequent care. Further work is needed in large, randomized trials to examine these findings.

Development of a Risk Stratification Scoring System to Predict General Surgical Complications for Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Preventing postoperative complications is crucial for patients, surgeons, and health care facilities. We developed a risk stratification scoring system to optimize postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. A total of 35,580 patients who underwent foot and ankle procedures from 2005 to 2017 were identified as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). To assess the risk of a postoperative complication, we identified several independent risk factors associated with 30-day postoperative complications, then proceeded to develop a point-based risk scoring system. To validate our scoring system, we used it on a cohort of patients from the database who underwent foot and ankle surgery. Risk factors that correlated with postoperative complications included tobacco abuse, age (≥65 years), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, elevated creatinine level (≥1.3 mg/dL), hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), hyponatremia (<135 mEq/L), and anemia (hematocrit value, men <42%; women <38%). Point scores for each factor were: anemia, +10; hypoalbuminemia, +9; elevated creatinine level, +6; CHF, +4; diabetes mellitus, +3; hyponatremia, +3; COPD, +2; hypertension, +2; age, +1; and tobacco abuse, +1. For the validation cohort, we stratified patients according to risk as low (0-20 points), medium (21-30 points), and high (≥31 points) risk. In terms of having a postoperative complication, compared with low-risk patients, patients who were at medium risk had an odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI, 2.8-7.9) and those at high risk had an odds ratio of 8.3 (95% CI, 4.8-14.5). [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):139-144.].

Using the Greater Tuberosity as a Reference for Placement of Proximal Humerus Plates Leads to a High Rate of Calcar Screw Malposition.

OBJECTIVES: Achieving calcar fixation is critical to minimize the failure of proximal humerus fractures repaired with proximal humeral locking plates (PHLPs). Many operative technique manuals reference the greater tuberosity (GT) for plate placement. The objective of this study was to examine the accuracy of calcar screw placement when PHLPs were placed based on distance from the GT. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric specimens were acquired representing a height distribution across the US population. Thirteen different PHLPs were applied. A drill bit was placed through the designated calcar screw hole and measured on radiographs, with the inferior 25% of the head representing an ideal placement. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty constructs were studied. In 28% of the specimens, the calcar screw was misplaced. In 20% of the specimens, it was too low, whereas in 8%, it was too high. The calcar screw missed low in 30% of patients shorter than 5 feet, 5.5 inches versus 8% of taller patients ( P = 0.007). It missed high in 13% of taller patients versus 2% of shorter patients ( P = 0.056). Calcar screws in variable-angle plates missed 0% of the time, whereas those in fixed-angle plates missed 36% of the time ( P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of PHLPs based on distance from the GT results in unacceptable position of the calcar screw 28% of the time and up to 36% in fixed-angle plates. This could be further compounded if the GT is malreduced. Current technique guide recommendations result in an unacceptably high rate of calcar screw malposition.

Do Multidisciplinary Spine Conferences Alter Management or Impact Outcome?

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary spine conferences (MSCs) are a strategy for discussing diagnostic and treatment aspects of patient care. Although they are becoming more common in hospitals, literature investigating how they impact patient care and outcomes is scarce. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of MSCs on surgical management and outcomes in elective spine surgical care. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the impact of MSCs on patient management and outcomes. PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched using combinations and variations of search terms "Spine Conferences," "Multidisciplinary," and "Spine Team." RESULTS: The literature search yielded 435 articles, of which 120 were selected for full-text review. Four articles (N = 529 patients) were included. Surgical plans were discussed in 211 patients. The decision was altered to conservative treatment in 70 patients (33.17%) and a different surgical strategy in 34 patients (16.11%). The differences were significant in 2 studies (P < 0.05). A 51% reduction in 30-day complications rates was observed when MSC was implemented in patients with adult complex scoliosis. Other spinal disorders showed a 30-day complication rate between 0% and 14% after MSC. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of outcomes of MSCs in elective spine surgery and it confirms that MSCs impact management plan and outcomes. Consistent MSCs that include surgeons and nonsurgeons have the potential to enhance communication between specialists, standardize treatments, improve patient care, and encourage teamwork. More analysis is warranted to determine if patient outcomes are improved with these measures.

