No Association Between Previous General Infection and Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Hip Arthroplasty-A National Register-Based Cohort Study on 58,449 Patients Who Have Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a complication associated with increased risk of death. There is limited knowledge about the association between infection before THA, and risk of revision due to PJI. We investigated the association between any previous hospital-diagnosed or community-treated infection 0 to 6 months before primary THA and the risk of revision. METHODS: We obtained data on 58,449 patients who were operated with primary unilateral THA between 2010 and 2018 from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Information on previous infection diagnoses, redeemed antibiotic prescriptions up to 1 year before primary THA, intraoperative biopsies, and cohabitations was retrieved from Danish health registers. All patients had a 1-year follow-up. Primary outcome was revision due to PJI. Secondary outcome was any revision. We calculated the adjusted relative risk with 95% confidence intervals (CI), treating death as competing risk. RESULTS: Among 1,507 revisions identified, 536 were due to PJI with a cumulative incidence of 1.0% ([CI] 0.9 to 1.2) and 0.9% ([CI] 0.8 to 1.0) for patients who did and did not have previous infection. For any revision, the cumulative incidence was 3.1% ([CI] 2.9 to 3.4) and 2.4% ([CI] 2.3 to 2.6) for patients who did and did not have previous infection. The adjusted relative risk for PJI revision was 1.1 ([CI] 0.9 to 1.4) and for any revision 1.3 ([CI] 1.1 to 1.4) for patients who did have previous infection compared to those who did not. CONCLUSION: Previous hospital-diagnosed or community-treated infection 0 to 6 months before primary THA does not increase the risk of PJI revision. It may be associated with increased risk of any revision.

The association between socioeconomic factors and the success of decolonization treatment among individuals diagnosed with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A cohort study from 2007 to 2020.

OBJECTIVES: To examine associations between socioeconomic factors and (1) adherence to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) posttreatment follow-up swab sampling after 1 and 6 months and (2) successful decolonization treatment. DESIGN: Cohort study with 2 years of follow-up. Data on patients diagnosed with MRSA were extracted from a regional MRSA database and national registries. We used a cluster-based logistic regression model to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for associations between socioeconomic factors and decolonization treatment. SETTING: Danish primary health care. RESULTS: The rate of adherence to posttreatment follow-up swab sampling among 2,536 cases 1 month after decolonization treatment was 66% (95% CI, 64%-68%), and it decreased to 30% (95% CI, 28%-32%) after 6 months. Living in intermediate municipalities (76-159 inhabitants/km2) or having retired were associated with completed posttreatment follow-up swabs 1 month after decolonization treatment: aOR, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.2-1.74) and aOR, 2.67 (95% CI, 1.16-6.13), respectively. The rate of successful decolonization treatment 2 years after initiating treatment was 36% (95% CI, 34%-38%). Factors associated with successful decolonization treatment included individuals with higher education (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.22-2.15), early retirees (aOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.12-2.38), those living in intermediate municipalities (ie, 160-900+ inhabitants/km2; aOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08-1.68), and those living in predominantly urban municipalities (ie, 160-900+ inhabitants/km2; aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.5-2.76). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in the effect of decolonization treatment and adherence to MRSA follow-up sampling among MRSA-positive individuals appear to be largely explained by the level of education, area of residence, and employment status.

Comparison of BD MAX GBS and GenomEra GBS assays for rapid intrapartum PCR detection of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of BD MAX and GenomEra PCR assays for a rapid PCR detection of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci at delivery. METHODS: This is a retrospective laboratory analysis of vaginal swab samples taken intrapartum from a randomly selected cohort of pregnant women giving birth at a single childbirth and maternity unit. RESULTS: Ninety-one culture-positive and 279 culture-negative vaginal samples were included from a cohort of 902 women. One-hundred-and-two specimens were found positive with the BD MAX and 84 with the GenomEra PCR assay. No statistically significant difference was observed compared to culture, sensitivity of BD MAX 84.6% (77/91) [95%CI 75.5-91.3] and of GenomEra 71.4% (65/91) [95%CI 61.0-80.4]. When compared to a combined reference standard, no statistically significant differences were seen between culture, BD MAX and GenomEra PCR assays. The sensitivities were 82.7% (91/110) [95%CI 74.3-89.3], 87.3% (96/110) [95%CI 79.6-92.9], and 79.1% (87/110) [95%CI 70.3-86.3], respectively. CONCLUSION: Both PCR assays performed comparably to culture of the intrapartum vaginal samples. In particular, the GenomEra assay is potentially an easy and rapid on-site PCR test for intrapartum detection of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci at a maternity ward to identify women who should receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.

