Acute hepatitis B in blood donors over a 5-year period in England and North Wales: who is getting infected?

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains the infection most frequently recognized by donation testing in blood donors. It is usually a persistent infection and mostly reflects the country of origin of the donor or the donor's family. There are, however, a minority of acute infections and this study undertook their phylogenetic analysis to determine the likely source of infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma samples from 11 donors donating between July 2005 and June 2010, whose test results revealed recent infection with hepatitis B, were available for further analysis. Plasma DNA was extracted, amplified, sequenced, and analyzed phylogenetically. Donor and virus characteristics were compared with the overall demography of all hepatitis B-infected donors attending over the same period. RESULTS: Three of the 11 individuals were first-time donors. Nine were male, of whom eight were white British. All had serum markers of very recent infection. Only two indicated known HBV exclusion risk factors at postdonation discussion not declared previously. Genotype A was present in seven, Genotype B in two, and Genotype C in two, contrasting with the pattern in persistently infected persons in the United Kingdom. A single A2 strain was identified in six of the white British male donors, suggesting epidemiologic linkage. CONCLUSION: Phylogenetic analysis of HBV-infected donors performed in real time can potentially lead to identification of undeclared risk factors that donor health questionnaires may fail to identify.

The diversity of chronic hepatitis B virus infections within blood donors in England and North Wales 2005 through 2010.

BACKGROUND: In 2010 hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the most frequently detected infection in UK blood donation screening, typically found in first-time, male, chronically infected donors born abroad. To date there has been no comprehensive characterization of the virologic profile of these infections. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Epidemiologic and serologic data were collected retrospectively for 344 chronically HBV-infected blood donors identified from July 2005 to June 2010. Additional laboratory testing was carried out to determine the HBV genotype, viral load, and prevalence of clinically significant mutations and to detect hepatitis delta virus (HDV) coinfection. RESULTS: Five HBV genotypes (A-E) were found, Genotypes D (45%), A (20%), and E (20%) were the most prevalent. A strong association was seen between genotype and donor ethnicity (p < 0.001) and between genotype and place of residence (p = 0.006). Clinically significant mutations were observed across hepatitis B surface antigen (17%), basal core promoter (25%) and precore (78%) regions. An antiviral resistance profile was identified in one donor. Evidence of HDV coinfection was found in 2% of donors. CONCLUSION: The data show the diversity of HBV in asymptomatic chronic infections detected in blood donors in England and North Wales and demonstrates the presence of mutations which may impact on disease. The global nature of these infections and the inability to identify chronically infected donors before donation highlights the importance of using screening assays capable of detecting a broad range of genotypes and mutations. Furthermore, the integration of the virologic and demographic data allows us to more accurately construct a profile of our chronically HBV-infected blood donors.

The early implementation of Trypanosoma cruzi antibody screening of donors and donations within England: preempting a problem.

BACKGROUND: Trypanosoma cruzi is a parasitic infection endemic in Central and Southern America, but is spreading into nonendemic countries with migration of infected individuals from endemic countries. The parasite is transmitted by transfusion or transplantation and donation screening is performed routinely in endemic countries to prevent transmission. In situations where migrants from endemic countries have settled in nonendemic countries and present as donors (blood or other cellular products), intervention is required to prevent transfusion or transplantation transmission. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A screening program for T. cruzi was developed and has been used successfully for over 10 years that includes donor selection and donation screening. Donor selection criteria to identify specific risk of T. cruzi infection were developed together with laboratory screening of donations for T. cruzi antibodies and the subsequent confirmation of screen reactivity. RESULTS: Since the introduction of T. cruzi screening in England in 1998, a total of 38,585 donors and donations have been screened for T. cruzi antibodies, of which 223 were repeat reactive on screening and referred for confirmation: 206 confirmed negative, 14 inconclusive, and three positive. Since the move in 2005 from donor qualification to donation release testing, 15,536 donations were collected and screened, of which 15,499 (99.8%) were T. cruzi antibody negative and released to inventory. CONCLUSION: An effective program to minimize risk of the transmission of T. cruzi infection via donations has been developed and implemented. Not only does the program minimize risk of transmission, it also minimizes the cumulative, and needless, loss of donors and donations that would ensue if permanent donor deferral alone was adopted.

Malaria blood safety policy in five non-endemic countries: a retrospective comparison through the lens of the ABO risk-based decision-making framework.

BACKGROUND: In non-endemic countries, malaria risk is addressed by selectively testing or deferring at-risk donors. These policy decisions were made using a variety of decision-making frameworks prior to the development of the Alliance of Blood Operators Risk Based Decision-Making Framework. It is unclear whether the range of items assessed in the decision-making process would be increased if the Framework were used. We compared assessments considered in France, England and Australia for decisions to implement selective testing, plus donor selection criteria (Canada and the USA included) with those recommended by the Framework. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elements of the Framework were identified: the intervention, safety threat, availability threat, donor impact, financial implications, risk communication, stakeholder and regulatory aspects. Decisions about selective testing and donor selection criteria were analysed separately. Assessments were compared against elements of the Framework and the level of concern for considerations rated. RESULTS: Sufficiency of the blood supply (plus safety in France) were the drivers for selective testing; main trade-offs were high operational impact and cost. In three donor criteria examples, transfusion-transmitted malaria cases prompted the change. Social concerns were high in France and Australia, political/regulatory concerns influenced decisions in France, Australia and Canada, while sufficiency was a consideration in Canada and the USA. Decision trade-offs involved moderate operational impact. DISCUSSION: The assessments considered in each country were generally consistent with the assessments recommended by the Framework. When data supported quantified risk assessment, safety and operational feasibility had the greatest weight. When risk was not well defined, contextual factors such as social and political concern had greater weight.

Hepatitis C virus window-phase infections: closing the window on hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND: The detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is of major importance for the prevention of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis. The testing of donations by nucleic acid testing (NAT) techniques may not be feasible or economic. Combined antigen and antibody assays are now available, and the performance of two combined assays on window-phase donations is evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Three panels of antibody-negative plasma samples from HCV NAT-only-positive donors were characterized for HCV status by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, a commercial third-generation HCV antibody assay (Ortho), and combined antigen and antibody assays (Bio-Rad MONOLISA and Murex). RESULTS: All 142 plasma samples were antibody negative by Ortho third-generation HCV. A total of 112 samples (79%) were found to contain HCV RNA; 32 were detected by the Bio-Rad assay (29%), whereas 56 (50%) were detected by the Murex assay. Of 45 samples with viral loads of greater than 10(6), 32 (71%) were positive in the Bio-Rad combination assay and 44 (98%) were positive in the Murex assay. Interestingly none of the 3a genotypes were detected by the Bio-Rad MONOLISA, including eight donations that were greater than 10(6) IU per mL. CONCLUSIONS: Combined antigen and antibody testing provides a useful improvement on the sole reliance on antibody testing for detection of HCV infection; however, it remains less sensitive than NAT for detecting viremic donors and may be genotype susceptible.