Is L5/S1 interbody fusion necessary in long-segment surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus regarding the best surgical strategy at the lumbosacral junction (LSJ) in long constructs for adult spinal deformity (ASD). The use of interbody fusion (IF) has been advocated to increase fusion rates, with additional pelvic fixation (PF) typically recommended. The actual benefit of IF even when extending to the pelvis, however, has not been vigorously analyzed. The goal of this work was to better understand the role of IF, specifically with respect to arthrodesis, when extending long constructs to the ilium. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify the relevant studies in English, addressing the management of LSJ in long constructs (defined as ≥ 5 levels) in ASD. The search terms used were as follows: "Lumbosacral Junction," "Long Constructs," "Long Fusion to the Sacrum," "Sacropelvic Fixation," "Interbody Fusion," and "Iliac Screw." The authors excluded technical notes, case reports, literature reviews, and cadaveric studies; pediatric populations; pathologies different from ASD; studies not using conventional techniques; and studies focused only on alignment of different levels. RESULTS: The PRISMA protocol was used. The authors found 12 retrospective clinical studies with a total of 1216 patients who were sorted into 3 different categories: group 1, using PF or not (n = 6); group 2, using PF with or without IF (n = 5); and group 3, from 1 study comparing anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Five studies in group 1 and 4 in group 2 had pseudarthrosis rate as primary outcome and were selected for a quantitative analysis. Forest plots were used to display the risk ratio, and funnel plots were used to look at the risk of publication bias. The summary risk ratios were 0.36 (0.23-0.57, p < 0.001) and 1.03 (0.54-1.96, p = 0.94) for the PF and IF, respectively; there is a protective effect of overall pseudarthrosis for using PF in long constructs for ASD surgeries, but not for using IF. CONCLUSIONS: The long-held contention that L5/S1 IF is always advantageous in long-construct deformity surgery is not supported by the current literature. Based on the findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis, PF with or without additional L5/S1 interbody grafting demonstrates similar overall construct pseudarthrosis rates. The added risk and costs associated with IF, therefore, should be more closely considered on a case-by-case basis.

10-Year Trends in the Surgical Management of Patients with Spinal Metastases: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases are present in approximately 20% of patients with cancer, giving a risk for neurologic dysfunction and instability. In already frail patients, surgeons strive to improve quality of life. Our goal was to review a 10-year trend in the surgical management of spinal metastases. METHODS: A scoping review was performed systematically using PubMed to assess trends in surgical treatment for spinal metastases. The search terms used were: metastas∗, "neoplasm metastasis"[Mesh], "Spine"[Mesh], spine, spinal, "vertebral column," "vertebral body," laser, robot, radiofrequency, screws, fixation, "separation surgery," corpectomy, vertebrectomy, spondylectomy, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, surgery, "open surgery," "mini open surgery," "minimally invasive surgery," endoscopy, thoracoscopy, corpectom∗, vertebrectom∗, spondylectom∗, "en bloc," and MIS. The variables of interest were neurologic improvement, tumor recurrence, reoperation, and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 2132 articles were found within the primary query. Fifty-six studies were selected for final review. The results were organized into main surgical practices: decompression, mechanical stabilization, and pain management. For separation surgery, clinical outcomes were overall 1-year survival, 40.7%-78.4%; recurrence rate, 4.3%-22%; reoperation, 5%; and complications, 5.4%-14%. For corpectomy, clinical outcomes were overall 1-year survival, 30%-92%; reoperation, 1.1%-50%; and recurrence rate, of 1.1%-28%. Complications and reoperations with spinal instrumentation were 0%-13.6% and 0%-15%, respectively. Cement augmentation achieved pain reduction rates of 56%-100%, neurologic improvement/stability 84%-100%, and complication rates 6%-56%. Laser achieved local tumor control rate of 71%-82% at 1 year follow-up, reoperation rate of 15%-31%, and complication rate of 5%-26%. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive techniques for decompression and stabilization seem to be the preferred method to surgically treat metastatic spine disease, with good outcomes. More research with high level of evidence is required to support the long-term outcomes of these approaches.