Cohort study of adherence to correct hand antisepsis before and after performance of clinical procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of adherence by hospital staff members to the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub before and after performance of clinical procedures. DESIGN: A cohort study conducted during the period from 2006 through 2007 and 2 cross-sectional studies conducted in 2006 and 2007. SETTING: Arhus University Hospital, Skejby, in Arhus, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Various hospital staff members. METHODS: Following an ongoing campaign promoting the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub, we observed rates of adherence by hospital staff to the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub. Observations were made before and after each contact with patients or patient surroundings during 5 weekdays during the period from 2006 through 2007 in 10 different hospital units. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the rate of adherence to the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub before and after performance of a clinical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 496 participants were observed during 22,906 opportunities for hand hygiene (ie, 11,177 before and 11,729 after clinical procedures) that required the use of alcohol-based hand rub. The overall rates of adherence to the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub were 62.3% (6,968 of the 11,177 opportunities) before performance and 68.6% (8,041 of the 11,729 opportunities) after performance of clinical procedures. Compared with male participants, female participants were significantly better at adhering to the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub before performance (odds ratio [OR] 1.51 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.09-2.10]) and after performance (OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.27-2.36]) of clinical procedures. In general, the rate of adherence was significantly higher after the performance of clinical procedures, compared with before (OR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.35-1.52]). For our cohort of 214 participants who were observed during 14,319 opportunities, the rates of adherence to the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub were 63.2% (4,469 of the 7,071 opportunities) before performance and 69.3% (5,021 of the 7,248 opportunities) after performance of clinical procedures, and these rates increased significantly from 2006 to 2007, except for physicians. CONCLUSION: We found a high and increasing rate of adherence to the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub before and after performance of clinical procedures following a campaign that promoted the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub. More hospital staff performed hand hygiene with alcohol-based hand rub after performance of clinical procedures, compared with before performance. Future campaigns to improve the rate of adherence to the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub ought be aware that certain groups of hospital staff (eg, male staff members) are known to exhibit a low level of adherence to the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub.

Effect of correctly using alcohol-based hand rub in a clinical setting.

We evaluated hand antisepsis in clinical practice at Aarhus University Hospital in Skejby, Denmark. The rate of compliance with the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub exceeded 55% of all routine clinical procedures observed. With the correct use of alcohol-based hand rub by hospital staff, bacterial counts were reduced by 90% before and 82% after a clinical procedure; with incorrect use, the bacterial counts were reduced by 60% before and 54% after a clinical procedure.

Mycoplasma genitalium: prevalence and behavioural risk factors in the general population.

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium has been shown to cause urethritis in men and cervicitis in women and may also be a causative agent in female infertility. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of urogenital M genitalium infection and identify sexual behavioural risk factors in the general population. METHODS: Participating individuals were 731 men and 921 women aged 21-23 years and not seeking the healthcare system because of symptoms. They answered questionnaires on sexual behaviour and provided samples for M genitalium testing. RESULTS: In women aged 21-23 years, the prevalence of infection was 2.3% (21/921) and in men of the same age it was 1.1% (8/731). For both sexes, an increasing number of partners was associated with a greater chance of being infected. Among women a shorter duration of a steady relationship and having a partner with symptoms was associated with being infected, and for men younger age at first intercourse was associated with M genitalium infection. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the prevalence of infection in the general population is too low for population-based screening. However, the development of test algorithms based on behavioural risk factors is a promising alternative.